SensorWeb Data Fusion in Large Arrays of Microsensors MURI Review Meeting Introduction/Overview Alan S. Willsky September 22, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Widening the Research Pipeline Update to NSF/CISE BPC Evaluation Workshop December 7, 2006.
Advertisements

DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
V-1 Part V: Collaborative Signal Processing Akbar Sayeed.
 Introductions  Webinar etiquette ◦ Please place your phone on MUTE if you are not asking a question or not responding to the presenters. ◦ If you encounter.
College of Business Spring 2013 Advisory Council Meeting AACSB Standards Update.
A system Performance Model Instructor: Dr. Yanqing Zhang Presented by: Rajapaksage Jayampthi S.
Systems Wireless EmBedded 1/18/2002WEBS Retreat Breakout1 Proposed Breakout Topics Programming Support for NEST –TinyOS macros, NesC, FSMs, SQLs, Matlab,
Volkan Cevher, Marco F. Duarte, and Richard G. Baraniuk European Signal Processing Conference 2008.
1 SAFIRE Project DHS Update – July 15, 2009 Introductions  Update since last teleconference Demo Video - Fire Incident Command Board (FICB) SAFIRE Streams.
Rutgers Components Phase 2 Principal investigators –Paul Kantor, PI; Design, modelling and analysis –Kwong Bor Ng, Co-PI - Fusion; Experimental design.
Compressed Sensing for Networked Information Processing Reza Malek-Madani, 311/ Computational Analysis Don Wagner, 311/ Resource Optimization Tristan Nguyen,
Quality of Service in IN-home digital networks Alina Albu 7 November 2003.
Model Personalization (1) : Data Fusion Improve frame and answer (of persistent query) generation through Data Fusion (local fusion on personal and topical.
Uncertainty Quantification and Visualization: Geo-Spatially Registered Terrains and Mobile Targets Suresh Lodha Computer Science, University of California,
Scalable Information-Driven Sensor Querying and Routing for ad hoc Heterogeneous Sensor Networks Maurice Chu, Horst Haussecker and Feng Zhao Xerox Palo.
June 20, 2001MURI Review Meeting Decision-Making under Uncertainty University of California, Berkeley Venkat Anantharam Laurent El Ghaoui Michael I. Jordan.
Summary Alan S. Willsky SensorWeb MURI Review Meeting September 22, 2003.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Introduction SNR Gain Patterns Beam Steering Shading Resources: Wiki:
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
GoalsStrategySuccess Measure Improve Council recognition/awareness A Council Officer attend a PTSA or Site Council meeting at each of our 15 schools Parents.
Slide Adaptive Sampling and Prediction (ASAP) AOSN-II Undersea Persistent Surveillance (UPS) Autonomous Wide Aperture.
HPC use in Testing Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Dissertation Defense Susan J. Wolff September 7, 2001 Dr. George H. Copa, Major Professor.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? May 2014 Note: This is one of seven slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
Standardization: An Academician’s Perspective Pramod K. Varshney Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Syracuse University Syracuse, NY 13244
NSF Critical Infrastructures Workshop Nov , 2006 Kannan Ramchandran University of California at Berkeley Current research interests related to workshop.
Research Projects in the Mobile Computing and Networking (MCN) Lab Guohong Cao Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University.
Collaborative Work Package Criteria Suitable for accomplishing in a period of 90 days to 1 year. Work should fall within the expertise of one or more consortium.
Michael Murphy, Huthasana Kalyanam, John Hess, Vance Faber, Boris Khattatov Fusion Numerics Inc. Overview of Current Research in Sensor Networks and Weather.
Science & Technology Centers Program Center for Science of Information National Science Foundation Science & Technology Centers Program Bryn Mawr Howard.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and.
Wireless Networks Breakout Session Summary September 21, 2012.
Chapter 11: Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research Design
Tracking with Unreliable Node Sequences Ziguo Zhong, Ting Zhu, Dan Wang and Tian He Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Infocom 2009.
1 Heterogeneity in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign © 2003 Vaidya.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Optimal, Robust Information Fusion in Uncertain.
Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and David H.C. Du Dept. of.
IEEE SCC41 PARs Dr. Rashid A. Saeed. 2 SCC41 Standards Project Acceptance Criteria 1. Broad market application  Each SCC41 (P1900 series) standard shall.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? March 2015 Note: This is one of eight slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
T Iteration Demo CloudSizzle PP Iteration
Distributed State-Estimation Using Quantized Measurement Data from Wireless Sensor Networks Li Chai with Bocheng Hu Professor College of.
Covilhã, 30 June Atílio Gameiro Page 1 The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Dynamic Sensor Resource Management for ATE MURI.
Value of Information 1 st year review. UCLA 2012 Kickoff VOI Kickoff ARO MURI on Value-centered Information Theory for Adaptive Learning, Inference, Tracking,
Approximate Dynamic Programming Methods for Resource Constrained Sensor Management John W. Fisher III, Jason L. Williams and Alan S. Willsky MIT CSAIL.
Presenting your Research. What’s the point? Communicating your findings is important step in the scientific method. You will likely learn more about your.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Sensorweb Architecture and Dynamic Sensor Tasking in Mobile Sensor Networks Sanjoy K. Mitter, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint work with: Maurice.
SCALABLE INFORMATION-DRIVEN SENSOR QUERYING AND ROUTING FOR AD HOC HETEROGENEOUS SENSOR NETWORKS Paper By: Maurice Chu, Horst Haussecker, Feng Zhao Presented.
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AVIATION | CIVIL | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | DATA SYSTEMS | ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING | GEOSPATIAL.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology.  Qualitative research is designed to reveal a specific target audience’s range of behavior and the perceptions.
Energy-Efficient Signal Processing and Communication Algorithms for Scalable Distributed Fusion.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and.
+ Informatics 122 Software Design II Lecture 13 Emily Navarro Duplication of course material for any commercial purpose without the explicit written permission.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Dynamic Declarative Networking Exploiting Declarative Knowledge To Enable Energy Efficient Collaborative Sensing Daniel J. Van Hook.
Earth Educators’ Rendezvous Workshop Leader Webinar Introduction Workshop Design Best Practices Utilizing the Web Tools Evaluation Instruments David McConnell,
John Fisher, Alexander Ihler, Jason Williams , Alan Willsky
First-Year Experience Seminars: A Benchmark Study of Targeted Courses for Developmental Education Students.
SENSOR FUSION LAB RESEARCH ACTIVITIES PART I : DATA FUSION AND DISTRIBUTED SIGNAL PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS Sensor Fusion Lab, Department of Electrical.
MURI Kickoff Meeting Randolph L. Moses July 21, 2006
MURI Annual Review Meeting Randy Moses November 3, 2008
Individual Research Report and Team Multimedia Presentation
Evidence Based Policing Knowledge-Oriented Approaches
SRH & HIV Linkages Agenda
Nonparametric Hypothesis Tests for Dependency Structures
Presentation transcript:

SensorWeb Data Fusion in Large Arrays of Microsensors MURI Review Meeting Introduction/Overview Alan S. Willsky September 22, 2003

The Day’s Agenda Introduction/Overview Research Presentations Summary

Introduction/Overview Outline Setting the stage: Intellectual themes and research concentration areas Facts, Statistics, and Such What we have heard from the EAB/TAC Outline of remaining presentations and how they fit

Intellectual Themes IT-1: Consistent (or manageably inconsistent) fusion of networked, myopic sensors IT-2: Fusion of heterogeneous sensors in unstructured and uncertain environments IT-3: Wireless networks, network communication and information theory

Research Concentration Areas RCA-1: (Self-)Calibration RCA-2&3: Fundamental limits on fusion, network information theory, tradeoffs in local vs global processing RCA-4: Bounds & characteristics of algorithms to ID minimum resources needed to detect, estimate, track… RCA-5: Fusion Algorithms RCA-6: Distributed Algorithms with guarantees on global behavior (both positive & negative!) RCA-7: Create events/data for experiments and demos

Funding, Timing, and Staffing We are 3 years, 1 month into this program Funding: We are on plan Includes adjustments for delays in funding and other ARO- approved variations (e.g,. Sanjoy Mitter’s time this fall) Principal Faculty/Investigators Willsky, Mitter, Jaakkola, Fisher, Cetin, Tsitsiklis (MIT); Kulkarni, Verdu (Princeton); Kumar (Illinois) Numerous post-docs, visitors, and grad students MIT (19), Illinois (12), Princeton (12)

Website: Continually growing record of accomplishments and activities The Website:

Publications, Presentations, Results Publications Latest count: 113 publications Includes a (growing) number of key invited journal papers Presentations Numerous internal and external talks Continually growing record of invited, plenary, and keynote talks Continuing participation in Battlefield Acoustics mtg. Significant research results in all aspects of our intellectual agenda See talks to follow, publications, summary at the end, website

A few of our industrial/DoD interactions With PARC (formerly Xerox PARC) Joint Paper, Transition and Experimental Demo within SensIT program, Maurice Chu has joined PARC team With ALPHATECH Transition of fusion methods to several programs (Raptor, DARPA DTT program (with SenTech), DARPA ISP Program) ARO SBIR Topic A MURI research (Tsitsiklis) cited as foundational to the topic With ARL: Numerous since last review Visits to ARL by Verdu, Kumar Battlefield Acoustics Mtg. (Willsky-Sadler, Pham, Srour, Moses) Interactions with Sensors CTA (Falco, Moses) Visits to MIT: Sadler, Moses Extended follow-ups with ARL: Ihler, Fisher, Cetin, Malioutov

Sampling of Academic Interactions Berkeley/Stanford MURI Post-doctoral positions of Drs. Sekhar Tatikonda and Martin Wainwright Continuing interchange and reciprocal visits MURI on Battlefield Visualization Interaction with Prof. Pramod Varshney Ohio State University Collaboration with Prof. Randy Moses Through Sensors CTA Reciprocal visits (Moses, Fisher) Utilization of our network-constrained estimation algorithms in Prof. Moses’ work Several collaborative research projects initiated

Standing Questions from the EAB/TAC - I Time spent on the project We are maintaining/exceeding levels anticipated (Mitter 4 mo., Willsky 3 mo., Kulkarni 2/3 mo., Kumar 2/3 mo., Jaakkola 2/3 mo., Verdu 2/3 mo.) Cost-sharing Substantial for faculty (Schools pay almost all AY time) Even greater for students (More than twice as many students involved as are receiving direct support) Plans for handling real data, for demos and/or paths to implementation Variety of examples given in previous reviews Further discussions embedded in talks this year

What we heard from the EAB/TAC last year - I Significant praise Caliber of research Conscientiousness of our efforts to meet MURI objectives and respond to suggestions Several issues/requests made Allow more time for discussion and questions Fewer talks with more time between for informal discussions during breaks Expand interactions with ARL See preceding list plus discussions embedded in today’s presentations Enhance collaboration among investigators Talks today will make that collaboration more apparent

What we heard from the EAB/TAC last year - II Issues/requests continued Make sure to consider communication constraints in the context of fusion objectives as well as limitations of low power Several talks address problems related to this Is “optimal” processing required if it implies global communications; can’t one achieve adequate performance with more “local” fusion? See later talks Make sure work is relevant to sensor modalities of interest to the Army One of the purposes of our interactions with ARL Also, see several talks today

Agenda - I Welcome/Overview 8:30 – 9:15 Lavery, Willsky: Welcome/Overview 9:15 – 9:50 Cetin: A Sparse Signal Reconstruction Perspective for Source Localization with Sensor Arrays IT-2, RCA-1 (also ties to RCA-4) 9:55 – 10:30 Fisher (Kulkarni/Verdu): Information-Theoretic Approaches to Data Association and Fusion in Sensor Networks IT-2, RCA-1,5 10:30 – 10:45 Break 10:45 – 11:20 Willsky (Kumar): Network-Constrained Estimation IT-1, RCA-4,5,6 (also ties to RCA-2&3)

Agenda - II 11:20 – 1:00 Lunch 1:00 – 1:35 Jaakkola (Tsitsiklis): Using Heterogeneous Data Sources and Sequential Resource Management IT-1, RCA-4,5,6 1:40 – 2:15 Kumar (Verdu/Tsitsiklis): Information Transfer in Wireless Networks for Distributed Sensing and Control IT-2, RCA-2&3 2:15 – 2:30 Break

Agenda - III 2:30 – 3:10 Mitter/Chu/Willsky: Distributed Multiple Target Tracking and Information Architecture for Designing Applications on Ad Hoc Sensor Networks IT-1, RCA-4,5,6 3:10 – 3:30 Willsky: Summary 3:30 – 4:30 Government Caucus 4:30 – 5:00 Preliminary Debrief