P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Problem Definition Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feasibility Study of Replacing an Industrial Hydraulic Lift System with an Electro-Mechanical Lift System Critical Design Review Thursday, 21 September.
Advertisements

MECH Design Project I, Fall 2013 Formula SAE Brake Rotor Optimization Design Review Team #2 Megan Tunney Alex Burgess Karim Shaloh Han Ou Xu Team.
Case-New Holland Steer-by-Wire Detailed Design. Today’s Agenda  Who is CNH?  Background  Project Goal  System Level Concept  Design Components 
Filament Winding Machine. Project Name – Filament Winding Machine Project Number – P09226 Project Family – Competitive FSAE Autosports Systems Project.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08210/11 – Ruggedization of a Data Recorder for a Forklift Truck Shadle Stewart ME Rick Chadwick ME.
© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only Publisher The Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Tinley Park, Illinois.
Greg Hyde Raymond Zheng Joseph Rojano Katie Bentley Lori Liebman P14414 P3 ARBORLOO WIND RESISTANCE TEST STAND DETAILED DESIGN REVIEW 1.
BRAKE DYNAMOMETER DEVELOPMENT FOR DREXEL UNIVERSITY FSAE RACE TEAM MEM-01 Dr. Tein-Min Tan Frank DiMentoAlfredo Vitale Anthony TofaniJohn Henry.
A Sled System for Motor Vehicle Crash Simulation and Forensic Biomechanics Group Members: Joshua Booren Travis Deason Steve Savas Max Brunhart Customer:
P09226 Dept of Mech Eng (Sponsor) Dr. Alan Nye (Faculty Advisor) Alexander Sandy (ME), Christofer Brayton (EE), Tiago Santos (ME), Daniel Weimann (ME),
Development of Laser Fuser Test Bed Project Number: P07501 Justin McMillan.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08210/11 – Ruggedization of a Data Recorder for a Forklift Truck Shadle Stewart ME Rick Chadwick ME.
R I T Advisors: Dr. Wayne WalterMechanical Engineering Dept. Faculty Jeffrey WebbTeacher’s Assistant Team Members: Aman Verma EE - Electrical Craftsman.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P09452 Compressor Part Fabrication and ReVamp Snehapriya Rao (ME) Ed Budriss (ME) Alex Scarangella (ME) Edward Wolf (CE)
Team Mejor – The Spyder Critical Design Review -12/7/04.
04013 Micro Turbine Senior Design Micro Turbine Senior Design CDR – May 14 th, 2004 Project
P /20093 Composites Autoclave Brandon Allen (EE) Matt Brady (ME) Brian Cario (ME) Matt DiFrancesco (ME) John Mink (EE) ‏ Chris DeMinco.
EDGE™ P08222 – FSAE Engine Management System Erich Fiederlein (EMEN)
LABVIEW INTERFACE CONTROL LOGIC DESIGN FEATURES Pneumatic power source encapsulated by single connection Opposable muscles for full range of motion Independent.
Wind Turbine Energy Conversion System Design and Integration Advisor: Venkataramana Ajjarapu 2009 Project Team Elsammani Ahmed Hassan Burawi Brandon JanssenLuke.
Project Description: Dr. Iglesias-Victoria, a professor at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), is interested in the design and fabrication of a specialized.
Passive, Semi-Active and Active Suspension System
TelosB Charging and Energy Meter Kit(Dec1201) Group Leader: Tomas Mullins Communicator: Casey Liebl Webmaster: Shiya Liu Team Members: Andrew Gurik & Qiao.
Doppler Ultrasound Test Stand Background Information and Voice of the Customer Allan Andranikian.
MSD P15280 RIT HOT WHEELZ TEST BENCH. AGENDA ❖ Review Problem Definition Material ❖ Review System Design Material ❖ Sub-System Design Review ▪Motor.
“HEAR IT AND FORGET IT, SEE IT AND REMEMBER IT, DO IT AND UNDERSTAND IT” R12310: ME and ChemE Lab and Demo Hardware Development DPM – Spring 2012.
FSAE Instrumentation Presentation Bret Isbell Al Mukmin Paul Otto Miguel Roncal Jud Ryckman Walter Thorn.
Project Status Update R09220 – Competitive FSAE Autosports Systems Aaron Heyman (IE) Shijo George (ME) Stephanie Malinowski (ME) Alex Sandy (ME) Greg Wall.
Bicycle Harvesting Waste Energy: Bicycle Power Generation MSD-I RIT-Systems Design Review Winter/Spring P12414 January 13, 2012 Group # P12414.
Project Status Update R09220 – Competitive FSAE Autosports Systems
Centrifugal Pump Performance Experiment Presented by: Steven King ME 498 Senior lab November 16, 2004.
