1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO LRFD/LRFR Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
Advertisements

Load Rating Seminar1 Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 amIntroductions and House Keeping 8:15 am – 8:45 amSession 1: Load Rating Basics 8:45 am – 9:30 amSession.
RAILROAD BRIDGE AND TRACK DESIGN AND COORDINATION ISSUES Lloyd M. Wolf, P.E.
New Graphic Engine New Graphic User Interface Tabbed Toolbar
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
Composite Beams (cont’d)
Solutions for Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Structures
Elastic Stresses in Unshored Composite Section
Advanced Flexure Design COMPOSITE BEAM THEORY SLIDES
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
VOBUG Conference August 3 rd, 2010 Nashville, Tennessee Robert LeFevre, P.E. Adam Price, P.E. Tennessee Department of Transportation Structures Division.
VDOT LRFD Software Andy Zickler VDOT Structure and Bridge Division Central Office September 8, 2006.
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation
Section 3 design of post-tensioned components for flexure Developed by the pTI EDC-130 Education Committee lead author: trey Hamilton, University of.
Two-Span LRFD Design Example
Bridge Engineering (7) Superstructure – Reinforced Concrete Bridges
Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
Design of Tension Members
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis Bridgeware User Group 2011 Conference Helena, Montana 1.
Virtis-Opis Update Virtis-Opis User Group Training Meeting Helena – August 2011.
PGSuper2AASHTOWare Bridge Data Translator
Chapter -9 WEB STIFFENERS.
Connection of flange plate with web
Shear Capacity of Composite Steel Girder at Simple Support Virtis/Opis User Group Conference Nashville, TN, August 3-4, 2010 George Huang, PhD, PE California.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part IV PCI Bridge Design Manual
Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation RADBUG - August 2014 Water Management and Structures.
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part I PCI Bridge Design Manual
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part III PCI Bridge Design Manual
Code Comparison between
EXAMPLE 9.2– Part VI PCI Bridge Design Manual
Beams. BEAMS A structural member loaded in the transverse direction to the longitudinal axis. Internal Forces: Bending Moments and Shear.
Composite Beams and Columns
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part VII PCI Bridge Design Manual
EXAMPLE 9.2 – Part II PCI Bridge Design Manual
2013 Design Rating User Group Presentation Virginia Beach, Virginia August 8, 2013.
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
Bentley Leap Bridge Components Overview
University of Palestine
LRFR vs. LFR Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 2, 2011
I. Truss Bridge Gussets Background
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO Standard Spec Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
Extra Examples.
1 AASHTOWare Bridge Technical Update AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/Design User Group Training Meeting Traverse City – August 2014.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
N.W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar 1 By: Prof Dr. Akhtar Naeem Khan Lecture 12: Composite Beams.
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part V PCI Bridge Design Manual BULB “T” (BT-72) THREE SPANS, COMPOSITE DECK LRFD SPECIFICATIONS Materials copyrighted by Precast/Prestressed.
Design and Rating for Curved Steel I- and box-girder Bridge Structures
1 Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2010 Nashville, Tennessee.
Bridge Girder Alternatives for Extremely Aggressive Environments Project Manager: Will Potter, P.E. - FDOT Research Team: Jeff R. Brown, PhD, Assoc. Professor.
Dr Ana M. Ruiz-Teran Transverse schemes for bridge decks. Part 3: Box girders.
6- Calculation of shear stress at composite interface: A)Under service load: Strain and stress distributions across composite beam cross- section, under.
Composite Construction
By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-6 Shear Design of Beams.
Design of Gantry Girders
General purpose cold-formed steel component design software
High Bridge Re-Deck Project
Structural Considerations for Bridges
Design of Gantry Girders
FRAMING CONECTIONS Session 3.
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.
1C2 Conceptual Design of Buildings
Chapter 3 BENDING MEMBERS.
Virtis Opis User Group Meeting, August 6, 2013
AASHTOWare Bridge Design & Rating (BrDR) 3D FEM Analysis Capabilities
Presentation transcript:

1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO LRFD/LRFR Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana

2 AASHTO LRFD Engine Version 6.3 and BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Version are compared

3 Steel Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Implemented BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Not implemented Moment Redistribution Control Option

4 Steel Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Implemented BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Not implemented Wind Effects

5 Steel Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Uses plate depth entered by user BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Computes web depth as back-back angle depth minus the flange thicknesses Built-up Section Web Depth

6 Steel Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Implemented BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Not implemented Article Net Section Fracture

7 Steel Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Implemented BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Not implemented Article LTB Resistance For nonprismatic sections:

8 Prestressed Concrete Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Control option allows you to pick gross or transformed section properties BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Uses gross section properties Loss and Stress Calculations

9 Prestressed Concrete Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Loss Methods AASHTO Approximate AASHTO Refined AASHTO Pre-2005 interim Refined Elastic gains can be included BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Loss Methods AASHTO Approximate AASHTO Refined Lump Sum PCI Elastic gains cannot be included Loss Calculations

10 Prestressed Concrete Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Implemented BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Not implemented Article Splitting Resistance

11 Prestressed Concrete Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine No limit on Mcre/Mmax BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Controlled by engine data: No limit on Mcre/Mmax Limit Mcre/Mmax to 1.0 Article

12 Prestressed Concrete Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Uses simple span bearing span lengths for DL1 analysis and centerline of support span lengths for DL2 and LL analyses. Analysis points considered for DL1 analysis correspond to tenth points of the continuous span lengths used for DL2 and LL analyses. Analysis points for which the results are reported correspond to tenth points of the continuous span lengths. BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Uses the same support positions, simple span bearing span lengths or centerline of support span lengths, for all stages. Non- composite stage is considered as simple spans and composite stage as continuous spans. Support Positions

13 Prestressed Concrete Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine Considers regions of the deck to be composite if the effective slab thickness and width are entered on the Deck Profile window and one of the following are entered on the PS Shear Reinforcement Ranges window: Vertical reinforcement extends into deck "Composite" horizontal reinforcement range entered Horizontal shear reinforcement range entered BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Considers the total length of deck to be composite if the effective slab thickness and width are entered on the Deck Profile window. Composite Slab Designation

14 Reinforced Concrete Girders AASHTO LRFD Engine No limit on Mcre/Mmax BRASS-GIRDER(LRFD) Controlled by engine data: No limit on Mcre/Mmax Limit Mcre/Mmax to 1.0 Article

15 Thank you