Introduction to Legal Research Prof. L. Labrousse Seminar: Thursdays, 10PM ET Office Hours: Thursdays, 9PM – 10PM ET & 11PM – 12AM ET AIM: LabrousseEsq Last updated 3/12/2009

Course Outcomes As a result of completing this course, you should be able to: –Identify the components of a case –Brief cases –Cite applicable sources using the Legal Bluebook –Verify that legal sources are accurate and up-to- date Develop a legal research plan –Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English –Use electronic libraries and databases for research purposes As a result of completing this course, you should be able to: –Identify the components of a case –Brief cases –Cite applicable sources using the Legal Bluebook –Verify that legal sources are accurate and up-to- date Develop a legal research plan –Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English –Use electronic libraries and databases for research purposes

Review of Kaplan Services  Writing Center (check with the Academic Success Center in “My Studies” Tab in KU Campus)  Tutors (available from the Legal Studies Honor Society – contact me for more information)  Academic Advisors (Instructor Concerns)  Instructor ( , Ask the Prof, Office Hours, Seminar)  Career Resources  If you need help – reach out! Our goals are the same – your success!  Writing Center (check with the Academic Success Center in “My Studies” Tab in KU Campus)  Tutors (available from the Legal Studies Honor Society – contact me for more information)  Academic Advisors (Instructor Concerns)  Instructor ( , Ask the Prof, Office Hours, Seminar)  Career Resources  If you need help – reach out! Our goals are the same – your success!

Outreach Policies  If you are struggling and your grade shows it – I will try to reach out to you! I hope you will be receptive and feel free to reach out to me first.  If you have less than a 60% in the course, the outreach procedure is: – –Instructor Concern –Phone Calls (Please make sure your phone number is correct or me with the best choice)  If you are struggling and your grade shows it – I will try to reach out to you! I hope you will be receptive and feel free to reach out to me first.  If you have less than a 60% in the course, the outreach procedure is: – –Instructor Concern –Phone Calls (Please make sure your phone number is correct or me with the best choice)

Instructor Contact Info.  –If you me – expect a response within 24 hours or 36 hours on weekends (If it needs a response) –If you submit a late assignment (ie. late dropbox submission or late DB post) please confirm via you submitted. –Check grade book for updated grades (5 days from due date OR 5 days from submission if its late) or feel free to to confirm receipt.  –If you me – expect a response within 24 hours or 36 hours on weekends (If it needs a response) –If you submit a late assignment (ie. late dropbox submission or late DB post) please confirm via you submitted. –Check grade book for updated grades (5 days from due date OR 5 days from submission if its late) or feel free to to confirm receipt.

Instructor Contact Info.  Office Hours –Thursdays, from 9 to 10 PM EST; 11PM to 12 AM EST –AOL Instant Messenger – LabrousseEsq  Ask the Prof  Contact me if you have any questions or concerns  Office Hours –Thursdays, from 9 to 10 PM EST; 11PM to 12 AM EST –AOL Instant Messenger – LabrousseEsq  Ask the Prof  Contact me if you have any questions or concerns

Grading Policy  Review the Syllabus for Rubrics  Do your own work! Honor Policy! Plagiarism is not tolerated! My favorite and most dependable resource is Turnitin.com  Assignments will be graded and returned within five days of its due date (or submission if its late)  Use the Dropbox for any written assignments  alternative assignments (requirements are in the Syllabus)  Use Microsoft Word (if you do not have Word then save as a rtf file)  If you miss an assignment, you will have a “0” in the gradebook until it is submitted and graded  Review the Syllabus for Rubrics  Do your own work! Honor Policy! Plagiarism is not tolerated! My favorite and most dependable resource is Turnitin.com  Assignments will be graded and returned within five days of its due date (or submission if its late)  Use the Dropbox for any written assignments  alternative assignments (requirements are in the Syllabus)  Use Microsoft Word (if you do not have Word then save as a rtf file)  If you miss an assignment, you will have a “0” in the gradebook until it is submitted and graded

