2012 AASA Legislative Agenda NCE 2012 Bruce Hunter Houston, TX February 17, 2012 Associate Executive Director Advocacy and Communication.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
PORTFOLIO.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA Reauthorization and Waivers AFT Teachers PPC Meeting March 13, 2012 New York, NY.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Developing a Federal Platform Presentation to State Board of Education January 2013.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
ALL CHILDREN WILL LEARN AASA’s Proposal for Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act Developed January 2009, by the AASA Executive.
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
AASA 2011 Legislative Agenda Presented by Bruce Hunter & Sasha Bartolf National Conference on Education, Denver CO February 17, 2011.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Update on ARRA Presentation for the National Network of State School Improvement Leaders Tom Corwin, Susan Wilhelm, and Carlas McCauley US Department of.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 25 – 27, 2015 August 2015.
Title 1, Part A Local Consolidated Plan (LCP) Application May 2009.
AASA Advocacy Briefing AASA Advocacy Conference Arlington, VA July 9, 2013.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Federal Education Update Mary Kusler Asst. Director, Advocacy & Policy American Association of School Administrators April 22, 2009.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Federal Policy Discussion How do Policy Issues play out? ESEA–Budget-Appropriations Federal Policy Discussion How do Policy Issues play out? ESEA–Budget-Appropriations.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
School Choice, Vouchers, and Students with Disabilities Class Presentation February 7th, 2007.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
ESEA – How Did We Get Here?  No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – enacted 2001 Why was it so strict? Role of special ed advocates  Required all students.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
OVERVIEW OF THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT: TITLES I & III RIVERSIDE COUNTY PELD MEETING JANUARY 29, 2016 Presented by Patti F. Herrera, School Services.
Emporia State University - Computer and Business Teacher’s Conference February 20, 2013 Diane DeBacker, Commissioner of Education.
CEC Legislative Recommendations Education Appropriations Recommendations CEC urges Congress to: Provide $12.9 billion to fully fund IDEA’s Part.
Students With Disabilities & The ESEA. CCD Education Task Force CCD has 114 member organizations 65 organizations on the ED TF Co-chairs: –Katy Neas,
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
AASA Advocacy Briefing
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
Federal education update
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Presentation transcript:

2012 AASA Legislative Agenda NCE 2012 Bruce Hunter Houston, TX February 17, 2012 Associate Executive Director Advocacy and Communication

Guiding Principles for ESEA  Allocate funds via formulas based on poverty;  Federal government should supplement, not dictate the local policies;  Connection of children’s health and personal and social development to students and families;  School systems should not be required to spend state and local funds for federal mandates.

Improving Standards and Accountability  Support state-developed standards, including Common Core  Oppose federally established standards  Separate accountability and instructional measures: one test cannot serve both purposes  Clear and accurate accountability measures.  Less intrusive and costly testing

Improving Standards and Accountability  Measure growth  Multiple measures  Individualized Education Plans guide assessment for students with disabilities  Assess ELL students in a language they understand.  Support metric that reflects total ELL subgroup

Improving Standards and Accountability  Emphasize rewards not punishment – build capacity.  Disaggregate student outcomes  Eliminate mandatory set-asides - SES & choice.  Three- to six-year graduation rates  Recognize alternative pathways to graduation, including GED

Improving Struggling Schools  Focus on 5% lowest-achieving schools  Rolling three-year averages.  Focus on building capacity.  Special consideration for alternative schools.  Implement state intervention with school districts.  Support a broad range of turn-around models.

Improving the Effectiveness of Teachers and Administrators  Accountability for effectiveness is a state and local responsibility.  Compensation decisions are a state and local matter.  Evaluations must be created at the local school district  Permit use of ESEA funds to encourage teachers to work in hard-to-staff schools.

Improving the Effectiveness of Teachers and Administrators  Distribute professional development funds by poverty.  Local flexibility in professional development  Student performance part of evaluations  multiple measures of performance  not a single test score.

Special Populations and Conditions  Distribute funds through formulas.  Support current law related to equitable service  Authorize a dual-language pilot program for concentrations of low-income students.  Increase funding for the extended day and year programs  Provide funds directly to LEAs.

Special Populations and Conditions  Fully fund the Rural Education Achievement Program Reauthorization Act (REAP)  Reauthorize REAP,  maintain federal to district funding,  update locale codes,  adjust the sliding scale, and  poverty indicator to free and reduced lunch  Full funding of Impact Aid.

ESEA Waivers  Oppose regulatory relief through conditional waivers.  Regulatory relief should be targeted and direct to states and districts, without policy requirements

IDEA  Mandatory funding for IDEA at 40 percent of the national average per-pupil expenditure.  Permit school districts to reduce local effort by up to 100 percent of federal funding increases.  Eliminate the requirement for parental consent for Medicaid reimbursement.

Early Childhood Education  Funding to address non-school barriers to student achievement.  Improve access to high-quality child care for poor families.  Tax incentives for employers to provide support for child care and after-school care.  Make early childhood education available to all children.  Coordinate early childhood programs regardless of funding source.

Health Care  Permit schools to claim reimbursement from Medicaid.  Uniform methodology for claiming reimbursement from Medicaid.  Increase Medicaid reimbursements for low- income students.  Ensure schools access to mental health services funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.  Continue the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

E-Rate and Instructional Technology  Raise the funding cap for E-Rate to meet demand.  Continue E-Rate as part of the Universal Service Fund.  Reduce the paperwork requirements for E- Rate.  Expand broadband to all parts of the country.  Permanent exemption from the Anti- Deficiency Act.  Include technology-related professional development (such as the ATTAIN Act).

Vouchers  Oppose federal funding to non-public schools.  Oppose special education vouchers.  Permit the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, to expire.

Seclusion and Restraint  Fund professional development regarding seclusion and restraint.  Permit engagement of parents regarding safe and appropriate seclusion and restraint in Individualized Education Plans and Behavioral Intervention Plans.  Allow monitored seclusion and restraint as an option of last resort.  Recognize distinction between use for discipline and use for safety.

Foster Care  Transportation costs for foster children is the responsibility of the state  Provide school districts immediate access to all relevant student data, including academic, social, emotion, criminal, and behavioral.  Delete the Franken amendment from the HELP Committee ESEA bill