Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Baltimore, MD 2008 Child Outcomes Measurement: Practices at the Local Level Amanda Faulkner, Frontier Community Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
Advertisements

State Variations in the Child Outcome Summary Form Process.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Activity. Lunch Time Activity Discuss at your table: –How is information about your district Special Education Services provided to parents? –Does your.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Early Childhood Intervention and Education Branch, November 2011
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
WWB Training Kit #13 Inclusion: The Role of the Program Administrator.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
Approaches to Measuring Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Prepared for the NECTAC National Meeting on Measuring Child and Family Outcomes,
Building Outcome Data into a State On-Line Data System A birth through five project in Kansas Margy Hornback, Ed.D., Kansas Part B 619 Coordinator Kansas.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Getting Better All the Time Assuring the Quality of COSF Data Andy Gomm: New Mexico Part C Jane Atuk: Alaska Part C Lisa Backer: Minnesota Part C & 619.
Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Chandra Jones Vanessa Winborne MICC Parent Michigan Part C Coordinator.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
IT STARTS WITH A PROMISE PARENT INVOLVEMENT : MOVING FROM PHILOSOPHY TO PRACTICE.
1 Training Strategies and Resources for States Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form Saundra Harrington (VA) Part C Mary Peters (WI) Section 619 Chelsea.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
What Counts: Measuring Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai`i Beppie Shapiro, University of Hawai`i.
Community Learning Center Model Transformational Outcomes Determines learning experiences Curriculum is based on achieving standards and outcomes Learning.
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
Brinnon School District. Understanding the new standards Understanding the major shifts between the old and new standards within their subject and grade.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
What Did North Carolina Learn From Child Outcomes Pilots ? Sherry Franklin, NC Part C Quality Improvement Unit Manager Steve Snipes, NC Part C Program.
Your Site Name Here Accreditation Your logo here Picture of children from your site here.
Maryland’s Early Childhood Intervention and Special Education System of Services Birth through Five.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Vanessa WinborneJulie Lagos Michigan Part C CoordinatorParent,
Maryland’s Early Childhood Intervention and Special Education System of Services Birth through Five 1 Maryland State Department of Education, Division.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
School Goals for Parent Engagement Goal #1: Welcoming Environment Provide a welcoming environment for families and invite them to participate as equal.
Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.
WWB Training Kit #13 Inclusion: The Role of the Program Administrator.
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
Misty Zyvoloski  To provide/equip staff, community members and students with current knowledge and equipment necessary to effectively utilize the current.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Making Progress on Measuring Progress Barbara Jackson, NE Beppie Shapiro, HI Lynne Kahn and Kathy Hebbeler, ECO.
From Preschool to Post-School Outcomes Preparing Florida’s Youngest Students to Become College and Career Ready Monica Verra-Tirado, Chief Florida Department.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Early Childhood Outcomes
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Maryland’s Online IFSP Database
Early Childhood Intervention and Education Branch, November 2011
Understanding the Outcomes and the COSF: A Quick Review
Presented by: Marcella Franczkowski, Assistant State Superintendent
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
LCC Strategic Plan Renewal 2006—2011
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Preschool Outcomes Measurement System SY Implementation
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Baltimore, MD 2008 Child Outcomes Measurement: Practices at the Local Level Amanda Faulkner, Frontier Community Services Linda Borghols, AK Part C Keri Bowers, Charleston County School District Norma Donaldson-Jenkins, SC 619

2 State Profile: AK DHSS/Office of Children’s Services DHSS/Office of Children’s Services Part C (birth to 3) Part C (birth to 3) Using Child Outcomes Summary Form Using Child Outcomes Summary Form Decided by stakeholder process Decided by stakeholder process Collecting data statewide since Collecting data statewide since March 2007 March 2007

3 State Profile: AK Anchor tools Anchor tools –AEPS –Bayley–III –Carolina Curriculum –Brigance –ELAP –HELP –Michigan –SEED

4 State Profile: SC State Department of Education State Department of Education 619 (3 through 5) 619 (3 through 5) Using Child Outcomes Summary Form Using Child Outcomes Summary Form Decided by stakeholder process Decided by stakeholder process Collecting data for more than a year Collecting data for more than a year Using several assessment tools including AEPS Using several assessment tools including AEPS

5 Local Challenge STAFF DEVELOPMENT!!

South Carolina!!

7 Local Strategies--SC CollaborationCollaboration Focus groupsFocus groups Materials developmentMaterials development

Alaska!!

9 Local Strategies--AK CollaborationCollaboration Training materials on lineTraining materials on line Training integral to staff developmentTraining integral to staff development Feedback informing trainingFeedback informing training

10 Local Challenge AGE EXPECTED CHILD DEVELOPMENT

South Carolina!!

12 Local Strategies--SC Early learning standardsEarly learning standards Web resourcesWeb resources Team communicationTeam communication Input from general educatorsInput from general educators

Alaska!!

14 Local Strategies--AK Parents as active team membersParents as active team members Decision treeDecision tree Gathering sufficient information about the childGathering sufficient information about the child

15 Local Challenge MEETING AS A TEAM

South Carolina!!

17 Local Strategies--SC  Phone conferences  Scheduling meetings to coincide with IEP team meetings  Shared folder on district site that is password protected

18 Alaska!!

19 Local Strategies--AK  Teleconferences, especially with rural communities  Strategic meeting scheduling

20 Local Challenge SHIFT TOWARD THINKING FUNCTIONALLY

South Carolina!!

22 Local Strategies--SC  Picture children in different settings  Collect information from the family about how the child functions in daily life

Alaska!!

24 Local Strategies--AK  Core competencies  Functional assessment and IFSP goals  Face-to-face training  Monthly teleconferences  Crosswalks  PRACTICE!!!

25 Local BENEFITS--SC Opportunities to collaborate with other staff, other programs Opportunities to collaborate with other staff, other programs Improved IEP goals Improved IEP goals Improved communication with families about child’s functioning Improved communication with families about child’s functioning

26 Local BENEFITS--AK Stronger collaboration between ILP and school district Stronger collaboration between ILP and school district ILP and school district using same form!! ILP and school district using same form!! More functional IFSP goals More functional IFSP goals