UNIT 1 ASSIGNMENTS  Review the unit introduction and key terms; Read Chapter 1 of Basic Legal Research Tools and Strategies; Read about primary and secondary sources; Learn about the Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation; Familiarize yourself with the Course Project; Review the unit’s key terms ; Prepare for the quiz by completing the practice exercise GRADED ASSIGNMENTS  Participate on the Discussion Board  Attend and participate in this week’s Seminar  Complete and submit the Written Assignment  Take the Unit 1 Quiz  Review the unit introduction and key terms; Read Chapter 1 of Basic Legal Research Tools and Strategies; Read about primary and secondary sources; Learn about the Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation; Familiarize yourself with the Course Project; Review the unit’s key terms ; Prepare for the quiz by completing the practice exercise GRADED ASSIGNMENTS  Participate on the Discussion Board  Attend and participate in this week’s Seminar  Complete and submit the Written Assignment  Take the Unit 1 Quiz

UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENTS  Review the unit introduction and key terms; Learn about legislative history by listening to “I’m Just a Bill Away”; Learn about the U.S. Constitution by playing Double Jeopardy; Read Chapter 6 of Basic Legal Research Tools and Strategies; Read about drunk driving statutes and see a statute in action; Learn about Bluebook Rules 12.1 and 12.2; Learn about the Collins Fact Pattern; Review the unit’s key terms GRADED ASSIGNMENTS  Participate on the Discussion Board  Attend and participate in this week’s Seminar  Complete and submit the Written Assignment  Take the Unit 2 Quiz  Review the unit introduction and key terms; Learn about legislative history by listening to “I’m Just a Bill Away”; Learn about the U.S. Constitution by playing Double Jeopardy; Read Chapter 6 of Basic Legal Research Tools and Strategies; Read about drunk driving statutes and see a statute in action; Learn about Bluebook Rules 12.1 and 12.2; Learn about the Collins Fact Pattern; Review the unit’s key terms GRADED ASSIGNMENTS  Participate on the Discussion Board  Attend and participate in this week’s Seminar  Complete and submit the Written Assignment  Take the Unit 2 Quiz

QUESTIONS?

Introduction to the Legal Research Process

Legal Research Why & How?  Role of legal professionals –Solve problems and give advice –You must know the rules applicable to the situation  Understand different sources of legal rules –What are they? –Where do they originate from?  Process of Legal Research –Tools –Citation  Role of legal professionals –Solve problems and give advice –You must know the rules applicable to the situation  Understand different sources of legal rules –What are they? –Where do they originate from?  Process of Legal Research –Tools –Citation

Sources of Law  Sources of Law (state and federal) –Constitutions (created by legislative branch) –Statutes (created by legislative branch) –Court opinions (cases) (interpreted law by judicial branch) –Administrative regulations (created by administrative agencies established by legislative branch) Laws are enforced by executive branch  Sources of Law (state and federal) –Constitutions (created by legislative branch) –Statutes (created by legislative branch) –Court opinions (cases) (interpreted law by judicial branch) –Administrative regulations (created by administrative agencies established by legislative branch) Laws are enforced by executive branch

[Untitled image of three branches of United States government]. Retrieved 3/13/2009 from /ap_gov/lec_notes_00.htm

Primary Sources: Constitutions Statutes Court Decisions Administrative Regulations Sources of Law

Secondary Sources: American Law Reports (ALR) American Jurisprudence Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS) Restatements Treatises Law Reviews etc. Sources of Law

AUTHORITY OF SOURCES Mandatory (Binding)  Authority a court is obligated to follow  Rules you MUST apply to determine the correct answer to the issue you are researching  Examples Persuasive (Non-binding)  Authority a court may follow if it is persuaded to do so, but is not required to follow  It may help you figure out the answer, but it will not dictate it  Examples

WEIGHT OF AUTHORITY  All authority is NOT created equal  It depends… –Primary or secondary authority? –Some primary authority is mandatory and others persuasive –Secondary authority is ALWAYS persuasive –You have to be able to distinguish between them to determine how much weight a particular legal authority has in the resolution of issue you are researching  All authority is NOT created equal  It depends… –Primary or secondary authority? –Some primary authority is mandatory and others persuasive –Secondary authority is ALWAYS persuasive –You have to be able to distinguish between them to determine how much weight a particular legal authority has in the resolution of issue you are researching

WEIGHT OF AUTHORITY  FIGURING IT OUT…  Secondary Sources – Persuasive only; Examine source  Primary authority – Mandatory only if its your jurisdiction; Persuasive only its if its not your jurisdiction  Determining the weight of court opinions (HINT: Look at your CITATION)  FIGURING IT OUT…  Secondary Sources – Persuasive only; Examine source  Primary authority – Mandatory only if its your jurisdiction; Persuasive only its if its not your jurisdiction  Determining the weight of court opinions (HINT: Look at your CITATION)

Taken from calonline/apgov/modul e4/lesmod4/4_15.htm

The Thirteen Federal Judicial Circuits

FEDERAL - Determining the weight of court opinions (HINT: Look at your CITATION)  U.S. Supreme Court Decision Citation Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page, (year of decision [NEVER the court!])  Federal Circuit Court Decision Citation Sierra Club v. Larson, 2 F.3d 462 (1st Cir. 1993) Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)  Federal District Court Decision Citation United States v. Bin Laden, 146 F.Supp.2d 373 (S.D.N.Y 2001) Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)  U.S. Supreme Court Decision Citation Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page, (year of decision [NEVER the court!])  Federal Circuit Court Decision Citation Sierra Club v. Larson, 2 F.3d 462 (1st Cir. 1993) Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)  Federal District Court Decision Citation United States v. Bin Laden, 146 F.Supp.2d 373 (S.D.N.Y 2001) Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)

Court Structure of Texas Taken from

Regional Reporters (State Cases)

STATE - Determining the weight of court opinions (HINT: Look at your CITATION)  NY Court of Appeals Citation (state highest level) Witter v. Taggart, 78 N.Y.2d 234, 577 N.E.2d 338, 573 N.Y.S.2d 146 (1991). Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page of official reporter, parallel reference(s) to regional reporter(s), (year of decision [NEVER the court!])  NY Appellate Division Citation (intermediate appeals level) Adamy v. Ziriakus, 231 A.D.2d 80, 659 N.Y.S.2d 623 (4th Dep’t 1997). Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page of official reporter, parallel reference(s) to regional reporter, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)  NY Supreme Court Citation (trial court level) Dorfman v. Berman, 186 Misc. 2d 415, 718 N.Y.S.2d 142 (Sup. Ct. Albany County 2000). Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page of official reporter, parallel reference(s) to regional reporter, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)  NY Court of Appeals Citation (state highest level) Witter v. Taggart, 78 N.Y.2d 234, 577 N.E.2d 338, 573 N.Y.S.2d 146 (1991). Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page of official reporter, parallel reference(s) to regional reporter(s), (year of decision [NEVER the court!])  NY Appellate Division Citation (intermediate appeals level) Adamy v. Ziriakus, 231 A.D.2d 80, 659 N.Y.S.2d 623 (4th Dep’t 1997). Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page of official reporter, parallel reference(s) to regional reporter, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)  NY Supreme Court Citation (trial court level) Dorfman v. Berman, 186 Misc. 2d 415, 718 N.Y.S.2d 142 (Sup. Ct. Albany County 2000). Elements: Parties, volume-reporter-page of official reporter, parallel reference(s) to regional reporter, (court [if needed to specify jurisdiction] and year of decision)

In short… The weight of your authority depends on whether the decision is from your jurisdiction!

ONE MORE THING… UPDATING  What is Updating?  Remember, a statute or case is only good law if it has not been overruled, superseded, repealed, or otherwise invalidated.  Updating is the process of verifying that the statute or case is still good law.  What is Updating?  Remember, a statute or case is only good law if it has not been overruled, superseded, repealed, or otherwise invalidated.  Updating is the process of verifying that the statute or case is still good law.

QUESTIONS?

Bluebook: Uniform Citation For Legal Reference

When to Cite?  When you rely on and use legal sources and legal authorities in your own work, The Bluebook provides a systematic citation form to “cite” those references.  The citation follows the discussion from the source: It is clear that only personal rights that can be deemed "fundamental" or "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” are guaranteed personal privacy Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 325 (1937).  When you rely on and use legal sources and legal authorities in your own work, The Bluebook provides a systematic citation form to “cite” those references.  The citation follows the discussion from the source: It is clear that only personal rights that can be deemed "fundamental" or "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” are guaranteed personal privacy Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 325 (1937).

How to Cite?  The order of the citation is important because each part identifies something in the reference that can lead the reader to the original source as you found it.  Each legal source has its own particular order to follow and specific information that must be included in the cite.  The order of the citation is important because each part identifies something in the reference that can lead the reader to the original source as you found it.  Each legal source has its own particular order to follow and specific information that must be included in the cite.

How to Cite Cases?  A general case citation is as follows: Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. United E. Mining Co., 39 Ariz. 533 (1932).  Always underline or italicize case names: –Smith Corp. v. Doe Inc.  The “v.” is lowercase, is followed by a period, and is not “vs.”: –Paradise v. Parker,  Follow case names by a comma, which is not underlined or italicized: –Arizona v. Fulminante,  A general case citation is as follows: Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. United E. Mining Co., 39 Ariz. 533 (1932).  Always underline or italicize case names: –Smith Corp. v. Doe Inc.  The “v.” is lowercase, is followed by a period, and is not “vs.”: –Paradise v. Parker,  Follow case names by a comma, which is not underlined or italicized: –Arizona v. Fulminante,  volum e

How to Cite Cases?  Do not include parties' first names, unless they are the name of a corporation: –Baker v. John Smith Inc.,  If there is more than one plaintiff or defendant, use only the first party on each side.  Do not abbreviate United States in a case name: –United States v. Michigan,  Some words may be abbreviated, but do not abbreviate them if they are the first word of a party. Refer to the Bluebook for common abbreviations.  Do not include parties' first names, unless they are the name of a corporation: –Baker v. John Smith Inc.,  If there is more than one plaintiff or defendant, use only the first party on each side.  Do not abbreviate United States in a case name: –United States v. Michigan,  Some words may be abbreviated, but do not abbreviate them if they are the first word of a party. Refer to the Bluebook for common abbreviations.

How to Cite Federal Cases?  U.S. Supreme Court: Cite to U.S. If it's not yet published there, cite to S. Ct., L. Ed., U.S.L.W., or LEXIS, in that order of preference. Do not include parallel cites: –Smith & Jones, Inc. v. Couch, 401 U.S. 313 (1985).  U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal: Cite to F., F.2d, or F.3d. Note no space between the F. and the number. Include the circuit in the cite: –Davis v. Everett, 102 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1954).  U.S. Supreme Court: Cite to U.S. If it's not yet published there, cite to S. Ct., L. Ed., U.S.L.W., or LEXIS, in that order of preference. Do not include parallel cites: –Smith & Jones, Inc. v. Couch, 401 U.S. 313 (1985).  U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal: Cite to F., F.2d, or F.3d. Note no space between the F. and the number. Include the circuit in the cite: –Davis v. Everett, 102 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1954).

How to Cite Federal Cases?  U.S. District Courts: Cite to F. Supp. Note the space between the F. and the Supp. Include the district in the cite: –Flanders v. Glissandi, 913 F. Supp. 885 (C.D. Cal. 1996).  U.S. District Courts: Cite to F. Supp. Note the space between the F. and the Supp. Include the district in the cite: –Flanders v. Glissandi, 913 F. Supp. 885 (C.D. Cal. 1996).

How to Cite State Cases?  Cite to the regional reporter. Include the court in the cite: –Hoyt, Inc. v. Irving-Johnson Corp., 425 P.2d 976 (Cal. App. 1976). Kearney v. Lovejoy, 777 P.2d 1024 (Cal. 1993).  Cite to the regional reporter. Include the court in the cite: –Hoyt, Inc. v. Irving-Johnson Corp., 425 P.2d 976 (Cal. App. 1976). Kearney v. Lovejoy, 777 P.2d 1024 (Cal. 1993).

How to Cite Cases Available Only in Lexis?  Vaughn v. Wilson, No , 1995 U.S. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 3255, at *16 (1995).

How to Cite Quotations?  Always give the exact page of a quote (i.e. pinpoint cite), even when paraphrasing: –"The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places." Katz v. United States, 375 U.S. 76, 82 (1965).  Always give the exact page of a quote (i.e. pinpoint cite), even when paraphrasing: –"The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places." Katz v. United States, 375 U.S. 76, 82 (1965).

How to Cite Statutes?  Federal Statutes: Cite to U.S.C. or U.S.C.A. –12 U.S.C. § 1986 (West 1996). –12 U.S.C.A. § 1986 (1996).  State Statutes: The form varies by state. –Cal. Pen. Code § 187 (West 1989). –Neb. Stat. Ann. § (b) (West 1990). –A.R.S. § (2005).  Federal Statutes: Cite to U.S.C. or U.S.C.A. –12 U.S.C. § 1986 (West 1996). –12 U.S.C.A. § 1986 (1996).  State Statutes: The form varies by state. –Cal. Pen. Code § 187 (West 1989). –Neb. Stat. Ann. § (b) (West 1990). –A.R.S. § (2005).

How to Cite Constitutions?  Federal: –U.S. Const. amend. XX –U.S. Const. art. I, § 2, cl. 3  State: –Cal. Const. art. XIV  Federal: –U.S. Const. amend. XX –U.S. Const. art. I, § 2, cl. 3  State: –Cal. Const. art. XIV

How to Cite Secondary Sources?  Books: John Knight, A Jury of Twelve, 225 (1st. ed. 2001).  Periodicals: Mary A. Jones, The Best of Trial Briefs, 28 Neb. L. Rev. 102 (2006).  Encyclopedias: 16 C.J.S. Evidence § 12 (1996).  Dictionaries: Black's Law Dictionary, 826 (7th ed. 1998).  Annotations: Tom McCannon, Annotation, Searches and Warrants, 79 A.L.R.2d 1257 (1995).  Books: John Knight, A Jury of Twelve, 225 (1st. ed. 2001).  Periodicals: Mary A. Jones, The Best of Trial Briefs, 28 Neb. L. Rev. 102 (2006).  Encyclopedias: 16 C.J.S. Evidence § 12 (1996).  Dictionaries: Black's Law Dictionary, 826 (7th ed. 1998).  Annotations: Tom McCannon, Annotation, Searches and Warrants, 79 A.L.R.2d 1257 (1995).

How to Cite Court Rules?  Federal: –Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6). –Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b).  State: –Haw. Fam. Ct. R –N.J. Ct. R. 3:8-3.  Federal: –Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b)(6). –Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b).  State: –Haw. Fam. Ct. R –N.J. Ct. R. 3:8-3.

How to Cite Electronic Sources?  American Bar Association. Section on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar. Legal Education and Bar Admission Statistics, 1963 – 2005, available at ats.html, (last visited Oct. 18, 2006).

Miscellaneous Points  When a cite is in the middle of a sentence, follow it with a comma. –In Yon v. Sambaed, 421 U.S. 119 (1992), the Supreme Court held that...  When a cite is at the end of a sentence, follow it with a period. –This decision was overruled in Ankeny v. Burnside, 102 F.2d 65 (3d Cir. 1942).  When a cite is in the middle of a sentence, follow it with a comma. –In Yon v. Sambaed, 421 U.S. 119 (1992), the Supreme Court held that...  When a cite is at the end of a sentence, follow it with a period. –This decision was overruled in Ankeny v. Burnside, 102 F.2d 65 (3d Cir. 1942).

Miscellaneous Points  When you have a string cite (several cases cited in a row) separate them with semicolons. Cite federal cases first, then state cases, and cite higher courts before lower ones. –Several courts have held that the sun rises in the east. Caruthers v. Druid, 414 U.S. 9 (1992); Major v. Minor, 2 F. Supp (S.D.N.Y. 1912); California v. Parker, 421 P.2d 198 (Cal. App. 1978).  When you have a string cite (several cases cited in a row) separate them with semicolons. Cite federal cases first, then state cases, and cite higher courts before lower ones. –Several courts have held that the sun rises in the east. Caruthers v. Druid, 414 U.S. 9 (1992); Major v. Minor, 2 F. Supp (S.D.N.Y. 1912); California v. Parker, 421 P.2d 198 (Cal. App. 1978).

Miscellaneous Points  To delete one or more words within a quote, use ellipses. At the end of a sentence, follow the ellipses by a period. –"The time has come... to talk of many things." Lewis Caroll, Alice in Wonderland 56 (1872).  Never start a sentence with ellipses. If you start a quote in the middle of a sentence, or if you substitute letters or words in a sentence, use brackets. –"[M]y troubles seemed so far away." Paul McCartney, Yesterday 2 (1966).  To delete one or more words within a quote, use ellipses. At the end of a sentence, follow the ellipses by a period. –"The time has come... to talk of many things." Lewis Caroll, Alice in Wonderland 56 (1872).  Never start a sentence with ellipses. If you start a quote in the middle of a sentence, or if you substitute letters or words in a sentence, use brackets. –"[M]y troubles seemed so far away." Paul McCartney, Yesterday 2 (1966).

Miscellaneous Points  When one authority is quoting from another, indicate it. –"Citations stink." Brennan v. Marshall, 102 F. Supp. 1234, 1236 (D. Mass. 1984) (quoting Scalia v. Thomas, 313 U.S. 653, 655 (1976)).  When one authority is quoting from another, indicate it. –"Citations stink." Brennan v. Marshall, 102 F. Supp. 1234, 1236 (D. Mass. 1984) (quoting Scalia v. Thomas, 313 U.S. 653, 655 (1976)).

For Further Information  See The Bluebook, eighteenth edition as this is only a primer in formatting.

QUESTIONS?

THE COURSE PROJECT  Developing a research plan  Due in Unit 9  Based on The Collins Fact Pattern  Fact pattern available in Unit 2 under “The Collins Fact Pattern” (and links available in Units 1, 5 and 9); Also available under DocSharing tab  Developing a research plan  Due in Unit 9  Based on The Collins Fact Pattern  Fact pattern available in Unit 2 under “The Collins Fact Pattern” (and links available in Units 1, 5 and 9); Also available under DocSharing tab

THE COURSE PROJECT  Find 2 relevant law review articles (secondary sources) and be able to briefly explain the relevance.  Locate at least one government agency website (secondary source) that would provide information relevant to the case.  Identify at least 5 key words that you would use to conduct a Lexis case search to find relevant cases (primary sources; potentially mandatory).  Find 2 relevant law review articles (secondary sources) and be able to briefly explain the relevance.  Locate at least one government agency website (secondary source) that would provide information relevant to the case.  Identify at least 5 key words that you would use to conduct a Lexis case search to find relevant cases (primary sources; potentially mandatory).

THE COURSE PROJECT  Locate the Price,Waterhouse case (primary source; potentially mandatory) mentioned by your attorney and Shepardize it.  Identify how many cases (updating): a) Superceded b)Distinguished c) Followed  Find the five best cases that are relevant (also referred to as “on point”) to your research (primary and mandatory authority). You will likely read over 20 cases before you find relevant and mandatory sources.  Locate the Price,Waterhouse case (primary source; potentially mandatory) mentioned by your attorney and Shepardize it.  Identify how many cases (updating): a) Superceded b)Distinguished c) Followed  Find the five best cases that are relevant (also referred to as “on point”) to your research (primary and mandatory authority). You will likely read over 20 cases before you find relevant and mandatory sources.

THE COURSE PROJECT  Prepare a case brief of ONE of these cases of your choice. For the remaining four cases, be able to briefly explain the relevance to the Collins scenario.  Find at least one relevant statute (primary and mandatory authority) mentioned in the sources you have located. Be able to briefly explain the relevance of the statutes to the Collins scenario.  Find at least one relevant regulation or rule (primary and mandatory authority) mentioned in the sources you have located. Be able to briefly explain the relevance to the Collins scenario.  For all sources located, provide the proper Legal Bluebook citation.  Prepare a case brief of ONE of these cases of your choice. For the remaining four cases, be able to briefly explain the relevance to the Collins scenario.  Find at least one relevant statute (primary and mandatory authority) mentioned in the sources you have located. Be able to briefly explain the relevance of the statutes to the Collins scenario.  Find at least one relevant regulation or rule (primary and mandatory authority) mentioned in the sources you have located. Be able to briefly explain the relevance to the Collins scenario.  For all sources located, provide the proper Legal Bluebook citation.

QUESTIONS?