National Workshop 3 Luwero, Uganda 26-27 March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

 Capacity Development; National Systems / Global Fund Summary of the implementation capacities for National Programs and Global Fund Grants For HIV /TB.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation Supporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action Building Sustained Capacities.
Project HEART Transition Monitoring Challenges and Successes of Monitoring Health System Capacity August 12, 2010 Rozalin Wise.
Pillar 4a Information management
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Béavogui Director, West and Central Africa January 2009.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Nutrition Cluster briefing: WFP and UNICEF Scale up Plan in support of the Nutrition Cluster Response Plan 4 July 2014 Juba World Food Programme.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Improving health workforce performance in Ghana, Tanzania and Uganda Kaspar Wyss Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute.
Introducing Quality Management in District Hospitals in Tanga Region First Experiences from Korogwe District Hospital.
Lean Supply Chain Action Learning Program September 2007.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
1 Implementing Computer Applications in Counseling James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson, Jr. All rights reserved.
PRIORITY SETTING PROCESS ON NUTRITION AND USE OF GUIDELINES IN RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN ARUSHA DISTRICT COUNCIL Temina Mkumbwa MPH-Executive Track 22 nd.
Developing a result-oriented Operational Plan Training
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Chapter 11: Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research Design
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
By Bankole Ebisemiju At an Intensive & Interactive workshop on Techniques for Effective & Result Oriented Annual Operation Plan November 24th 2010 Annual.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Reforming civil service in the Baltic States: the Case of Lithuania Jurgita Siugzdiniene, PhD Department of Public Administration, Kaunas University of.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.
MAFF Workshop on INTERNATIONAL BEST Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) PRACTICES 24 August 2010.
Developing your Research Plan for FemNorthNet Community Case Studies 1.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Tounessi Bamba Zoumana Virginia Cameroon Retreat 4-5 November.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Module 8: Monitoring and Evaluation Gap Analysis and Intervention Plans.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
January 2013 Action Plan Skills Building: Module 4 Implementing and Evaluating the Action Plan.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
Mid-cycle Review (MCR) & Library Review. Develop Framework Library Self Study Strategic Directions Review Process External Review & Report Final Report.
IPSP Outcomes Reporting Framework What you need to know and what you need to do.
Comprehensive M&E Systems: Identifying Resources to Support M&E Plans for National TB Programs Lisa V. Adams, MD E&E Regional Workshop Kiev, Ukraine May.
Planning for Sustainability 1 Susan Ramsey Pearls of Wisdom Consulting Lia Katz ASTHO (202)
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Reading Discussion – s519 by Peter Hall – 1/21/09 Ryan, J., McClure, C. R., & Bertot, J. C. (2001). Choosing measures to evaluate networked information.
Improving the Quality of Health Service Delivery through Hands-on, Work-based Training: Experiences from the District Capacity Building Program, Uganda.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Dr Alvaro Alonso-Garbayo Second National Summit of Health and Population Scientists in Nepal ‘Health and Population Research for Achieving sustainable.
Project monitoring and evaluation
Project Cycle Management
12. Role of national and international technical and funding partners in the implementation of aDSM Multi-partner training package on active TB drug safety.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
National Workshop 2: Developing the bundles of strategies
Stakeholder Workshop 1: Situation Analysis
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
UNDP Asia Pacific Regional Centre August 2010
Presentation transcript:

National Workshop 3 Luwero, Uganda March 2015

Objectives To share key findings from the evaluation with the DHMTs To identify any gaps or possible errors in the key findings from the evaluation To discuss issues with the quantitative data collected in the evaluation To plan the next steps until end of August and after PERFORM has finished

Expected outputs Any gaps or errors in interpretation in the key findings from the evaluation, which will feed into a revised country report Understanding of the issues with the quantitative data and possible ways forward Plans for next steps Brief report of workshop

Programme: day 1

Programme: day 2

Project phases Phase onePhase twoPhase three Preparation for implementation Research implementation Evaluation and feedback

Timeline: where are we now? Initial Situation Analysis Jun-Aug 2012 National workshop 1 Oct 2012 National workshop 2 Feb 2013 Consortium workshop 2 Nov 2012 Implementation of bundles Feb 2013 – Aug 2014 National workshop 3 March 2015 Evaluation Aug-Oct 2014 Consortium workshop 3 Nov 2013

Evaluation of PERFORM

Methods Qualitative interviews and discussions Review of documents Quantitative: utilization of services, HR data, finance data from each facility in each district

Methods: qualitative KabaroleJinjaLuwero In depth interview DHMT454 Focus group discussion DHMT111 In depth interview sub district manager666 In depth interview sub district staff666 In depth interview stakeholder444 Total Interviews and discussion were transcribed verbatim Analysed thematically with support from NVivo software: coded using a thematic framework; then summarised under each theme and synthesized with data from documents

Methods: review of documents Documents included: diaries, problem trees, bundles plans, district plans and reports, DHMT and DHT minutes, workshop and inter district meeting reports Documents were analysed thematically: coded using a thematic framework; summarized under each theme and synthesized with data from interviews and discussions

Methods: quantitative District data: collected from HMIS in discussion with biostatistician, DHO and accountant Facility data: collected from HMIS Analysis: data is still being cleaned; some problems with data

Key findings: action research cycle Management strengthening intervention (action research) has helped DHMTs develop plans for improving workforce performance based on through problem analysis Plans are being implemented and show positive results Most plans include strengthening existing performance management systems e.g. supervision, appraisal, monitoring absenteeism

Key findings: action research cycle During implementation period, plans were modified: – Luwero reactivated QI teams – Jinja recognized best performing staff and facilities – Kabarole introduced spot check supervision visits This modification should lead to wider improvements in performance management

Key findings: PERFORM approach DHMT members were engaged in and liked the approach (identify and analyse problems, develop bundles, implement, observe) Already familiar with some elements but more freedom to apply to their priority areas Some DHMTs adapting approach to routine work Some DHMTs would like continued support with this approach and more facilitated communication with districts

Conclusions Management strengthening approach appears to be acceptable, effective and viable at district level DHMTs have improved problem solving and planning skills and a better understanding of workforce performance problems and appropriate strategies

Recommendations 1.Ways of providing some ongoing support for the next annual budget cycle to the three participating DHMTs should be investigated, so the teams can consolidate their skills for improving the management of workforce performance. Particular support should be provided for monitoring the effects of the strategies and continued information exchange between districts. 2.The potential and benefits for using this approach in other districts should be explored. Clustering of districts could be considered to make external facilitation and inter-district exchange more efficient. PERFORM facilitation materials, which will be made available, could be used with modifications if necessary.

Recommendations (cont.) 3.The critical mass of DHMT members who have participated in the PERFORM approach could be drawn on to develop a pool of facilitators to support new districts wishing to use this approach for management strengthening. The participating districts could also host orientation visits for DHMTs from other districts wishing to learn more about the approach. 4.Effective methods of improving workforce performance within the financial and decision-making constraints of the DHMT could be reviewed with the intention of further dissemination by the relevant departments of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Local Government and other partners involved in supporting workforce performance improvement.

Instructions for group work (districts) Review and discuss the key findings and conclusions from evaluation – Fair reflection? – Any changes to be made? – Anything missing?

Group work Prepare a short presentation (maximum 15 minutes) – Most important findings – Things that we have learned during PERFORM – Things that we want to do in the future – What you would tell the CAO about the PERFORM approach – The message you would like Sebastian and team to give to the MoH about PERFORM