2012 Public Opinion Research: Canadian Views on Electronic Health Records This study was commissioned by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ACI Annual Audit Committee Survey - Global M A R K E T I N G & C O M M U N I C A T I O N S R E S E A R C H Charles Garbowski Research February 21, 2006.
Advertisements

Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
ENROLLED STILL UNINSURED Voices from the Newly- Enrolled And Still Uninsured A Survey about the Affordable Care Act’s First Open Enrollment Period June.
172 Commercial Street, 2 nd Floor Portland Maine 1 May 2014 Full Service Market Research and Public Opinion Polling 172 Commercial.
Perceptions Of Homelessness In Canada GCI Group November, 2005.
Health Information Security & Privacy February 9, 2014 ONC Policy HIT Policy Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup Denise Anthony Sociology and ISTS.
1 Strategizing Impact Report on a Study of the Exposure to and Impact of the Cleveland Federation's Overseas Activities on the Local Community Partnership.
ASBM European Prescribers Survey Kevin Olson, CEO Industry Standard Research x701 November, 2013 Industry Standard Research1.
National Breastfeeding Awareness Campaign Results Babies Were Born To Be Breastfed! Suzanne G. Haynes, PhD Senior Science Advisor Office on Women’s Health.
City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.
Beef Producer Attitude Study – June 2010 Prepared for Cattlemen’s Beef Board By Aspen Media and Market Research.
Third Party Advertising Evaluation: American Express eStatement Topline July 2008.
ORC International Proprietary & Confidential Stress Awareness Month Survey Report April 7, 2015 EMBARGOED UNTIL 8:00 AM, April 13, 2015.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
Health Insurance Coverage of California’s Working Latinos Howard Greenwald Suzanne O'Keefe Mark DiCamillo University of Southern California California.
Chapter 2 Electronic Health Records
1 Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hospital Care for Heart Attacks Among First Nations, Inuit and Métis Released January 31,
© Prescient Ltd 1 UNDERSTANDING THE MINDSET OF THE HOLIDAYMAKER AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ‘KNOW BEFORE YOU GO’ CAMPAIGN Debrief of Wave 4 Prepared by :Prescient.
Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs: Looking Back, Looking Forward Kathryn J. Aikin, Ph.D. Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and.
Market Research Results for East Devon AONB 8 th March 2013.
Nobody’s Unpredictable March 2009 Legal Aid in BC Prepared by Ipsos Reid for the Legal Services Society of British Columbia.
1 Prepared for: Home Fire Sprinkler Coalition January 5, 2006 REPORT DRAFT Home Fire Safety.
© Yankelovich, Inc The Segmentation Company a division of Yankelovich © Yankelovich, Inc The Segmentation Company a division of Yankelovich.
A Summary Of Key Findings From A National Survey Of Voters. #07160.
Executive Summary July SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland conducted 1,650 telephone interviews between March 27, 2015 and May 4, 2015.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
Lake Research Partners * Voter/Consumer Research 1 Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease A presentation on findings from a nationwide survey of 1,500 likely.
PARTS OF AN ARGUMENT: The Introduction. THE INTRODUCTION OF AN ARGUMENT So what do you do in your spare time? I like to skydive! Where are you from? Wisconsin,
EHealth 2013: Do eHealth investments really match consumer expectations? Presented by: Aaron Berk (Director, Advisory, KPMG) Craig Worden (SVP, Public.
Groups and Intergroup Relations: Canadian Perceptions.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Nobody’s Unpredictable Date Public opinion about individual philanthropy Serbia, December 2009.
Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association The Way Forward Initiative - Topline Results (National vs. Ontario) February 7, 2014.
Public opinion on sociodemographic data collection in Ontario healthcare settings KETAN SHANKARDASS, PhD, Research Associate Centre for Research on Inner.
The 2002 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey Adults with Health Problems The Commonwealth Fund Harvard University School of Public Health.
Big Listening 2010 A summary of surveys 13, 14 and 15.
Making IT Meaningful Christine Bechtel Vice President National Partnership for Women & Families Making IT Meaningful: How Consumers Value and Trust Health.
Privacy, Quality and Electronic Health Information Royal New Zealand College of GPs Quality Forum 14 February 2009 Sebastian Morgan-Lynch
East Melbourne Medicare Local (EMML) GP Primary Health Networks (PHN) Survey 2015 Interim Results Apr 2015.
Mutual Fund Investors in Canada 2011: Sixth Annual Landscape Study Overview of Key Findings.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute Ontario Trail Survey Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute Trail Usage in Ontario:
Public Attitudes Toward Privacy in HIPAA and HIT Programs Dr. Alan F. Westin Professor of Public Law and Government Emeritus, Columbia University Director,
© Yankelovich, Inc The Segmentation Company a division of Yankelovich © Yankelovich, Inc The Segmentation Company a division of Yankelovich.
Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA) November 2, 2009 Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA)
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
Medicare Sustainability: Public Opinion Environment June 17 th, 2010.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Teacher Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Whose Responsibility is it? Karen Korb TELUS Health Solutions November 24, 2009 Privacy and Confidentiality in the EHR:
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical.
Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.
CBC News Poll on Discrimination November Methodology This report presents the findings of an online survey conducted among 1,500 Canadian adults.
BULLYING POLL Prepared for: Equality Hawaii Foundation February 2014 ___________________________.
Pastors Report Mixed Economic Signs Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors.
2010 Public Opinion Research: A Nation-Wide Study of Attitudes Towards Electronic Health Records and Health System Use of Patient Information This study.
Walking Survey 2015 National Top-Line Report June 2015.
Results Providers (n=20) were more willing to share patient data when: Sharing with universities vs. private firms and non-government organizations No.
The Nationwide Retirement Institute Health Care and Long-term Care Study November 2015 Conducted by Harris Poll NFM-14918AO.
Abstract Research with youth faces particular challenges, including potential confusion about researchers’ intentions and vulnerabilities related to power.
Privacy concerns and sharing data Telephone and Online Omnibus Quantitative surveys March / April 2016.
Conversation Stopper: What’s Preventing Physicians from Talking With Their Patients About End-of-Life and Advance Care Planning Media Webinar – April 14,
Financial and Business Planning Concepts Business owner perspectives.
Pharmacists in Nova Scotia Perceptions and attitudes towards pharmacists in Nova Scotia with national comparisons. February 2016 Prepared for the Pharmacy.
Marketplace: 2017 Cell Phone Risk-Knowledge Study
Privacy concerns and sharing data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Presentation transcript:

