Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Delivery Because MiniBooNE is off.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
Advertisements

AGS pp Status Feb. 6, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
5/18/2015J-PARC1 High Level Physics Applications Magnets & Beams Day ?, Lecture ? Accelerator View from the Physicist.
Linac Status Eric Prebys DOE Review, Proton Source Breakout Session July 21,2003.
Booster Corrector Upgrade October William Pellico.
Highlights of the ATS MD part I (injection and ramp) … An 8h video game party carefully organized by Jorg et al. 1S. Fartoukh, LSWG 24/05/2011.
Proton Plan PMG 3/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status February Eric Prebys.
Alignment and Beam Stability
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Dog( leg )s of War Eric Prebys Run II Meeting March 13, 2003.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Spin Injection June 5, 2015 APEX Meeting H. Huang, P. Oddo, V. Ptitsyn.
New Corrector System for the Fermilab Booster E.J. Prebys, C.C. Drennan, D.J. Harding, V. Kashikhin, J.R. Lackey, A. Makarov, W.A. Pellico Fermilab, Batavia,
F AAC Review, May 10, Prebys 1 Answer to Question  What is the analysis backing up the claim that the losses will be reduced with the new corrector.
Booster Acceptance, Apertures, and Alignment Kiyomi Seiya Proton Source WorkshopDecember 07, 2010.
KEKB lattice Taken from LATTICE DESIGN FOR KEKB COLLIDING RINGS By H. Koiso and K. Oide.
Proton Plan PMG 7/7/05 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status June Report Eric Prebys.
Proton Plan PMG 9/27/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status Eric Prebys.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
What’s Up in the Booster Eric Prebys February 27, 2002 and March 6, 2003.
Proton Planning – Major Projects, Schedule, Decisions, and Projections Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Plan PMG 2/23/06 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Report Eric Prebys.
Proton Plan Expectations Eric Prebys AD/Proton Source.
Proton Source Meeting, March 26 th, Prebys Ramped Correctors  Old approach  Calculate a closed orbit at each timeslot  Problem  Not enough corrector.
Booster corrector measurement QA Phil Schlabach 1 May 2007 Proton Source Magnet Meeting.
Proton Plan PMG 2/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Eric Prebys.
SNuMI: WBS 1.1 Booster Upgrades Eric Prebys $642K FY06$ (no contingency, no G&A) xx% contingency Main Injector & Recycler BNB NuMI Tunnel Booster Ring.
Correctors magnets V. Zubko, IHEP, Protvino SIS 300 Pre-consortium Meeting Thursday 19 March 2009, Protvino.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Plan PMG 10/13/05 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status September Report Eric Prebys.
Beta* leverage during RHIC AuAu Run14 G. Robert-Demolaize, M. Bai, C. Harper, A. Marusic, X. Shen, S. White Work supported, in parts, by the European Commission.
Proton Plan PMG 5/25/06 David Harding Booster Correctors Status and CR David Harding.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys Proton Plan Answers to Questions Director’s Review August 2006 Eric Prebys.
Overview of Ramp Development Giulio Stancari E-835 Collaboration Meeting Torino, May
Proton Source July 21, 2006 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Meeting Agenda:  Review of parameter list: Prebys, Kourbanis  Status of writing assignments Prebys,
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
PAC Meeting, December 12, Prebys 1 The Problem.
Intensity Dependent Quad Ramps We know that in order to get the most intensity, the quad ramps must be tuned for a particular intensity. The way this is.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
A Possible Source of the Tune Drift on the Front Porch in the Tevatron.
Antiproton Acceptance Steve Werkema DOE Review February 24, 2004.
Antiproton Acceptance Steve Werkema February 8, 2005.
Booster lattice measurement and correction with LOCO C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya Booster workshop 23 Nov 2015.
AGS FY11 Summary RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 5/6/11.
Proton Economics Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Status of the ASTRID2 facility
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
Auxiliary Positron Source
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB
Field quality of LHC corrector magnets
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Ion Collider Ring Chromatic Compensation and Dynamic Aperture
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Multipole Limit Survey of Large-beta Dipoles
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Presentation transcript:

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Delivery Because MiniBooNE is off

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 2 General The new Booster corrector system will have dramatically enhanced capability, however… We are installing it at a time when there is great pressure to keep the machine running reliably for Run II and NuMI - neither of which will benefit in the short term from the improvements. We could easily waste a lot of time commissioning the new system It’s vital that we bring up the new system in a way such that it can be operated in a way very similar to the existing system  This means ignoring some of the new capabilities We can worry about taking for advantage of the new features later.

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 3 Important Differences between present (465) and new (473) ramp Modules Update rate:  465: 10 kHz  473: 100 kHz DC Offset:  465: not available on the module; implemented in hardware for quads.  473: implemented within the module. MDAT:  465: can load up to two lookup tables based on MDAT inputs We do not use this feature at the moment  473: not implemented in the prototype Do we want it?

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 4 Trim Dipole Control Now:  Low beta points (B:VSn, B:HLn) Constant DC level  High beta points (B:VLnRT, B:HSnRT) Controlled by individual 465 ramp modules After 2007 Shutdown:  All long sections (B:VLn??, B:HLn??) Controlled by individual 473 ramp module  Short vertical trims (B:VSn) Constant DC level  Short horizontal trims (B:HSnRT) Controlled by 465 ramp modules After 2008 shutdown:  All trims (B:VSn??,B:VLn??,B:HSn??,B:HLn??) Controlled by independent 473 ramp modules

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 5 Trim Quads and Skew Quads Now  All quads and skew quads have individual DC levels (B:QSn, B:QLn, B:SSn, B:SLn).  On top of this a common ramp is added (in hardware) for each type of quad B:QLRMP, B:QSRMP, B:SSRMP, B:SLRMP Note: each of these types actually has four ramped controllers, but these are always controlled in unison as one pseudo-device After 2007 shutdown:  All long quads and skew quads will have dedicated 473 ramped controllers Individual DC levels are now implemented within the module, rather than with a hardware sum.  Short quads and skew quads remain as they are After 2008 shutdown:  All quads and skew quads will have dedicated 473 ramped controllers

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 6 Sextupole and Skew Sextupole Now  Odd short sections only Sextupoles controlled by single ramp (B:SEXTS) No individual DC control Correct horizontal chromaticity  Long sections 4, 10, and 18 Sextupoles (3 in each section) controlled by a single ramp (B:SEXTL) No individual DC control Correct vertical chromaticity  Long sections 4, 5, 6, and 7 Pairs of normal and skew sextupoles Controlled in pairs by DC levels (no ramps) –B:SEXL4 = normal 4 and 7 –B:SEXL5 = normal 5 and 6 –B:SEXL6 = skew 5 and 6 –B:SEXL7 = skew 4 and 7 Used to cancel resononces After 2007 shutdown  All long sections will have individually ramped normal and skew sextupoles After 2007  All sections will have individually ramped normal and skew sextupoles

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 7 Affected Applications B2: Injection Parameters B6: Aperture scan bumps (do we still use this?) B11: All the individual trim parameters B14-16: 465 ramp control B71: Harmonic params B75: Aperture scan program B76: Harmonic corrector B80: Closed orbit B82: Ramped 3-bump B93: Beta bumps (probably obsolete?) B121: Booster tune scans (still used?) Others?

Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 8 Topics for Discussion By now, Booster tuners have a “feel” for what a particular current change means for both dipoles and quadrupoles:  This will be very different for the new corrector system.  Is this important enough to consider defining a new unit (“old_amp”?) to make things look and feel like they are now? In the case of the DC elements of the QUADS and DIPOLES, can we simply redefine the device names in such a way that we can leave the parameter pages alone?  Is it too much to hope this might also be done with the time slots of the ramp cards? Is there any problem generalizing the B:QLRMP, etc meta- devices to set 24 ramp cards, rather than 4 as they do now? How much work is involved in generalizing the B14-16 ramp control devices to handle the 473’s and who will do it? How are we going to deal with sextupoles in the new scheme?  Could emulate existing system, but no particular reason not to go immediately to a more accurate set of harmonic corrections. How do we proceed and who will be in charge?