Airfield Ground Lighting Safety & Capacity Enabler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
Advertisements

Total Airport Management Systems
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
Airside Capacity Enhancement
PETAL A major step Towards Cooperative Air Traffic Services Patrice BEHIER Manager of the Air/ground Co operative ATS Programme Directorate Infrastructure,
© DLR, Institute of Flight Guidance ASAS Thematic Network 2 nd Workshop 6-8 October 2003 – Malmö Session 1 – ATSA Application Track Bernhard Czerlitzki.
27 June Report on two themes: Airport Management Weather & Environment by: Jan Terlouw (NLR) ATM 2003 Seminar, Budapest June 27, 2003.
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
SC227 – SC214 ISRA – Datalink Interface. PBN Manual, Part A, Chapter On-board performance monitoring and alerting On-board performance.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
MIT Lincoln Laboratory RWSL OpEval PilotTraining, page 1 Aug 2006 MPK Pilot Training for Continued Operational Evaluation of Runway Status Lights (RWSL)
Miami International Airport Runway Incursion Action Team Recommendations for Incursion Mitigation Presented to: ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM Runway Safety/Runway Incursion.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY Mariia Naumenko.
Applications from packages I to III
1 DLR/EEC Total Airport Management Christoph Meier & Peter Eriksen European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Vincent Chu and Peter Hwoschinsky, FAA Maria Picardi Kuffner, MIT/LL
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Future ATM Technologies May 19 th 2015Oslo ATM conference Oslo, May 19 th 2015 Don-Jacques OULD FERHAT VP, Airspace and Airlines Services.
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Brussels December 5,20021 New Technologies and Airport Management Presented by Cesare Bernabei Università di Piacenza & Politecnico di Milano January.
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
1 1st ANNUAL WORKSHOP NAS-WIDE SIMULATION IN SUPPORT OF NEXTGEN: REQUIREMENTS AND CAPABILITIES Lance Sherry Center for Air Transportation Systems Research.
ASAS FRA OB/T ATM Projects Lufthansa point of view.
Lecture 3: Air Traffic Control Tower
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
NAS-WIDE Simulation Workshop December 10, 2008 Interagency Portfolio & Systems Analysis Division Yuri Gawdiak.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
Airport Markings & Signs
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, April 2007 G2G project G2G project : ASPA S&M experiments and main validation results Marinella Leone
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space, sponsored by EC, DG TREN Contract FP Internet:
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 NUP II+…results from different areas… …not only CPDLC and S&M Presented by Fredrik Lindblom, LFV
What Is Multilateration Triangulation System Uses Aircraft Transponder Multiple Ground Receivers Central Computer Calculates & Displays Aircraft Position.
1 Airport mobiles surveillance and control by means of EGNOS METIS Workshop Benefits of EGNOS in Civil Aviation Istanbul 18 November 2009 Pierre GRUYER.
1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle.
Lecture 2: AIRSIDE PART 2 By: Zuliana Ismail.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida FSDO Runway Safety Program- Pilot Deviations Runway Incursions Instructor and Student.
Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space, sponsored by EC, DG TREN Contract FP Internet:
“ A location on an aerodrome movement area with a history or potential risk of collision or runway incursion, and where heightened attention by pilots/drivers.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
Terminal Airspace Traffic Complexity Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering Division of Airports and Air Traffic.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
1 EUROCONTROL S TRATEGIES FOR The ATM Strategy for the Years As from MATSE/6 decision (Jan. 2000): To cater for forecast increase in demand.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Second ATM R&D projects Co-ordination and networking meeting 14 Nov 2007 Advanced Remote Tower - ART A concept study of Enhanced functionalities during.
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Aerodrome Operations under Limited Visibility Conditions
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Miami International Airport Runway Incursion Action Team Recommendations for Incursion Mitigation Presented to: ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM Runway Safety/Runway.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Agenda Motivation & Goals „Out-of-the-Loop“-Phenomenon MINIMA Concept
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
Miami International Airport Runway Incursion Action Team Recommendations for Incursion Mitigation Presented to: ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM Runway Safety/Runway.
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Presentation transcript:

Airfield Ground Lighting Safety & Capacity Enabler

Airport Eco-System HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 2 Airport Customers Passengers Baggage Cargo Aircrafts Airport Elements Runways Taxiways Apron Area Pax Terminal etc. Scen. 1Scen. 2 …………Scen. n CapacityDelays Level of Service Safety SecurityEmissionsNoiseCost Airport management is a complex business: many customers, providers, authorities and airport elements are involved and they do have conflicting interests. Airport managers have to evaluate the impact of the proposed solutions (scenarios) in several key performance areas, considering all the stakeholders.

Inefficiencies in Ground Operations HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 3 Annually, at major airports in the United States (2009 ASPM) – Over 32 million minutes taxi-out delay (over unimpeded times) – Over 13 million minutes taxi-in delay (over unimpeded times) Terminal-area volume responsible for 19% of delays at OEP 35 airports in 2009 – Aircraft in Europe are estimated to spend % of their time taxiing [Airbus 2008] – A short/medium range A320 expends as much as 5-10% of its fuel on the ground [Airbus 2008] – Taxiing aircraft contribute to surface emissions as well as noise Increased Taxi Times, Fuel Burn, Emissions

Needs of Airside Operations HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 4 A-CDM (Airport Collaborative Decision Making) Unambiguous communications Runway entrance control No confusing lights Less stop and go Continuous taxi speed Improved controller efficiency Optimizing the use of available infrastructure Robust A-SMGCS (Advance Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems) Towards Optimized Ground Operations

Total Airside Management Concept HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 5 Airports Process AMAN – Arr ManagerDMAN – Dep ManagerSMAN – Surface ManagerTMAN – Terminal ManagerEMAN – EnRoute Manager ASMGCS – Advanced Surface Movement Guidance & Control System Pre-tactical 30min…3hr Tactical 30min Adhoc Now Situation Assessment Monitor & Control A-SMGCS Surveillance A-SMGCS Alerting E2E Turnaround Monitor Traffic Monitor Total Operations Planner AMAN TMAN SMAN DMAN EMAN Ground Guidance Onboard Guidance Source: DLR More Predictable & Efficient Operations

Airside Impact HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 6 Positions & Identities (Trajectories) of all Objects at the Airports e.g: Aircraft, Vehicles, Baggage, Cargo, Pax… Events according to one holistic Process Model, “LH263 landed”, “Last Pax Boarded”,…. Demand & Capacities Rwys, Txwys, Stands, Ramp Airport Performance Level of Data Abstraction & Degree of Info Fusion Collaborative Decisions & Data Availability Predictability & Open Communication Planned trajectories for all Object at the Airport, Aircraft, Vehicles, Baggage, Cargo, Pax,….Nav – Support for Humans Airport Milestone Plan including E2E Process Target Times and Resource Usage Plan Planned Flows for Rwys, Txwys, Stands, Ramp Performance Targets Management Paradigm – From Objs. down to Ops & Procs. Mechanisms for Plan Adherence On-Time Performance /Service and Improve Work share Source: DLR Performance Driven Management

A-SMGCS Level as Defined by ICAO HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 7 A-SMGCS Level Surveillance Control Conflict Prediction and / or Detection Conflict Analysis Conflict Resolution Routing Guidance Painted Center Lines / TGS Fixed Center Line Lights Manually Switched Center Line Lights Automatically Switched Center Line Lights Onboard Guidance for Vehicles and Aircraft I IIIIIIVV Carried out manually by Controller or Pilot / Driver Carried out automatically by the System State of the art and recommended by Honeywell Optimized Ground Management Towards Optimized Ground Operations

Delivery Safety, Capacity & Predictability HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 8 Controller (Human Machine Interface) Routing and Planning Planning Rules and Parameters Guidance (Airfield Ground Lighting) Planned Routes Objects Control of Lights & Signs Data Link to Co-op Objects Control (Monitoring, Alerting) Planned Routes Surveillance Coop Non Co-op Sensor Fusion Data Acquisition Echoes, Replies, Broadcast Location, Identification Velocity, Heading Deviation from Planned Routes Conflict Resolution Voice Communication Warnings, Alerts Surveillance Results Stop Bar or TXC Switching Arrival Management (AMAN) Departure Management (DMAN) Aerodrome Management Airline Management Surface Manager (SMAN)

Airside System Integration Architecture HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 9 Total Airside Management System

A-SMGCS Guidance with AGL

Runway Functions (Safety) HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 11 Runway Protection – Time to touch down in an ‚Impending Arrival‘ arrow – Automatically switching on and locking of runway stop bars 30 sec before touch down – Show runway as occupied – Automatically switch off stop bars behind landing aircraft – Automatically switch off all stop bars, if aircraft slower than 80km/h video scene – Smart Runway Protection  Automatically switch on runway stop bar in front of aircraft for line up or crossing runway video scene

Taxiway Functions (Safety) Aircraft separation (blocking) under CAT II/III Under weather condition CAT II/III there is always one switched on stop bar between two aircrafts video scenevideo scene Taxiing with Guidance by TXC and STB; Fog Picture Source: Atrics GmbH

Individual Routing (Capacity) Automatic Individual Routing An optimal route (with relation to distance) is shown for each individual aircraft which has a stand or runway as destination On a landing aircraft the runway exits are switched on into the direction of the destination The route for each pilot is displayed with taxiway center line lights The route ends at a switched on stop bar, an aircraft which drives in front, at the border of an area of responsibility, at the destination – video scene video scene If a pilot leaves his assigned route a ‚route deviation‘ alert is generated and as soon as possible a new optimal route is calculated and displayed to the pilot – video scene video scene

Individual & Collective Routes Individual routes consider restricted areas (Safety) Restricted areas are considered by individual routes video scenevideo scene Collective route for lot of aircrafts and displayed through the taxiway center line lights Taxiing with Guidance by TXC Picture Source: Atrics GmbH

Key Benefits HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 15 Safety – 70% less incursions –Prevention of Runway Incursion with increased situational awareness for pilots Efficiency & Environment –Continuous Taxi Speeds – pilot maintain speed at intersections –Reduced Handover delay – frequency is free from continuing taxi clearance –Improved Traffic Sequencing – More time for planning by reduced workload –Smooth Flow of Traffic – No route deviations or holding position overruns Capacity – Up to 15% increase and corresponding reduce in delays –Increased LVP Taxiway throughput – Automated provisioning of longitudinal separation Cost Effectiveness –Increased Controller Productivity – Handle Traffic growth without additional resources –Economic use of lighting equipment – Reduced lamp burning and replacements

SESAR-JU “Follow the Green” Results HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 16 Increased FLIGHT CREW’S SITUATIONAL AWARENESS (>Factor 3) Pilots see a potential in further improving SITUATIONAL AWARENESS by providing information on sequences and stop reasons, e.g. via GMG Reduced FLIGHT CREW’S WORKLOAD (>50%) Reduced FLIGHT CREW’S FRUSTRATION LEVEL (less ambiguity) Very good USABILITY values (easy to understand and credible) Increased SAFETY (4 route deviations in pre-SESAR, none with AGL) Source: SESAR AGL Validation

SESAR-JU “Follow the Green” Results HONEYWELL CONFIDENTIAL - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 17 Reduced TAXI TIMES (>37% in low- vis, >17% in CAVOK) Increased TRAFFIC FLUENCY (> -65% stops in low-vis, > -40% in CAVOK) Reduced FUEL BURN (>40% in low- vis, >18% in CAVOK) Reduced EMISSIONS (>40% in low- vis, >20% in CAVOK) Improved AIRPORT TAXI PERFORMANCE (~100% performance in low-vis) Reduced MOVEMENT DELAY (>50% time reduction TXR to movement) Reduced COMMUNICATION EFFORT (~50% reduction of R/T time) Source: SESAR AGL Validation

18 Today’s Honeywell With 400 tons and 400 passengers that you are responsible for, you need somebody to lighten your way! Thank You For Your Attention, and remember: