Busted! Judith A. Schechter Lexington School for the Deaf.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
Advertisements

CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
The American Legal System
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Do you know your civil rights?
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
Miranda v. Arizona.
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Interrogations,
Plain View Doctrine 1.Item is positioned easily in an officer’s sight. 2.Officer is legally in a position to notice. 3.The discovery of the item is inadvertent.
Civil Liberties: Due Process Rights of Accused Persons.
■Essential Question ■Essential Question: –How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? ■Warm-Up Question: –?
The 5 th & 6 th Amendments. Fifth Amendment The primary focus of the 5 th amendment is the criminal process. due processdue process double jeopardydouble.
The Judicial Branch Study Guide for Unit 5. 5 th Amendment Deals with the rights of the accused: Double jeopardy is prohibited Right to be heard by a.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Seven: Confessions and the 5 th Amendment This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
Supreme Court Cases. U. S. v. Nixon Background: Background: Watergate Hotel; burglars break into Democratic Party headquarters. White House staff are.
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Journal– 3/8/12 Read the article “Searching for Details Online, Lawyers Facebook the Jury” and answer the questions on the back of your packet .
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F Government 4 th Hour Mr. Baker.
Miranda Warnings and The Bill of Rights P.S. 2 Summarizing Activity.
Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 4 Interrogation.
Preview In your group… Match the amendment to the Bill of Rights. Use the reading and pictures to help.
1 Bakersfield College Criminal Justice Charles Feer, JD, MPA Miranda.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Chapter 22 Rights of the Accused. A. Protections 1.Nothing can protect you against being accused of a crime 2.5 th, 6 th and 8 th Amendments help protect.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
Aim: What is Criminal Justice? Do Now: What do you think is involved in the criminal justice system?
Promptbook  During our last class, we discussed Marbury v. Madison and the idea of judicial review. This will be the topic of your essay assignment. 1.In.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
In re Gault The Supreme Court Establishes Rules for Juveniles.
SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
 When police place someone under arrest, they have to follow certain rules to ensure that the person’s Charter rights are being upheld  In order to.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
The Investigation Phase. An arrest takes place when a person is suspected of crime and taken into custody.
Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Miranda: Its Meaning and Application Chapter 6 Basic Criminal Procedures, 3/E by Edward E. Peoples PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
 Dates: Debated: Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided: June 13, 1966  Ruling: The prosecution could not use Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal.
Still confused? You may need the services of a CDI.
Tracing Our Rights
The Judicial System What Courts Do and Crime. Stages of Criminal Justice.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.
Miranda v. Arizona.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Cole Kirschner, Paige Haney, Kelsey Hickle
Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
How Do the 4th and 5th Amendment Protect against unreasonable law enforcement procedures? Lesson 31.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
by Marcos Cardona-7th period
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
Lesson 01 Aim: What is Criminal Justice? Do Now: What do you think of when you hear the word CRIME?
Presentation transcript:

Busted! Judith A. Schechter Lexington School for the Deaf

Imagine that you are arrested on the way home from school one day. What do you do?

When police officers arrest people for a crime, they are required to inform them of some of their Constitutional rights.

 These rights are included in what is called the Miranda Warning.

When police officers arrest people for a crime, they are required to inform them of some of their Constitutional rights.  These rights are included in what is called the Miranda Warning.  The Miranda Warning is an explanation of rights that must be given to an arrested person before he or she is questioned while in police custody.

When police officers arrest people for a crime, they are required to inform them of some of their Constitutional rights.  These rights are included in what is called the Miranda Warning.  The Miranda Warning is an explanation of rights that must be given to an arrested person before he or she is questioned while in police custody.  Most of the Miranda Warning stems from your Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

When police officers arrest people for a crime, they are required to inform them of some of their Constitutional rights.  These rights are included in what is called the Miranda Warning.  The Miranda Warning is an explanation of rights that must be given to an arrested person before he or she is questioned while in police custody.  Most of the Miranda Warning stems from your Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.  The Miranda Warning is derived from the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). In this case, the Court held that a person who has been detained and interrogated by the police must be made aware of his or her rights: 1) to remain silent; 2) to consult with an attorney and to have the attorney present during questioning; and 3) to have an attorney appointed if he or she cannot afford one.

Let’s take a minute to read the Miranda Warning to ourselves. Source: Jacqui Shine, “How ‘You Have the Right to Remain Silent’ Became the Standard Miranda Warning,” Slate.com at _how_the_language_of_the_warning_became_standard.html _how_the_language_of_the_warning_became_standard.html

Do you understand this printed Miranda Warning? Source: Jacqui Shine, “How ‘You Have the Right to Remain Silent’ Became the Standard Miranda Warning,” Slate.com at _how_the_language_of_the_warning_became_standard.html _how_the_language_of_the_warning_became_standard.html

Next, imagine that a hearing police officer reads the Miranda Warning to you. Will you be able to understand your rights if they are spoken to you?

So, what do you do next?

 Request an American Sign Language Interpreter!

Here’s an example of an interpreter signing the Miranda Warning.  Fisher or Cole or Corporan or Heinbaugh or Dattolo

Do you understand what this interpreter said?

 If you didn’t understand this interpretation, it may be because it was transliterated.