Regular Expressions Chapter 6. Regular Languages Regular Language Regular Expression Finite State Machine L Accepts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theory Of Automata By Dr. MM Alam
Advertisements

Finite Automata CPSC 388 Ellen Walker Hiram College.
COMP-421 Compiler Design Presented by Dr Ioanna Dionysiou.
FORMAL LANGUAGES, AUTOMATA, AND COMPUTABILITY
Regular Languages and Regular Grammars Chapter 3.
1 Introduction to Computability Theory Lecture3: Regular Expressions Prof. Amos Israeli.
1 Introduction to Computability Theory Lecture4: Regular Expressions Prof. Amos Israeli.
1 Introduction to Computability Theory Lecture3: Regular Expressions Prof. Amos Israeli.
1 FORMAL LANGUAGES, AUTOMATA AND COMPUTABILITY (For next time: Read Chapter 1.3 of the book)
CS 310 – Fall 2006 Pacific University CS310 Regular Expressions Sections:1.3 page 63 September 18, 2006 September 20, 2006.
1 Single Final State for NFAs and DFAs. 2 Observation Any Finite Automaton (NFA or DFA) can be converted to an equivalent NFA with a single final state.
CS5371 Theory of Computation Lecture 6: Automata Theory IV (Regular Expression = NFA = DFA)
79 Regular Expression Regular expressions over an alphabet  are defined recursively as follows. (1) Ø, which denotes the empty set, is a regular expression.
FSA Lecture 1 Finite State Machines. Creating a Automaton  Given a language L over an alphabet , design a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) M such.
CS 310 – Fall 2006 Pacific University CS310 Homework 2 & JFLAP September 22, 2006.
1 Regular Expressions/Languages Regular languages –Inductive definitions –Regular expressions syntax semantics Not covered in lecture.
1 A Single Final State for Finite Accepters. 2 Observation Any Finite Accepter (NFA or DFA) can be converted to an equivalent NFA with a single final.
Fall 2004COMP 3351 Regular Expressions. Fall 2004COMP 3352 Regular Expressions Regular expressions describe regular languages Example: describes the language.
Regular Languages A language is regular over  if it can be built from ;, {  }, and { a } for every a 2 , using operators union ( [ ), concatenation.
Chapter 4 Context-Free Languages Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1.
Language Recognizer Connecting Type 3 languages and Finite State Automata Copyright © – Curt Hill.
Finite State Machines Chapter 5. Languages and Machines.
CMPS 3223 Theory of Computation
Theory of Computation, Feodor F. Dragan, Kent State University 1 Regular expressions: definition An algebraic equivalent to finite automata. We can build.
Introduction to CS Theory Lecture 3 – Regular Languages Piotr Faliszewski
Automata, Computability, & Complexity by Elaine Rich ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Slides provided by author Slides edited for.
Lecture 05: Theory of Automata:08 Kleene’s Theorem and NFA.
1 Module 14 Regular languages –Inductive definitions –Regular expressions syntax semantics.
Regular Grammars Chapter 7. Regular Grammars A regular grammar G is a quadruple (V, , R, S), where: ● V is the rule alphabet, which contains nonterminals.
MA/CSSE 474 Theory of Computation Kleene's Theorem Practical Regular Expressions.
Computability Review homework. Regular Operations. Nondeterministic machines. NFSM = FSM Homework: By hand, build FSM version of specific NFSM. Try to.
MA/CSSE 474 Theory of Computation Regular Expressions Intro.
Regular Expressions and Languages A regular expression is a notation to represent languages, i.e. a set of strings, where the set is either finite or contains.
Regular Expressions Chapter 6 1. Regular Languages Regular Language Regular Expression Finite State Machine L Accepts 2.
Kleene’s Theorem Group No. 3 Presented To Mam Amina Presented By Roll No Roll No Roll No Roll No Group No. 3 Presented To Mam.
CHAPTER 1 Regular Languages
January 9, 2015CS21 Lecture 31 CS21 Decidability and Tractability Lecture 3 January 9, 2015.
Copyright © Curt Hill Finite State Automata Again This Time No Output.
Regular Expressions Chapter 6.
Regular Expressions Chapter 6. Regular Languages Regular Language Regular Expression Finite State Machine Recognizes or Accepts Generates.
Lecture # 12. Nondeterministic Finite Automaton (NFA) Definition: An NFA is a TG with a unique start state and a property of having single letter as label.
CSCI 2670 Introduction to Theory of Computing September 13.
CS 203: Introduction to Formal Languages and Automata
Chapter 3 Regular Expressions, Nondeterminism, and Kleene’s Theorem Copyright © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction.
Computability Regular expressions. Languages defined by regular expresses = Regular languages (languages recognized by FSM). Applications. Pumping lemma.
MA/CSSE 474 Theory of Computation Minimizing DFSMs.
UNIT - I Formal Language and Regular Expressions: Languages Definition regular expressions Regular sets identity rules. Finite Automata: DFA NFA NFA with.
Regular Expressions Section 1.3 (also 1.1, 1.2) CSC 4170 Theory of Computation.
CSCI 4325 / 6339 Theory of Computation Zhixiang Chen.
Conversions Regular Expression to FA FA to Regular Expression.
1 Chapter 3 Regular Languages.  2 3.1: Regular Expressions (1)   Regular Expression (RE):   E is a regular expression over  if E is one of:
1 Introduction to the Theory of Computation Regular Expressions.
Finite State Machines Chapter 5. Languages and Machines.
Regular Languages Chapter 1 Giorgi Japaridze Theory of Computability.
Lecture 09: Theory of Automata:2014 Asif NawazUIIT, PMAS-Arid Agriclture University Rawalpindi. Kleene’s Theorem and NFA.
MA/CSSE 474 Theory of Computation Regular Expressions Intro.
Kleene’s Theorem and NFA
Practical Regular Expressions
Formal Language & Automata Theory
Regular Expressions Sections:1.3 page 63 September 17, 2008
Lecture 9 Theory of AUTOMATA
Chapter 7 Regular Grammars
Kleene’s Theorem Muhammad Arif 12/6/2018.
CSCI 2670 Introduction to Theory of Computing
CSE322 Regular Expressions and their Identities
Recap lecture 11 Proof of Kleene’s theorem part II (method with different steps), particular examples of TGs to determine corresponding REs.
CSC312 Automata Theory Kleene’s Theorem Lecture # 12
Kleene’s Theorem (Part-3)
CSCI 2670 Introduction to Theory of Computing
Presentation transcript:

Regular Expressions Chapter 6

Regular Languages Regular Language Regular Expression Finite State Machine L Accepts

Regular Expressions The regular expressions over an alphabet  are all and only the strings that can be obtained as follows: 1.  is a regular expression. 2.  is a regular expression. 3. Every element of  is a regular expression. 4. If ,  are regular expressions, then so is . 5. If ,  are regular expressions, then so is . 6. If  is a regular expression, then so is  *. 7.  is a regular expression, then so is  If  is a regular expression, then so is (  ).

Regular Expression Examples If  = { a, b }, the following are regular expressions:   a ( a  b )* abba  

Regular Expressions Define Languages Define L, a semantic interpretation function for regular expressions: 1. L(  ) = . 2. L(  ) = {  }. 3. L(c), where c   = {c}. 4. L(  ) = L(  ) L(  ). 5. L(    ) = L(  )  L(  ). 6. L(  *) = (L(  ))*. 7. L(  + ) = L(  *) = L(  ) (L(  ))*. If L(  ) is equal to , then L(  + ) is also equal to . Otherwise L(  + ) is the language that is formed by concatenating together one or more strings drawn from L(  ). 8. L((  )) = L(  ).

The Role of the Rules Rules 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 give the language its power to define sets. Rule 8 has as its only role grouping other operators. Rules 2 and 7 appear to add functionality to the regular expression language, but they don’t. 2.  is a regular expression. 7.  is a regular expression, then so is  +.

Analyzing a Regular Expression L(( a  b )* b ) = L(( a  b )*) L( b ) = (L(( a  b )))* L( b ) = (L( a )  L( b ))* L( b ) = ({ a }  { b })* { b } = { a, b }* { b }.

Examples L( a * b * ) = L( ( a  b )* ) = L( ( a  b )* a * b * ) = L( ( a  b )* abba ( a  b )* ) =

Going the Other Way L = {w  { a, b }*: |w| is even}

Going the Other Way L = {w  { a, b }*: |w| is even} (( a  b ) ( a  b ))* ( aa  ab  ba  bb )*

Going the Other Way L = {w  { a, b }*: |w| is even} ( a  b ) ( a  b ))* ( aa  ab  ba  bb )* L = {w  { a, b }*: w contains an odd number of a ’s}

Going the Other Way L = {w  { a, b }*: |w| is even} ( a  b ) ( a  b ))* ( aa  ab  ba  bb )* L = {w  { a, b }*: w contains an odd number of a ’s} b * ( ab * ab *)* a b * b * a b * ( ab * ab *)*

More Regular Expression Examples L ( ( aa *)   ) = L ( ( a   )* ) = L = {w  { a, b }*: there is no more than one b in w} L = {w  { a, b }* : no two consecutive letters in w are the same}

Common Idioms (    ) ( a  b )*

Operator Precedence in Regular Expressions RegularArithmeticExpressions HighestKleene starexponentiation concatenationmultiplication Lowestunionaddition a b *  c d *x y 2 + i j 2

The Details Matter a *  b *  ( a  b )* ( ab )*  a * b *

The Details Matter L 1 = {w  { a, b }* : every a is immediately followed a b } A regular expression for L 1 : (b  ab) * A FSM for L 1 : b b a

Kleene’s Theorem Finite state machines and regular expressions define the same class of languages. To prove this, we must show: Theorem: Any language that can be defined with a regular expression can be accepted by some FSM and so is regular. Theorem: Every regular language (i.e., every language that can be accepted by some DFSM) can be defined with a regular expression.

For Every Regular Expression There is a Corresponding FSM We’ll show this by construction. An FSM for:  :

For Every Regular Expression There is a Corresponding FSM We’ll show this by construction. An FSM for:  :

For Every Regular Expression There is a Corresponding FSM We’ll show this by construction. An FSM for:  : A single element of  :

For Every Regular Expression There is a Corresponding FSM We’ll show this by construction. An FSM for:  : A single element of  :

For Every Regular Expression There is a Corresponding FSM We’ll show this by construction. An FSM for:  : A single element of  :  (  *):

For Every Regular Expression There is a Corresponding FSM We’ll show this by construction. An FSM for:  : A single element of  :  (  *):

An Example (b  ab )* An FSM for b An FSM for a An FSM for b An FSM for ab :

An Example ( b  ab )* An FSM for ( b  ab ):

An Example ( b  ab )* An FSM for ( b  ab )*: Error in Book, Not an Accept State

The Algorithm regextofsm regextofsm(  : regular expression) = Beginning with the primitive subexpressions of  and working outwards until an FSM for all of  has been built do: Construct an FSM as described above.

For Every FSM There is a Corresponding Regular Expression We’ll show this by construction. The key idea is that we’ll allow arbitrary regular expressions to label the transitions of an FSM.

A Simple Example Let M be: Suppose we rip out state 2:

The Algorithm fsmtoregexheuristic fsmtoregexheuristic(M: FSM) = 1. Remove unreachable states from M. 2. If M has no accepting states then return . 3. If the start state of M is part of a loop, create a new start state s and connect s to M’s start state via an  -transition. 4. If there is more than one accepting state of M or there are any transitions out of any of them, create a new accepting state and connect each of M’s accepting states to it via an  -transition. The old accepting states no longer accept. 5. If M has only one state then return . 6. Until only the start state and the accepting state remain do: 6.1 Select rip (not s or an accepting state). 6.2 Remove rip from M. 6.3 *Modify the transitions among the remaining states so M accepts the same strings. 7. Return the regular expression that labels the one remaining transition from the start state to the accepting state.

