NYS Assessment System NYSAA is a component of the NYS Assessment that ensures participation by all students with disabilities, even those with severe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships….Every Student, Every Teacher, Every Day!
Growing Success Overview
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Modified High School Assessment (Mod-HSA) Maryland State Board of Education August 26, 2008.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Alternate STAAR Alternate September 1, 2010 TETN # 7960 Handouts Copyright © 2011 Texas Education Agency.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
National Center on Educational Outcomes June, 2004 How do we keep kids from being stuck in our gap? A frame, a series of discussion questions, and some.
Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships….Every Student, Every Teacher, Every Day!
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships….Every Student, Every Teacher, Every Day!
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Testing Students with Disabilities Office of Assessment Update Suzanne Swaffield Anne Mruz November
NC DPI WEBINAR APRIL 24, 2012 Title III Application
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
New York State Alternate Assessment Candace Shyer Bureau Chief, Test Development Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PLANNING MEETING GRAVES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JULY 2015.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessment with Alternate Achievement Standards Conference on Exceptional Children November 17-18, 2008 NCDPI Division of Accountability.
Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
Legal Foundations of Special Education Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 1.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment
American Institutes for Research
Title I Information Lake Preston School District 38-3
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Florida Standards Alternate Assessment Performance Task
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
INFORMATIONAL SESSION
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

NYS Assessment System NYSAA is a component of the NYS Assessment that ensures participation by all students with disabilities, even those with severe cognitive disabilities. All students must be assessed in grades 3-8 and high school. No student is exempt from State assessments. The “Locally Selected Assessment” option is no longer available starting in

NCLB and General Assessments New 3-8 testing in ELA and Mathematics begins in school year. –ELA to be administered in January –Mathematics to be administered in March 2006.

NCLB Act of 2001 Title 1, sec “The Purpose of this title is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal and significant opportunity to obtain a high – quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic achievement standards and State academic assessments. This purpose can be accomplished by…

NCLB Act of 2001 ( 2) Meeting the educational needs of low- achieving children in our Nation’s highest- poverty schools, limited English proficient children, migrant children, children with disabilities, Indian children, neglected or delinquent children, and young children in need of reading assistance; and

NCLB Act of 2001 (9) Promoting school-wide reform and ensuring the access of children to effective, scientifically-based instructional strategies and challenging academic content.

IDEA 2004 Many of the provisions of IDEA 2004 require significant changes to: NYS laws Regulations Policies and Guidance documents.

IDEA 2004 and NYSAA It repeals the requirement for benchmarks and short term objectives on IEPs, except for students with significant cognitive disabilities taking the alternate assessment. Most of the IDEA 2004 amendments became effective July 1, 2005.

Increase in my ability to assess An increased value in teaching to academic standards Increased expectations for student learning Teachers Said Their Experience Administering NYSAA led to:

IDEA 2004 Requires the CSE to… Determine if the student must take an alternate assessment instead of the Statewide or district assessment. If the student is determined to need an alternate assessment, the IEP must include statements indicating: Why the student cannot participate in regular assessments, and Why this particular alternate assessment is appropriate.

Earlier Registration Dates School Administrators will have until October 31, 2005 to register their students for the NYSAA with the RIC A second registration deadline will be December 22, 2005 for students who need to be added or deleted from the district’s data. Registration Memo was released this week.

NYSAA Has Undergone Some Changes

NYS Changes for There are several changes this year being made in NYS law and regulation to comply with NCLB and IDEA 2004 requirements. One major change is that NYSAA will be expanded to assess eligible students whose birth dates fall within the age range equivalents to grades 3-8 and high school.

Students to be Included in NYSAA NYSAA Grade Equivalent Birth Date Range Content Areas To Be Assessed Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 High School July 1, June 30, 1996 July 1, June 30, 1995 July 1, June 30, 1994 July 1, June 30, 1993 July 1, June 30, 1992 July 1, June 30, 1991 July 1, June 30, 1988 ELA, Math ELA, Math, Soc.St., Science ELA, Math ELA, Math, Soc.St., Science

Making Changes to NYSAA NYSAA model designed with input from AATNs, SSCs, teachers and others Model parameters – -based on Federal requirements of IDEA and NCLB; -keep what we know and have done for grades 4, 8 and high school (anchor years); -add for years 3, 5, 6 and 7 (expanded years) Stakeholders meeting held to present model and to elicit feedback Advisory committee established/NYSAA model finalized Design Teachers Guide and training materials based on preliminary results and teacher feedback.

NYSAA Data Statewide in [Total of 7,205 datafolios] 65% had datafolios that received scores in all areas (4,664). 79% of completely scorable datafolios with AA levels 3 or 4 in at least one content area. (3,661)

NYSAA Data Statewide [Total of 7,205 datafolios] 35% had at least one content area not scored (2,541) 14% had all four content areas not scored (1,001) 29% contained avoidable errors _________________ 3% took another assessment in at least one area (214) 0.2% were medically excused in at least one area (15) 0.9% were not enrolled (68)

More on NYSAA Results from Scorer Comment Sheets Overall, scorers made more positive comments than negative ones: Evidence was complete, data were well documented, well organized, instruction was clearly linked to the learning standards, student was clearly portrayed and evidence demonstrated rich and varied approaches to learning.

More on NYSAA Results from Scorer Comment Sheets Some of the scorers’ negative comments were: dates were not circled on the DSS; task was not clearly linked to the API; student appears ready for more challenging content; required elements on the VE were missing; levels of accuracy and independence were not calculated correctly or were not indicated on VE or DSS; white-out and photocopies were used; and there was a need to consider adjusting the level of complexity to promote greater independence.

Highlights for NYSAA now extends to the equivalents of grades 3-8 and high school. In fall 2005, we are providing Regional Trainings. Eligibility –continues to be based on criteria and birth date ranges Time Line –Data Collection Period Oct 3, 2005-Feb 10, 2006 –Registration by October 31, 2005 –Benchmarking on January 11 and 12, 2006 –Scoring March 27 through May 5, 2006 –Reporting Results to Schools & Families, Summer 2006

Highlights for Content areas vary according to the grade level equivalent --Anchor Years: 4, 8 and high school Assess in ELA, Math, Soc. St., Science --Expanded Years: 3, 5, 6 and 7 Assess in ELA and Math only.

Anchor Grade Equivalents: 4, 8 and high school ELA D2D3 D1D3D1D3 Man. API API TASK D1D2 VE Math Science Social Studies

Expanded Grade Equivalents: 3, 5, 6 and 7 ELA Man. API TASK D 1D 2D 3 VE MATH

8 THINGS for AATNs TO REMEMBER 1.Encourage accuracy and quality in administering NYSAA. 2.NYSAA should be integrated with the student’s IEP-consider PLP and IEP goals and objectives. 3. Align Standard, API, Task and present level of performance indicated on IEP. 4.Remember to integrate collegial review(s).

8 THINGS for AATNs TO REMEMBER 5.The tasks that are assessed should be part of the student’s curriculum and instruction. 6.Tasks need to be challenging, not ones that are already mastered. 7.Parent input is required, not optional. Complete the Parent/Guardian Survey. 8.Strive for procedural validity and the consistent administration of NYSAA statewide.

WHAT VESID WILL DO TO HELP Registration memo requires earlier Registration: by October 31, Update VESID’s Regional Associates and Supervisors about the NYSAA. Develop brochures about NYSAA and the roles of CSEs, Administrators, Teachers, Parents etc.

Resources alterassessment/home.html

Our goal is to have a successful trip and a smooth landing of the NYSAA.