McKinney-Vento Education for Homeless Children and Youth Program (EHCY) Improving the Quality of LEA Level Data February 28, 2013 Prepared for: Office.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Standards and Indicators for Quality McKinney-Vento Programs: New and Improved National Center for Homeless Education May 2006.

Advertisements

 Free- and reduced-price lunch data › Used for identifying Title I schools, as designated by school districts  Reported to the Bureau of Student Assistance.

Building Liaison Capacity: Helping YOU to Help THEM

Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)

Title III National Professional Development (NPD) Program Grantee Performance Reporting: A Webinar for FY2011 and FY2012 Grantees February 28, 2013 Prepared.

Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program

Selecting Title I Schools and Allocating Funds June 2014.

Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.

An Evaluation of Data from the Teacher Compensation Survey: School Year June, 2010 Stephen Q. Cornman Frank Johnson.

1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.

BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.

Annual State Coordinator Meeting Feb 28 – Mar 1, 2012 Arlington, VA.

Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.

STG International A member of the National Head Start Training and Technical Assistance Network Paducah Head Start Community Assessment Presented by: Frances.

Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI

ENMU-Roswell1. 2 CAPS (College Access Program) Part of the Rural Community College Initiative funded by the Ford Foundation.

Balancing Incentive Program and Community First Choice Eric Saber Health Policy Analyst Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.

Update: Web Data Collection System (WDCS) Title I Administrative Meeting—September 30, 2010 Kristi Peters, Research and Evaluation Coordinator 1.

Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.

OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.

2. NLTS2 Study Overview. 1 Prerequisites Recommended module to complete before viewing this module  1. Introduction to the NLTS2 Training Modules.

Data in Perspective: A view of national, state, and local data collection, compilations and systems Presented by : Beth Hartness Program Specialist, National.

EHCY Program Office Q4 Updates 1September 19, 2012John McLaughlin, Federal Coordinator.

Federal Financial Participation (FFP) Overview Office of Family Planning Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.

Nutrition Education LAP FY 2016 Our learning objectives for this section of the training are to: 1. Provide an overview on the Nutrition Sessions worksheet.

Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.

Connecting Financial Data to EDFacts 25th Annual Management Information Systems Conference San Diego, CA February 15, 2012 Ross Santy and Matthew Case.

Meeting the Needs of English Language Learners: Using Assessment Results and Data to Inform Decisions Michael Sabados, PhD, CSDE consultant Bureau of Data,

Homeless Students and the Expenditure of Title I Part A Funds Rebecca Derenge, N&D Coordinator.

A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.

WELCOME TO THE ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING FOR PARENTS PLEASE SIGN-IN.

0 Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities PERFORMANCE MEASURES Craig Stanton Office of Planning, Evaluation,

McKinney-Vento Education for Homeless Children and Youth Program (EHCY) Improving the Quality of LEA-Level Data March 6, 2014 Prepared for: Office of Elementary.

MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.

December 15, 2014 ESEA Flexibility Analysis. The flex analysis was designed to examine the characteristics of schools identified by each SEA’s differentiated.

Homelessness Collaboration Consortium Minigrant Webinar Wednesday, April 25, 2012.

1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.

TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May

TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.

MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)

1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.

> Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Title of Presentation > Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Education.

1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.

Coordinating Title I Services with Homeless Programs Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator Division of Federal Programs, PDE Sheldon Winnick State Coordinator.

1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.

Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.

Promoting Data Collection and Evaluation in Title I, Part D, Programs Stephanie Lampron, NDTAC; John McLaughlin, Program Officer; and Bobbi Stettner-Eaton,

No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.

ENSURING EQUITABLE ACCESS TO EXCELLENT EDUCATORS December 1, 2014.

1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.

1 REGION 3 Planning Workshop for the School Year Office of Field Services.

Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Association.

1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.

Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.

State Coordinator Webinar CSPR Data Information and Federal Updates June 28, 2012 Presented by: John McLaughlin, Federal Program Officer, EHCY Program.

1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.

1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.