2012 Public Opinion Research: Canadian Views on Electronic Health Records This study was commissioned by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and Canada Health Infoway. March 2012 © Harris/Decima

Summary of Objectives A baseline survey was conducted in 2010 to understand Canadians’ views on a number of areas: –Situating electronic health records in the health care system; –Understanding the current state of Canadians’ health records; –Gauging awareness and impressions of electronic record transition; and –Determining awareness and impressions of Health System Usage of records. The 2012 survey explored the same areas to identify any changes in impressions from © Harris/Decima

Summary of Methodology A total of 1,010 telephone surveys were completed among Canadian adults, (excluding the territories) 18 years of age and over –A random sample of Canadians was selected All households with a landline had an equal opportunity in participating in the study The study was not designed to re-contact previous participants. Rather, a “fresh” sample was pulled Interviews were conducted between January 31 and February 10, 2012 and averaged 13 minutes in length Results from this survey can be considered accurate within a margin of error of +/-3.1%, 19 times out of 20 –Larger for sub-samples Data results are weighted to reflect the population –Base sizes (n) indicated below the data are unweighted numbers Don’t know responses are reported if 5% or greater © Harris/Decima

Summary of Methodology (2) The table below highlights the completions by region. © Harris/Decima RegionSample Size (Unweighted) Atlantic Canada101 Quebec251 Ontario329 Manitoba/Saskatchewan103 Alberta100 British Columbia126 Total1,010

Key Findings © Harris/Decima

Key Findings from the Research Overall, the data show positive movement in a number of key areas: There has been an increase in receptivity to the idea of converting records from paper to electronic (up 11 points to 85% very good or good idea). Moreover, the proportion of Canadians who express some concern about the idea of electronic records has decreased. More Canadians in 2012 believe that their physician is using electronic records as compared to 2010 (50% vs. 38%). The data suggests that Canadians’ understanding of an electronic health record as a tool that goes beyond record keeping has increased. Additionally, there is a sense that electronic records would have some impact on patient care and the health care system. While there is comfort with health system usage of health information, there are two key considerations: –The data indicates that a majority of Canadians would insist on disclosure and consent when their information would be used for this purpose. –The information would NOT be shared with private organizations such as insurance or pharmaceutical companies © Harris/Decima

Situating Electronic Health Records © Harris/Decima

Key Findings: Situating Electronic Health Records (EHRs) Initially, the survey suggests that EHRs are not a top-of-mind issue among Canadians for the health care system. –Only 1 person in the full sample named electronic records as the top issue Instead, Canadians identify a number issues facing the Canadian health care system relating predominantly to availability/access of resources (25%) or speed of care (22%). © Harris/Decima

