Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
Critical Thinking about Affective Issues as it Relates to Student Motivation Presentation by: Andrea Kelly, Ph.D.
Evaluating Thinking Through Intellectual Standards
*taken from The Foundation for Critical Thinking Critical Thinking in Education & Life.
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Professional Judgment: Then and Now During the previous two decades, “professional judgment” was often used to indicate that a process wherein the EDT/IEP.
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.
700: Supporting Supervisors in Using Critical Thinking Skills.
Summary-Response Essay
A Student’s Guide to Methodology Justifying Enquiry 3 rd edition P ETER C LOUGH AND C ATHY N UTBROWN.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Critical Appraisal of an Article by Dr. I. Selvaraj B. SC. ,M. B. B. S
Ideas to Action Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement Patricia R. Payette, Ph.D. January 9, 2008.
Writing a Research Proposal
Critical Thinking: Close Reading of Texts Presented by Dr. Cheryl Torok Fleming November, 2013 Based on Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking:
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CRITICAL ANALYSIS IN ASSESSMENT.
EKU will graduate informed, critical and creative thinkers who can communicate effectively.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Objectives Raise awareness/ challenge our own thinking and understanding of how we make sense of our international practice,ie explore why we do, what.
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENTS. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Students or teachers collect student work products.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 16, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
ELD Transition Sessions
Home Enrichment (HE) TEST THE IDEA. DAY ONE (1) Focus: Purpose & Questions at Issue 4 Home Enrichment (HE)- 4/13 Do Nightly / Due on Fri. 4/17 TEST THE.
Program-level Assessment With Faculty Learning Communities: The Wisdom Of Well-managed, Small Crowds Amy Liu, Mary Maguire, Lynn Tashiro Sacramento State.
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
1 st Quarter Self- Reflection English I. The Grade Profile The purpose of a grade profile is to give students the opportunity to take responsibility for.
A Checklist for Reasoning & Questions Using the Elements of Thought
FdEng 301: Advanced Writing & Critical Thinking Instructor: David Grover.
MICHELLE MARCH, PHD WEDNESDAY 9:00 PM EST HN Unit 7 Seminar Chapters 19, 20 & 22.
Using COS Data to Inform Program Improvement at All Levels Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and nurture.
 Give people / university information ◦ Because you supplement the hard data of OLE records  Prepare for a review or interview, e.g. university admission.
Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
1 Tempus Tempus Workshop Sarajevo 7 June 2006 « Good practice in Preparing an Application » Anne Collette European Training Foundation Tempus Department.
Distinguishing Between Inferences and Assumptions
Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.
GCSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT. Summary of Assessment Unit 1 Written Paper 1½ hours (40% final mark, one tier only) Unit 2 Controlled Assessment – Child Study.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
102: Supporting Families in Using Critical Thinking Skills.
What do you think? The most effective method for assessing my students is to use a large end of unit test.
A Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Critical thinking for assignments to get a better grade
Nahid Al-Bakri ( ) Aisha Al_khaldi( ) Lama Al-bassam( )
Writing a sound proposal
Building Evidence of Effectiveness
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Business Case Analysis
Problem Solving and Critical Thinking
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Understanding by Design
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Critical Thinking.
Assessment and Analyzing Family Functioning
FdEng 301: Advanced Writing & Critical Thinking
Critical Reading Charting the Text.
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Honors Debate Wednesday, January 6, 2016.
ACADEMIC DEBATE.
703: Coaching for Performance Improvement
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Zimbabwe 2008 Critical Thinking.
Critical Thinking.
Students can fail professionally if they:
Presentation transcript:

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Developed by TACT: Pamela E. Aeppel, M.A. Shawna L. Thomas, B.A. Chief Visual Designer: Kayvrie Vega Child Welfare Training Consortium University of South Florida Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Introductions  Name / Role  How Many Methodology Cases Have You Had Your Hands On? Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Reflection  Share something that has been the most “thought provoking” in your role since implementation and practice of the model. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Pre-Test Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

What Can Be Expected? Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Information Collection Competencies Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium  1. I know what information I must learn about a family. I know what information I must collect on each case I am assigned.  2. I understand the purposes or reasons for needing to know this information.  3. I demonstrate the ability to gather the information.  4. I demonstrate awareness that everything I do to reconcile and validate information influences the overall quality of the information.  5. I can discuss and write about information I collected logically, succinctly, and in a way that justifies my conclusions.

