Aerosol Optical Depth Measurements by Airborne Sun Photometer in SOLVE II: Comparisons to SAGE III, POAM III and Airborne Spectrometer Measurements* P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Products from the OMPS Limb Profiler (LP) instrument on the Suomi NPP Satellite Pawan K. Bhartia Earth Sciences Division- Atmospheres NASA Goddard Space.
Advertisements

UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY limb operational NO 2 product F. Azam, K. Weigel, Ralf Bauer, A. Rozanov, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN,
Envisat Symposium, April 23 – 27, 2007, Montreux bremen.de SADDU Meeting, June 2008, IUP-Bremen Cloud sensitivity studies.
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
CPI International UV/Vis Limb Workshop Bremen, April Development of Generalized Limb Scattering Retrieval Algorithms Jerry Lumpe & Ed Cólon.
Atmospheric Emission.
On average TES exhibits a small positive bias in the middle and lower troposphere of less than 15% and a larger negative bias of up to 30% in the upper.
ADEOS-II. Stratospheric aerosol and cloud characterization from ILAS observations (extended) Sergey Oshchepkov Yasuhiro Sasano Tatsuya Yokota Hideaki.
Comparison of Results of SAGE III Atmospheric Sounding with Data of Independent Interpretation, Measurements and Numerical Modeling Yu. M. Timofeyev*,
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Now That I Know That… What Do I Do? (Analyzing your Microtop Solar Radiometry Data)
NASA Ames: P. Russell, J. Redemann, S. Dunagan, R. Johnson, J. Zavaleta PNNL: B. Schmid, C. Flynn, E. Kassianov NASA GSFC: AERONET Team A collaboration.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
First Flight of NASA’s Coastal and Ocean Airborne Science Testbed (COAST) L. Guild 1, J. Dungan 1, M. Edwards 1, P. Russell 1, J. Morrow 2, S. Hooker 3,
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
A Progress Report on Combining MODIS and CALIPSO Aerosol Data for Direct Radiative Effect Studies Jens Redemann, Qin Zhang, Philip Russell, John Livingston,
Trace gas and AOD retrievals from a newly deployed hyper-spectral airborne sun/sky photometer (4STAR) M. Segal-Rosenheimer, C.J. Flynn, J. Redemann, B.
Aerosol Optical Depths from Airborne Sunphotometry in INTEX-B/MILAGRO as a Validation Tool for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura J. Livingston.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
A. Bracher, L. N. Lamsal, M. Weber, J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, FB 1, Institute of Environmental Physics, P O Box , D Bremen, Germany.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET-AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan Gupta Originally.
SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.
4STAR: Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research Development and Results from First Test-flights A collaboration involving: PNNL:
T2 T1 (biomass burning aerosol) (dust) Findings (1) OMI and AATS AOD retrievals have been analyzed for four spatially and temporally near-coincident events.
Figure 1. (left) Direct comparison of CCN concentration adjusted to 0.4% supersaturation and 499 nm AOD, both observed from ≤1 km altitudes during ARCTAS.
IGARSS 2011, July 24-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 A PRINCIPAL COMPONENT-BASED RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION TO HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING Xu.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan Gupta Satellite.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet.
1 NOAA-UPRM COOP Program in Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, Department of Physics, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR Yaítza.
Livingston et al. EGU General Assembly April 2007 Comparison of airborne sunphotometer and satellite sensor retrievals of aerosol optical depth during.
4STAR: Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun- Tracking Atmospheric Research Results from Test-flight Series PNNLNASA AmesNASA GSFC B. SchmidS. DunaganS. Sinyuk.
Redemann, ICARTT workshop, Durham, NH, Aug.9-12, 2005 Airborne measurements of spectral direct aerosol radiative forcing - a new aerosol gradient method.
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
Airborne sunphotometer (AATS-14) measurements in ARCTAS - first insights into their combined use with satellite observations to study Arctic aerosol radiative.
Aerosol distribution and physical properties in the Titan atmosphere D. E. Shemansky 1, X. Zhang 2, M-C. Liang 3, and Y. L. Yung 2 1 SET/PSSD, California,
NASA’s Coastal and Ocean Airborne Science Testbed (COAST) L. Guild 1 *, J. Dungan 1, M. Edwards 1, P. Russell 1, S. Hooker 2, J. Myers 3, J. Morrow 4,
For INTEX-B/MILAGRO the J31 was equipped to measure solar energy and how that energy is affected by atmospheric constituents and Earth's surfaces. Because.
Limb Retrieval at IFE/IUP in Bremen Working team: A. Rozanov, K.-U. Eichmann, C. v. Savigny, J. Kaiser Tests based on level 0 data Normalisation by –Solar.
4STAR: Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research A collaboration involving: PNNL: Connor J. Flynn, B. Schmid, E. Kassianov NASA.
