Presented by: Luke A. Wake, Esq. National Federation of Independent Business November 20, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Regulatory Program.
Advertisements

9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP Implications of Current Wetlands Policy and Management.
401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
Water Supply Law Use and ownership of water ( Water Law). Riparian Doctrine – land owners have a right to use water adjacent to their land (but they cannot.
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
Clean Water Act Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Regional Sewer Districts and IDEM Bruno Pigott Assistant Commissioner Office of Water Quality September 22, 2009 The Indiana Department of Environmental.
Utah Watershed Coordinating Council Conservation Planning Workshop Navigating the Corps’ Permitting Process July 20, 2011 Jason Gipson Chief, Utah/Nevada.
Deborah M. Smith United States Magistrate Judge District of Alaska LAWS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Second Asian Judges Symposium.
1 Clean Water Act Jurisdiction & SWANCC October 2002.
What are Waters of the United States and why should I care? According to USACE, those waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are.
The Clean Water Act “Waters of the US” Proposed Rule -- What is it and what are the implications for agriculture? August 1, 2014.
Agricultural Irrigation and the Corps Regulatory Program
Waters of the U.S. The EPA land grab. Background Water has always been regulated, either by states or the federal government. The federal law is the Clean.
THE PROPOSED WOUS DETAIL DEFINITION “A PRACTITIONER’S VIEW” Presented by: Richard W. Whiteside, PhD, CWB, CSE Corblu Ecology Group, LLC.
Waters of the United States Defining the scope of waters protected under the Clean Water Act ASA Board Meeting July 8, 2014.
Waters of the United States Conference of Western Attorneys General July 22, 2014 Deidre G. Duncan.
EPA’s Proposed Rule on Waters of the United States February 27, 2014.
D. Kenyon (“Ken”) Williams, Jr. Hall Estill Law Firm, Tulsa, Oklahoma Presented at: OML/OMUP Water & Environment Summit February 20, 2015.
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Legislation.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
Protecting Wetlands Expanding the Clean Water Act Environme1tal Politics & Policy 1.
California Wetlands: Update on new state definition and policy development California Native Plant Society Fall Conservation Symposium September 10, 2011.
Cooperative Federalism in the Regulation of the Environment Conference of Western Attorneys General July 22, 2014 Tony Willardson Executive Director Western.
2015 FINAL WOUS DEFINITION “KEY PROVISIONS TO THE RULE” Presented by: Richard W. Whiteside, PhD, CWB, CSE Corblu Ecology Group, LLC.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
 Administrative law is created by administrative agencies which regulate many areas of our government, community, and businesses.  A significant cost.
“Waters of the U.S.” in Missouri Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Constitutional Limits to Wetlands Regulation By: Chris Smith.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Kensington Mine Tailings Impoundment Litigation
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Clean Water Act Section 404 How it affects your airport during project implementation.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans020-1 Unit 20 Regulation of Wetlands Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Section 10, Rivers and Harbors Acts of 1890 and 1899.
“Waters of the U.S.” in New York Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Section 404 Permits Update
Inland Waterways: The National Perspective Amy Larson Executive Director National Waterways Conference, Inc PNWA Annual Meeting.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers REGULATORY PROGRAM WILMINGTON DISTRICT March 13, 2008.
1 Clean Water Act Section 404: Jurisdictional Issue Questions related to the SWANCC Decision Corps Regulatory Program.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
“Waters of the U.S.” in Oklahoma Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Carrie Bond Project Manager ODOT Liaison Portland, Oregon April 21, 2015 Understanding the Corps Permitting.
IMLA New England Regional Land Use Seminar June 21, 2012 Work Session 2. Storm Water Management James N. Katsiaficas, Esq. P.O. BOX 426 PORTLAND, MAINE.
Overview of the 401 WQC Process. Main Topics Relationship between Clean Water Act Sections 404 and 401 State permitting processes Specifics of Kentucky’s.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 21 Policy History: Rivers as a Legal Battleground Public Policy in the American Federal System – An Overview Prepared by.
OREGON IDAHO WYOMING COLORADO NEVADA NEW MEXICO TEXAS UTAH ARIZONA CALIFORNIA US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® And Taking Care Of People! Proposed.
Water, Water Everywhere? EPA and Army Corps Publish New Clean Water Rule Sarah K. Walls, Cantey Hanger, LLP.
Water Issues Every Broker of Rural Land Should Know October 22, 2015.
42 U.S.C. Section 7418(a), of the federal Clean Air Act “Each department, agency, and instrumentality of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lisa Mangione Regulatory Division Los Angeles District January 14, 2016 USACE Regulatory Program Emergency.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 6: Administrative Law.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
EPA and Agriculture: A New Era of Partnership NACD Summer Board Meeting July 21, Ellen Gilinsky Senior Policy Advisor Office of Water, US EPA.
Waters of the United States (WOTUS) Primer A Breakdown of Policies and Actions Taken April 27, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Katharine Conlon.
The SWANCC Decision and 2001 WI Act 6 NGA State Wetland’s Workshop October 21, 2002 Michael Cain Staff Attorney- WI DNR.
Legal Status of Cities GOVT 2306, Module 11.
Virginia’s Economic Future
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
Clean Water Act Regulatory Session
Waters of the United States and Other Wetlands
Professor Edward Richards Director, Climate Law and Policy Project
The Clean Water Act and Oil & Gas Operations Professor Tracy Hester
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Environmental Law Fall 2018
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
National Act Regulated by EPA
Waters of the U.S. Updates and Changes
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Luke A. Wake, Esq. National Federation of Independent Business November 20,

#SaveMyLand 2 Luke A. Wake, Esq. Senior Staff Attorney NFIB SBLC

#SaveMyLand » Overview of the Waters of the United States Rule » What is NFIB doing stop EPA / Army Corps? » What does the “WOTUS Rule” mean for affected landowners? » How to identify affected lands? » Common concerns for small businesses » Questions and Answers » This webinar is intended to help landowners understand if their property may be affected by the WOTUS Rule. But for those with questions about whether a questionable portion of your land is subject to Clean Water Act regulation, it is highly advisable to seek out professional assessments before any sort of development. 3

#SaveMyLand » The Clean Water Act (CWA) was enacted in 1972 to protect America’s waters. » The Act prohibits the discharge of any pollutants into “waters of the United States.” » Enforced by the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers. » Requires federal permits for most activities. 4

#SaveMyLand » A federal permit is required for:  building,  grading,  landscaping,  dredging,  draining, or  Any other plans to add fill, of any sort, in affected areas. » Narrow exemptions / shock-and-awe penalties! 5

#SaveMyLand » Sackett family sought to build dream home. » EPA threatened $37,500 per day in penalties! » Additionally, EPA required them to spend thousands to restore to natural state. » Sacketts believed their property was not subject to CWA jurisdiction – EPA disagreed! 6

#SaveMyLand » EPA and Army Corp have issued a new rule defining “Waters of the United States” » The Rule radically expands CWA jurisdiction » Creates a presumption of jurisdiction for land with any wet features 7

#SaveMyLand » NYT reports: “The Environmental Protection Agency engaged in ‘covert propaganda’ and violated federal law when it blitzed social media to urge the public to back [the WOTUS Rule]…” » Ruling by the Government Accountability Office. 8

#SaveMyLand » The Agencies claim the Rule results in only a modest 3% increase in CWA jurisdiction. » At the same time—they assert the Rule provides new protections for 1/3 rd of America’s waters. 9

#SaveMyLand » EPA has developed maps identifying at least 8.1 million miles of rivers and streams that will be identified as new “waters of the United States.” » In Kansas alone, the Rule results in a 400% expansion in CWA jurisdiction.  134,000 miles covered now—up from 32,000 miles! 10

#SaveMyLand 11

#SaveMyLand 12

#SaveMyLand 13

#SaveMyLand 14

#SaveMyLand » NFIB opposed the WOTUS Rule at every step! » Letters to Office of Management and Budget; » Official comments raising legal concerns; » Official comments urging Agencies to consider alternatives less harmful to small business; » Testified in Congress on EPA’s overreach. 15

