Critical Improvements to National Mercury Disposal Practices Presented by: Mercury Waste Solutions, Inc. ©COPYRIGHT 2003 – Mercury Waste Solutions, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What’s in a Name: EPA Region VIII’s (Non-)Application of the E&P Exemption to Natural Gas Condensate
Advertisements

Export of mercury and mercury waste Sven Hagemann GRS.
1 Bill C-42 Antarctic Environmental Protection Act Standing Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources September 2003.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
Managing Hazardous Solid Waste and Waste Sites
Waste Management (Food Waste) Regulations 2009
How to Respond When you Have Hazardous Sediment Material Candy Stonecipher – Capitol Environmental Services.
Toxic Substances Control Act TSCA Current Events Heighten Awareness for Semiconductor Industry SESHA Hill Country Chapter December 5, 2002.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Solid and hazardous Wastes
Food Safety Legislation. Introduction Victorian England ( ) The history of much modern food safety legislation can be traced back to Victorian.
OVERVIEW OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MALAYSIA by Nadzri Yahaya, Ph
The Role of Private Enterprise in the Reclamation, Recycling and Storage of Mercury Presented by Brad J. Buscher, Chairman and CEO of Mercury Waste Solutions,
October Module 1: Why Should I be Concerned about Lead Paint? Overview What is lead-based paint? What health risks and health effects are related.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
POINT OF ENTRY POINT OF USE BOTTLED WATER
Fourth Meeting June 26, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
Third Meeting May 22, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
1 Electronic Waste Recycling Act DTSC Final Regulations Workshop Presented by Charles Corcoran and Valetti Lang Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Canada Consumer Product Safety Act An Overview Graham Stewart Health Canada.
© 2007 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. The New US.
Pollution Prevention and Minimization. Pollution Prevention Though an obvious concept, this has been one of the most difficult concepts to implement Congress.
Waste Chapter 19.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
CPSC Lead Program: Regulations, Guidance, and Outreach Frank J. Nava U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission January 26, 2006 These comments are those.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
Adem.alabama.gov Coal Combustion Waste Regulation Stephen A. Cobb Governmental Hazardous Waste Branch Land Division.
Mercury & Human Health Ann Melamed R.N., M.A. Environmental Health Specialist American Nurses Association May 2004.
 Nuisance.  Person liable if they use their property in a manner that unreasonably interferes with others’ rights to use or enjoy their own property.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.  History of the Act ◦ The primary purpose of TSCA is to regulate chemical substances and mixtures  It does so by regulating.
WasteSection 3 Section 3: Hazardous Waste Preview Bellringer Objectives Types of Hazardous Waste Resource Conservation and Recovery Act The Superfund Act.
Environmental Issues and the Real Estate Transaction LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Define and list hazardous substances. Define and describe landfill. Identify.
Lead Based Paint 101 September 2005 Liz Wilde X
WasteSection 3 Types of Hazardous Waste Hazardous wastes are wastes that are a risk to the health of humans or other living organisms. They may be solids,
Chapter 16 Waste Generation and Waste Disposal.  Refuse collected by municipalities from households, small businesses, and institutions such as schools,
Fishing Advisories and Fish Contaminants EEES 4730 Amanda Wendzicki.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
WorkWaste LLC LDR Training/Guidance.
Chapter 46 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
1 Why Recycle Lamps? All fluorescent lamps contain mercury in varying amounts. Mercury is an elemental metal, meaning that it doesn’t break down in the.
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair
1 NATIONAL ENVIORMENTAL MANAGEMENT: WASTE AMENDMENT BILL PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: WATER AND ENVIRONMENT 28 JANUARY 2014.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Environmental Law.
Waste Chapter 19. Hazardous Waste  Hazardous Waste- any waste that is a risk to the health of humans or other living things –Toxic- Poisonous –Corrosive-
Understanding the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Hazardous Waste Definition Exemption Jeff Bowman, TEEX.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Draft Year: 1976 (drafted as an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act.) Amendment years: 1984(HSWA, Hazardous.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Draft Year: 1976 Amendment years: 1989 National/ Internatinal: National Law Sean Petersen, per:3.
Chapter 16 Waste Generation and Waste Disposal. Paper or Plastic? Polystyrene – plastic polymer with high insulation value Aka – styrofoam Is harmful.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
Bellringer. Types of Hazardous Waste Hazardous wastes are wastes that are a risk to the health of humans or other living organisms. – They include: solids,
Waste Management Workshop FUTURE PROOFING WASTE MANAGEMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA 6 June 2013 Environmental/Waste challenges facing South Africa.
Toxic waste is generally described as many discarded material that is dangerous to any life form, including humans, animals and plant life. Toxic waste.
1 Solid and Hazardous Waste Chapter 21 Living in the Environment, 13 th Edition, Miller.
1 Module 2(1) Noumea Convention and Protocols Investigating Shipping Pollution Violation Workshop Tarawa, Kiribati October 2010.
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION UNDER RCRA LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE Narendra Chaudhari Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection.
Lecture (11): Waste Recycling
Best Management Practices for Used Oil Collection Programs
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Module 54 Hazardous Waste
Environmental Hazard Awareness:
POINT OF ENTRY POINT OF USE BOTTLED WATER
Sora Oyaizu Bodas, Period 6 5/2/18
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Solid and Hazardous Waste Chapter 21
What is driving this change????
Presentation transcript:

Critical Improvements to National Mercury Disposal Practices Presented by: Mercury Waste Solutions, Inc. ©COPYRIGHT 2003 – Mercury Waste Solutions, Inc.

