The Mass has to do with? Mass implies light More mass, the more light. A detailed calculation shows the relation is that the Luminosity is proportional to the v 4 cf. tro12/tully.html tro12/tully.html TheTully-Fisher Relation
The S-Z (Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect) Concept: Hot gas in Cluster changes CMB by about 1/1000 Now you see the effect Now you don’t see the effect
The S-Z (Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect) Problems: Need to measure the gas temperature and distribution. This requires sophisticated X-ray telescopes in space and accurate modeling. Now the “claim to fame” is the effect can be used to detect clusters of galaxies better than any other technique because it is a surface brightness effect which is independent of distance
Motivation for the SZ and Grav. Lens approaches used to be to measure H 0. Now mainly use SZ to discover clusters and Grav. Lenses for statistical inferences about geometry of the universe:e.g. number of lenses found. For, with Cepheids from HIPPARCOS, we’re pretty confident the right answer is 68 5 km/(sec-Mpc); From J. Mould and 59 6 from Sandage => when doing something quick use 50,but for better number use 65
Measuring Redshifts in real life =>
From Jim Schombert Calibration source Light from galaxy Elliptical galaxy
This is not easy! Data Result of matching a “template” to the data. “High” is good Where are H & K??? Redder-> Higher z = redder
History of Hubble Constant Sandage & Tamann de Vaucouleurs; then Aaronson, Mould and Huchra Sandage: I told you so!!!
Summary: Use a “ruler” (Radar) to measure distance to the sun Use Parallax to measure distance to Cepheids Use Super Novae, Tully-Fisher and Jackson-Faber/Fundamental plane to work our way out Once we get out to about z = 0.1 we’re done as far as measuring H 0
We can study the local motions versus distance and search for mass concentrations to directly determine m Most famous “local” ( D = 42h -1 Mpc) mass concentration (the Great Attractor) Found with Tully-Fisher plus Jackson-Faber
The Great Attractor: Mass concentration of about solar masses (remember how much mass is in a cluster?) inside a volume about 3 times that of a typical cluster of galaxies at about z = We can’t see it directly only its effect due to gravity. Close enough and concentrated enough that if it were “only” a concentration of galaxies we could see it. => Direct evidence for Dark Matter.
GA, cont. © Kraan-Korteweg & Lahav, 1998, Scientific American 279, p.50 The recession velocities of relatively nearby galaxies show systematic deviations from a uniform expansion field. These deviations are believed to be caused by a gravitational perturbation, in the form of a large - hitherto unnoticed - concentration of mass (5 x M O ) near the southern Milky Way at a redshift- distance of 4350 km/s, named the `Great Attractor' (GA). Attempts to quantify both the nature and extent of the GA have been hampered by the fact that the GA is largely hidden by the disk of the Milky Way. Although there is an excess of optical and IRAS galaxies in this region (Lynden-Bell 1991), no dominant galaxy cluster or other concentration of mass has been identified until recently, when it was found that the Norma cluster (ACO 3627) is a very massive cluster of galaxies located at the heart of the Great Attractor. Another web page gives a distance = 45 Mpc, assuming they used the same v, what H 0 did they use?.
3-D map of sphere out to GA In collaboration with Prof. Kraan- Korteweg (Guanajuato, Mexico), Prof. Fairall and Dr. Woudt (both UCT) have been working on a detailed analysis of the Norma cluster at the core of the Great Attractor. The importance of this cluster was realized following a deep optical galaxy search behind the southern Milky Way. Current studies of the Norma cluster include a detailed dynamical analysis of the cluster, deep R-band imaging of the cluster (MSc project of Mr. Karsten Markus) and a redshift-independent distance determination of the Norma cluster using the near-infrared Fundamental Plane analysis, to unambiguously determine the nature of the Great Attractor. © Kraan-Korteweg & Lahav, 1998, Scientific American 279, p.50
=>In the direction of the Great Attractor, nothing unusual: Centaurus
Great Attractor, nothing unusual just an “ordinary” massive cluster: Norma “false color”
OK, we can’t “see” the GA with light. So why do we think it’s there?? Gravity!! Concept: measure the distances to a many galaxies as you can in the 1-20 Mpc range and make a plot What I call a “tadpole” plot
The Tadpole Plot: simplified The large circles mark a given distance from the sun. Head is galaxy location, tail length is size of recession velocity ;GA here; as Earth feels tug; so expansion is not seen so great in this dir.. earth