How accurately we can infer isoprene emissions from HCHO column measurements made from space depends mainly on the retrieval errors and uncertainties in.
J31 Data Workshop 9-10Mar05 Validation of Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth by AATS-14 during ICARTT 2004 NASA Ames Airborne Sunphotometer Team Presented.
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
Direct aerosol radiative effects based on combined A-Train observations Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, J. Livingston, M. Vaughan, P. Russell, M.Kacenelenbogen,
Aerosol optical properties measured from aircraft, satellites and the ground during ARCTAS - their relationship to aerosol chemistry and smoke type Yohei.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies during the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid BAER/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies in the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid 1, P.B. Russell 2, P.Pilewskie 2, J. Redemann 1, P.V. Hobbs.
AATS-14 measurements during COAST J. Livingston R. Johnson M. Kacenelenbogen C. Chang P. Russell.
Stratospheric Aerosol Size Distribution Retrievals Using SAGE III Mark Hervig GATS Inc. Terry Deshler University of Wyoming.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
Phil Russell 1, John Livingston 2, Beat Schmid 3, Jens Redemann 4, Stephanie Ramirez 4, Qin Zhang 4 and many other contributors 10 Years of Studies Comparing.
Jetstream-31 (J31) in ITCT-INTEX (Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation- Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment) J31 GOALS in.
SAGE III Aerosol Studies: Size Distribution Retrievals and Validation Mark Hervig GATS Inc.
Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research (4STAR) Earth Science Division - NASA Ames Research Center 2006 A concept for a sun-sky.
Horizontal variability of aerosol optical properties observed during the ARCTAS airborne experiment Yohei Shinozuka 1*, Jens Redemann 1, Phil Russell 2,
Challenges in remote sensing of CCN concentration An assessment based on airborne observations of AOD, CCN, chemical composition, size distribution, light.
Challenge the future Corresponding author: Delft University of Technology Collocated OMI DOMINO and MODIS Aqua aerosol products.
J. Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J.A. Eilers 2, R. Kahn 3, R.C. Levy 4,5, P.B. Russell 2, J.M. Livingston 6, P.V. Hobbs 7, W.L. Smith Jr. 8, B.N. Holben 4 1.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
Studying the radiative environment of individual biomass burning fire plumes using multi-platform observations: an example ARCTAS case study on June 30,
Jens Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J. M. Livingston 2, P. B. Russell 3, J. A. Eilers 3, P. V. Hobbs 4, R. Kahn 5, W. L. Smith Jr. 6, B. N. Holben 7, C.K. Rutledge.
Polarization Effects on Column CO2 Retrievals from Non-Nadir Satellite Measurements in the Short-Wave Infrared Vijay Natraj1, Hartmut Bösch2, Robert J.D.
Introduction and Basic Concepts
Presentation transcript:

Aerosol Optical Depth Measurements by Airborne Sun Photometer in SOLVE II: Comparisons to SAGE III, POAM III and Airborne Spectrometer Measurements* P. Russell 1, J. Livingston 2, B. Schmid 3, J. Eilers 1, R. Kolyer 1, J. Redemann 3, S. Ramirez 3, J-H. Yee 4, W. Swartz 4, R. Shetter 5, C. Trepte 6, A. Risley, Jr. 7, B. Wenny 7, J. Zawodny 6, W. Chu 6, M. Pitts 6, J. Lumpe 8, M. Fromm 8, C. Randall 9, R. Bevilacqua 10 1 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 2 SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 3 Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA 4 Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 5 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 6 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 7 SAIC, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 8 Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, VA 9 Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 10 Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 2. AATS-14 and SAGE III Transmission Measurements Fig. A. SAGE III vertical profiles of transmission at representative wavelengths for the occultation events near the DC-8 on 19, 24, 29, and 31 January, with near-coincident AATS transmission values at the AATS measurement SZA, SZA meas, and converted to apparent SZA=90 o. Fig. E. Conditions and results for the DC-8 flight of 19 January Top left: DC-8 track (black line) on map of forecast MPV. Top right: Aerosol extinction profiles retrieved from SAGE III occultation at UT, lat, and lon shown. Middle: DC-8 altitude, distance from SAGE III 10- km tangent point, and true and apparent (refracted) SZA, with AOD retrieved from AATS-14 at two wavelengths. Red vertical dotted line marked