Jaquanda Pugh Teacher assist II- 0606 February 22, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
Advertisements

State of Hawaii Department of Education April 2005 Title II A – Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Title II D – Enhancing.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
1 Increasing Access to Higher Education for Early Educators with Limited English Proficiency.
East Bay Conservation Corps Charter School Charter Renewal Presentation OUSD State Administrator Board of Education September 28, 2005.
Floridas Outcome-Based Evaluation Program Technical Session LSTA Coordinators Annual Conference November 16-17, 2000.
The Urban Teacher Partnership A Collaboration of Metropolitan State College of Denver Denver Public Schools Mayor’s Office for Education and Children.
January,  Title I – Workforce Development Activities ◦ Subtitle A: System Alignment ◦ Subtitle B: Workforce Activities and Providers  Title.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Lifespan Respite Systems: Building Bridges to Family Support Jill Kagan, Director ARCH National Respite Network and Resource Center
Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12,
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Early Achievers Overview Starting Strong – August 15, 2012.
AB 86 Adult Education Regional Planning. What is AB86 ? $25 Million Statewide for Planning AB 86, Section 76, Article 3 The purpose is develop regional.
Student Success Students Temple College.  Is a self-paced, individualized program based upon a pre-assessment that addresses the specific academic needs.
Alaska Native Education Program Project Director’s Meeting Juneau, Alaska.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Angelor Johnson, Training Coordinator Louisiana PROMISE Parent Information and Resource Centers What is PIRC?
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Washington Learns Overview for Shoreline Operations November Norma Goldstein.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
NEW YORK STATE STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK Updates from the Office of Curriculum and Instructional Support March 3, 2006.
An Update on Charter Schools Presentation to the New Jersey State Board of Education November 3, 2010.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Planning a Museum & Community Partnership Project Brown-Bag Workshop | Wednesday, September 30, Welcome (Kayla Berry) 2.Introduction (Rae Ostman)
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Title I Orientation Title I Programs Support the Katy ISD Mission Katy Independent School District, the leader in educational excellence, together.
CUSD TWO-WAY SPANISH/ENGLISH IMMERSION PROGRAM Report to the Governing Board May 10, 2012.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Recognition that Education is the key to a better economy.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
1 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Virginia Department of Education Division of Instruction Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Family Services Department Head Start Division Annual Report & Community Assessment Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners October 20, 2015.
Community and Technical Colleges The Hub of Modern Workforce Systems Hans Meeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Vocational and Adult Education United.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Take One! ™ Jumpstarting Your National Board Teaching Certification Process.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
OMNIBUS: LABOR/HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES/EDUCATIONPRESENTATION CENTER Highlights From The Department of Education’s $68.3 Billion Budget The Department.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
October Katy Independent School District, the leader in educational excellence, together with family and community, provides unparalleled learning.
Crafting a Quality Grant Proposal March, 2016 ACCELERATED COLLEGE CREDIT GRANT.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
 According to the U.S. Department of Education the purpose of Title 1 funding, “is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity.
PHSKC Health Dialogue: New Opportunities for Public Health, Workforce and Innovative Pilot Projects under Health Care Reform Charissa Fotinos, MD Chief.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Carmen M. Sánchez February 6, 2018
Title I Schools: “ESSA” Every Student Succeeds Act Information Meeting Pershing M. School Library October 12, 2017 Pershing Middle School Houston Independent.
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
Funding for State-level Activities under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 June 27, 2018 Good morning This presentation is in response to.
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Presentation transcript:

Jaquanda Pugh Teacher assist II February 22, 2010

 The main reason for community technology centers is to increase community access to technology and opportunities to enhance technological proficiency. It also supports learning inside and outside the classroom as well as broader community improvement.  Access to computers and technology in the community is mostly important for low- income students and adults.  Many children and adults do not have access to computers and internet outside of school.

 The federal share of the cost of any funded project cannot exceed 50 percent. The requirement for the grantees must use funds to create or expand community technology centers and to evaluate the projects effectiveness.  Applicants must demonstrate the need for the services and commitment to the project.  A plan for evaluation of the program is also required.  Grantees prepare and submit to the U.S department of education and a report that describes the results.

 This program develops culturally based educational activities and internships programs to assist Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and children and families of Massachusetts.  In this program you learn about shared culture and traditions.  Grants and contracts are awarded to the people of the ethnic groups above.  Grantees are required to submit an application to the secretary of education.  Applicants must inform the local school district if their students will participate in the program.

 The arts in education program supports education reform by strengthening arts education as part of the school curriculum.  It’s main focus is to help all students achieve standards in arts.  Children in this program learn in many different ways such as, aural, spatial, kinetic, and visual learning.  College board data shows that the students who are involved in this program do better on the SAT, on both verbal and mathematics sections, than students who don’t participate in this program.  If funding is greater than $15 million this program must provide assistance. If the funding is less than $15 million grants are provided to the John F. Kennedy center and very special arts only.  Grantees are required coordinate to the practicable organizations such as, museums, arts of education associations, libraries, and theaters.

 This program establishes school-based parental information that provide training, information, and support to parents and organizations that work with parents, to help them on parental involvement strategies to improve students academic achievement.  Research demonstrates that parent involvement in children's learning is related to achievement.  Also, researchers found that the schools with the most successful parent involvement programs are those which offer parents a variety of ways to participate.

 The U.S department of education awards competitive grants to all geographic regions of the U.S. the first $50 million is to be used for parent information and resource centers.  Any amount above $50 million is to be split evenly between the parent information and resource centers and the local family information centers.  A key requirement is how effective the parental involvement activities of districts and schools on student achievement.  The performance of the program is measured through the annual data reported by grantees.

 This program promotes educational equity for girls and women who experience multiple forms of discrimination based on gender, race, ethnic origin, limited English proficiency, disability, or age.  The secretary is to make sure that the program is ran by a professional with experience in the field of gender- equity education.  The performance is measured by the secretary submitting the status of educational equity for girls and women in the U.S no later than 1/1/2006, to the president and congress.