A Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria Cornelia Aichhorn, Sandro Krauss (1) Günter Stangl (2) (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graz University of Technology Institute of Navigation and Satellite Geodesy ADDRESSSteyrergasse 30, 8010 Graz, Austria
Advertisements

A comparison of R1 and R4 IVS networks S.B. Lambert, Royal Observatory of Belgium, formerly at NVI, Inc./US Naval Observatory A.-M. Gontier, Paris Observatory.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo National Report of Switzerland E. Brockmann, D. Ineichen, M. Kistler, U. Marti, S. Schaer, A. Schlatter,
Geodetic Reference Frames In Presence of Crustal Deformations Martin Lidberg 1,2, Maaria Nordman 3, Jan M. Johansson 1,4, Glenn A Milne5, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
On the alternative approaches to ITRF formulation. A theoretical comparison. Department of Geodesy and Surveying Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Athanasios.
OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,
TWG Berne November 2005 EUREF High Rate GPS for Positioning, Atmospheric Effects and Natural Hazards Warning System EPN Study Group Chairmen G. Stangl.
Graz 2003 Report of the OLG LAC EPN and other activities Report 2003 E. Cristea, Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences G. Stangl, Federal.
Assessment of SLR observation performance using LAGEOS data Gang ZHAO, You ZHAO, Mingguo Sun, Huanhuan YU Changchun Observatory, NAOC, CAS, China 16 th.
EPN LAC Workshop 2008 Frankfurt Main, Germany, October, 2008 ASI Local Analysis Center Report C. Ferraro, Telespazio/CGS Matera R. Pacione, e-GEOS/CGS.
16 years of LAGEOS-2 Spin Data from launch to present Daniel Kucharski, Georg Kirchner, Franz Koidl Space Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna High frequency EOP estimated from the CONT campaigns Tobias Nilsson.
GPS – Global Positioning System Space segment Control segment user segment 32 satellites World wide monitor and control stations.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Workshop on Earthquakes: Ground- based and Space Observations 1 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Graz, Austria 2 Institute of Physics,
© TU Darmstadt-IPG p 1 The CEGRN 2011 Campaign and the densification of ETRF2000 in Central Europe A. Caporali, M. Barlik, M. Becker, L. Gerhatova, G.
WEGENER Nice 2006 OLG Monitoring of the Eastern Mediterranean and Arabia Velocitiy Estimations of Permanent GPS Stations 1Space Research Institute, Austrian.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.
1 First Results of the CMONOC GNSS Network Junping Chen Bin Wu, Shuhua Ye, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
Space Research Institute Group: Applications of GNSS Ionosphere-Atmosphere-Hydrosphere- Pedosphere-Lithosphere G. Stangl (1), C. Aichhorn, W. Hausleitner,
1 AOGS 2012, Singapore, Aug 13-17, 2012 Surveying co-located GNSS/VLBI/SLR Stations In China Xiuqiang Gong, Yunzhong Shen, Junping Chen, Bin Wu Shanghai.
Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,
Main tasks  2 kHz distance measurements to 60 satellites  Precision: 2.5 mm single shot;
Latest GNSS results of the CMONOC network and its application in earthquake monitoring Junping Chen, Yize Zhang, Yibing Xie, Weijie Tan, Sainan Yang, Bin.
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
The Austrian absolute gravity base net: 27 years of spatial and temporal acquisition of gravity data Ullrich Christian and Diethard Ruess, Federal Office.
Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
CERGOP2 EGU Nice 2004 Development of the CERGOP2 Database - Progress report Work Package 1 P. Pesec, C. Haslinger, E. Cristea, Space Research Institute.
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
CEGRN 2015 Campaign A. Caporali (1), J. Zurutuza (1), O. Khoda (2), G. Stangl (3), M. Becker (4), M. Bertocco (1), L. Gerhatova (5), M. Mojzes (5), M.
EUREF2011: National Report of Austria Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) 1 EUREF 2011 Symposium National Report of Austria by Günter Stangl,
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
Technical Specifications for Monitoring Ground Displacements at a National Highway Project K. Lakakis, P. Savvaidis and I. Ifadis Laboratory of Geodesy.
Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
EUREF2012: National Report of Austria Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) 1 EUREF 2012 Symposium National Report of Austria by Günter Stangl,
EGS Nice 2003 G17 Deficits of CEGRN Solutions and Time Series G. Stangl.
EUREF2012: National Report of Austria Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) 1 EUREF 2013 Symposium National Report of Austria by G. Stangl, N.
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) / Institut für Weltraumforschung (IWF), 8042 Graz, Austria, Contact:
P. Mitterschiffthaler, D. Ruess, G. Stangl, H. Titz, Ch. Ullrich, E. Zahn EUREF National Report Austria.
Time Series of GPS stations in the Near East 1Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences 2Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) EUREF.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
Thessaloniki Continuous Reference GPS Station: Initial Estimation of Position P.Savvaidis, I. Ifadis, K. Lakakis Laboratory of Geodesy Department of Civil.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Velocity Fields From Geodesy to Geodynamics G. Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ + Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
Reprocessing CEGRN campaigns M. Becker(1), A. Caporali(2), R. Drescher(1), L. Gerhatova(5), G. Grenerczy(3), C. Haslinger(4), J. Hefty(5), S.
NAPEOS: The ESA/ESOC Tool for Space Geodesy
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
EGU G6 Vienna 2006 The CERGOP2 database after the project EU project CERGOP2/Environment Work Package 1 P. Pesec, C. Haslinger, Space Research Institute.
Determination of the SLR station coordinates and velocities on the basis of laser observations of low satellites Paweł Lejba, Stanisław Schillak Space.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
CERGOP2 Sofia 2004 Development of the CERGOP2 Database - Progress report Work Package 1 P. Pesec, C. Haslinger, Space Research Institute Graz, Austrian.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
GNSS-meteorology situation
FOMI Satellite Geodetic Observatory
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
Joint analysis of historic leveling data and permanent GPS observations for subsidence determination over the Netherlands R. Grebenitcharsky, R. Hanssen.
Presentation transcript:

A Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria Cornelia Aichhorn, Sandro Krauss (1) Günter Stangl (2) (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences (2) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying

2IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Contents  Investigation Area  GPS Permanent Stations  2 Networks processed by the OLG  Velocity Estimation  Normal Equation Stacking of Weekly Solutions  Detection and Elimination of Offsets and Outliers  Processing of absolute and relative Velocities w.r.t the Eurasian Tectonic Plate  Velocity Comparison  OLG Velocities (2 Networks)  EPN Time Series Project  IERS Solutions  Velocity field for Romania and Bulgaria  Conclusions

3IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Investigation Area # GPS StationCityCountry CEGMONEPNIERSCARP 1 AUT M002ThessalonikiGreece  2 BACA 11405M001BacauRomania  3 BAIA 11406M001Baia MareRomania  4 BRAI 00000M001BrailaRomania  5 BUCU 11401M001BucurestiRomania  6 CLUJ 00000M001ClujRomania  7 COST 11407M001ConstantaRomania  8 CRAI 00000M001CraiovaRomania  9 DEVA 11408M001DevaRomania  10 GRAZ 11001M002GrazAustria  11 ISTA 20807M001IstanbulTurkey  12 MATE 12734M008MateraItaly  13 MIKL 12335M001Mykolaiv,Ukraine  14 NYIR 11208M001NyirbatorHungary  15 ORAD 00000M001OradeaRomania  16 ORID 15601M001OhridMacedonia  17 OROS 11207M001OroshazaHungary  18 ROZH 00000S001RozhenBulgaria  19 SIBI 00000M001SibiuRomania  20 SOFI 11101M002SofiaBulgaria  21 SUCE 00000M001SuceavaRomania  22 TIMI 00000S001TimisoaraRomania  23 VARN 00000S001VarnaBulgaria  24 ZECK 12351M001ZelenchukskayaRussia 

4IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Investigation Area  Bulgaria and Romania with Surrounding Area Results of 2 OLG networks combined

5IWF/ÖAW GRAZ  CERGOP – Network (CEG) Legend investigation area compared with IERS and EPN estimated velocities Investigation Area

6IWF/ÖAW GRAZ  Monitoring Oriental Network (MON) Legend investigation area compared with IERS and EPN estimated velocities Investigation Area

7IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Estimation Time series splitted at GPS week 1400 for better velocity estimation  OLG (data and analysis centre)  4 networks  weekly processing (BSW5.0)  EPN standards  NEQ-stacking of weekly solutions  Detection and Elimination of Offsets and Outliers

8IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Estimation Repeatability Raw Time SeriesCleaned Time Series AUT M002AUT M000AUT M002 N [mm] E [mm] U [mm]  OLG (data and analysis centre)  4 networks  weekly processing (BSW5.0)  EPN standards  NEQ-stacking of weekly solutions  Detection and Elimination of Offsets and Outliers

9IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Estimation Jump in N, E and U at GPS week 1400 reduced  OLG (data and analysis centre)  4 networks  weekly processing (BSW5.0)  EPN standards  NEQ-stacking of weekly solutions  Detection and Elimination of Offsets and Outliers RepeatabilityRaw TSCleaned TS N [mm] E [mm] U [mm]

10IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Estimation Outliers at GPS weeks 1459 and 1460 eliminated RepeatabilityRaw TSCleaned TS N [mm] E [mm] U [mm]  OLG (data and analysis centre)  4 networks  weekly processing (BSW5.0)  EPN standards  NEQ-stacking of weekly solutions  Detection and Elimination of Offsets and Outliers

11IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Estimation #Station#Weeks Repeatability [mm] NEU 1AUT M BACA 11405M BAIA 11406M BRAI 00000M BUCU 11401M CLUJ 00000M COST 11407M CRAI 00000M DEVA 11408M ISTA 20807M MIKL 12335M NYIR 11208M ORAD 00000M ORID 15601M OROS 11207M ROZH 00000S SIBI 00000M SOFI 11101M SUCE 00000M TIMI 00000S VARN 00000S  OLG data and analysis centre  4 networks  weekly processing (BSW5.0)  EPN standards  NEQ-stacking of weekly solutions  Detection and Elimination of Offsets and Outliers  Processing of absolute and relative velocities w.r.t the Eurasian Tectonic Plate  VX, VY, VZ  VN, VE, VU  Quality check  repeatabiliy of coordinates  „age“ of stations

12IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Comparison  Velocity Differences w.r.t the IERS Solution and the EPN Time Series Project  Absolute Velocities  VX, VY, VZ  ITRF2005  CEG, MON and EPN velocities w.r.t. IERS solution

13IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria  Lateral Velocities w.r.t the Eurasian Tectonic Plate Problems  CLUJ sliding sloape  TIMI only 11 weeks

14IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria  Lateral Velocities w.r.t the Eurasian Tectonic Plate Interpretation  stable in the Carpathian Mountains  rotation in the South of the Carpathian Mountains

15IWF/ÖAW GRAZ Conclusions  Velocity Estimation  Quality control is very important  A lot of effort had to be spent for data preprocessing  Comparison with official solutions  More stations are required  More offical solutions are preferable  Velocity field in Romania and Bulgaria  Rotation south of the carpathian mountains comes clear  Problem is the littlt number of stations in this area  Increase Densification  HEMUS Net (more stations in Bulgaria and Greece) already included in the OLG MON-Network

A Velocity Field for Romania and Bulgaria THANK YOU!