by red arrow and “SAGE” shows time of SAGE III tangent at 10 km altitude. Bottom: Airmasses for Rayleigh, ozone, and aerosol (755 nm), at SZAmeas and apparent SZA=90 o, computed from the SAGE III profiles at top right using the Yee algorithm Fig. F. As in Fig. E, but for 24 January AATS-14 provides aerosol results at 12 wavelengths between 354 and 1556 nm, spanning the full range of SAGE III and POAM III aerosol wavelengths. Because most AATS measurements in SOLVE II were made at solar zenith angles (SZA) near 90 o, retrieved AODs are strongly affected by uncertainties in the relative optical airmass (here called airmass for brevity) of the aerosols and other constituents along the (generally refracted) line of sight (LOS) between instrument and sun. For any given constituent and/or wavelength, airmass is defined as the ratio of LOS optical thickness (OT) to vertical OT (i.e., OD). For SZA near 90 o, airmass is sensitive to the vertical profile of the associated attenuator. Uncertainties in such vertical profiles therefore produce corresponding uncertainties in the associated airmass. To reduce dependence of the AATS-satellite comparisons on airmass, we perform the comparisons in LOS transmission and LOS OT as well as in vertical OT (or optical depth). 1. Introduction The 14-channel NASA Ames Airborne Tracking Sunphotometer (AATS-14) measured solar-beam transmission on the NASA DC-8 during the Second SAGE III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE II). The companion poster by Livingston et al. describes the AATS-14 instrument, measurement procedures, and results for ozone. This poster presents AATS-14 results for multiwavelength aerosol optical depth (AOD), including its spatial structure and its relationship to results from two satellite sensors and another DC-8 instrument. These are the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment III (SAGE III), the Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM III) and the Direct beam Irradiance Airborne Spectrometer (DIAS). Altitude nm [km] Pixel Group: 21 SAGE  : nm AATS : nm Pixel Group: 22 SAGE  : nm AATS : nm Pixel Group: 35 SAGE  : nm AATS : nm DC-8 flight altitudes Pixel Group: 51 SAGE  : nm AATS : nm Pixel Group: 81 SAGE  : nm AATS : nm 5. AATS-SAGE Comparisons 6. AATS-DIAS Comparisons 4. Converting AATS Transmissions to 90 o Refracted SZA Fig. J. Comparison of SAGE and AATS transmission, LOSOT, and OD, by components and totals, for 19 January 2003 at km. All AATS results for T and LOSOT have been converted from SZA meas to apparent SZA 90 o. Fig. I. AATS transmission, LOSOT, and OD, for components and totals, for 19 January 2003 at km. Top: Transmission at SZA meas and converted to 90 o. Middle: LOSOT at SZA meas and converted to 90 o. Bottom: OD. Shown for comparison are SAGE total transmission, LOSOT, and OD, plus DIAS LOS AOT at 400 nm and SZA meas. Fig. K. Comparison of AATS and SAGE LOSOT (total and components) for 19, 24, 29, and 31 January AATS values have been converted to apparent SZA= 90 o, using the procedure shown in Sect. 4 and illustrated in Fig. I. Fig. M. As in Fig. K, but for vertical OD. Fig. L. Comparison of SAGE and AATS transmission, LOSOT, and OD, by components and totals, for the 2 February 2003 SAGE spectral survey case, at 9.7 km. The AATS period is UT. All AATS results for T and LOSOT have been converted from SZA meas to apparent SZA 90 o. SAGE III Spectral Survey Case Converting transmission from SZA meas to 90 o needs to be done by components, since different components have different vertical profile shapes, and hence different dependences of airmass on SZA. For 5 AATS-SAGE near-coincidences--on 19, 24, 29, and 31 Jan, and the SAGE III spectral survey case of 2 Feb the method shown in Section 4 was used to convert AATS transmission T and LOSOT from SZA meas to 90 o (refracted), for components and totals. Results for T, LOSOT, and vertical OD were then compared to SAGE III results (Figs. J, K, L, M). Fig. MM. DIAS LOS aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at SZA meas compared to AATS LOS AOT at SZA meas.for 19, 24, 29, and 31 January Also shown are AATS results for other components and total LOSOT, both at SZA meas and converted to 90 o, along with SAGE total LOSOT. 