J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD 25-10-05 1 CERN participation to ILC ILC- MoU: Support to GDE Contribution to GDE: J.L.Baldy: Civil Engineering & Conventional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC Nick Walker (DESY) EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting DESY 1 November 2004.
Advertisements

Nick Walker KEK-DESY meeting 7 th March 2005.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Applied superconductivity group L. García-Tabarés, F. Toral, I. RodriguezCIEMAT, I/2008.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
Status of ILC Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 17-Aug-07.
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Grigori SHIRKOV Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Russia International Intergovernmental Organization 18.
September 2006 F. Richard LAL/Orsay 1 News from ELAN SC of CARE CERN September 2006.
R&D proposals for EuCard 2 EuCard2, April 21Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  SRF basic research (W. Weingarten)  CTF3 and CTF3+, possible infra - structure for.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
J.P.DelahayeE-GDE meeting 10/05/061 CERN non EU contribution to ILC J.P.Delahaye.
ESPG R. Aleksan November 28 th, 2011 Accelerator R&D Accelerator R&D 1.Introduction 2.Accelerator Science and Technology 3.Conclusion.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
1 Albrecht Wagner DESY and the ILC DESY today DESY strategy and funding DESY and the ILC Funding from the European Union KEK/DESY Collaboration.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
27 Nov 07 VM Workshop Global Design Effort 1 ILC – Superconducting Linear Collider Marc Ross, Project Manager GDE Fermilab.
FALC Technology Benefits study P. Grannis Beijing GDE meeting Feb. 7, 2007 FALC = Funding Agencies for Large Colliders is composed of representatives from.
Cost Model including Civil Engineering and Conventional Facilities Hans-H. Braun, CLIC ACE, June 20, 2007  Cost model goals  Methodology  Scaling assumptions.
Revised SPL-study work-plan W. Weingarten 3 May 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
CLIC08 workshop CLIC module layout and main requirements G. Riddone, on behalf of the CMWG Home page of the TBM WG:
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
CTF3 Probe Beam G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London CTF3 Meeting, CERN 30 th November 2005 Introduction – UK Context Draft Proposal Future prospects.
CLIC Workshop, CERN 1 CLIC/ILC Collaboration Report: Marc Ross (Fermilab); for Nick Walker, Akira Yamamoto Project Managers International Linear.
Meeting of the European Global Design Effort Report from INFN non EU-funded R&D Carlo Pagani University of Milano and INFN DESY, 10 May 2006.
F. Richard LAL/Orsay 1 ELAN in 2006 Annual Meeting.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
An Overview of the ILC Cryogenic System Tom Peterson, Fermilab LCFOA at SLAC 1 May 2006.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
ILC Cryogenic Systems Reference Design T. Peterson M. Geynisman, A. Klebaner, V. Parma, L. Tavian, J. Theilacker 20 July 2007.
April 2006 F. Richard LAL/Orsay 1 News from ELAN SC of CARE Paris April 2006.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto th ATF2 Project Meeting Accelerator Design and Integration – New Baseline Proposal for ILC – ‘Strawman Baseline.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
E.Elsen GDE Meeting, Beijing, Feb 2007 Perspectives and Planning for European LC R&D.
Accelerator Activities at Spain Madrid CIEMA T CMAM Valencia IFIC Bilbao ESS Barcelona ALBA UPC Sevilla CNA 1 PAC-ILC May 2010.
LNF Frascati, July 8, 2011 DR Technical Baseline Rev. Global Design Effort 1 DR Technical Baseline Review INFN LNF · Frascati, Italy July 7 and 8, 2011.
Risto Nousiainen, CLIC workshop ” Technical Issues, Integration & Cost ” working group Progress on Study of Module Cooling Risto Nousiainen.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
SLHC-PP WP7 8 April 2008 Structure SLHC- PP WP7 SLHC-PP Steering Group SPL Study Group DESY Peters INFN ? CERN Scrivens / Hofle STFC- RAL Faircloth CEA.
ESGARD – OMIA 10 & 11/09/2007 JRA on Sc cavities and Cryomodule for a Pulsed proton Linac Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources R. Garoby for S.
FP7: EuCARD after a year of preparation… A.Jeremie.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 1 European Regional R&D plan Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) MAC Meeting.
Lucio Rossi The High Luminosity LHC Project Distinguished Lecturer 2013.
J.P.Delahaye Journees Thematiques DAPNIA “Accelerateurs” ( ) 1 The CLIC Study and the DAPNIA participation The world-wide scene about Linear Colliders.
FCC Infrastructure & Operation Update on the cryogenics study Laurent Tavian CERN, TE-CRG 28 October 2015.
Capabilities and Programmes of STFC’s Accelerator Science & Technology Centre (ASTeC)
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
EuroTeV WP7 activities in DESY
Accelerator Research and Innovation for European Science and Society
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
What Should We Do?.
Sébastien Bousson (CNRS-IN2P3-IPN Orsay)
Future Collider Projects at CERN
ILC Cryogenic Systems Draft EDR Plan
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Presentation transcript:

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD CERN participation to ILC ILC- MoU: Support to GDE Contribution to GDE: J.L.Baldy: Civil Engineering & Conventional Facilities J.P.Delahaye: EU-GDE co-Deputy Director, D.Schulte: Beam dynamics L.Tavian: Cryogenics ILC project management tools Participation to Data Management System (ILC-DMS) committee to recommend best tools for ILC: J.Ferguson Proposal to use tools (EDMS,…) developed for LHC Offer of technical and administrative support ILC Site Specific Cost Study

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD ILC site specific cost study Two EU sample sites: CERN and DESY Strong collaboration between CERN and DESY W.Bialowons: GDE European Cost engineer J.L.Baldy: GDE European Conventional Facilities expert Limited number of site specific systems Civil engineering and conventional facilities Cryogenics Major sub-systems are non site specific: Use of cost studies already done for TESLA Adaptation to ILC following BCD baselines (from January 06) Definition of WBS and tools following recommendation by dedicated committee (GG4) ILC and CLIC cost studies in parallel, on same site with same tools and same method Identify cost drivers and main differences

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Tesla Project Siting Site map of the Linear Collider and X-FEL at DESY

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD P4 P5 P6 P8P2 10 km PO9 PO7 PO5 PO3 PO1 PO2 PO4 PO6 PO8 Possible site for a Linear Collider at CERN – P10 P11

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Longitudinal section of a Linear Collider on CERN site–

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD ILC WBS

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD CERN additional contribution to ILC Major partner in specific studies: Civil engineering and site specific cost study: J.L.Baldy Cryogenics and cryostats: L.Tavian Beam dynamics issues: D.Schulte R&D on generic key issues independent of technology: Participation in EUROTeV design study, CARE project and ELAN network R&D on Beam diagnostics, Beam Delivery System (BDS), Beam dynamics... Resources: 2.3 MEur. material, 25 staff-y, 20 fellows-y = 6.75 MEur. total Tests with beam in CTF3 Test facility: Beam instrumentation and beam simulations benchmarking Beam combination for DR injection/extraction with RF transv. cavities Participation to R&D on Low Emittance ATF/KEK

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD ~ ILC He Inventory of Large Cryogenic Systems

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Transport of Refrigeration in Large Distributed Cryogenic systems Low Pressure drop over long distances requires large pumping headers !

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Alternative Configuration Distributed 2 K refrigeration Increase the distance between cryoplant by a factor 2 Require specific alcove for 2K cryoplants but saving of a lot civil engineering and infrastructure as well as reducing of the surface site impact. Require specific study on the design and operation of “underground” warm compressor station Require refrigeration (water) capacity of about 1 to 2 MW per alcove Require an additional header in the cryomodule to return the compressed He (20-30 K, few bar) to the main cryoplant

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Alternative Configuration Larger cryoplants 4.5 K refrigerator Feasibility study on larger refrigerators (40-50 kW equivalent at 4.5 K) and impacts on cost, layout, operation, site … R&D requirement Warm centrifugal compressor as booster Feasibility study with impacts on cost, operation and reliability. Validation test is mandatory. 2 K refrigeration Feasibility study on larger cold compressors and impacts on cost, layout, operation… R&D requirement

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Alternative Configuration Cryomodule Cryostat optimization Cost effectiveness of the 5-8 K shield Use of conduction cooled current leads for quadrupole (if HTS retained as baseline). Gain on operation flexibility. Separated distribution line Mainly justified by cost saving, if any (no sectorization required for cryomodule repair or exchange). Could be interesting in case of 2 tunnels (operation availability if the line is in the service tunnel) Could increase the filling factor of the linacs Could be justified if the vibration due to He flow is not acceptable (reduced flows in cryomodules). Could simplified the heat intercept design and efficiency (small pipe can be routed close to the components to be thermalized) The 300 mm pumping header (thickness 6 mm !!) is use as a rigid beam for cavity alignment inside a module (separated line with or without the pumping header?)

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Participants: 22 Duration: January 2004 – December 2008 Total expenditures:35.14 MEuros Total E.U. support: MEuros The main objective of the CARE project is to generate a structured and integrated European area in the field of accelerator research and related R&D. The program includes the most advanced scientific and technological developments relevant to accelerator research for Particle Physics. It is articulated around 3 Networking Activities and 4 Joint Research Activities: - ELAN (Electron Linear Accelerator Network) - BENE (Beam for European Neutrino Experiments) - HHH (High intensity High brightness Hadron Beams) - SRF (Superconducting RF) - PHIN (PHoto-INjector) - HIPPI (High Intensity Proton Pulsed Injectors) - NED (Next European Dipole) Initiated: - EUROTeV - Beta beam task in the EURISOL Design Study Considered: - LHC luminosity upgrade - Neutrino factory - Light quark and Phi factory Initiated: - None yet Considered: - None yet E.U. programmes: [2/12]

