Peter-Raymond Kettle MEG Review February 2007 1 BeamBeam LineLine StatusStatus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JET PROPULSION Part 5 Jet Engine Operation Oil Systems.
Advertisements

Peter-Raymond Kettle MEG Review February Cockcroft-Walton Status Carlo Bemporad Angela Papa Giovanni Signorelli Peter-Raymond Kettle Carlo Bemporad.
COBRA Magnet Test Milestone AssemblyDesignManufactoring DesignAss.TestWinding & Cryo. Deliv. PSI Test Platform Calibration Mapping device.
P.-R. KettleMEG-Review February MEG Beam Line Studies  E5 Z-Branch NOW !!! NOW !!!
2/9/2004DC status - BVR1 1.Mechanics 2.Foil 3.Frame and Print Anode Inner cathode Hood 4.Pressure control + He bag + target 5.Electronic 6.Schedule Status.
G2P Target installation and Beyond. Schedule Pivot before.
7/5/05,MEG DC,je MEG DC 1.Foils 2.Wires 3.Frames + tools 4.Preamplifier 5.Gas pressure control 6.final.
P.-R. KettleMEG Review July MEG Beam Line Studies.
Some beam tuning musings from Fall 2004 runs David Hertzog.
P.-R Kettle MEG Review February Beam Line & Target Status Topics to be Addressed: Results of Beam Line Commissioning Phase Results of Beam.
Luminosity Monitor MWPCs, commissioning. A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
Progress on the final TWIST measurement of James Bueno, University of British Columbia and TRIUMF on behalf of the Triumf Weak Interaction Symmetry Test.
MICE Target Review Chris Booth Sheffield 12 th June 2006.
1 PSI 27/6/2006 C.Bemporad “THE TAMING OF MEG” News on Calibration Methods Cockcroft-Walton Accelerator  -sources on wire  -lines from neutron capture.
MuCool RF Status MICE Collaboration Meeting June 7-10, 2006, Fermilab A. Moretti June 9, 2006.
Genova/Pavia/Roma Flavio Gatti, PSI, July 1st, Timing Counter july 2004.
The 2nd Tevatron Electron Lens and tests of a new electron gun in the framework of Beam-Beam Compensation project Yu. Alexahin, V. Kamerdzhiev, G. Kuznetsov,
Assembly, Installation and Interfaces Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RFCC Module Design Review October 21, 2008.
COBRA Magnet Test Milestone AssemblyDesignManufactoring DesignAss.TestWinding & Cryo. Deliv. PSI Test Platform Calibration Mapping device.
MC_ Muon Beam Lines 8/3/06 Want a  beam of ~300MeV/c –This requires a  beam of ~300 MeV/c Possible Sources: SY Proton Beam line components removed.
In Engineering --- Designing a Pneumatic Pump Introduction System characterization Model development –Models 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Model analysis –Time domain.
Malte HildebrandtMEG Review Meeting, 14th February 2007 Report of Run Coordinator Run 2006 Summary Malte Hildebrandt MEG Review Meeting, 14th February.
MICE: overview K. Long, 18 March, Contents ► Introduction ► Beam line ► Infrastructure ► MICE steps ► Phase II (comment) ► Conclusions.
P.-R Kettle MEG Review July Beam Transport & Target Systems BTS Success Novosibirsk 24/5/ : A 300 A.
Peter-Raymond Kettle MEG Review February MEG Commissioning & Engineering Run 2007.
Malte HildebrandtDC Status Report, Dear MEG Committee,PSI, April 14 th 2009 this is the first report concerning the drift chamber status as.
2 1/March/2015 日本物理学会大70回年次大会@早稲田大学 東大ICEPP 内山雄祐 他 MEG II collaboration.
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
Timing Counter Report of Feb. 14 th, 2007 P.W. Cattaneo.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
MEG DC (report June 04) DC report june_04,J.E. a)Foil stability and quench related problems b)How to get more stability c)Frame design d)Measurement of.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Laser Status Update J. Moody, E. Oz, P. Muggli MPP Future Accelerators AWAKE Collaboration
Forum March 2003H.Taureg1 Magnetic Fields in ALICE Mapping and Monitoring.
PSI July 2002MuEGamma Review Meeting1 Beam Line Status update 1.  E5 Test Beam Overview : Aims + RequirementsAims + Requirements Zone Layout + Measurement.
Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System.
Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Peter-Raymond Kettle Beam Line Update End-Caps End-Caps Insertion System Insertion System Target System Target System.
Two problems with gas discharges 1.Anomalous skin depth in ICPs 2.Electron diffusion across magnetic fields Problem 1: Density does not peak near the.
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
Projected performance of NPDGamma and new systematics introduced by SM polarizer Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting.
Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Beam Monitoring Basis for Discussion only Beam Rate Beam Rate Beam Profile Beam Profile Beam.
Forward Muon Installation and Commissioning Dmitri Denisov Fermilab Director’s review 7/12/1999 Plan Forward muon detectors Mini-drift tubes installation.
Lau and Niels, NA62 TD meeting, 17 March Complete the crane consolidation in TCC8 Reinstall front-end after alignment checks Consolidation of T10.
Status of and Installation Plan for DC Gas Control System and Target Work Scheduling Meeting 4 August 2006 PSI W. Molzon, Feng Xiao.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.
Radioactive source and cosmic-ray test for the MWPC Davide Pinci on behalf of the Frascati-Roma1 MWPC group.
P.-R. KettleMEG Review January MEG – Beam Line Studies Present Status & Overview since July 2002.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
TIMING COUNTER: status report Giorgio CECCHET, PSI July 11th, 2003.
Mu to e Meeting BNL, June 2006 Extinction requirement relaxation (Kevin O’Sullivan) Stopping Target Geometry (Cenap Ozben, David Morse) Yannis Semertzidis.
Xenon Delivery Japan 1 MCHF 575 kCHF granted Additional grant 656 kCHF Last 50l subject to negotiation.
P.-R. KettleMEG-Review July MEG Beam Line Studies  E5 Z-Branch Collaborative Effort !!! Effort !!!  E5 Z-Branch Collaborative Effort !!! Effort.
Phobos Magnet Status Leslie Rosenberg & Patrick Decowski, MIT Technical Advisory Committee November 1998.
A. Baldini PSI July 05 Overview of the experiment MEG is being built (Beam line, Magnet, LXe, DC, TC, Elect., Software) Delays in some items: O(months)
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Status of physics analysis Fabrizio Cei On Behalf of the Physics Analysis Group PSI BVR presentation, February 9, /02/2015Fabrizio Cei1.
MEG I Accounting & Retrospective Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Fukuoka Meeting October
Overview of the MEG * CDCH * one of the following ( MEG UP MEG2 MEG + ) Marco Grassi on behalf of the CDCH Group.
MEG Review Meeting June Peter-Raymond Kettle Beam Line Line Status StatusBeam Line Line Status Status.
Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Fortnightly Meeting 16/5/20071 Beam Schedule Update.
Polarized Injector Update
An active target for MEG2, a status report
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
MEG Summary T. Mori for MEG Collaboration February 9, 2005.
Decay Angular Measurement in the MEG Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Peter-Raymond Kettle MEG Review February BeamBeam LineLine StatusStatus

