Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 12 Assessing Group Work.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Analyzing Student Work
Session Outcomes Explain how assessment contributes to the learning process Use a model of feedback to enhance student learning Identify a range of feedback.
Cooperative Teaching By Mr. Salvador. Major Aspects to consider What approach will you use? Choosing your material? What are your objectives? How will.
1 Welcome to Module 1 Principles of Mathematics Instruction.
Session 3 Assessement of, for, & as Learning. Phases of Assessment Diagnostic Formative Summative Assessment.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
Team Task Choose 1 Progression to READ: Number and Operations--Fractions Ratios and Proportional Relationships Develop “Content” Knowledge.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
Assessing Student Learning
The purpose of this workshop is to introduce faculty members to some of the foundation issues associated with designing assignments for writing intensive.
Essay Assessment Tasks
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Chapter 1 Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Coaching and Providing Feedback for Improved Performance
ASSESSMENT Formative, Summative, and Performance-Based
Robert Reid Torri Ortiz Lienemann.  Session I: ◦ Introductions of group members, facilitators, and text ◦ Review format for the book study ◦ Choose partners/small.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Top 10 Instructional Strategies
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
© 2011 Brooks/Cole, A Division of Cengage Learning Chapter 16 Consultation and Collaboration You must be the change you wish to see in the world. Mahatma.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 7 Portfolio Assessments.
Researchers of homework are Harris Cooper, Herbert Walberg, and Joyce Epstein. Epstein found that homework is important because learning is extended into.
EEX 3257 COOPERATIVE LEARNING. BENEFITS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING Academic Benefits Increased achievement and increased retention of knowledge Improved.
Cooperative Language Learning (CLL) Collaborative Learning (CL)
Bringing Students and Texts Together Chapter 10 By Dawn Oliver.
Student assessment Assessment tools AH Mehrparvar,MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
Accommodations for Students with Special Needs By Robyn Rubel Diane Knight Tracy Lemus Santos.
THE DEMOCRATIC CLASSROOM: ASSESSMENT
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 13 Assessing Affective Characteristics.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
Roger Johnson & David Johnson
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Roger Johnson & David Johnson Cooperative Learning.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 10 Social Constructivist Approaches © 2011 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights.
 What is Cooperative Learning and how is it different from other instructional methods?
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Group Work Evaluation Issue Fairness in Group Work Evaluation Evaluation can be difficult enough when.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT  EDU 310 Week 1 Individual Assignment Main Factors of Lesson plans EDU 310 Week 1 DQ 1 EDU 310 Week 1 DQ.
JIGSAW METHOD OF TEACHING. The purpose of Jigsaw is to develop teamwork and cooperative learning skills within all students. In addition it helps.
Cooperative Learning A number of strategies whereby students help one another acquire course content.
Chapter 1 Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms
Chapter Six What Makes a Teacher Effective?
3 Chapter Needs Assessment.
Chapter 10 Cooperative Learning.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Chapter 16 Participating in Groups and Teams.
SPE 578 STUDY perfect education/spe578study.com
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
The BUILD Strategy Professional Developer’s Guide developed by D
Promoting Inclusion with Classroom Peers
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
Cooperative Learning Concepts
Cooperative Language Learning
The Intentional teacher
Presentation transcript:

Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 12 Assessing Group Work

Introduction  Assessing group work is not as straightforward as it may seem; it is not a simple extension of individual student assessment.  There are several additional assessment issues related to the assessment of group work.

The Importance of Group Process  More and more classrooms are emphasizing cooperative learning strategies, involving small groups of two to six students who must work on a task together.  Can foster student learning, self-esteem, social skills, and attitudes toward others.  Not only an important instructional strategy, but also an important assessment strategy. To create a better parallel between instruction and assessment.

The Importance of Group Process  Three basic purposes of assessment in cooperative learning environments: to measure each individual student’s level of learning resulting from the group work to measure the quality of the group’s solution to measure students’ abilities to collaborate with others  Main idea is that students often learn more (or differently) when working with others, rather than in isolation.

The Importance of Group Process  Several types of group processes can emerge when students are placed in collaborative situations: Working together. Conflict and controversy. Giving and receiving help. Equality of participation. Diffusion of responsibility. Division of labor. Expert model Interchangeable model

Designing Assessments of Group Process  Group process can have both positive and negative effects on individual and group learning.  Three types of group work that focus on mastery of subject matter (and include collaborative processes) are: Group papers Group projects Group presentations

Designing Assessments of Group Process  However, students’ collaborative (group) skills can also be assessed as a result of these types of work. Assessing Collaborative Work Skills: Step-by-Step Procedure Step 1: Clarify your reasons for wanting to assess group skills. Step 2: Describe the assessment context. Step 3: Identify and describe each collaborative skill. Step 4: Design an appropriate scoring instrument.

Methods for Assessing Group Process  Most common practice is to assign a single grade to the group’s solution and give that grade to each member. Assumes equal participation and contribution to the solution (typically not the case). If teacher stresses that individual contributions are more important than that of the group, many benefits of group process will be lost. Tends to create very competitive—not collaborative—environment.

Methods for Assessing Group Process  No single solution to this dilemma. Depends on purpose of group work, teacher’s views of assessment, etc. Often results in the incorporation of subjective decisions.  Many teachers are content to award the same grade to everyone; some rely on additional observations made by others; some incorporate self- and peer-assessment.

Methods for Assessing Group Process  Three specific methods for assessing group work: Self-assessment Appropriate in upper-elementary and secondary grades. Can be used to assess level of effort, amount of time contributed, portions of process with which students felt comfortable, and those that were difficult. Tendency to self-assess in a less-than-honest manner.  Good practice to examine alongside other evidence.

Methods for Assessing Group Process Self-assessment (continued)  Can also incorporate informal discussion with individual students, comparing various assessments.

Methods for Assessing Group Process Peer assessment Each team member assesses all other members. In theory, a very effective approach since they know best what happened within the group. May also have problems with honesty. Should be used only as formative feedback to teachers; not as basis for grades.

Methods for Assessing Group Process Teacher assessment Entire responsibility can be placed on the teacher. This involves assigning both individual and group grades—each student receives two grades.  Assigns a grade for the quality of the group- based product or solution; each student receives this grade for the group’s work.  Students are then required to complete individual follow-up activities related to the group’s solution or product; purpose is to determine individual understanding (therefore, students have responsibility for group and individual learning).