#SaveMyLand » NFIB has filed suit to block the WOTUS Rule! » The Agencies ignored small business concerns and failed to comply with Regulatory Flexibility Act. » WOTUS Rule contravenes Supreme Court precedent. 16

#SaveMyLand » The Constitution imposes limitations on CWA jurisdiction—meaning Agencies cannot assert CWA jurisdiction over every wet spot in America. ˃S.W.A.N.C.C. v. Army Corp of Engineers » The Agencies exceed the authority Congress gave if they cannot demonstrate a meaningful connection to interstate waters. ˃Rapanos v. United States 17

#SaveMyLand » The WOTUS Rule has been temporarily blocked! ˃Federal judge in ND blocked rule in 13 states; ˃Federal Court of Appeals for Sixth Circuit blocked nationwide; » Preliminary jurisdictional questions; » It may take awhile before there is a final resolution; » Expect this will ultimately go to Supreme Court. 18

#SaveMyLand » Navigable and Interstate Waters – Any waterway that can be navigated by a boat is subject to regulation if it eventually flows across state lines or to the sea. » For example, a landowner would need a federal permit to add fill, or to dredge, a lake that spills into the Mississippi river. 19

#SaveMyLand » Tributaries – EPA now claims regulatory authority over all “tributaries,” which they define as any property over which water occasionally runs—so long as the water eventually makes its way into another regulated water. » This means that even properties that are dry throughout most of the year will be subject to federal CWA regulation. » This also includes many ditches and canals. 20

#SaveMyLand » EPA will look for physical signs of occasional water flow—such as a high-water mark and banks. » Mere indentations in the ground may be jurisdictional if there are visible signs suggestive of water flow—including lines in the soil attributable to occasional water flow, or even debris. 21

#SaveMyLand 22

#SaveMyLand » Adjacent Waters – EPA asserts regulatory authority over all “adjacent waters,” which would include wet land features in close proximity to jurisdictional waters. » This may include marshy areas, ponds, lakes, and similar waters—even areas that are only occasionally wet. 23

#SaveMyLand » A federal permit is now required to drain, fill, dredge or do anything with a wet portion of your land if it is: » (a) within a 100 year flood plain, and; » (b) within 1,500 feet of another regulated water or tributary. 24

#SaveMyLand » EPA may also assert regulatory authority over other wet portions of your property. » Properties within a 100 year flood plain and within 4,000 feet of a regulated waterbody are very likely subject to regulation under the new rules. » These areas must be reviewed on a case by case basis. 25

#SaveMyLand » Underground aquifers; » Swimming pools; » Puddles; and » Municipal drainage systems. 26

#SaveMyLand » There is an exemption for “normal farming” activities on areas that have been continuously farmed since the 1970s. » This allows for plowing, cultivating, minor drainage (e.g. tiling), and harvesting for the production of food and forest products. » The exemption does not cover the grading of affected areas of land, the adding of fill materials, or the digging of ditches for the purpose of draining wet areas. 27

#SaveMyLand » There are exemptions for some ponds. » Basic maintenance is allowed for stock ponds and ponds used for “normal farming” purposes. » This does not necessarily allow for construction of new ponds, or for any expansion or filling of existing ponds. » A permit may be required to dredge a pond used for non-agricultural purposes. 28

#SaveMyLand » May be deemed jurisdictional “tributaries” if:  They flow into other regulated waters, and  There are visible signs of water flow. » Basic maintenance is generally allowed. » Federal permit required to make any changes to covered ditches—including for projects intended to widen, deepen, reroute, extend or construct ditches. 29

#SaveMyLand » There is a procedure for requesting an official jurisdictional assessment of your property. » What if you disagree with Army Corps’ assessment? 30

#SaveMyLand » EPA does not have power to regulate storm water. » Nonetheless Chesapeake Bay TMDL purports to regulate local land-use decisions. » Asking the Supreme Court to take this case! 31

#SaveMyLand » For more information visit 32

#SaveMyLand 33

#SaveMyLand 34

#SaveMyLand 35 Luke A. Wake, Esq /