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February last Review Beam Study at Centre of COBRA with – Beam Study at Centre of COBRA with – 4cm Tg.E + Degrader System Needed !!! 4cm Tg.E + Degrader System Needed !!! full beam centre COBRA tested only with 6cm Tg.E so far full beam centre COBRA tested only with 6cm Tg.E so far full beam centre COBRA 4cm Tg.E without Degrader full beam centre COBRA 4cm Tg.E without Degrader Beam Study at Centre of COBRA with – Beam Study at Centre of COBRA with – 4cm Tg.E + Degrader System Needed !!! 4cm Tg.E + Degrader System Needed !!! full beam centre COBRA tested only with 6cm Tg.E so far full beam centre COBRA tested only with 6cm Tg.E so far full beam centre COBRA 4cm Tg.E without Degrader full beam centre COBRA 4cm Tg.E without Degrader TopTop Outstanding Problems to be solved: 1. Beam Misalignment due to Solenoidal Bfield Asymmetry caused by magnet material under hall floor by magnet material under hall floor 2. Muons prematurely ranging-out due to air/gas contamination + inadequate mixing in/of COBRA He-atmosphere inadequate mixing in/of COBRA He-atmosphere 3. APD-Array System needed for future phase space measurements Outstanding Problems to be solved: 1. Beam Misalignment due to Solenoidal Bfield Asymmetry caused by magnet material under hall floor by magnet material under hall floor 2. Muons prematurely ranging-out due to air/gas contamination + inadequate mixing in/of COBRA He-atmosphere inadequate mixing in/of COBRA He-atmosphere 3. APD-Array System needed for future phase space measurements Remaining Components: US End-CapUS End-Cap DS End-CapDS End-Cap Insertion SystemInsertion System + Drive System + Drive System Remaining Components: US End-CapUS End-Cap DS End-CapDS End-Cap Insertion SystemInsertion System + Drive System + Drive System

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Full MEG Beam Line 11 Main Components All now Implemented DSEnd-Cap + Insertion System DSEnd-Cap US End-Cap BTSBTS DegraderDegrader Triplet I + II + Seperator Steering Magnet CollimatorCollimator Compensation Coils 4x Compensation

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Problem Solving: 1) Beam Misalignment Compensation Coils 4x Compensation Horizontal (SM41H) + Vertical (SM41V) Steering Magnets made, placed on DS-side BTS – Between focii (water-cooled) Power Supplies installed on gallery Horizontal (SM41H) + Vertical (SM41V) Steering Magnets made, placed on DS-side BTS – Between focii (water-cooled) Power Supplies installed on gallery SMH41SMH41 SMV41SMV41 Power Supplies: 2x 250A(limited 200A) 55V unipolar Ramp-rate 0.5A/s (BTS/COBRA) Bdl = 24 G  m at 200A Power Supplies: 2x 250A(limited 200A) 55V unipolar Ramp-rate 0.5A/s (BTS/COBRA) Bdl = 24 G  m at 200A *** No simple solution for Compensation *** *** No simple solution for Compensation *** Since phase space rotation in BTS & COBRA Horizontal field:  Vertical & Horizontal displacement Vertical field:  Horizontal & Vertical displacement Hence for given correction at given z Hence for given correction at given z  Solve simultaneous equations  Solve simultaneous equations *** No simple solution for Compensation *** *** No simple solution for Compensation *** Since phase space rotation in BTS & COBRA Horizontal field:  Vertical & Horizontal displacement Vertical field:  Horizontal & Vertical displacement Hence for given correction at given z Hence for given correction at given z  Solve simultaneous equations  Solve simultaneous equations

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Problem Solving: 2) Gas Quality + Mixing Last Run: Air Contamination responsible for Muons Ranging-out gradient 3-9% air along z 7-11% (air + C 2 H 6 ) with DCs 7-11% (air + C 2 H 6 ) with DCs New Run: Improved COBRA He-System With End-Caps 3 Volumes treated separately 3 Volumes treated separately (i)Central Volume (i)Central Volume (ii+iii) US+DS End-Cap (ii+iii) US+DS End-Cap distributed equalized-flow distributed equalized-flow inlets inlets equalized flow outlets equalized flow outlets Pressure Regulation Pressure Regulation He-Monitoring He-Monitoring Last Run: Air Contamination responsible for Muons Ranging-out gradient 3-9% air along z 7-11% (air + C 2 H 6 ) with DCs 7-11% (air + C 2 H 6 ) with DCs New Run: Improved COBRA He-System With End-Caps 3 Volumes treated separately 3 Volumes treated separately (i)Central Volume (i)Central Volume (ii+iii) US+DS End-Cap (ii+iii) US+DS End-Cap distributed equalized-flow distributed equalized-flow inlets inlets equalized flow outlets equalized flow outlets Pressure Regulation Pressure Regulation He-Monitoring He-Monitoring

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Problem Solving: 3) APD-Array System Geiger-mode APD APD-Array 10 mm pitch APD-Array Fast Photoniques Preamp Preamp Fast Photoniques Preamp Preamp Geiger-mode APD Single mounted Test yy xx x- y-distributions Beam Test: Photonique Geiger-mode APD + BCF20 Scintillator (2x2)mm 2 + BCF20 Scintillator (2x2)mm 2 large gain/rate dependence large gain/rate dependence  modify R 1 R 2 on Preamp  modify R 1 R 2 on Preamp optimized preamp. Bias voltage vs. gain optimized preamp. Bias voltage vs. gain radiation damage studied radiation damage studied Beam Test: Photonique Geiger-mode APD + BCF20 Scintillator (2x2)mm 2 + BCF20 Scintillator (2x2)mm 2 large gain/rate dependence large gain/rate dependence  modify R 1 R 2 on Preamp  modify R 1 R 2 on Preamp optimized preamp. Bias voltage vs. gain optimized preamp. Bias voltage vs. gain radiation damage studied radiation damage studied 1748pixels1748pixels BackfaceBackface Discovered high radiation damage sensitivity to e + &  s -pixels don’t recover > dark current fluence > dark current fluence LIFE EXPECTANCY ~ 8 hrs in full beam  CANNOT USE for ARRAY !!!!  CANNOT USE for ARRAY !!!! Discovered high radiation damage sensitivity to e + &  s -pixels don’t recover > dark current fluence > dark current fluence LIFE EXPECTANCY ~ 8 hrs in full beam  CANNOT USE for ARRAY !!!!  CANNOT USE for ARRAY !!!! Intensive investigation started at PSI with Photoniques varies makes geiger-mode APD Investigated  ALL show similar effects!!!! Intensive investigation started at PSI with Photoniques varies makes geiger-mode APD Investigated  ALL show similar effects!!!!

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Component Status: US End-Cap COBRA US End-Cap Manufactured & assembled & INSTALLED COBRA US End-Cap Manufactured & assembled & INSTALLED US End-Cap Gas Distribution System INSTALLED US End-Cap Gas Distribution System INSTALLED COBRA US End-Cap Manufactured & assembled & INSTALLED COBRA US End-Cap Manufactured & assembled & INSTALLED US End-Cap Gas Distribution System INSTALLED US End-Cap Gas Distribution System INSTALLED VacuumChamberconnectionVacuumChamberconnection N 2 Bag + TC TC N 2 Bag + TC TC Outside View Inside View Installation with N 2 -Bag Not Optimal Not Optimal have learned how to have learned how to improve on several improve on several points !!! points !!! Installation Finished 12/10/2006 InsideCOBRA N 2 -Bag EC sand- wich foil Arrived 13/7/2006

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February DS End-Cap & Insertion System Problem with frictional drive of Insertion System (IS) – Designed Kurath Eng. - Built Bieri Eng. Too weak for frictional Force We managed the impossible with Bieri Eng. !!! Design + Construction of New Drive System + adaptation to IS + delivery  *** 3 WEEKS ***  *** 3 WEEKS *** Problem with frictional drive of Insertion System (IS) – Designed Kurath Eng. - Built Bieri Eng. Too weak for frictional Force We managed the impossible with Bieri Eng. !!! Design + Construction of New Drive System + adaptation to IS + delivery  *** 3 WEEKS ***  *** 3 WEEKS *** Installed 14/12/2006 Delivered 24/10/2006 NBR Bellows System Stroke ~ 1.6m Stroke ~ 1.6m NBR Bellows System Stroke ~ 1.6m Stroke ~ 1.6m New Belt-driven Insertion System under test at Bieri Engineering Winterthur New Belt-driven Insertion System under test at Bieri Engineering Winterthur Belt driven system

