Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.
Advertisements

Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment in the Columbia Cascade Province Project Goal: The Columbia Cascade Province will have an implementation strategy that.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Culvert Passage SM Anglea, GD Williams, KD Ham, and GA.
Blind Slough Restoration Project Project Sponsors:Clatsop Diking Improvement Company # 7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Columbia River Estuary Study Task.
Lower Columbia River and Columbia River Estuary Habitat Restoration Program Mission of the Estuary Partnership is to protect and enhance the lower Columbia.
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Evaluate Spawning of Fall Chinook and Chum Salmon Just Below the Four Lowermost Columbia River Mainstem Dams Project PNNL.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Restoration of Columbia River Floodplain Functions to Steigerwald Lake
Conserving Americas Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Columbia River Fisheries Program Office Future of Our Salmon A Vision of Restoration in the.
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
NMFS BiOp on FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) DeeAnn Kirkpatrick January 22, 2009.
Development of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan: A Brief History Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Administrator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Implementation of the Biological Opinion for Russian River Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance National Marine Fisheries Service.
NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.
The Northwest Power Act: The Spokane Tribe’s Perspective.
Recent Events in Water Law and Policy in the United States Portion of the Columbia Basin The Federal Columbia River Power System: Pacific Salmon and the.
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)
Klamath Coho Integrated Modeling Framework (IMF)
Hydrosystem Operations and Fish Recovery in the Columbia River Basin U
2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)
1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.
John M. Volkman June 13, 2003 Either/Or? Is it Hydropower or Salmon in the Northwest?
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
Salmon Recovery Status Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee Linda Byers September 14, 2005.
Atlantic Salmon Recovery Framework Briefing for Regional Director November 1, 2010.
Columbia River Basin White Sturgeon Framework Lynn Palensky Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, Oregon USA July 2013.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
The Columbia River Basin Where we’ve been. Where we’re going. October 18, 2005.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Fiscal Year 2004 April 10, FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004 EnactedBudgetBudget COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN: Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Land.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
Status of Columbia River salmon and links to flow: What we do and do not know Presentation to Northwest Power Planning Council December 11, 2002
Data Models and the Role of NOAA Hydrographic Services Products in the Lower Columbia River and Estuary Keith Marcoe, GIS and Data Management Specialist,
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.
Energy Beyond Hydropower Atlas Chapter 13 Figure 13.1 – Energy Consumption No PNW sources of natural gas or crude oil Refining crude oil – 4 north Puget.
Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Plume G. A. McMichael 1, R. L. McComas 2, J. A. Carter 1, G.
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
Tracey Yerxa Bonneville Power Administration Implementing the 2008 FCRPS BiOp Using Emerging Tools and Strategies
NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion for Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance by the Army Corps, SCWA, and.
Columbia River Basin Fish Restoration Activities ACCOMPLISHMENTS TO DATE AND UPCOMING ISSUES Bonneville Legal Briefing – October 2015.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS EXAMPLE.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
Biological Opinions and ESA Consultations Ritchie Graves NMFS-NWR Hydropower Division Portland, Oregon February 19, 2013.
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
Blaine D. Ebberts Presented at the NPCC Science to Policy Exchange
Relevance and Synergies of CMOP to Fisheries Management
Science Policy Exchange
Collaboration on Comprehensive Columbia River Basin Hatchery RM&E How do we get to a comprehensive list of Hatchery RM&E for the Basin??
Presentation transcript:

Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary Recovery Plan Module Northwest Power and Conservation Council Fish & Wildlife Program

- 1 year of FCRPS dam operations only - Conclusion: No Jeopardy - Invalidated in IDFG v. NMFS - 1 year of FCRPS dam operations only - Conclusion: No Jeopardy - Invalidated in IDFG v. NMFS - 5 years of FCRPS interim operations - Transportation vs. dam drawdown study - Conclusion: Jeopardy with RPA - Upheld in American Rivers v. NMFS - 5 years of FCRPS interim operations - Transportation vs. dam drawdown study - Conclusion: Jeopardy with RPA - Upheld in American Rivers v. NMFS - 10 years for implementation of an aggressive non- breach strategy - Was long-term program called for by the 1995 BiOp - Offsite habitat mitigation - Conclusion: Jeopardy with RPA - Invalidated in NWF v. NMFS in years for implementation of an aggressive non- breach strategy - Was long-term program called for by the 1995 BiOp - Offsite habitat mitigation - Conclusion: Jeopardy with RPA - Invalidated in NWF v. NMFS in year implementation of an aggressive non- breach strategy - Based on a broader ESA analysis, similar to 2000 BiOp analysis - Offsite habitat mitigation, hatchery, predation control - Conclusion: Jeopardy with RPA - Court challenge pending in NWF v. NMFS - 10-year implementation of an aggressive non- breach strategy - Based on a broader ESA analysis, similar to 2000 BiOp analysis - Offsite habitat mitigation, hatchery, predation control - Conclusion: Jeopardy with RPA - Court challenge pending in NWF v. NMFS Progression of FCRPS BiOp 1993 BiOp 1995 BiOp 2000 BiOp 2008 BiOp

161, 195, 196, 197 Program Development 158 Implement Restoration , 162, 194 RM&E Plans and Modeling 2000 FCRPS BiOp Estuary Actions

2000 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Actions Action 158 – Inventory estuary habitat to understand the relationship of that habitat to the needs of ESA-listed salmon and steelhead. Action 159 – BPA and the Corps, working with LCREP and NMFS, shall develop a plan addressing the habitat needs of salmon and steelhead in the estuary.

2000 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Actions Action 160 – The Corps and BPA, working with LCREP, shall develop and implement an estuary restoration program with the goal of protecting and enhancing 10,000 acres of tidal wetlands and other key habitats. Action 161 – Fund a monitoring and research program acceptable to NMFS and closely coordinated with the LCREP monitoring and research efforts. Action 162 – Develop a conceptual model of the relationship between estuarine conditions and population structure and resilience. Action 163 – Develop a compliance monitoring program.

2000 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Actions Action 194 – Develop a physical model of the lower Columbia River and plume. Action 196 – Develop appropriate level of funding to support funding studies to develop an understanding of juvenile and adult salmon use of the Columbia River estuary. Action 197 – Develop appropriate level of funding to support funding studies to develop an understanding of juvenile and adult salmon use of the Columbia River plume.

2008 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Action 36 Estuary Habitat Implementation – Action Agencies will provide funding to implement specific actions as part of a 10-year estuary habitat program to achieve the estimated ESU survival benefits of 9.0% and 6.0%, for ocean and stream types, respectively. – Projects in an early state of development such that quantitative physical metrics have not been related to estimated survival benefits will be selected per Action 37. – If projects identified for implementation in prove infeasible, the action agencies will implement comparable replacement projects in – Implementation plans and annual reports.

2008 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Action 37 Estuary Habitat Implementation – Achieving Habitat Quality and Survival Improvement Targets – Action Agencies will actively engage the LCREP Science Work Group to identify project benefits in coordination with other regional recovery planning products and the modified LCREP project selection criteria to identify projects that will benefit salmon considered in this RPA. – The Action Agencies will convene an expert regional technical group. This group will use the habitat metrics to determine the estimated change in survival which would result from full implementation. – Project proposals will clearly describe the completed project in terms of quantitative habitat metrics which can be used to quantitatively evaluate progress and completion of individual projects.

2008 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Action 37 Estuary Habitat Implementation – Achieving Habitat Quality and Survival Improvement Targets – The expert regional technical group will use the existing approach applied in the FCRPS BA and all subsequent information on the relationship between actions, habitat, and salmon productivity models developed though the FCRPA RM&E to estimate the change in overall estuary habitat and resultant change in population survival. – Replacement projects as needed will be developed to achieve equivalent survival benefits, based on input from expert panels, regional recovery planning groups, the Northwest Power and Conversation Council, and NOAA Fisheries. – New information can and should be used to review projects and their estimated survival benefits. If benefits are determined to be overstated, replacement projects will be implemented. – Implementation plans and annual reports.

2008 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Action 38 Piling and Piling Dike Removal Program – Increase productive habitat and reduce avian predation. – In 2008, the Action Agencies will work with LCREP to develop a plan for strategic removal of structures that have lower value to navigation channel maintenance, present low risk to adjacent land use, support increased ecosystem function, and are cost-effective. – Implementation plans and annual reports.

2008 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Action 58 Monitor and Evaluate Fish Performance in the Estuary and Plume – Smolt survival and/or fitness in select reaches from Bonneville Dam through the estuary. – Develop and index and monitor and evaluate life history diversity of salmonid populations at representative locations in the estuary. – Salmon and growth rates and prey resources at representative locations in the estuary and plume. – Implementation plans and annual reports.

2008 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Action 59 Monitor and Evaluate Migration Characteristics and Estuary/Ocean Conditions – Map bathymetry and topography of the estuary as needed for RME. – Establish a hierarchical habitat classification system. – Develop and index of habitat connectivity and apply it to the eight reaches of the study area. – Evaluate migration through and use of a subset of various shallow- water habits from Bonneville Dan to the mouth. – Monitor habitat conditions periodically. – Implementation plans and annual reports.

2008 FCRPS BiOp Reasonable Prudent Alternative Action 60 Monitor and Evaluate Habitat Actions in the Estuary – Reference site development. – Evaluate the effects on individual restoration sites. – Develop a methodology to estimate the cumulative effects of habitat conservation and restoration projects. – Implementation plans and annual reports.

Salmon and Steelhead Estuary Recovery Plan Module For NMFS by the Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership For NMFS by the Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership Part of a larger ESA domain plan for the lower Columbia Part of a larger ESA domain plan for the lower Columbia Consistent estuary application for upstream recovery plans Consistent estuary application for upstream recovery plans Consistent with NPCC subbasin plans Consistent with NPCC subbasin plans

Extensive Review Process First draft in October 2005 Presentations and feedback from other recovery planning efforts Presentation to Northwest Power and Conservation Council Formal public review process (Federal Register) Review by ISAB (Fall 2007)

Module Elements Limiting factors Limiting factors Threats Threats Management actions Management actions Cost Cost Schedule Schedule Monitoring Monitoring

Management Actions 23 comprehensive actions 23 comprehensive actions Actions supported by projects Actions supported by projects Project metrics defined (# of acres, etc.) Project metrics defined (# of acres, etc.) Cost Cost Schedule Schedule Potential implementers Potential implementers

Estuary Module Status Proposed draft submitted to NMFS Proposed draft submitted to NMFS Final draft – October 2009 Final draft – October 2009

Northwest Power and Conservation Council 2009 Lower Columbia River and Estuary Program Implementation of habitat actions in estuary, and associated M&E, will occur through the CR estuary and Lower Columbia subbasin plans. Implementation of habitat actions in estuary, and associated M&E, will occur through the CR estuary and Lower Columbia subbasin plans. Columbia River Estuary ESA Recovery Plan Module for Salmon and Steelhead will be used to guide actions in lower river and estuary. Columbia River Estuary ESA Recovery Plan Module for Salmon and Steelhead will be used to guide actions in lower river and estuary.

Northwest Power and Conservation Council 2009 Lower Columbia River and Estuary Program Council supports strategies to protect, enhance and restore critical habitat, spawning and rearing grounds, including: – Habitat restoration to reconnect ecosystem functions, e.g., removing dikes/levees, installing tide gates, removing pile dikes – Long-term effectiveness monitoring – Continued evaluation of salmon/steelhead migration and survival rates in lower Columbia River, estuary, and marine environment – Evaluation of impact of flow regulation, dredging, and water quality on habitat – Continued partnerships in planning, M&E, and implementation of actions