Learning Objectives  Define and identify the six stages of critical thinking.  Analyze how critical thinking is utilized in preparation for information collection with the family.  Distinguish when conversations are task driven, as opposed to a consultative approach.  Formulate a plan for a successful conversation with the family and articulate how you would have this conversation. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Learning Objectives  Define and identify the six stages of critical thinking.  Analyze how critical thinking is utilized in preparation for information collection with the family.  Distinguish when conversations are task driven, as opposed to a consultative approach.  Formulate a plan for a successful conversation with the family and articulate how you would have this conversation. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

What is Critical thinking?  Refer to handouts in Participant Guide.  “What is Critical Thinking?”  “What Exactly is Critical Thinking?”  “6 Stages of Critical Thinking Development”  “Reasoning” Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

The Ideal Critical Thinker in Child Welfare…  Seeks and offers clear reasons, assumptions and conclusions to support justification of safety decision-making.  Takes into account the “family conditions” within the context of each case.  Suspends decision-making until information is reconciled, validated and is sufficient.  Uses critical thinking abilities and skills during case assessments.  Uses “The Standards,” “The Elements,” and “Intellectual Traits.”

What Exactly is Critical Thinking?  Basic Process of Critical Thinking  Taking Informed Action

The 6 Stages of Critical Thinking  1. The Unreflective Thinker  2. The Challenged Thinker  3. The Beginning Thinker  4. The Practicing Thinker  5. The Advanced Thinker  6. The Accomplished Thinker

Reasoning:  Gather sufficient information that supports and opposes your claim.  Make sure all information is accurate, clear and relevant.  Infer only what the evidence implies & check for consistency.  Consider and trace all possible implications and consequences that follow your reasoning.  Look out for negative and positive implications.

Discussion  Individually, take 5 minutes to identify someone in your personal or professional life represented in a particular stage of critical thinking development. Provide an example of how you know they are in that particular stage. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Learning Objectives  Define and identify the six stages of critical thinking.  Analyze how critical thinking is utilized in preparation for information collection with the family.  Distinguish when conversations are task driven, as opposed to a consultative approach.  Formulate a plan for a successful conversation with the family and articulate how you would have this conversation. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Critical Thinking in Pre-Commencement Activities/ Consultations  Benefits and challenges during pre-commencement activities and consultations.  Reference pre-commencement handouts.

Activity #1 What Do I Ask and Why?  Within your groups, review the domain you have been assigned. Read the provided scenario and develop questions you would ask the family in order to get meaningful information for your assigned domain. Why did you consider these questions? How are these questions a “need” to know for child safety decision making?  Identify a scribe and a spokesperson to report out. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Case Scenario (PG page 24) Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity Debrief Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Learning Objectives  Define and identify the six stages of critical thinking.  Analyze how critical thinking is utilized in preparation for information collection with the family.  Distinguish when conversations are task driven, as opposed to a consultative approach.  Formulate a plan for a successful conversation with the family and articulate how you would have this conversation. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity #2 Tasking or Talking?  Review the provided list of directives and questions. Rework as many directives into consultation questions that you can. If any are best suited as directives, provide an explanation. Relate your responses to sufficiency, reconciliation, and validation and/or the impact of not obtaining or discussing the need for the information. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity Debrief

Learning Objectives  Define and identify the six stages of critical thinking.  Analyze how critical thinking is utilized in preparation for information collection with the family.  Distinguish when conversations are task driven, as opposed to a consultative approach.  Formulate a plan for a successful conversation with the family and articulate how you would have this conversation. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity #3 Planning with Purpose  Read about the family’s prior DCF history from the provided case scenario from Activity 2. Demonstrate and/or report out group responses based on Trainer’s direction. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Questions to Consider:  What would be your approach? Why?  Did you tie your strategy/approach to a specific domain? Which one? Why?  What would be a challenge for you to discuss?  What would you be cautious about in your approach?  What would be your fears of this approach?  What would you have to know?  What would you like to know? Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity Debrief

Compare/Contrast Discussion  Prior history section within FFA’s. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Post-Test

“In Hindsight” Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium