ABSTRACT In this study, structural equation modeling is applied to examine the determinants of students’ satisfaction and their perceived learning outcomes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Advertisements

Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Dissertation - August 2003 Enhanced Benefit Finding in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer: The Mediational Role of Skill Building and Social Functioning.
COURSEWORK ON BASE NUMERATION SYSTEMS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON PRE- SERVICE ELEMENTARY TEACHER’S UNDERSTANDING OF PLACE VALUE CONCEPTS BY DOROTHY J. RADIN.
TEACHING WITH PRIMARY SOURCES Level III Training Section Two ADULT LEARNING MODULE.
Genre Shift: Instructor Presence and its Impact on Student Satisfaction in Online Learning.
FUNDAMENTALS OF EFFECTIVE LEARNING. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 CONSTRUCTIVISM Children construct their own knowledge of the world rather than it being.
Chais Conference, Raanana, February 20, 2007 Nitza Geri, Orr Mendelson, David Gefen How to Increase Student Retention in MBA Programs with an Online Element?
The priority factor model for customer relationship management system success Reporter :林曉薇 Date: 2006/12/05 Author : Tae Hyup Roh, Cheol Kyung Ahn, Ingoo.
Learners’ Internal Management of Cognitive Processing in Online Learning Chun-Ying Chen Department of Electronic Commerce Transworld Institute of Technology,
Instructional Design & Technology Cooperative Learning Effects in Online Instruction Beth Allred Oyarzun.
E_learning.
CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION THAT WORKS
What do Graduate Learners Say about Instructor and Learner Discourse in their First Online Course? By Dr. Peter Kiriakidis, PhD Abstract This study was.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Andragogy and Online Learning Assignment #3 for Glen Gatin EL5006-8
Are there “Hidden Variables” in Students’ Initial Knowledge State Which Correlate with Learning Gains? David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy.
MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE ACCEPTANCE OF MICROBLOGGING SOCIAL NETWORKS: 1 THE µBTAM MODEL FRANCISCO REJÓN-GUARDIA FRANCISCO J. LIÉBANA-CABANILLAS.
ONLINE VS. FACE-TO-FACE: EDUCATOR OPINIONS ON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DELIVERY METHODS BY TERESA SCRUGGS THOMAS Tamar AvineriEMS 792x.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Impact of Learning Strategies and Motivation on Performance:A Study in Web- Based Instruction Siva R.Sankaran Tung Bui.
Chuk Cheuk Ka Lau Ming Sze Ng Ka Fan Tsoi Chak Fei Wan Chun Kit Wong Tsun Lam Gruen T.W., Osmonbekov, T.,
Experiences and Opinions of E- learners: What Works, What Doesn't, and What Competencies Ensure Successful Learning Michael F. Beaudoin (University of.
Question 1 Why did a majority of students perceive the innovative web-enhanced Japanese language courses favorably and participate in additional online.
Direct and indirect effects of online learning on distance education 指導教授 : 陳 明 溥 研 究 生 : 許 良 村 Shin, N. & Chan, K.Y.(2004).Direct and indirect effects.
Motivation and Learner Characteristics Affecting Online Learning and Learning Application 指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Chen, Wan-Yi 報告日期: Lim,
2010 Focus on Faculty No Free Lunch: Fostering and Facilitating Active Student Participation in Online Courses.
A Preliminary Investigation of Student Perceptions of Online Education Angela M. Clark University of South Alabama Presented at ISECON 2003 San Diego,
Reading Comprehension Exercises Online: The Effects of Feedback, Proficiency and Interaction N97C0025 Judith.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
Online and Hybrid Course Design. Define Terms Traditional course Web Enhanced course Hybrid course Online course.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
Jenefer Husman Arizona State University Jenefer Husman Arizona State University When learning seems (un)important: Future Time Perspective and post-secondary.
Predictors for Student Success in an Online Course Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: June 21, 2008 Yukselturk, E. & Bulut, S. (2007).
Online learner’s ‘flow’ experience: an empirical study Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Li-Chun Wang Presenter: Li-Chun Wang Shin,
1 Enhancing E-Learning with Interactive Multimedia Information Resources Management Journal, 16(4), 1-14, Oct-Dec Reporter Yu-Wen Hsiao.
Student Engagement and Success in Online Courses Research Studies Crampton, A., Ragusa, A., & Cavanagh, H. (2012). Relationship between academic performance.
What do Graduate Learners Say About Instructor and Learner Discourse in Online Courses? By Dr. Peter Kiriakidis, PhD Abstract This study was grounded on.
The Peer Review Process in graduate level online coursework. “None of us is as smart as all of us” Tim Molseed, Ed. D. Black Hills State University, South.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Investigating the Efficacy of E- learning for the Egyptian Higher Education Tamer Sameer AbdEl-Badea AbdEl-Gawad 2009.
+ All for one and one for All! Collaboration in online learning environments Kim Livengood, Ph. D. Lesley Casarez, Ph. D. Angelo State University Global.
Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: April 12, 2008 Liaw, S., Huang, H.,
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No and Any opinions, findings, and conclusions.
Exploring the Effects of Motivated Learning Support in a Problem-based Learning Environment Ming-Puu Chen National Taiwan Normal University Taipei, Taiwan.
INTRODUCTION TO E-LEARNING. Objectives This chapter contains information on understanding the fundamental concepts of e-learning. In this chapter, e-learning.
The relationship between student characteristics, including learning styles, and their perceptions and satisfaction in web-based courses in higher education.
Feedback: Keeping Learners Engaged Adult Student Recruitment & Retention Conference Sponsored by UW-Oshkosh; March 21-22; Madison, WI Bridget Powell,
Principles for Online Communication: Influencing learners’ experiences of you as the teacher.
Taeho Yu, Ph.D. Ana R. Abad-Jorge, Ed.D., M.S., RDN Kevin Lucey, M.M. Examining the Relationships Between Level of Students’ Perceived Presence and Academic.
Kimberly R. Burgess, Ph.D. Troy University, Albany Site Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
Students’ Autonomy Support in the Context of the English Foundation Program Dr Saleh Al-Busaidi & Dr Victoria Tuzlukova.
Information Retention in e-Learning De Leon Kimberly Obonyo Carolyne Penn John Yang Xiaoyan.
English Extension 1 Preliminary Course. A Word From BOS  2 English (Extension) 12.1 Structure  The Preliminary English (Extension) course consists of.
The Ballerina’s Self-Concept: Self-Aspect Importance, Social Comparison, and Instructor Feedback at an Intensive Summer Program Katarina Walker and Beth.
The roles of user motivation to perform a task and decision support system(DSS) effectiveness and efficiency in DSS use Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor:
Training for Master Trainers: Learning Engagement & Motivation
Exploratory Factor Analysis Participants, Procedures, & Measures
Jenn Shinaberger Corey Lee Lee Shinaberger Coastal Carolina University
The relationship between student characteristics, including learning styles, and their perceptions and satisfaction in web-based courses in higher education.
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Teaching and Educational Psychology
Learning online: Motivated to Self-Regulate?
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
Lecture 10: User Acceptance
Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c
TPS Workshop Objectives
DR. Ibrahim H.M. Magboul Community College of Qatar
Presentation transcript:

ABSTRACT In this study, structural equation modeling is applied to examine the determinants of students’ satisfaction and their perceived learning outcomes in the context of university online courses. Independent variables included are course structure instructor feedback self-motivation learning style interaction and instructor facilitation A total 397 valid unduplicated responses from student taking at least one online course Of the six antecedent variables only instructor feedback and learning outcome are significant. The findings suggest online education can be a superior mode of instruction if it is targeted to learners with specific learning styles (visual and read/write learning styles) and with timely, meaningful instructor feedback of various types.

The distance learning system can be viewed as having several human/nonhuman entities interacting together via computer-based instructional systems to achieve the goals of education, including perceived learning outcomes and student satisfaction. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education using e-learning systems. INTRODUCTION

THE IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE SUCCESS OF E-LEARNING SYSTEMS 1. Student Self-Motivation we hypothesized: H1a: Students with a higher level of motivation will experience a higher level of user satisfaction. H1b: Students with a higher level of motivation in online courses will report higher levels of agreement that the learning outcomes equal to or better than in face-to-face courses.

2. Students’ Learning Styles we hypothesized: H2a: Students with visual and read/write learning styles will experience a higher level of user satisfaction. H2b: Students with visual and read/write learning styles will report higher levels of agreement that the learning outcomes of online courses are equal to or better than in face-to-face courses.

3. Instructor Knowledge and Facilitation we hypothesized: H3a: A higher level of instructor knowledge and facilitation will lead to a higher level of user satisfaction. H3b: A higher level of instructor knowledge and facilitation will lead to higher levels of student agreement that the learning outcomes of online courses are equal to or better than in face-to-face courses.

4. Instructor Feedback we hypothesized: H4a: A high level of instructor feedback will lead to a high level of user satisfaction. H4b: A higher level of instructor feedback will lead to higher levels of student agreement that the learning outcomes of online courses are equal to or better than in face-to-face courses.

5. Interaction we hypothesized: H5a: A high level of perceived interaction between the instructor and students and between students and students will lead to a high level of user satisfaction. H5b: A higher level of perceived interaction between the instructor and students and between students and students will lead to higher levels of student agreement that the learning outcomes of online courses are equal to or better than in face-to-face courses.

6. Course Structure we hypothesized: H6a: A good course structure will lead to a high level of user satisfaction. H6b: A good course structure will lead to higher levels of student agreement that the learning outcomes of online courses are equal to or better than in face-to-face courses.

STRUCTURAL MODEL RESULTS

DISCUSSION We found that all six factors—course structure, self-motivation, learning styles, instructor knowledge and facilitation, interaction, and instructor feedback— significantly influenced students’ satisfaction. Of the six factors hypothesized to affect perceived learning outcomes, only two (learning styles and instructor feedback) were supported.

Contrary to other research findings, no significant relationships were found between students’ self-motivation and perceived learning outcomes. Additional work is needed to better specify the conditions under which self- motivation is likely to have a positive, negative, or neutral effect on perceived learning outcomes.

LIMITATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH future research should seek to further investigate the non significant relationships between the remaining constructs (course structure, self-motivation, and interactions) and perceived learning outcomes. future studies should use more sophisticated measures of course structure, self-motivation, and interactions and their engagement in learning activities, either quantitatively or qualitatively. Although students are in general satisfied with online courses, they believe that they did not learn more in online courses or they believe that the quality of online courses was not better than face-to-face class.

In future research, it would be interesting to know the critical success factors for improving the quality of online learning using multilevel hierarchical modeling.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS This study is one of the first to extend the structural equation modeling to student satisfaction and perceived learning outcomes in asynchronous online education courses. The results indicated that online education is not a universal innovation applicable to all types of instructional situations. Our findings suggest online education can be a superior mode of instruction if it is targeted to learners with specific learning styles (visual and read/write learning styles) and with timely, helpful instructor feedback of various types.

More specifically, there is a clear relationship between instructor feedback and student satisfaction and perceived outcomes. Online quizzes can provide preprogrammed feedback to learners. online learning will be enhanced when there is a better understanding of critical online learning factors.