An Example 1. Create a new initial state and a new, unique accepting state, neither of which is part of a loop.

An Example, Continued 2. Remove states and arcs and replace with arcs labelled with larger and larger regular expressions.

An Example, Continued Remove state 3:

An Example, Continued Remove state 2:

An Example, Continued Remove state 1:

When It’s Hard M =

When It’s Hard A regular expression for M: a ( aa )*  ( aa )* b ( b ( aa )* b )* ba ( aa )*  [ a ( aa )* b  ( b  a ( aa )* b ) ( b ( aa )* b )* ( a  ba ( aa )* b )] [ b ( aa )* b  ( a  b ( aa )* ab ) ( b ( aa )* b )* ( a  ba ( aa )* b )]* [ b ( aa )*  ( a  b ( aa )* ab ) ( b ( aa )* b )* ba ( aa )*]

Further Modifications to M Before We Start We require that, from every state other than the accepting state there must be exactly one transition to every state (including itself) except the start state. And into every state other than the start state there must be exactly one transition from every state (including itself) except the accepting state. 1. If there is more than one transition between states p and q, collapse them into a single transition: becomes:

Further Modifications to M Before We Start 2. If any of the required transitions are missing, add them: becomes:

Ripping Out States 3. Choose a state. Rip it out. Restore functionality. Suppose we rip state 2.

What Happens When We Rip? Consider any pair of states p and q. Once we remove rip, how can M get from p to q? ● It can still take the transition that went directly from p to q, or ● It can take the transition from p to rip. Then, it can take the transition from rip back to itself zero or more times. Then it can take the transition from rip to q.

Defining R(p, q) After removing rip, the new regular expression that should label the transition from p to q is: R(p, q) /* Go directly from p to q  /* or R(p, rip) /* Go from p to rip, then R(rip, rip)* /* Go from rip back to itself any number of times, then R(rip, q) /* Go from rip to q Without the comments, we have: R = R(p, q)  R(p, rip) R(rip, rip)* R(rip, q)

Returning to Our Example R = R(p, q)  R(p, rip) R(rip, rip)* R(p, rip) Let rip be state 2. Then: R (1, 3) = R(1, 3)  R(1, rip)R(rip, rip)*R(rip, 3) = R(1, 3)  R(1, 2)R(2, 2)*R(2, 3) =   a b * a = ab * a

The Algorithm fsmtoregex fsmtoregex(M: FSM) = 1. M = standardize(M: FSM). 2. Return buildregex(M). standardize(M: FSM) = 1. Remove unreachable states from M. 2. If necessary, create a new start state. 3. If necessary, create a new accepting state. 4. If there is more than one transition between states p and q, collapse them. 5. If any transitions are missing, create them with label .

The Algorithm fsmtoregex buildregex(M: FSM) = 1. If M has no accepting states then return . 2. If M has only one state, then return . 3. Until only the start and accepting states remain do: 3.1 Select some state rip of M. 3.2 For every transition from p to q, if both p and q are not rip then do Compute the new label R for the transition from p to q: R (p, q) = R(p, q)  R(p, rip) R(rip, rip)* R(rip, q) 3.3 Remove rip and all transitions into and out of it. 4. Return the regular expression that labels the transition from the start state to the accepting state.

Simplifying Regular Expressions Regex’s describe sets: ● Union is commutative:    =   . ● Union is associative: (    )   =   (    ). ●  is the identity for union:    =    = . ● Union is idempotent:    = . Concatenation: ● Concatenation is associative: (  )  =  (  ). ●  is the identity for concatenation:   =   = . ●  is a zero for concatenation:   =   = . Concatenation distributes over union: ● (    )  = (   )  (   ). ●  (    ) = (   )  (   ). Kleene star: ●  * = . ●  * = . ●(  *)* =  *. ●  *  * =  *. ●(    )* = (  *  *)*.