Resources and access continue to dominate the health care agenda Base: All respondents (n=1,010) Q1. Overall, what would you say is the most important issue facing the Canadian Health Care system today – in other words, the one that concerns you most? © Harris/Decima

Current State of Medical Records © Harris/Decima

Key Findings: Current State of Medical Records Similar to the findings in 2010, a majority have most or all of their medical records in one place and are at least fairly easy to access. –36% say their records are all in one place –32% believe they are mostly in one place and fairly easy to access –Close to one in four say they are in a number of different places or all over the place Meanwhile, a majority of Canadians see a relationship between where their records are stored and the type of care they receive. –A perceived positive impact (59%) outstrips a perceived negative impact (14%) Perhaps not surprising, those whose records are all over consider it having a negative impact on the care they receive Canadians are not quite convinced that the way in which their records are stored is a big problem for the health care system at large –7% very big problem; 28% big problem © Harris/Decima

Two in three believe their records are fairly easy to access; mostly in one place Q2. What about the state, condition and location of your personal health care records? As far as you know are they… Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

A small majority believe how their records are maintained has a positive impact on the care they receive Q3. Would you say the way your health care records are maintained has a very positive impact, a positive impact, no impact, a negative impact, or a very negative impact on the kind of care you receive? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Perceptions of the impact of record storage on the type of care received increases with age; views vary by storage of medical records Q3. Would you say the way your health care records are maintained has a very positive impact, a positive impact, no impact, a negative impact, or a very negative impact on the kind of care you receive? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Less convinced that the maintenance of records is a big problem for the health care system Q4. And would you say that the way personal health care records are maintained is a very big problem, a big problem, a small problem or no problem whatsoever for the Canadian health care system? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Likelihood of recognizing problem is related to storage of records Q4. And would you say that the way personal health care records are maintained is a very big problem, a big problem, a small problem or no problem whatsoever for the Canadian health care system? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Those with easy access more convinced of the positive benefits Base: All respondents (n=1,010) All in one place and very easy to access Mostly in one place and fairly easy to access In a number of places and fairly difficult to access All over the place and very difficult to access Impact on Personal care Positive 76%72%70%62%29%17%20% 18% None 16%23%20%27%34%36%21% 26% Negative 3%1%6%7%34%40%54% 52% Impact on System Very big/Big problem 24%20%28%26%59%51%69%62% Small/No Problem 64%71%62%65%38%44%28%35% © Harris/Decima

Awareness and Impressions of Electronic Record Transition © Harris/Decima

Key Findings: Awareness and Impressions of Transition Just over half of Canadians believe that there is a goal to convert health records from paper to electronic. While overall awareness has not changed, there has been a marked increase in the receptivity to converting personal health records from paper to electronic. –46% say this a very good idea in 2012 in comparison to 29% in 2010 Generally, those with records in more places are stronger proponents of this idea The primary concern with this idea continues to focus on privacy and identify theft. That said, fewer in 2012 say they have a concern in comparison to There has been an increase in perceptions that their physician is using an electronic record system in their office. –50% say this is the case in 2012 vs. 38% in 2010 –The data suggests that current use of an electronic record by their physician does not have an impact on the perceived value of it 86% with an EMR say it is a good idea while 84% of those without one feel this way © Harris/Decima

Half think there is a goal of converting paper records to electronic Q5. As far as you know, do we have a goal and a plan to convert all personal health care records in Canada from a paper format into an electronic format? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Younger Canadians are less aware of a national goal to convert records Q5. As far as you know, do we have a goal and a plan to convert all personal health care records in Canada from a paper format into an electronic format? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Increase in receptivity to converting from paper to electronic records Q6. On balance, do you think that converting all personal health records from a paper format to an electronic format would be a very good idea, a good idea, a poor idea or a very poor idea? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Younger Canadians are the most receptive to the idea of an electronic format for health records Q6. On balance, do you think that converting all personal health records from a paper format to an electronic format would be a very good idea, a good idea, a poor idea or a very poor idea? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Privacy continues to be the chief concern with electronic records Q7. Is there anything about having your health records in an electronic format that would concern you? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Reported Use of Electronic Records in Doctor’s office has risen Q8. Does your principal doctor or care provider use an electronic record in their office? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

There is significant variance by region on reported use of electronic records Q8. Does your principal doctor or care provider use an electronic record in their office? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Both those with and without electronic records feel that EHRs are a good idea Base: All respondents (n=1,010) Have EMRDon’t have EMR EHRs are… Good idea86%78%84%73% Bad idea12%17%13%22% © Harris/Decima