Title I: Ranking, Serving, and Allocating Funds to Schools 2016 ESEA Directors Institute August 23, 2016.

Challenges and TA Solutions for Allocating Part B Subgrants to LEAs

Winding Your Way through Program Details: Titles II-A & VI

Monitoring LEA McKinney-Vento Programs

The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.

Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Technical Assistance Webinar

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

State performance plan indicator 14

State performance plan indicator 14

Presentation transcript:

McKinney-Vento Education for Homeless Children and Youth Program (EHCY) Improving the Quality of LEA Level Data February 28, 2013 Prepared for: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative contract (ED-PEP-11-C-0062) for Policy and Program Studies Service, U.S. Department of Education

Presentation Overview 2 1. The Data Quality Initiative 2. Purpose and Approach of the Data Quality Review 3. Data Quality Review Topics 4. Sample Data Review 5. Next steps

The Data Quality Initiative (DQI)…. 3  Provides assistance to the U.S. Department of Education PK-12 programs and grantees to improve the quality and use of program performance data for GPRA reporting and performance management,  Is overseen by the U.S. Department of Education’s Policy and Program Studies Service (PPSS) in the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development (OPEPD),  Is conducted by Westat and Compass Evaluation and Research.

Purpose and Approach of the Data Quality Review 4 Focus on LEA-level data Identify potential data problems (e.g., outliers) Develop guidance and TA to allow states to conduct data analyses Inform target monitoring and assistance to LEAs Improve quality of LEA data

Purpose and Approach of the Data Quality Review Data Sources  Analysis based on data that states already report:  The Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR), and  The Common Core of Data (CCD) submitted through EDFacts. 5

Purpose and Approach of the Data Quality Review Data Checks  Inconsistent data  Data for primary nighttime residence vs. enrolled (do totals match, are the same grades reported?)  Incomplete data  Do all Local Education Agencies (LEAs) report data?  Inaccurate data  Typos: numbers transposed or wrong numbers entered  Number of students instead of number of subgrants 6

Data Quality Review Topics 7 1. Do LEAs with similar characteristics report similar numbers and percentages of homeless students enrolled in their schools? 2. Do LEAs with similar characteristics report similar numbers and percentages of homeless students served by McKinney-Vento? 3. Do LEAs with similar characteristics report similar rates of academic proficiency among their homeless students? How do these rates compare to the student body as a whole? 4. Do LEAs with similar levels of certain characteristics report similar rates of academic proficiency among their homeless students? How do these rates compare to the student body as a whole?

Sample Data Review Do LEAs with similar characteristics report similar numbers and percentages of homeless students enrolled in their schools?  LEA Characteristics  LEA size (student population),  Locale (city, suburban, town, or rural),  Poverty (percent Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (FRPL) eligible), and  Geography (state and region).  Topics for Analysis  The number of homeless students enrolled in each LEA, and  The percentage of total enrollment that is homeless. 8

Sample Data Review 9  The next five slides contain  Sample results of a data review,  Showing the composition of homelessness at the national, state, and LEA level.  These slides will examine data in different characteristics, to provide context to the outlier analysis.

Sample Data Review: Geography (across nation, by Census regions) 10 These are sample data, and are for illustration only. Please do not cite them.

Sample Data Review: Geography (across states, within a region) 11 These are sample data, and are for illustration only. Please do not cite them.

Sample Data Review: Poverty 12 These are sample data, and are for illustration only. Please do not cite them. State F average

Sample Data Review: Locale 13 These are sample data, and are for illustration only. Please do not cite them. State F average

Sample Data Review: LEA size 14 These are sample data, and are for illustration only. Please do not cite them.

Next steps 15  Continue the data quality review,  Identify common issues, and  Develop technical assistance to help states, including:  Report templates for SEA staff to use with LEA data (Sept. 2013)  Training to help states review and analyze LEA data (future)  Additional tools for reviewing data across years (future)  Work with you to identify and address existing and future data issues.

16  Questions?  Comments?  Suggestions?

For additional information, please contact: 17 Brad Keller Data Quality Initiative Westat