EMTA General Meeting – London October 9° 2014 SURVEY ON THE INTERCHANGE RATE Results of the questionnaire circulated among EMTA Members.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COST 355 Madrid mai Estimating total mileage at the national level Estimating total mileage at the national level Modelling versus mobility survey.
Advertisements

Demand for bus and Rail Analyzing a corridor with a similar Level Of Service 5 th Israeli-British/Irish Workshop in Regional Science April, 2007.
Increasing the Quality of Public Transport in Prague Prague Integrated Transport.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
April 27, 2006 Budapest Transport Closely Held Corporation HOUSEHOLD SURVEY OF BUDAPEST AND ITS SURROUNDINGS Data processing, utilization and.
Joint query on co-modality: urban transport and bikes 15 th, May, 2014 Rotterdam.
Experiences of Demand Responsive Transport System (DRTS) in Keski- Uusimaa/Finland.
Flexible transport services for elderly people: a solution against social exclusion. Dora Ramazzotti 1, Athanasios Lois 2 1 SRM – Reti e Mobilità, Public.
Business and Management Research
Transport for London and the Mayor’s Transport Strategy Steve Newsome Transport for London EMTA General Meeting, Madrid 31 March 2011.
1 WORLD TOURISM ORGANIZATION (UNWTO) MEASURING TOURISM EXPENDITURE: A UNWTO PROPOSAL SESRIC-UNWTO WORKSHOP ON TOURISM STATISTICS AND THE ELABORATION OF.
1 London 10. October 2014 EMTA General Meeting A Danish experience: electronics for transport communication Per Gellert Director Planning.
The Civic Recommendations: some informations Out of 42 draft recommendations, 18 showed an average value exceeding 50% of high priority. These Civic Recommendations.
SURVEY ON HEAVY RAIL CONTRACTS A comparison between the different public services contracts for heavy rail administered by the EMTA Authorities EMTA Budapest.
Restructuring the public transport network in times of financial crisis: Solutions from Thessaloniki Prof. Panos Papaioannou, Chairman Konstantinidou Christiana,
English 212: Technical Writing Sarah A. Bujno. Overview Introduction Criteria Methods Research Results Conclusions Recommendations.
Smooth travel in all transport modes EU Passenger Law – Towards 2020 LTTL - Forum 6 December 2011 Salvatore D’ACUNTO Head of Unit Passenger Rights European.
Workshop on Mobility Plans Torino experience & lessons learnt EMTA General Meeting Valencia 27th-28th April 2009.
FINANCING OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IN EUROPE Maria-Pilar Machancoses Regeneration & Planning Manager Centro.
Market Research Lesson 6. Objectives Outline the five major steps in the market research process Describe how surveys can be used to learn about customer.
A student guide To completing Level 1 & 2 portfolios.
BILBAO MEETING / APRIL 2007 CREDITRANS The single public transport ticket for Bizkaia.
Helsingin seudun liikenne -kuntayhtymä Ticketing practices in certain large European cities Questionnaire to the EMTA network.
Study on the Implementation of the European Regulation (EC) N° 1370/2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road of 23 October 2007.
EMTA Strategy & Working program Lyon meeting October2006.
A comparison using the EMTA Barometer 2004 data This work has been realized on the basis of EMTA Barometer 2004 data recently published. Its objectives.
OLDER PEOPLE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT Challenges and Chances of an Ageing Society UITP Light Rail Committee Tenerife, October 2007 UITP Waterborne Transport.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Major Research Designs How Sociologists Gather their Data.
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