Wegmans Bread Tray Lift Assist By Brendan Moran,Greg Feather Alex Phillips and Andrew Beasten.
Problem Statement Automotive and heavy equipment applications use sensors on machines to report temperatures, pressures, speeds, etc. to a central embedded.
CS-EE 481 Spring Swift-Fox Founder’s Day, 2005 University of Portland School of Engineering Imagine the ability to view and record Up to five different.
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 09/10/15.
Digital Microfluidics Control System II P Agenda ● Introduce Team ● Background ● Problem Statement ● Stakeholders ● Use Scenario ● Customer Requirements.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015.
Advisor: Dr. Edwin Jones 1 Client: Paul Jewell ISU Engineering Distance Learning Facility May01-13 Design Team: David DouglasCprE Matt EngelbartEE Hank.
P15741: Air Table Mover Photo: Newport.com. Team Members Cameron Young – Team Leader Daniel Miller – Lead Mechanical Engineer Nicholas LeBerth – Edge.
Testing Considerations Because of potential life threatening consequences resulting from device malfunction, it is critical that the device be fully tested.
Sami Lottes Team Leader Electrical Engineer David Sawyer ElliottChief Engineer Mechanical Engineering Coty Winchell Mechanical Engineering Michael Ballow.
Golf Game Genie Senior Design May08-07 Team Itiel DiazCpr E Tim HasselCpr E Ryan BillerCpr E Brett ScottCpr E Client John Whitmer Faculty Advisors Dr.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
MSD P15280 RIT HOT WHEELZ TEST BENCH. AGENDA ❖ Review Problem Definition Material ❖ System Level Design Review ▪Functional Decomposition ▪Morphological.
May 10, 2013P Xerox Bearing Tester Final Project Review.
Magnetically Levitated Propeller Bernie Garcia (ME, Team Leader), Joe Bernardini (ME, Scribe), Elijah Sensenig (EE, System Integrator), Zachary Louison.
REFLOW OVEN MOCRO (Manually Operated Compact Reflow Oven)
Magnetically Levitated Propeller Bernie Garcia (Me, Team Leader), Joe Bernardini (ME, Scribe), Elijah Sensenig (EE, System Integrator), Zachory Louison.
Tim Southerton Brian Grosso Matthew Morris Lalit Tanwar Kevin Meehan Alex Reid.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08210/11 – Ruggedization of a Data Recorder for a Forklift Truck Shadle Stewart ME Rick Chadwick ME.
Project Final Presentation Joe Featherall.
Electrophotographic Cascade Development Apparatus Zachary FoggettiBridget Kearney Dalton MeadRuishi Shen Michael WarrenThomas Wossner.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Detailed Design Review December 8, 2015.
Analysis of a Nulling Yaw Probe ME 450: Computer Aided Engineering Analysis Instructor: Dr. Nema Group members: Billy Holland, Alan Koers, Allison Heying.
EDGE™ Final Project Plan Presentation P08043 – Mass Spectrometry Sample Preparation.
P08452: Reciprocating Compressor Install, Revamp, and Interface Dr. Margaret BaileyFaculty Guide Garry StudleyProject Manager Dave Rigolo Lead Engineer.
Lightweight Fuel Efficient Engine Package. Team Members Evan See, ME Chris Jones, ME John Scanlon, ME Stanley Fofano, EE Taylor Hattori, ME Brittany Borella,
Allen Luccitti (ME). Mission Statement Product Description ▫ Test stand consisting of a centrifugal pump, closed loop flow system with control through.
Biomechanical Tissue Stimulator Matt Brady (BME/EE) Ankeet Choxi (BME) Misha Kotov (CS) Steven Manuel (ME) Adviser: Dr. V. Prasad Shastri.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review
Turbomachinery Flow Visualization P08453
P FORMULA SAE ECU ENGINE CONTROL UNIT
Concept Level Project Plan P08453 – Turbomachinery Flow Visualization
P08310 PNEUMATICALLY CONTROLLED AUTOMATED SHIFTING SYSTEM FOR A POLARIS OUTLAW / Polaris Industries - Joel Notaro (Sponsor) Professor.
Project Status Update R09220 – Competitive FSAE Autosports Systems
Xerox Bearing Tester Systems Level Design Review
SAE MINI BAJA PROJECT Suspension Design Analysis
Project Readiness Review P10029 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb
P08310 PNEUMATICALLY CONTROLLED AUTOMATED SHIFTING SYSTEM FOR A POLARIS OUTLAW / Polaris Industries - Joel Notaro (Sponsor) Professor.
P19045 Essential Tremor Test Rig II Final Review April 7th, 2019
Presentation transcript:

P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Problem Definition Review

Aung Toe – EE Jim Holmes – EE – Project Manager Sal Fava – ME – Chief Engineer Chris Batorski – ME – Facilitator Andrew Dodd – ISE P16221 – MSD Team

RIT Formula SAE (FSAE) develops an open-wheel single seat race car for the Formula SAE collegiate design series. One of the more complicated parts of the car that the team does not produce in-house is the dampers. While the springs in the suspension are sensitive to displacement, shock absorbers (dampers) are used to control the relative velocity between the wheels and chassis. Project Background

Dampers can be very hard to understand Very nonlinear, with different damper shaft speeds controlling different aspects of the car. Speed dependent, and affected by temperature, air pressure, etc. Having the ability to test the dampers in-house would open a lot of opportunities for tuning and testing the car not currently available to the FSAE team. Project Background

Current State A shock dynamometer is a measurement device that can supply an input and measure the response (both displacement and force) of a damper. Similar machines in the mechanical engineering building labs do not meet the frequency requirements, size constraints, and mobility requirements. Problem Statement

Desired State The goal is to design a device that is better equipped for shock measurements – Analyze closest in house solution (Instron 8801 in Mechanics Lab) Larger eye to eye distance Input track data Faster control speeds Customizable user interface Save data in a common format Problem Statement

Actuation Type – Actuator EMA Hydraulic Air – Cam Motor driven Dynamometer Solutions

Example of Track data

Standard Performance Chart

Desired Output Chart

Use Scenarios

1.Cost less than $4,000 2.Able to be moved in the shop easily 3.Reproduce damper displacements from track data 4.Measure damper forces 5.Measure damper shaft position 6.Measure damper temperature during test 7.Save and recall test data for post processing 8.Maximum footprint of 4’ x 4’ 9.Accommodate wide range of damper sizes Customer Performance Requirements

Stakeholders RIT Formula SAE Team – Customer and End users – Want a working, affordable and user friendly Shock Dyno Dr. Alan Nye (Formula Team Advisor) – Concerned with development and funding RIT and KGCOE – Potential end users – Provide space for Dyno – Fabrication support Calibration Team – Who will calibrate the stand when necessary? Local External companies – Potential end users/sponsors

Key Engineering Requirements Input – Displacement (inches) and time (sec) profile (cam profile or a course map) >100Hz control frequency Record: – Force (max 2500lb) – Distance (.25-7in) – Time (s) – Temperature (150˚C max)

Key Engineering Requirements Cont’d Binary Requirements – must meet customer user approval – Save all data so it can be easily processed externally – Easily customized real time data display Safety Requirements – Fully enclosed test area – Emergency stop switch Budget – Senior Design Donation $500 – Additional Funding TBD

Importance Cost Sturdy base and mounting to withstand vibrations Able to be moved to different locations in the shop Overall footprint Save and recall test data to a widely used format Stand-alone data acquisition and control unit Create graphs usable for testing and tuning dampers Replay test data back in real time Measure damper forces Measure damper shaft position Measure damper temperature during test Variable stroke range Min/Max eye to eye distance Reproduce frequencies seen on track Measure fluid temperature if possible Cost less than $4, Sturdy base and mounting to withstand vibrations9 Able to be moved to different locations in the shop6 Maximum foot print of 4' x 4'6 Save and recall test data to a widely used format9 Stand-alone data acquisition and control unit6 Create graphs usable for testing and tuning dampers3 Replay test data back in real time3 Measure damper forces9 Measure damper shaft position9 Measure damper temperature during test9 Variable stroke range9 Ability to accommodate different sizes of dampers6 Reproduce frequencies seen on track6 Measure fluid temperature if possible3 Unit of Measure$$inBIinBI lbin˚Fin Hz˚F Ideal Value <4000 < ' x 48' > < >100<250 House of Quality

Conclusions: Develop a dyno with Roehrig Capabilities, ½ price of the Intercomp. Other option is to use the Instron Benchmark Existing Systems

Project Timeline

Questions?