3. Airmass dependence on SZA, extinction profiles, wavelength, and DC-8 altitude 7. AATS-POAM Comparisons8. Summary and Conclusions * Manuscript in preparation for Atmos. Chem. Phys. Posted at ftp://science.arc.nasa.gov/pub/aats/pub/phil / Fig. C. Comparison of airmass results from the methods of DeMajistre and Yee (2002, labeled Yee) and Thomason et al. (19xx, labeled UA), for different wavelengths of aerosol extinction and for molecular, ozone, and water vapor number density. Profiles in the left frames yield the airmasses in the right frames for two altitudes: 8.5 km (top row) and 10.5 km (bottom row). Fig. D. Absolute and percent differences between the airmass results from the methods of DeMajistre and Yee (2002, labeled Yee) and Thomason et al. (1983, labeled UA) shown in Fig. 3 Fig. B. Left frames: Representative vertical profiles of aerosol extinction and of ozone and molecular number density. Aerosol and ozone profiles are from SAGE III and POAM III retrievals near DC-8 flights on the dates shown. Aerosol profiles are for one SAGE III wavelength (775.4 nm) and one POAM III wavelength (779.4 nm). The molecular density profile is the MODTRAN subarctic winter model. Right frame: Corresponding results for airmass calculated for altitude 10 km using the method of DeMajistre and Yee (2002) and the constituent profiles in the left frames Fig. G. As in Fig. E, but for 24 January Fig. P. As in Fig. N, but for 21 January Fig. O. Comparison of AATS-14 and POAM III AOD spectra for the 19 January 2003 occultation shown in Fig. N. Fig. Q. Comparison of AATS-14 and POAM III AOD spectra for the 21 January 2003 occultations shown in Fig. P. References Fig. N. Conditions and results for the DC-8 flight of 19 January Top left: DC-8 track (black line) on map of forecast MPV. Top right: Aerosol extinction profiles retrieved from POAM III occultation at UT, lat, and lon shown. Middle: DC-8 altitude, distance from POAM III 10-km tangent point, and true and apparent (refracted) SZA, with AOD retrieved from AATS-14 at two wavelengths. Red vertical dotted line marked by red arrow and “POAM” shows time of POAM III tangent at 10 km altitude. Bottom: Airmasses for Rayleigh, ozone, and aerosol (755 nm), at SZA meas and apparent SZA=90 o, computed from the POAM III profiles at top right using the Yee algorithm. Fig. H. As in Fig. E, but for 24 January DeMajistre, R., and J.-H. Yee, Atmospheric remote sensing using a combined extinctive and refractive stellar occultation technique: 2. Inversion method for extinction measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 107, /2001JD000795, Thomason, L. W., B. M. Herman, and J. A. Reagan, The effect of atmospheric attenuators with structured vertical distributions on air mass determinations and Langley plot analyses, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, , Yee, J.-H., et al., Atmospheric remote sensing using a combined extinctive and refractive stellar occultation technique: 1. Overview and proof-of-concept observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, /2001JD000794, AATS-14 measurements on the DC-8 in SOLVE II provide AOD spectra for wavelengths nm, covering the full SAGE III and POAM III wavelength range. The AATS-14 results show AOD spatial structure along the DC-8 flight path and provide AOD spectra for comparison to SAGE III and POAM III at their tangent points. A new airmass algorithm [Yee, 2003; Magistre and Yee, 2002] validates the Thomason et al. [1983] algorithm to within 2% for SZA =90 o. The five AATS-SAGE comparisons shown in Figs. A and I-M have several features in common: -AOD differences were ≤ for all >400 nm. RMS differences were ≤ Mean differences (AATS-SAGE) were ≤ RMS percentage differences in AOD ([AATS-SAGE]/AATS) were ≤31% for <~755 nm and 56% for 1020 nm. -SAGE and AATS total LOSOT values (both at apparent SZA=90 o ) agree to within 10% of the AATS value for <~755 nm but differ by as much as 41% of the AATS value at 1020 nm and more at 1545 nm. Mean and rms differences, (SAGE-AATS)/AATS, are <8% for <~755 nm but increase to 36% at 1020 nm, and larger at 1545 nm. - SAGE and AATS LOS total transmissions T (both at apparent SZA=90 o ) agree to within 22% at all wavelengths, nm. Mean and root-mean-square (rms) differences, (AATS-SAGE)/SAGE, are ≤15% at each  The case with largest AATS-SAGE difference at short, 24 January, is also the case with largest scan-to-scan differences in SAGE short- transmission (see Fig. A). *The case with best AATS-SAGE agreement is the SAGE spectral survey of 2 Feb 2003 (Fig. L). What causes this? AATS-POAM AOD differences were ≤0.004 for all >400 nm. RMS differences were ≤ Mean differences (AATS-POAM) were ≤ * RMS percentage differences in AOD ([AATS-POAM]/AATS) were ≤31% for all between 450 and 1020 nm. * AATS-DIAS differences in LOS AOT at 400 nm and SZA meas were ≤11%. AATS & DIAS Rayleigh LOS Transmission and OT tracked very well at all, nm. See “Late-Breaking AATS-DIAS Comparisons” Four tests for frost on the AATS-14 window were all negative for all cases shown here (see Appendix of ms*). Frost deposition was prevented by a window heater and extensive purging with dry nitrogen. POAM III v4 AATS AATS: o o o POAM III v4:  v4 v3 (within 6% of v4) SAGE: AATS: SZA=90 o SAGE: AATS: SZA=90 o SAGE: AATS: SZA=90 o SAGE: AATS: SZA meas SZA=90 o, SZA meas, SZA meas, SZA meas, SZA meas