Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

Chicago Bus Rapid Transit. Improving Transportation in Chicago is Making the Most of Every Option Pedestrians – Countdown Signals, Safety Improvements.
Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
GIS Data in Real-Time Transit Management Systems 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Conference St. Petersburg, FL, September 14, 2011.
This is my “focus” slide, used to make sure that I’m getting the sharpest possible picture on the projection screen. It is the 1954 Freeway Plan for the.
1 October 12, 2012 December 5, Light Rail Efficiency Projects Board Adopted LRT Improvement Plan May 2010 Speed up system, open new markets, improve.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
9/7/2012 MBS UU.
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority THE HEATHLINE EUCLID CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Michael J. Schipper, P.E DGM- Engineering & Project.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Kansas City BRT Metro Area Express (MAX) TRB BRT Conference, July 21, 2008.
Euclid Corridor Design TRB BRT Workshop July 21, 2008.
1 Item 9: (DRAFT) Briefing on the Draft Update of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell DTP Presentation to the.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
T-FLEX Workshop Roger Snoble, L.A. Metro Chief Executive Officer October 29, 2007 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
Electronic Fare Collection CEE582. Vehicle-Based Systems (Fixed-Route) Exterior Route and Destination Announcements Electronic Destination Sign Vehicle.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates Public Meeting
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
VTA Light Rail System and Safety Enhancements MTC Railroad Crossing Seminar May, 21, 2008.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
Freedom to work Freedom to text Freedom to read.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
10 Easy Ways Arlington Provides Excellent Transit Information to Customers National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Regional Bus Subcommittee.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Bus Management System in SEOUL Metropolitan Area.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
1 Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overcoming Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges Lessons Learned Implementing Bus Signal Priority.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
Making Headways Smart Card Fare Payment and Bus Dwell Time in Los Angeles Daniel Shockley Fehr & Peers Julia Salinas Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation.
Real-time Bus Information on Mobile Devices Stuart D. Maclean, Daniel J. Dailey ITS Research Program University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Cleveland HealthLine Bus Rapid Transit Kenneth G. Sislak, Associate Vice President; Manager of Transit/Rail.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
Transit Technology Hampton Roads Transit. Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) provides public transportation for six cities in the South Hampton Roads region:
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
Gateway EMX Performance Review
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line TAC Meeting #1: Rapid Bus Improvements on 7th & 8th Streets Downtown Business Block Club July 26, 2017 Katie Roth, Bus Rapid Transit.
D Line Station Plan Overview
City of Alexandria Virginia Transportation and Environmental Services
M14A/D Select Bus Service
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun Wong, PE Transportation Engineer City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation June 24, 2009

Project History Public dissatisfied with slow bus service Metro average bus speeds have declined by 12% since mid-1980s LADOT found that 50% of the time a bus is in service it is stopped Metro and LADOT formed Metro Rapid Program

Page 3 Current Status  A total of 26 Metro Rapid lines fully operational as of Dec  Approximately 400 miles of services provided  Average weekday boarding is 250,000 and close to the combined ridership of Metro Rail lines (Red Line, Blue Line, Green Line and Gold Line)  High customer satisfaction

Metro Rapid (BRT) Attributes 1. Frequent Service 2. Transit Priority Systems 3. Headway-based Schedules 4. Simple Route Layout 5. Less Frequent Stops 6. Integrated with Local Bus Service 7. Level Boarding 8. Color-coded Buses and Stations 9. High Capacity Buses 10. Exclusive Lanes 11. Off-vehicle Fare Payment 12. Bus Feeder Network Primary Attributes Expansion Attributes

Page 5 Los Angeles Metro Rapid

Metro Rapid Station Refinement Lower, flatter canopy Smaller kiosk to fit on narrow sidewalks Added seats to integrated lean- bars Reduced power consumption

LADOT Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Metro Rapid Bus Metro Orange Line Passenger Information System Transit Priority Manager Mobile Internet Passenger System Street Embedded Bus SensorTransponder Transit Graphics iTRAQ

Page 9 Transit Priority Systems  Uses loops and transponders  Reduces bus delay and assists in maintaining bus spacing

Passenger Information Real-time next bus information at stations Real-time next bus information over the internet:

i Transit Report And Query (iTRAQ) Web Interfaces

Less Frequent Stops – Local bus0.2 miles – Limited stop0.3 – Metro Rapid0.7 – Orange Line1.0 – LRT1.0

Typical Station Locations Local Bus Metro Rapid

Local Bus Metro Rapid Typical Station Locations

Bus Signal Priority - Wireless Bus Signal Priority - Wireless

Uses an onboard processing unit Request transmitted via wireless communications technology

Processing Unit, GPS & Communications Equipment Typical on-bus processing unit On-Bus Equipment On-Bus Equipment GPS/WLAN roof mount antenna

Page 19 Program is a Success Reduced Passenger Travel Times  Wilshire/Whittier Corridor – up to 33%  Ventura Corridor – up to 25%  Broadway Corridor – up to 35%  Vermont Corridor – up to 40% Increased Corridor Ridership  Wilshire/Whittier Corridor – 49% increase  Ventura Corridor – 45% increase  Broadway – 17% increase  Vermont – 4% increase Attracted New Riders  1/3 of ridership increase are new riders to public transit

Page 20 Metro Orange Line  October 28, 2005  Over 83,000 people rode the line on opening day

Page 21 Grade Crossings  6 park & ride lots  8 miles of bike lanes  80 acres of landscaping  14 mile exclusive ROW  14 stations

Page 22 Pedestrian Crossings Four Pedestrian Crossings

Station Layout

Page 24 Orange Line is a Success  25,000 weekday boardings  1/3 of Orange Line customers are new riders to transit  77% of Metro customers who previously drove or carpooled indicated reduced travel times  Safety record has improved significantly

The End