Three Critical Issues The mercury debris loophole The mercury debris loophole Land disposal of USA generated mercury waste in Canada Land disposal of USA generated mercury waste in Canada Household hazardous mercury waste exemption Household hazardous mercury waste exemption

Objective Find a way to implement a National Mercury Reduction Strategy to improve the health and safety of all Americans, and our neighbors, through enforcing stringent standards for the treat- ment and disposal of highly contaminated mercury waste. Find a way to implement a National Mercury Reduction Strategy to improve the health and safety of all Americans, and our neighbors, through enforcing stringent standards for the treat- ment and disposal of highly contaminated mercury waste.

The United Nations concluded that mercury travels throughout the world at a much faster rate than was previously known. We must control the problem starting in our own western hemisphere.

Quick Facts You Need to Know Mercury is a pervasive bio-accumulative neurotoxin. It doesn’t go away… it can be fatal. Mercury is a pervasive bio-accumulative neurotoxin. It doesn’t go away… it can be fatal. 60,000 children are born in the USA every year at risk for adverse neurodevelopment due to exposure to methyl mercury in-utero 60,000 children are born in the USA every year at risk for adverse neurodevelopment due to exposure to methyl mercury in-utero One in ten women in the US have high levels of mercury in their blood One in ten women in the US have high levels of mercury in their blood Mercury damages the central nervous system… especially in children Mercury damages the central nervous system… especially in children Mercury has been proven to be destructive by entering the food chain through waterways, lakes, streams and coastal regions. Mercury has been proven to be destructive by entering the food chain through waterways, lakes, streams and coastal regions.

The Current Mercury Treatment Standard The appropriate treatment for highly contaminated waste (greater than 260 mg./kg) under RCRA, is retorting of contaminated materials. The appropriate treatment for highly contaminated waste (greater than 260 mg./kg) under RCRA, is retorting of contaminated materials. This standard was established in January 1992 and reaffirmed in January This standard was established in January 1992 and reaffirmed in January Retorting is extremely effective as this treatment method recovers up to % of mercury in contaminated items. Retorting is extremely effective as this treatment method recovers up to % of mercury in contaminated items.However…

The Intent of RCRA Is Being Abused Although not intended, the EPA provided for a more lenient disposal standard in 1994 by changing the definition of certain mercury- bearing wastes by calling them “debris” – which, in turn, created a “mercury debris loophole.” Although not intended, the EPA provided for a more lenient disposal standard in 1994 by changing the definition of certain mercury- bearing wastes by calling them “debris” – which, in turn, created a “mercury debris loophole.” If the waste is a mercury contaminated object greater than 60 mm (about 2”) in size, it can be considered “hazardous debris” under RCRA. It can be land disposed after it has been “encapsulated.” If the waste is a mercury contaminated object greater than 60 mm (about 2”) in size, it can be considered “hazardous debris” under RCRA. It can be land disposed after it has been “encapsulated.” This Mercury Debris Loophole includes most all mercury wastes. This Mercury Debris Loophole includes most all mercury wastes. But… But…

The EPA concluded that encapsulation in landfills Does Not Work!

On January 29, 2003 The US EPA published in Federal Register Land Disposal Restrictions: Treatment Standards for Mercury- Bearing Waste; Notice of Data Availability (NODA). This NODA concluded that retorting mercury contaminated waste is the best solution and should not be changed. However, the EPA left the Mercury Debris Loophole intact. (40 CFR )

As a result…Generators can continue to landfill the majority of mercury waste under the Mercury Debris Loophole.

Alternatively, generators can ship their mercury waste to Canada for placement in landfills where standards are lower.

Canada has different standards allowing the landfill of mercury waste. These standards are imposed at the Provincial level and not at the Federal level.

In late February, The Northeast Waste Management Official’s Association confirmed that many hazardous waste companies prefer to transport waste to Canada. Why?

Two Main Reasons 1. COST – One metric ton of mercury-containing waste costs $400 for Canadian landfill disposal vs. $2,000 for Retorting in the US 2. LIABILITY – Generators believe that by shipping to Canada they will avoid future CERCLA liability.

The Third Issue… Household Hazardous Waste Exemption

The US EPA agrees that there is an additional loophole. RCRA excludes household waste that contains mercury- contaminated items or devices.

Once these items are collected by municipalities through mercury round-up or household hazardous waste collection programs, the waste continues to be exempt from RCRA and therefore, is not subject to land ban regulation.

Thus….. Household mercury waste disposal is concentrated and unregulated!

Three specific actions are requested……

1.Amend Sen. Susan Collins’ bill S by adding language to close the Mercury Debris Loophole. The bill should be amended to include treatment standards for mercury devices banned in the bill and for all high-subcategory mercury wastes.

Upon introducing S. 616, Sen. Susan Collins was quoted: Once the mercury is collected, my intention is it will never again be able to pose a threat to the health of our children. We believe our amendment would be consistent with her desires.

2. Prohibit the export of mercury wastes until Canadian standards are as stringent as those of the United States.

3. Ensure that mercury contaminated household wastes collected by governmental and waste contractors are not exempt from treatment before disposal.

We believe these issues present a great opportunity to be proactive on the environment ……

Because….. -- These are narrow issues. -- There is no debate about the science of toxicity of mercury. -- These are issues that matter! -- It’s the right thing to do! -- It’s good politics.