Descartes' Meditations 80-100: Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy Through the Centuries
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
The evil demon argument. I will suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant demon, who is.
Descartes’ rationalism
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
René Descartes ( ). The popular version of Descartes.
Meditations on First Philosophy
1.Why does Descartes want certainty? 2.What area of philosophy was Descartes concerned with? 3.Explain the differences between the sceptical approach and.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
The Evil Demon Argument
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
Descartes’ First Meditation
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Descartes. Knowing In normal life, we distinguish between knowing and just believing. “I think the keys are in my pocket.”
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Lecture 2 (Think, pp. 14 – 34) Descartes and the Problem of Knowledge: I. Some historical and intellectual background II. What is knowledge? III. Descartes’
Descartes’ Meditations
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
Meditation 1. Argument From Illusion We needn’t reject sources of knowledge one by one – we can reject by class. Authorities – parents, books, famous people,
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
He did just about everything. Everything that’s important anyway.
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
The History of Knowledge. Rene Descartes (ca. 1620): “As soon as I had finished the course of studies which usually admits one to the ranks of the learned...
L ECTURE 6: D ESCARTES. L ECTURE O UTLINE In today’s lecture we will: 1.Become introduced to Rene Descartes 2.Begin our investigation into Descartes’
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
“Cogito, ergo sum.” “I think, therefore I am.”.  chief architect of 17 th C intellectual revolution  laid foundations of ‘modern scientific age’
Descartes’ Interactionist Dualism. Overview Descartes’ general project Descartes’ general project Argument for dualism Argument for dualism Explanation.
Can you trust your senses?. WHAT DO YOU KNOW? AN INTRODUCTION TO SCEPTICISM.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
DESCARTES MEDITATION 1. René Descartes
 The value of certainty.  Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis.
Rene Descartes ( ) The Father of Modern Philosophy
René Descartes (1596–1650) Cartesian Substance Dualism.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.
René Descartes ( ) The Father of Modern Philosophy.
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Skepticism.
Descartes’ Meditations
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
The Evil Demon Argument
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Descartes Scepticism.
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Meditation 2: The Nature of the Mind, which is Better Known than the Body Descartes Meditation I.
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
First Meditation – paragraph 1
Descartes The Cogito.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

Descartes' Meditations : Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University

Descartes' Project: Meditation I What's the problem that Descartes' is trying to solve? –Familiar problem: wants to eliminate false beliefs How does he propose to proceed? –Tear down everything and begin again from the foundations

How can he tear down everything and start over? Can he just show each of his beliefs to be false (or true?)? –Too hard! Plan: –Reject (set aside) any belief which can be doubted Does he need to look at all of his beliefs? –No. Start with the foundational beliefs, and the rest will follow

Okay, let's get started… What sorts of things are indubitable? –Evidence from our senses (our eyes, ears, etc)? –That we are here, sitting in this room? –That we have hands, and eyes? –That things like hands or eyes exist?

How about other things? Physics, astronomy, medicine? Arithmetic or geometry? God? What else?… –Basically, EVERYTHING!! –"I'm forced to admit that nothing that I used to believe is beyond legitimate doubt"

Okay, now what?? "[I]t's not enough to have noticed this: I must also take care to bear it in mind." Why? What does he mean by this?

"I will suppose, then, not that there is a supremely good God who is the source of all truth, but that there is an evil demon, supremely powerful and cunning, who works as hard as he can to deceive me." Why does he do this? What does this get him?

Descartes' Solution: Meditation II Recall Descartes' plan: "I will reject whatever is open to the slightest doubt just as though I have found it to be entirely false, and I will continue until I find something certain–or at least until I know for certain that nothing is certain." Build up from new foundations - all we need is "one fixed point" and we can get the rest..

Eureka!! What does Descartes find that he can be certain of??? Cogito ergo sum –"I think therefore I am" –"I am, I exist"

How can he be so sure?! being a founder of modern philosophy is nothing but ess tea arr ee ess essbeing a founder of modern philosophy is nothing but ess tea arr ee ess ess

Discussion: Small Groups Do you think it is really possible to build all true beliefs out of "I am, I exist?" Descartes' conclusion that he can doubt his body, but not his mind lead him to dualism, the theory that physical things (body, brains, etc.) and mental things (the mind) are different "stuff." Do you think he is correct in this belief, or not? Why? What are the basic lessons that you take away from Descartes' Meditations?