Pathogen Reduction. Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Performed by FSIS n E. coli u Performed by Establishment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching Workshop Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Specified Risk Materials (SRMs)
Advertisements

EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS.
FSIS Notice Measures to Address E. coli O157:H7 at Establishments that Receive, Grind, or Otherwise Process Raw Beef Products FSIS Notice Measures.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS NOTICE CLARIFYING AND EXPANSION OF SAMPLING ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Salmonella Initiative Program : Timeline and Verification Patrick R. Burke Senior.
HACCP Validation The FSIS Perspective Charles Gioglio FSIS/OPPD Director, Meat and Poultry Advisory Committee Staff.
January 24, 2008 Policy Development Division 1 FSIS Notice Verification of the Annual Reassessment and Establishment Training Requirements Under.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
New Poultry Inspection System NPIS Dennis R. Johnson OFW Law NTF Technical Regulatory Committee February 16, 2012.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Role of Economics in Pathogen Control Regulations Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 E. coli O157:H7 and Certain Beef Exporting Countries Sally White, Director,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service 10/31/07OPPD; Policy Development Division1 FSIS Notice ROUTINE SAMPLING AND.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures. Objective In this module, you will learn: u How to define verification u What functions are part of HACCP plan verification.
1 Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) April Full Traceability (Pre-harvest) Birth Premises Slaughter Full Traceability All Production and Points.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service SALMONELLA SUBTYPING RESULTS IN RAW PRODUCTS FSIS Notice /3/2010 Policy Development.
Public Health Information System: Headquarters Session HACCP Verification.
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting.
NACMPI November 15-16, 2005 Risk-Based Inspection Dr. Barbara Masters Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service Philip Derfler Assistant Administrator,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 E. Coli Checklist for Beef Operations E. coli O157:H7 - Addressing the Challenges,
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE FSIS NOTICE NATIONWIDE MARKET HOGS MICROBIOLOGICAL BASELINE DATA COLLECTION.
DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency
OFFICIAL CONTROL OF FOOD LABELLING AND FOOD QUALITY CONTROL Dr. Pirjo-Liisa Penttilä Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Finland.
Review of the Federal Food Safety System
Example 5b: Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach Kerry L. Dearfield, Ph.D. Scientific Advisor.
Eligibility Traditional and Mixed Districts- Stay in Training Room with Katie Full CEP- Conference Room with Cindy McIntosh RCCI’s- Valerie’s Office with.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Rinse & Chill  Technology: A Novel Intervention for Reduction of Undesirable Bacteria on Beef Carcasses and On-going Protection from E. coli O157:H7 in.
Review of the Compliance Guide HACCP Systems Validation Public Meeting June 25, 2013 Washington, DC Dr. William Shaw Risk, Innovations & Management Staff.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Salmonella Initiative Program Isabel Arrington, PhD, DVM Sci. Advisor, RIMD.
E. coli O157:H7 FSIS Actions Directive 10,010.1 Rev. 1 In-Plant Control Transit.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Strengthening Verification Activities at and Guidance for Veal Slaughter Establishments.
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
MRWS GROUND WATER RULE (GWR) PREPARED BY JOHN CAMDEN MRWS GROUND WATER TECH
Regulatory Update National Turkey Federation 2012 Annual Convention February 15 – 18, 2012 Brett T. Schwemer.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 New FSA Tools EIAO Methodology Industry Walkthrough December 18, 2008 Washington,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Use of Subtyping Data by FSIS: A Public Health Based Approach to Salmonella.
FSIS Directive 10,800.1 Revision 1 District Correlation March 13, 2014 CDR Catherine Rockwell, DVM OPPD RIMS.
FSIS Policy Update: Turkey Product Presented by DANIEL ENGELJOHN, PhD Assistant Administrator Office of Policy and Program Development Food Safety and.
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 HACCP Impacts on Contamination Levels in Meat and Poultry Products: FSIS Perspective Delila R. Parham, DVM Office of.
OPPED Correlation with State Directors 5/31/2007 Custom Exempt Review Process FSIS Directive , Rev. 3, 4/26/07.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
System of Reinspection NACMPI August 27, 2008 Mary Stanley Office of International Affairs Food Safety and Inspection Service.
Proposed Rule: Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Public Health Based Slaughter Inspection: Rationale and Process August 7,
Public Health Lessons from HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project Presentation by Loren D. Lange August 7, 2007 United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03J Slaughter Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
FSIS Directive Verifying an Establishment's Food Safety System - Revision 4 OPPD/PDS Thursday District Correlation.
Food Safety and Inspection Service. November, 2011: pre-harvest food safety for cattle (Riverdale, MD)  Build upon successful mitigations in foreign.
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
Explaining the FSIS Sampling Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Raw Ground Beef Kristina Barlow, Priya Kadam, Stephanie Buchanan, Priscilla Levine.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Validation – In Plant Findings Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Public Health-Related Performance Standards Currently Under Consideration for.
NACMPI May 23-24, Measuring Establishment Risk Control for Risk-Based Inspection Philip Derfler Assistant Administrator, Office of Policy, Program.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Within Establishment Public Health Risk-Based Inspection for Poultry Slaughter.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Within Establishment Public Health Risk-Based Inspection for Processing and.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03B Raw Ground Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
Targeted Food Safety Assessments Barb Masters OFW Law September 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1.
Validation and Verification Tasks March 8, 2016 Suzanne Finstad Vice President, Food Safety & Regulatory Compliance.
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS. Prerequisite Programs Support the HACCP Plan.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 11 ISSUES FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION: E. coli O157:H7 DANIEL ENGELJOHN, Ph.D. Deputy.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Presentation transcript:

Pathogen Reduction

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Performed by FSIS n E. coli u Performed by Establishment

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Enforcement begins on same day plant comes under HACCP n E. coli u Enforcement for greater than very low volume plants in January 1997 u Enforcement for very low volume plants in June 1997

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Used as an indicator of process control and sanitary dressing procedures n E. coli u Used as an indicator of process control and sanitary dressing procedures

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Sponge u Whole bird rinse u Product n E. coli u Sponge u Excision u Whole bird rinse

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Carcass Sponge F beef F swine F turkey n E. coli u Carcass Sponge F beef F swine F turkey

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Excision F none n E. coli u Excision F beef F swine

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Whole bird rinse F chicken n E. coli u Whole bird rinse F chicken F turkey

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Raw Product F ground beef, F ground pork F ground chicken F ground turkey n E. coli u Raw Product F none

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u FSIS samples u Performance Standards F qualitative F positive or negative F # samples tested (n) F maximum # of positives to achieve standard (c) n E. coli u Plant samples u Performance Criteria F quantitative F m/M F expressed as cfu/cm 2 or as cfu/ml F statistical process control

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Performance Standards F steers/heifers F cows/bulls F ground beef F hogs F broilers F ground chicken F ground turkey n E. coli u Performance Criteria F cattle F swine F chickens

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Performance Standards F expressed as a “positive” or “negative” n E. coli u Performance Criteria F expressed as cfu/cm 2 or as cfu/ml

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Sampling procedures explained in FSIS Directive 10,230.5 n E. coli u Sampling guidelines given in F § and §381.94; F in 2 guidelines; and F in plant written procedures

E. coli Guidelines n Guidelines for Escherichia coli Testing for Process Control Verification in Cattle and Swine Slaughter Establishments n Guidelines for Escherichia coli Testing for Process Control Verification in Poultry Slaughter Establishments

Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Sampling frequency F each day product requested is produced F based on compliance history n E. coli u Sampling frequency F based on numbers of animals slaughtered F alternative frequencies an integral part of HACCP plan

E. coli n Basic requirements u Written collection procedure u Collect samples from species slaughtered in greatest numbers u Record results on a process control chart or table

E. coli n Written procedures identify u sample collector u sampling locations u sampling randomness u sample integrity

E. coli n Collect from predominant species only if that species is covered by the regulations F Beef F Swine F Chicken F Turkey

E. coli

n Basic compliance is determined by an E. coli Special Team Member if the plant is not under HACCP n All plants began E. coli testing in 1997 (January and June, depending on plant volume) n When a plant comes under HACCP, then the IIC can perform basic compliance if needed

E. coli n Basic (05A01) u Noncompliance (use Checklist) F Withholding action F Inform plant F Document NR (no trend indicator) and attach Checklist F Notify the DO F If plant takes no action, Compliance is called in

E. coli n Other Requirements u The plant must follow its written procedure u The samples must be analyzed using an AOAC Official Method or other method published by a scientific body u The plant must keep proper records for test results

E. coli n Other (05A02) u Noncompliance with written procedures F Plant not collecting samples in stated location F Plant not sampling with appropriate method F Plant not sampling at required frequency F Plant not sampling randomly

E. coli n Other (use Checklist) u Noncompliance actions F Notify plant F Document on NR (mark “Other” trend indicator) and attach Checklist F No additional action unless plant repeatedly fails to implement the immediate and further planned actions, then IIC calls DO

Salmonella n Implementation u Pre-implementation Phase F take 250 samples per plant in a one-year period F should be completed prior to implementation F no enforcement actions

Salmonella n Implementation u Compliance Phase F begins on same date as HACCP starts in plants F enforcement of standards in effect

Sampling Frequency n Normal u daily within a sample set u if more than one shift, randomly determine from which set to take the sample u acceptable to hold the sample overnight before FedExing F carcass, not sponge F ground product already collected

Salmonella n There is no basic or other (05A03) u The IIC takes a sample according to the FSIS Directive 10,230.5 u The sample is FedExed to the lab u The lab analyzes the sample and records the results u OPHS tracks the results

Salmonella n Results u After the sample set is complete, OPHS will the complete results to the F DO F Establishment (if it has provided an address) F Sampling Coordination Team (SCT)

Salmonella n The District Office will notify the u IIC u Establishment (even if OPHS sent an message)

Salmonella n Negative Results u All parties are notified u Sampling continues at normal frequencies for new sample sets

Salmonella n Positive Results u DO will notify plant that it needs to investigate and identify the cause and implement appropriate corrective actions u DO will guide the IIC in documenting the performance standards failure on the NR (no trend indicator, only procedure code)

Salmonella n Positive Results u DO will instruct the IIC in the frequency for sampling further sample sets

Salmonella n Failure to Meet Standards u First time F plant needs to identify the cause and take appropriate corrective actions to lower the incidence of Salmonella for all product of the type that failed F IIC issues NR F effectiveness is measured by subsequent testing (within 60 days) F frequency of testing may change

Salmonella n Failure to Meet Standards u Second time F plant must reassess its HACCP plan F IIC issues NR F effectiveness is measured by subsequent testing (within 30 days) F frequency of testing may change

Salmonella n If it fails a third consecutive series: u This would constitute a SSOPand a HACCP systems failure u FSIS will suspend inspection of the product associated with the HACCP system failure

Salmonella n Failure to Meet Standards u Third time F IIC takes a withholding action for all product of the type that failed F IIC issues NR F since the DO notified the IIC, the DO is aware of the situation and will dispatch a Compliance Officer to the plant F frequency of testing other product types may change

Salmonella n Fail Standard u put into a targeted pool u start second sample set for failed product type F within 60 days F sooner if compliance history warrants it

Sampling n Large Plants u May have both compliance and baseline samples to take u Take both if possible u If not possible, compliance samples take precedence

Sampling n Small and Very Small Plants u May have both pre-implementation and baseline samples to take u Take both if possible u If not possible, baseline samples take precedence