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Goal: … Coordination of R&D on electron accelerators at the European level. Evaluating the various technologies for improving the present infrastructures and defining a roadmap for future electron accelerators and colliders, including new techniques of acceleration. Number of participating laboratories: 55 Total contribution from EU ( ): MEuros [E.U. to CERN contribution:0.058 Meuros] Organization : Coordinator: F.Richard (LAL/IN2P3)/D.Schulte (CERN) Five Work Packages: – Normal Conducting linac technology (G.Guignard/CERN) – Super Conducting Linac Technology (L.Lilje/DESY) – Beam Dynamics (D.Schulte/CERN) – Instrumentation and Diagnostics (S.Smith/CCLRC) – Advanced and novel accelerator development (B.Cros/CNRS) ELAN (“Electron Linear Accelerator”) Network E.U. programmes: [4/12]

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Goal: … Research and Developments on charge production by interaction of laser pulse with material within RF field and improve or extend the existing infrastructures in order to fulfil the objectives. Coordinate the efforts done in various institutes on the photo-injectors Number of participating laboratories: 9 Total contribution from EU ( ): 3.5 MEuros [E.U. to CERN contribution:1.2 Meuros ] Organization : Coordinator: A.Ghigo(INFN)/R.Losito(CERN) Four Work Packages: – Management and communication (A.Ghigo/INFN) – Charge production (J.Teichert/FRZ-ELBE) – Lasers (I.Ross/CCRLC-RAL) – RF guns and beam dynamics (G.Bienvenu/LAL) JRA PHIN “Charge production with photo-Injectors” E.U. programmes: [4/12]

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD CERN contribution to CARE ELAN&PHIN

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD = CERN participation EU supported (9MEuros) Linear Colliders Design Study About common L.C. key issues

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD CERN resources to EUROTeV

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD CERN contribution to EUROTeV

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Participation to KEK Generation of small emittance beams in ATF1 and nanometer spot sizes in ATF2

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Latest stabilization technology applied to the accelerator field Contribution to ATF of Test Bench CERN Collaboration CERN/LAPP/KEK Stabilizing quadrupoles to the 0.5 nm level! (up to 10 times better than supporting ground, above 4 Hz) Collaboration on Nanometer Stabilisation

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD INFN CLEX Damped accelerating structure (R1.1) Drive beam generation scheme (R1.2) ON/OFF PETS (R1.3) Stability bench marking (R2.1) CLIC sub-unit (R2.3) Use of CLIC Test Facility (CTF3) Test with beam of beam diagnostics and RF transverse cavities

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD DRAFT of a Conceptual Proposal for an Instrumentation Test Beam (ITB) Line at the CTF3 Probe Beam G. A. Blair, John Adams Institute at RHUL, UK. H. Braun,CERN, Switzerland

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD CERN resources towards ILC

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD CERN FTE/year contribution to ILC

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Conclusion and possible developments CERN focused on LHC, resources committed up to 2010 CERN committed to demonstrate feasibility of CLIC technology towards colliding beam energies in multi-TeV range complementary to ILC, within the frame of a multi-lateral network of collaborating institutes Limited but substantial participation to ILC within the frame of the EU supported EUROTeV design study and CARE project (ELAN, PHIN) on generic key issues independent of technology with resources ( ): 2.3 MEur., 25 staff-years, 20 fellow-years Additional man-power for BCD and RDR: 2.4 FTE/year Beam dynamics Cryogenics and cryostat optimisation Civil engineering and Conventional Facilities Site specific cost study

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Conclusion and possible developments Civil engineering & conventional facilities for site specific cost studies 170 KCHF/year FTE Funding: CERN&DESY? Geotechnical & Civil eng consultancy, SW&Database, Cooling & Ventilation, Siting&Survey, Electrical eng, Alarms&Access, Development and support of ILC project management tools (if LHC tools selected) 2 to 3 FTE Funding: CERN? Beam Diagnostics Beam line in CTF3 CLEX Estimation: 500 kCHF + 7FTE Funding: EU?, PPARK?

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Conclusion and possible developments CARE2 in the frame of FP7: CARE and EUROTEV presently focused on design, modeling, prototypes, fabrication techniques, ending 2007 New Joint Research Activities (JRAs) from 2008 for engineering and fabrication techniques in collaboration with industry Taking advantage of available expertise in SC magnet technology and Cryogenics at CERN in parallel with LHC operation R&D on BDS SC quadrupoles, DR SC wigglers, Crab cavities (LHC upgrade), …., R&D for cryogenics optimisation Beam dynamics: Computing cluster, Codes development and bench-mark Pre-alignment and stabilisation Estimation: ? Funding EU?,

J.P.Delahaye GDE Meeting OXFORD Future R&D on ILC Cryogenics