Awareness of Health System Usage © Harris/Decima

Key Findings: Awareness of Health System Usage As far as most Canadians believe, personal health information is not used for any other purpose other than by their health care provider. Meanwhile, three in four Canadians believe that personal health records that are electronic could be used in more ways as compared to paper records. There has been a notable decline in Canadians’ awareness of the term “Health System Use or Secondary Uses”: now 18% from 34% in Four areas of health system usages were tested: Using this information to improve front-line health care Using this information to better track the health of the general population Using this information to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health care delivery to the public Using this information to strengthen medical and health research The data suggests that there has been in an increase in positive perceptions on health system usages of data on the overall healthcare system. –Increase most noted in the “very positive” impressions, as well as positive impressions overall (top 2 box scores) © Harris/Decima

Key Findings: Awareness of Health System Usage (2) A strong majority believe that Health System Usage of data will have a major or minor impact on both the healthcare system and patient care. There has been a decline in the proportion of Canadians who are concerned about their individual information being used for HSU. –14% very concerned (down 6 from 20% in 2010) and 22% somewhat concerned (down 7 from 29% in 2010) The data suggests that de-identifying information alleviates some concern about personal use of data for HSU. An increasing number of Canadians are comfortable with sharing de-identified information with organizations where Canadians see value in sharing the data, such as health care organizations, research, and statistics. There is very little comfort with private organizations, such as drug and insurance companies. © Harris/Decima

There continues to be limited awareness of using health information for purposes other than providing care Q9. As far as you know, is personal health information used for any purpose other than by your health care providers in giving care to an individual patient? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

A majority believe that electronic records can be used in more ways than paper records Q10. Do you think that personal health information could be used in different or more ways if it was stored as an electronic record, as compared to a paper record? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Quebecers are less aware of multiple uses of electronic records Q10. Do you think that personal health information could be used in different or more ways if it was stored as an electronic record, as compared to a paper record? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

A decline in awareness the terms health system use or secondary uses Q11. Have you ever heard of Health System Use or Secondary Uses of patient health information? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Younger Canadians least aware of Health System Use of information Q11. Have you ever heard of Health System Use or Secondary Uses of patient health information? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

A sense that HSU has an impact on health care and patient care Q Knowing a little more about Health System or Secondary Use of this information, does this strike you as something that can have a major impact, a minor impact or no real impact on the operation and quality of health care in Canada/on the kind of care you might receive as a patient? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) Health Care Patient Care © Harris/Decima

Overall increase in perceptions of benefits of HSU of information in a number of areas in health care Q I’m going to read you a few more ways how health information from electronic records might be used for health system or secondary purposes and for each one have you tell me whether you think that it would have a very positive, positive, neutral, negative or very negative impact on the operation and quality of health care in Canada. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Some variance in perceived impact on front-line health care Q14. I’m going to read you a few more ways how health information from electronic records might be used for Health system or secondary purposes and for each one have you tell me whether you think that it would have a very positive, positive, neutral, negative or very negative impact on the operation and quality of health care in Canada. Using this information to improve front-line health care. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Younger Canadians less likely to see very positive impacts on delivery of care to the public Q15. I’m going to read you a few more ways how health information from electronic records might be used for Health system or secondary purposes and for each one have you tell me whether you think that it would have a very positive, positive, neutral, negative or very negative impact on the operation and quality of health care in Canada. Using this information to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health care delivery to the public. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Younger Canadians less positive that HSU of information would be able to better track the health of the population Q16. I’m going to read you a few more ways how health information from electronic records might be used for Health system or secondary purposes and for each one have you tell me whether you think that it would have a very positive, positive, neutral, negative or very negative impact on the operation and quality of health care in Canada. Using this information to better track the health of the general population. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Younger Canadians most likely to see a very positive impact on HSU of information for strengthening medical and health research Q17. I’m going to read you a few more ways how health information from electronic records might be used for Health system or secondary purposes and for each one have you tell me whether you think that it would have a very positive, positive, neutral, negative or very negative impact on the operation and quality of health care in Canada. Using this information to strengthen medical and health research. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Decline in personal concern of using health information for HSU Q18. Would you personally be very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not concerned at all about your own health information being used for these types of Health System Uses? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Quebecers less concerned with secondary use of their information Q18. Would you personally be very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not concerned at all about your own health information being used for these types of Health System Uses? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

De-identifying information further reduces concern of system usage of information Q19. If your health information was de-identified, would you personally be very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not concerned at all about it being used for Health system purposes? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