SURVEYS ON MOBILITY OF CITIZENS AND QUALITY OF TRANSPORT SYSTEMS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF TORINO AND IN THE PROVINCE OF TORINO PARIS 28 NOVEMBER 2008.
Marie-Odile GASCON, CertuSHANGHAI, Forum THNS, 11 – 14 Novembre /11/ Household travel surveys how to carry them out ? Method and a few results.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL STUDY OF BUS ACCIDENT ARE THE BUSES SAFE OR NOT? GRSG, 109 th session Sept. – 2. Oct Presented by Dr. MATOLCSY Mátyás.
STATE-OF-THE-ART OF FINNISH PT TELEMATICS Research Scientist Mikko Lehtonen, VTT.
TRANSED of September 2012 in New Delhi, India How accessible was the Swedish public transport system in 2010? Helena Svensson, Ph D in public transport.
ATM Metropolitan Transport Authority of Barcelona Main ITS projects ( Contribution of ATM in ITS preparation for hearing 1 december ) November 27, 2009.
Case study Oslo: PT optimisation under different rules for revenue use REVENUE final conference Brussels 29th - 30th November 2005 Jon-Terje Bekken Institute.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.
Sociologists Doing Research Chapter 2. Research Methods Ch. 2.1.
1 Activity report General Meeting Barcelona 12 November 2010.
10th October, 2013 Public transport employees’ ticket privileges Tamás Dombi ZTM Warsaw.
EC Workshop 18 March 2010 Intelligent transport systems For Urban Areas.
Marko Matulin University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 21 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN Measure 4.4: Mobility management for.
Torino, April 17th-18th, 2008 Laura Delgado EMTA BAROMETER OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN EUROPEAN METROPOLITAN AREAS 2008 (Data 2006) Agenda.
2013 EMTA Barometer Antonio García Pastor 2013 EMTA barometer Feelings, doubts, wise decisions, future corrections, printed / online, yearly / twice yearly,
1 Accessibility Working Group March 2011 VBB Berlin Brandenburg.
EMTA General Meeting , Turin Tamas Dombi, ZTM Warsaw1 Actual Problems of the Public Transport in Warsaw Metropolitan Area.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
Regional and urban Policy Developing harmonised indicators on urban public transport in Europe Hugo Poelman European Commission DG Regional and Urban Policy.
1 Activity report General Meeting Prague 24 May 2012.
The monitoring of Customer Satisfaction Customer satisfaction survey of HCT BEST-survey Customer complaints.
1 Impacts of the growing motorization on the transport of the Warsaw metropolitan area Tamás Dombi, ZTM Warsaw.
EMTA Questionnaire on Governance and Mobility Plans EMTA General meeting April 2009 Valencia.
EMTA General Meeting Prague May 2012 Round table on PSO Regulation 1370/2007 “Two years after enforcement, where are we? How efficient is the regulation?
Mobile and web ticketing among EMTA members Tamás Dombi, ZTM.
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
Redgy Deschacht, Business Adviser Keolis. Keolis: an international leader in passenger transport title French Company 15 countries 60,000 employees 5,-
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// TRANSPORT LIBERALISATION TENDENCY MARCH 2016.
Helsingin seudun liikenne -kuntayhtymä Ticket survey – the way to share the costs of public transport for HSL’s member municipalities Matleena Lindeqvist.
Sociology. Sociology is a science because it uses the same techniques as other sciences Explaining social phenomena is what sociological theory is all.
UITP position on the draft regulation on passenger rights for bus/coach Ulrich Weber, UITP-EuroTeam European Bus and Coach Forum Kortrijk 16 October 2009.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
Business and Management Research
Business and Management Research
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Integration of the public transport system
Presentation transcript:

EMTA General Meeting – London October 9° 2014 SURVEY ON THE INTERCHANGE RATE Results of the questionnaire circulated among EMTA Members

DEFINITIONS Before introducing the subject of the interchange rate, a few definitions are useful: TRIP: A Trip is an unique unit from one origin to one destination for one purpose. It can be made using one or more networks and/or vehicles. If a trip is made using several modes, networks or vehicles, every change of mode, network or just vehicle is considered as an interchange : In the Barometer we define also how a trip can be composed: JOURNEY: in closed networks a journey is counted whenever the passenger enters or leaves the network. In open networks a journey is counted whenever a different vehicle is used. STAGE: each change of vehicle is counted as a stage both in closed and open networks. A stage can be referred to as “boarding”. The interchange rate is a fraction. We calculate it as:

WHY WE PROPOSED THIS SURVEY During the last 4 years the economic crisis reduced the amount of revenues from taxes As a consequence the central government in Italy has reduced public transport funding We have been intensively involved in reorganization processes to reduce the amount of service offered while ensuring a satisfactory level of service to our customers. In this process we used our simulation models to evaluate the impact of different scenarios. The urban transport operator asked for a consultancy from the University to analyze the PT network and make a proposal for a new PT network scheme The results of the simulations made by the University on both the current network and a scenario with a partially redesigned network reported an interchange rate that was higher than the rate measured by our surveys and also higher than the output of our simulations. We did not expect such a high interchange rate and therefore we decided to ask the EMTA Members to provide their figures for benchmark. This short presentation shows a comparison among our data from surveys and the data received from the EMTA members who participated in the survey.

THE INTERCHANGE RATE IN OUR REGION In our network we adopt the interchange rate as Stages divided by Trips The source of information is the IMQ (Mobility and Quality Survey) on a CATI basis on a sample of citizens living in the province of Turin. We ask the interviewed persons to describe all the trips made the working day before the interview. For every trip we ask them to declare how many modes they used: » Suburban rail » Metro » Interurban bus » Urban bus and tramway » Other bus and vehicles (school bus, company bus, water transportation, cable-car, etc) If the Turin urban network is one of the modes they used, we ask them to declare the line numbers. At the moment we don't ask to specify the different lines used in case of suburban rail and interurban bus.

CALCULATION OF INTERCHANGE RATE IN OUR REGION To calculate the interchange rate we count the number of different segments of the trip as different modes + different stages on the urban network: Example: A trip made using suburban rail, then urban tramway (Line 4) and then urban bus (Line 15) counts as two modes but counts as three stages. Therefore in order to calculate the interchange rate it counts 3. A trip made using interurban bus, then suburban rail, then urban bus (Line 10) has three modes as the previous example bus counts as 3.

OUR FIGURES Years/surveys Stages (Modes + Lines) Trips Combined Interchange rate1,291,251,291,30 Stages Trips Interchange between urban bus & tramway lines 1,251,261,221,21 Combined interchange rate modes + urban bus & tramway lines Interchange rate between urban bus & tramway lines

OUR QUESTIONNAIRE "In our network we classify the interchange rate at two levels: 1. Interchange between different modes, i.e.: 1a. Suburban rail 1b. Metro 1c. Urban buses and tramway 1d. Other buses and vehicles (interurban bus, water transportation, cable-cars, etc) 2. Interchange within the same mode and between different lines/routes (only for point 1c. urban bus and tramway and 1b. Metro if more than one line are present)" Do you use the same approach to measurement of the interchange rate? For those who answered NO to the previous question Can you please specify your approach? Calculation of interchange rate: Do you have figures about the interchange rate in your network? "In our network we calculate the interchange rate with the following method: 1. The average number of different modes used by the passenger in a single trip from origin to destination 2. The average number of different lines (if more lines are present within one mode) used by the passenger in the same trip."

BENCHMARK We received 9 filled questionnaires. Two PTA’s declared that they have no data available at the moment. A comparison is difficult because the calculation of the interchange rate is made by each Authority with different purposes (some PTA’s obtain it from the ticket validations for clearing purposes, some other PTA’s obtain the rate from general purpose surveys). These are the figures that are more homogeneous. Interchange rate stages / trips AMMT Turin (2010)1,30 SYTRAL Lyon1,48 VBB Berlin1,50 ATM Barcelona (Intermodality rate)1,33 ROPID Prague1,47 HSL Helsinki1,30

BENCHMARK These are the figures that are collected with a different purpose. Interchange rate (criteria) MOVIA CopenhagenShare of combination trips per company Min 21% max 60% Boardings per trip Calculated per company Min 1,014 max 1,14 ZTM WarsawInterchange measured by ticket validations It is different for each ticket/pass

ANSWERS IN DETAIL

CONCLUSIONS AMMT would like to thank all the EMTA Members who participated in the survey. The figures you provided are very useful to better compare our figures and the output of our simulations with the data coming from the other metropolitan areas. And of course, thanks for your attention today!