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Target System polyesterpolyester Rohacell DC Support Pneumatic Drive Drive Movement Polyester/Rohacell target Pneumatic (He) drive Target System: 175  m Polyester ellipse 210x70 mm 175  m Polyester ellipse 210x70 mm Rohacell support frame + stems Rohacell support frame + stems strain-relieved target mount strain-relieved target mount He-driven pneumatic insertion He-driven pneumatic insertion electronic position end-markers electronic position end-markers *** System Worked Very Well *** *** System Worked Very Well *** Expected Muon Stop-rate: R s ~ 0.62R 0 R 0 = incoming muon rate Decay + He interaction ~12% R 0 Stop in slanted target ~ 70% R 0 Target System: 175  m Polyester ellipse 210x70 mm 175  m Polyester ellipse 210x70 mm Rohacell support frame + stems Rohacell support frame + stems strain-relieved target mount strain-relieved target mount He-driven pneumatic insertion He-driven pneumatic insertion electronic position end-markers electronic position end-markers *** System Worked Very Well *** *** System Worked Very Well *** Expected Muon Stop-rate: R s ~ 0.62R 0 R 0 = incoming muon rate Decay + He interaction ~12% R 0 Stop in slanted target ~ 70% R 0 DCsDCs Inside COBRA in parking position USTCsUSTCs

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Commissioning Run Dec US COBRA Commissioning finished 28/11/2006 US COBRA Commissioning finished 28/11/2006 delays to closing DS End-Cap DC/N 2 -Bag conflict delays to closing DS End-Cap DC/N 2 -Bag conflict waiting for IS to be delivered waiting for IS to be delivered Full Beam Line (all components), 4cm Tg.E Ready 14/12/2006 *** 9 DAYS of Beam Left *** 14/12/2006 *** 9 DAYS of Beam Left *** Naturally decide to Maximize Commissioning time for DC, TC, Trigger, DAQ testing BUT priority beam Question to be answered first  Beam Misalignment Compensation at COBRA centre Lost time to finish studies Lost time to finish studies  2007  2007 US COBRA Commissioning finished 28/11/2006 US COBRA Commissioning finished 28/11/2006 delays to closing DS End-Cap DC/N 2 -Bag conflict delays to closing DS End-Cap DC/N 2 -Bag conflict waiting for IS to be delivered waiting for IS to be delivered Full Beam Line (all components), 4cm Tg.E Ready 14/12/2006 *** 9 DAYS of Beam Left *** 14/12/2006 *** 9 DAYS of Beam Left *** Naturally decide to Maximize Commissioning time for DC, TC, Trigger, DAQ testing BUT priority beam Question to be answered first  Beam Misalignment Compensation at COBRA centre Lost time to finish studies Lost time to finish studies  2007  2007 collimatorcollimatorcentredcentred above DegraderDegrader APD Problem solved APD Problem solved (temporarily) (temporarily) Large depletion layer Large depletion layer (non-Geiger mode) + v. fast Preamp sag-compensated 2-D sag-compensated 2-D Scanner with >3.5 m reach APD Problem solved APD Problem solved (temporarily) (temporarily) Large depletion layer Large depletion layer (non-Geiger mode) + v. fast Preamp sag-compensated 2-D sag-compensated 2-D Scanner with >3.5 m reach

Peter-Raymond KettleMEG Review February Commissioning Run Provisional Results Collimator Collimator transmission ε = 95% Collimator Collimator transmission ε = 95% Data still under Analysis PROVISIONAL Rate at Entrance COBRA 1.15  10 8  + s -1 at 1.8mA, 4cm Tg Rate at COBRA centre > 6  10 7  + s -1 at 1.8mA, 4cm Tg (under investigation) Beam Spot σ ~ 10.8 mm (as expected) Data still under Analysis PROVISIONAL Rate at Entrance COBRA 1.15  10 8  + s -1 at 1.8mA, 4cm Tg Rate at COBRA centre > 6  10 7  + s -1 at 1.8mA, 4cm Tg (under investigation) Beam Spot σ ~ 10.8 mm (as expected) Separation Quality Separation Quality High Intensity (slits open) 7.4σ Low Intensity 8.1σ Separation Quality Separation Quality High Intensity (slits open) 7.4σ Low Intensity 8.1σ e+e+e+e+ e+e+e+e+ ++++ ++++ Low Intensity SMH41 SMV41 SMH41 SMV41 Correction Correction at at Centre of COBRA ~ 2 mm Horizontally ~ 2 mm Horizontally ~ 7 mm Vertically ~ 7 mm Vertically CORRECTION CORRECTION WORKS !!! WORKS !!! COBRAcentreCOBRAcentre COBRAcentreCOBRAcentre