The Institute for Learning. l Established 1995 l Lauren B. Resnick l University of Pittsburg’s Learning Research and Development Center Background.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Resources Administration in Education
Advertisements

Rigorous Science Content and Instructional Practice Ms. Katrina Slone, Knott County Public Schools Dr. Kent Price, Morehead State University GEAR UP Alliance.
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
MISSION: POSSIBLE. Hello! Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to implement the Tennessee standards. This new curriculum will go.
TRUMANSBURG CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT’S ENTRY PLAN
PORTFOLIO.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
© WestEd, Teacher Professional Development, 2007 Literacy for Adolescent English Learners: Building Capacity for Quality Programs Aída Walqui Director,
Teaching American History Roots of Freedom Presented by: Angela Dorough Gil Diaz.
Successful Practices Network New York City and Long Island Career Pathways Regional Conference June 9, 2011.
Feinstein High School 544 Elmwood Avenue. Redesign and rebirth In the spring of 2001, Superintendent Diana Lam announced that Feinstein High School would.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Closing the Achievement Gap A 3-hour training for experienced SBDM Council members.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
Elizabeth A. Clark, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction.
HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT Dr. Lewis D. Ferebee, Superintendent Dr. Wanda H. Legrand, Deputy Superintendent for Academics May 29, 2015.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
Cognitive Coaching: Mathematics Session Lizette Diaz Jennifer Hodges.
Successful Practices Network ACTEA Annual Leadership Conference March 24-25, 2011 Dr. Edward Shafer, Director Dr. Constance H. Spohn,
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Foundational Ideas Module How Can the Principles of Learning Help Preschoolers.
Instructionally-Linked Assessments in an Age of Accountability Lauren B. Resnick University of Pittsburgh.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Creating Success through Academic Coaching Candler County Schools July 18, 2007.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Brownsville Independent School District Department of Curriculum and Instruction Presentation by Dr. Salvador Cavazos Tuesday, June 17, 2008 Dr. Salvador.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
20 What is our plan? Bold, comprehensive, approach to transformation – focused on students and student achievement High achieving, engaged students Effective.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
UMELA Cohort 2 Meeting Dallas, Texas Westin City Center November 3-5, 2009.
California Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools Educating for Democracy Preparing Students to Become Engaged Citizens: The Civic Mission of Schools.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Florence/Workshop Two Perceptions of Teaching: The Professional Perception - Teaching is a complex process which includes: 1. Identifying students' needs.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Becoming Familiar with the Core Issues.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Comprehensive K-12 Mathematics Improvement Plan Update May 9, 2013.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Company LOGO Professional Development Teams (PDTs) School Improvement Zone.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Culturally mediated classrooms
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Magnolia Public School
Presentation transcript:

The Institute for Learning

l Established 1995 l Lauren B. Resnick l University of Pittsburg’s Learning Research and Development Center Background

The Institute for Learning Learning Research and Development Center ________ University of Pittsburgh

Institute for Learning l New York City Community School Districts 2 and 15 l Boston Public Schools l School District of Philadelphia l Pittsburgh Public Schools l San Diego Unified School District Major urban school districts participating in the Institute:

Institute For Learning All students, with the appropriate forms of effort, are capable of high achievement and high level thinking. Provide educators with the resources and training they need to enhance learning opportunities for all students.

Resources and Training Institute Partners are Educational Professionals Distinguished classroom teachers Curriculum and professional development experts Central district leaders Principals who are instructional leaders

Principles of Learning 1. Organizing for Effort 2. Clear Expectations 3. Fair and Credible Evaluations 4. Recognition of Accomplishment 5. Academic Rigor in a Thinking Curriculum

Principles of Learning 6. Accountability Talk 7. Socializing Intelligence 8. Self-management of Learning 9. Learning as Appenticeship

Principles of Learning (1-9) 1. Organizing for Effort 2. Clear Expectations 3. Fair and Credible Evaluations 4. Recognition of Accomplishment 5. Academic Rigor in a Thinking Curriculum 6. Accountability Talk 7. Socializing Intelligence 8. Self-management of Learning 9.Learning as Appenticeship

Ancillary Materials Workbooks Manuals Videotapes

Nested Learning Communities Students School Staffs and Principals School and Central Instructional Leaders Central Instructional Leaders and Superintendents

Nested Learning Communities Students Students in every classroom and every subject are engaged in rigorous work and achieving high academic standards.

Nested Learning Communities School staffs and Principals Principals and staffs are engaged in rigorous study of content and pedagogy and are accountable for meeting the learning and resource needs of every student.

Nested Learning Communities School and Central Instructional Leaders Instructional supervisors and principals are engaged in rigorous study of content and pedagogy and accountable for meeting the learning and resource needs of every teacher.

Nested Learning Communities Central Instructional Leaders and Superintendents Superintendents and instructional supervisors are engaged in rigorous study of content and pedagogy and accountable for meeting the learning and resource needs of every principal.

Nested Learning Communities School Staffs and Principals Central Instructional Leaders And Superintendents School and Central Instructional Leaders Students

Institute For Learning “To improve student achievement.” — Local District G Goal….

Institute For Learning “To improve student achievement.” — Local District G Goal …. Institute for Learning Research and Development Institute

All presentations are available from the District G Website’s Administrator links (skip intro)