De-identifying information further reduces concern of system usage of information Q18. Would you personally be very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not concerned at all about your own health information being used for these types of Health System Uses? Q19. If your health information was de-identified, would you personally be very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not concerned at all about it being used for Health system purposes? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Relationship exists between initial concern of using information and concern if information is de-identified Q18. Would you personally be very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not concerned at all about your own health information being used for these types of Health System Uses? Q19. If your health information was de-identified, would you personally be very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerned or not concerned at all about it being used for Health system purposes? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Little comfort with sharing de-identified information with private organizations Q How would you feel about sharing your de-identified health information with the following organizations? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Albertans less comfortable with de-identified health information being shared with their provincial department of health Q20. How would you feel about sharing your de-identified health information with the following organizations? Your provincial government department of health Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Those with an EMR more comfortable with sharing information locally Q21. How would you feel about sharing your de-identified health information with the following organizations? Other health care organizations such as hospitals and regional health authorities. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Youth most comfortable with sharing information for research Q22. How would you feel about sharing your de-identified health information with the following organizations? Research organizations such as a University. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Older Canadians slightly less comfortable with sharing de-identified information with statistical organizations Q23. How would you feel about sharing your de-identified health information with the following organizations? Statistical organizations such as Statistics Canada or the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Comfort with private organizations having de-identified health information decreases with age Q24. How would you feel about sharing your de-identified health information with the following organizations? Private organizations such as drug companies or insurance companies. Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

There is no consensus on who should control sharing information Q If your information was used in this way, and was shared with other doctors, hospitals and health researchers, who do you think would/who would you prefer to have control of these data and make that decision? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

No agreement on comfort with using identified information to track how well treatments were working Q27. In rare cases, the use of your personal health information may contain your name or address. For example, if a doctor doing research needed to track the health of individuals to determine how well different treatments were working. Would you feel very comfortable, somewhat comfortable, somewhat uncomfortable or very uncomfortable if your identified health information was used in this way? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Comparison of Comfort/Concern about the General Concept of HSU vs. De-Identified vs. Identified Uses (top 2 box scores) Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Two in three continue to insist on requiring consent to use identified information Q28. In cases like this, where you were identified, how would you feel about a requirement that your personal approval or consent would have to be given before your health information was used? Is this something that you insist upon, you would prefer but not insist upon or something that you wouldn’t be concerned about and would not require your personal approval or consent? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Those in BC most insistent on consent Q28. In cases like this, where you were identified, how would you feel about a requirement that your personal approval or consent would have to be given before your health information was used? Is this something that you insist upon, you would prefer but not insist upon or something that you wouldn’t be concerned about and would not require you personal approval or consent? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Three in four claim that they would give their consent for HSU of information Q29. And if your approval or consent was required before your identified information could be used for health system purposes, do you think you would give your approval or consent or you would not give your approval or consent? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Atlantic and younger Canadians most apt to give consent for health system uses of their information Q29. And if your approval or consent was required before your identified information could be used for health system purposes, do you think you would give your approval or consent or you would not give your approval or consent? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

An increase in the number who would be more comfortable with an assessment process Q30. Would you be more comfortable if you knew that the research project seeking to use identified information would have to go through an assessment process and be approved by an independent agency that would examine the potential risk to your privacy? Base: Those who insist on approval or consent before their health information was used or would not give approval for their identified information to be used (n=700) © Harris/Decima

There has been an increase in the number of Canadians who would insist on providing consent and say that they would grant it Base: All respondents (n=1,010) Insist on ConsentPrefer ConsentWouldn’t care Would grant74%64%88%77% 81% Would not grant14%22%7%15%18% Don’t Know12%13%5%7%5%1% © Harris/Decima

There is a growing number that views consent as adding comfort Insist on ConsentPrefer ConsentWouldn’t care Oversight adds comfort 72%67%63%40%54%39% Makes no difference 25%31%37%55%42%57% Base: Those who insist on approval or consent before their health information was used or would not give approval for their identified information to be used (n=700) © Harris/Decima

There has been a decline in the number who would not grant consent Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

A strong majority expect their provider to notify them when their information is being used Q31. Would you expect your doctor or care provider to notify you about when and how your personal information was being used for Health system purposes? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

On balance, half think HSU of de-identified information outweighs privacy concerns Q32. Overall and on balance, what’s more important to you? Protecting the privacy of your health information or being able to use this de-identified information for Health system uses? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

18 to 24 year olds most apt to place more importance on using de- identified information for health systems uses than on privacy Q32. Overall and on balance, what’s more important to you? Protecting the privacy of your health information or being able to use this de-identified information for Health system uses? Base: All respondents (n=1,010) © Harris/Decima

Thank you. © Harris/Decima