Games People Play. 2. Sequential move games. In this section we shall learn How to figure out what to expect in games with sequential moves. Techniques.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Game Theory Part V: Extensive Games with Perfect Information Bernhard Nebel.
Advertisements

The Basics of Game Theory
Chapter 10 Strategic Choice in Oligopoly, Monopolistic Competition, and Everyday Life Odd-numbered Qs.
Look Forward, Reason Back
5. Combining simultaneous and sequential moves.
Introduction to Game Theory
ECON 100 Tutorial: Week 9 office: LUMS C85.
1 1 Deep Thought BA 592 Lesson I.3 Sequential Move Theory At first I thought, if I were Superman, a perfect secret identity would be “Clark Kent, Dentist”,
Any Questions from Last Class?. Chapter 14 Bargaining COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo,
APPENDIX An Alternative View of the Payoff Matrix n Assume total maximum profits of all oligopolists is constant at 200 units. n Alternative policies.
Games With No Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium Player 2 Player
Chapter Twenty-Eight Game Theory. u Game theory models strategic behavior by agents who understand that their actions affect the actions of other agents.
Non-Cooperative Game Theory To define a game, you need to know three things: –The set of players –The strategy sets of the players (i.e., the actions they.
Frank Cowell: Microeconomics Exercise MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell January 2007.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Game Theory Game theory is an attempt to model the way decisions are made in competitive situations. It has obvious applications in economics. But it.
Part 3: The Minimax Theorem
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Adverse Selection Asymmetric information is feature of many markets
1 1 Deep Thought BA 445 Lesson C.2 Cheap Talk when Interests Align A verbal contract isn’t worth the paper it’s written on. ~ Yogi Berra (Translation:
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
David Bryce © Adapted from Baye © 2002 Game Theory: The Competitive Dynamics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics.
MBA 201A Section 6: Game Theory and Review. Overview  Game Theory  Costs  Pricing  Price Discrimination  Long Run vs. Short Run  PS 5.
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Fourteen Game Theory.
Extensive-form games: applications Stackelberg model Spence-Dixit model Rubinstein bargaining model.
1 Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
APEC 8205: Applied Game Theory Fall 2007
Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
MAE 552 – Heuristic Optimization Lecture 28 April 5, 2002 Topic:Chess Programs Utilizing Tree Searches.
Chapter Fourteen Strategy. © 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.14–2 Strategic Behavior A set of actions a firm takes to increase its profit,
16.5 Introduction to Cost- based plan selection Amith KC Student Id: 109.
QR 38, 2/15/07 Extensive form games I.Writing down a game II.Finding the equilibrium III.Adding complexity.
David J. Bryce © 2002 Michael R. Baye © 2002 Game Theory: Entry Games MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy David J. Bryce.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
Reading Osborne, Chapters 5, 6, 7.1., 7.2, 7.7 Learning outcomes
CISC 235: Topic 6 Game Trees.
Lecture 5 Note: Some slides and/or pictures are adapted from Lecture slides / Books of Dr Zafar Alvi. Text Book - Aritificial Intelligence Illuminated.
Brian Duddy.  Two players, X and Y, are playing a card game- goal is to find optimal strategy for X  X has red ace (A), black ace (A), and red two (2)
A Game-Theoretic Approach to Strategic Behavior. Chapter Outline ©2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 2 The Prisoner’s Dilemma: An Introduction.
Games of Strategy (Game Theory) Topic 1 – Part IV.
Games People Play. 4. Mixed strategies In this section we shall learn How to not lose a game when it appears your opponent has a counter to all your moves.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 5 1.
Dynamic Games & The Extensive Form
Game Playing. Towards Intelligence? Many researchers attacked “intelligent behavior” by looking to strategy games involving deep thought. Many researchers.
Public Policy Analysis MPA 404 Lecture 24. Previous Lecture Graphical Analysis of Tariff and Quota Game Theory; The prisoner's Dilemma.
Games. Adversaries Consider the process of reasoning when an adversary is trying to defeat our efforts In game playing situations one searches down the.
Negotiation 101 Fairness and the importance of looking ahead.
Lecture 7 Course Summary The tools of strategy provide guiding principles that that should help determine the extent and nature of your professional interactions.
Topic 3 Games in Extensive Form 1. A. Perfect Information Games in Extensive Form. 1 RaiseFold Raise (0,0) (-1,1) Raise (1,-1) (-1,1)(2,-2) 2.
Adversarial Search Chapter Games vs. search problems "Unpredictable" opponent  specifying a move for every possible opponent reply Time limits.
제 10 장 게임이론 Game Theory: Inside Oligopoly
Dynamic games, Stackelburg Cournot and Bertrand
Chapter 16 Oligopoly and Game Theory. “Game theory is the study of how people behave in strategic situations. By ‘strategic’ we mean a situation in which.
Topics to be Discussed Gaming and Strategic Decisions
Extensive Form (Dynamic) Games With Perfect Information (Theory)
Lec 23 Chapter 28 Game Theory.
Econ 545, Spring 2016 Industrial Organization Dynamic Games.
Citizen Candidate Model Advanced Political Economics Fall 2011 Riccardo Puglisi.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection.
Strategic Decision Making in Oligopoly Markets
Games with Sequential Moves
Anticipating Your Rival’s Response
Game Theory: The Competitive Dynamics of Strategy
5. Combining simultaneous and sequential moves.
Instructor: Vincent Conitzer
Game Theory and Strategic Play
Presentation transcript:

Games People Play. 2. Sequential move games. In this section we shall learn How to figure out what to expect in games with sequential moves. Techniques for reducing complex games into easily understood ones. Why it is that the order of moved can matter for the outcome of the game. How it can be that some games need to be thought of as you playing against yourself!

Games People Play. Sequential Move Games Topics to be covered Game Trees Backwards Induction Tree Pruning Adding Players Order Advantages Adding Moves

Games People Play. Game Trees Sometimes called the extensive form of the game. A game tree allows an intuitive visual representation of the possible choices and payoffs available to the players. Player #1 (Moves first) Player #2 (Moves second) Choice a Choice b Choice c Choice d Choice e Choicef Payoffs #1,# Nodes Branches

Games People Play. How to Construct a Game Tree An Example Happy-Families vs. IBM Suppose IBM already produces servers, but Happy-Families currently do not. If Happy-Families decide to move into this market it will take 2 years of R&D etc. IBM can attempt to discourage Happy- Families’ entry by launching an advertising campaign today. IBM have the first move to choose ads or not, hence the split of the tree at the IBM node. Happy-Families have the second move to enter or not, hence the split at the Happy- Families nodes. At the terminal nodes we record the payoffs. The numbers used are calculated by business intelligence. IBM Ads No Ads H-F In Out In Out Payoffs IBM, H-F 1,1 3,3 2,4 4,2

Games People Play. Game Trees A game tree with an information set An information set indicates that the player only knows that she is in that set and no more. IBM Ads No Ads Happy-Families In Out In Out Payoffs IBM, Happy-Families 1,1 3,3 2,4 4,2

Games People Play. Backwards Induction - Thinking through sequential games by looking ahead and reasoning back. Suppose, for the sake of argument you have the last move in a game. You look at all the possible payoffs and make a contingent plan. If I end up here I will do thus, and receive the associated payoff. In the preceding play your opponent can figure out what you will do in the last stage. She thinks as follows. For each of her choices she knows that you will make the subsequent choice that maximizes your payoffs. Given that she knows you will behave in this fashion she then deduces which of your choices you will make after each of her moves. She can thus evaluate her choices knowing what you will do in reply to each possibility and the payoff she will receive. She thus places you in the position where your optimal choice will be most advantageous to her.

Games People Play. Yogi on Backwards Induction "If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else." – Yogi Berra.

Games People Play.

Sequential move games. The gubernatorial race game. Two politicians, Arnold and Gary are potential gubernatorial candidates. Arnold has declared his candidacy. Gary has to decide whether or not to enter the race after which Arnold decides whether or not to pay for ads. The potential payoffs, Gary’s first, are In-Ad {1,1}. Out-Ad {3,3}. In-No ad {4,2}. Out-No ad {2,4}. Decide whether to enter if you are Gary.

Games People Play. Sequential move games Equilibrium in the gubernatorial race game. If Gary chooses in we see that Arnold will choose no ads and the payoffs will be {4,2}. If Gary chooses out we see that Arnold chooses no ads and the payoffs are {2,4}. So Gary chooses in and Arnold chooses no ads. This is an example of backwards induction. Arnie Gary Ads No ads In Out 1, 1 4,4,2 3,3,3 2,2,4 GaryArnie, Ads No ads Arnie

Games People Play. Sequential move games. Pure strategies. Moves that you will play with probability one. Example; If Arnold chooses no ads Gary will choose in. In this section we shall only consider pure strategies and pure strategy equilibria.

Games People Play. Sequential move games. Games against yourself! In playing games you must think not about what you would like to plan on doing in the future, but also what you will do when the future actually arrives. This can be thought of as a sequential game between your current and future self in which your current self moves first. Any game against any number of opponents may have this same feature. You have to look ahead and see how you will play then next time it’s “your move”.

Games People Play. Sequential move games. Career choice as a game against yourself! Current Self Future Self Medical School Business School community medicine Law School family practice neurosurgeon public prosecutor politics corporate law finance management marketing $50.000/ yr $150,000/ yr $500,000/ yr $50,000/ yr $35,000-$200,00/ yr $600,000/ yr $100,000/ yr $250,00/ yr $0-$5m/yr

Games People Play. Sequential move games. Career choice as a game against yourself! As an idealistic 19 year old you might wish to eventually go into community medicine. But you know that as a 26 year old burdened with debt from graduate school you will choose the highest paying option. Your choices are really between neurosurgery, corporate law, and finance.

Games People Play. Sequential move games. A game against yourself - A real world example An Happy-Families corporation executive spots an opportunity to change the materials used to manufacture a particular input. By doing so the cost of producing the input will fall significantly. The manufacturer of the input is reluctant to adopt the new material despite the obvious reduction in costs. The reason is that if it adopts the material it will be tied to Happy-Families as its only potential customer. Happy-Families knows this and will subsequently adopt a much more aggressive bargaining posture. Happy-Families’ problem today is to commit itself to being generous with the parts supplier in the future despite the fact that when the future comes it will wish to do otherwise. Happy-Families today is effectively playing a game against Happy- Families tomorrow!!

Games People Play.

Sequential move games The importance of move sequence The gubernatorial race game again. Two politicians, Arnold and Gary are again potential gubernatorial candidates. Arnold has declared for the election, but has not decided on whether to launch any campaign ads. This time Arnold get the first move and must decides whether or not to pay for campaign ads. Following this Gary decides whether or not to enter the race. The potential payoffs, Arnold’s first, are as before Ad-in {1,1}. Ad-out {3,3}. No ad-in {2,4}. No ad-out {4,2}. Does the move sequence change the outcome, and if so why?

Games People Play. Sequential move games Equilibrium in the new gubernatorial race game. If Arnold chooses ads we see that Gary will choose out and the payoffs will be {3,3}. If Arnold chooses no ads Gary chooses in and the payoffs are {2,4}. So Arnold chooses ads and Gary does not enter. Gary Arnie Ads No ads In Out 1, 1 3, 3 2, 4 4, 2 Arnie, Gary In Out

Games People Play.

Sequential move games The chocolate cake game. Each pair of participants has to divide a chocolate cake. The first participant divides the cake. The second chooses which piece to take. What do you do?

Games People Play. Sequential move games The chocolate cake game - equilibrium. Apply backwards induction. The person choosing the piece will choose the largest one. The person cutting then has an incentive to maximize the size of the smallest piece. So, cut the cake in half.

Games People Play. Sequential move games More than 2 players. The logic of solving sequential move games with more than two players is the same as with two players. Apply backwards induction…..think ahead and reason back. One technique that allows us to keep track of this process is often referred to as pruning the tree. Consider three computer firms (surprise!!) Dell, Happy- Families, and Gateway. Each can manufacture either in or out of the US Each manufacturer can benefit from employing cheap foreign labor and can benefit from learning from the others experience of dealing with foreign regulations, unions, customs and the like. However there is not enough skilled foreign labor for all three firms. The following game might arise.

Games People Play. Sequential move games More than Two Players To prune the tree. First consider all the choices Gateway would not make and strike out these branches. Then prune out the choices HP would not make. Finally prune out the choices Dell would not make. Bad news for Dell The Computer Location Game

Games People Play. Sequential move games More than 2 moves Suppose you are playing a game like chess. In principle the game can be solved by backwards induction. In practice it is too complicated. This does not mean you don’t think ahead. Think ahead a few moves and assess which situations are possible. Give a value to each of these intermediate situations. Play for highest intermediate value. In chess this might involve creating space to maneuver your pieces.

Games People Play. Sequential move games A Happy-Families example. Suppose Happy-Families and a rival are both developing similar new products. Each has to chose between an expensive high-tech variant and an inexpensive cruder version. Happy-Families have a lead in the technological race, and so will be able to bring their product to market first. They must choose high or low tech before their rival commits to their choice. The sequential nature of this game may be to Happy-Families' advantage or disadvantage. Advantage: Getting to market first will allow customer loyalty to develop. Disadvantage: The rival may observe market response to Happy- Families’ product and use this information to choose a different expense/technology combination for their product.