US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP 2: INVENTORY AND FORECAST Planning Principles & Procedures – FY 11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSMENTS OF NATURAL HAZARDS Ron Conner Corps of Engineers.
Advertisements

F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY 11 LARGE GROUP RESPONSE EXERCISE.
Writing a Preliminary Assessment (The example of the Environmental Review Report) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Defining the Status Quo. Definition of Status Quo The “Status Quo” describes existing or anticipated conditions of a water resources system if policies,
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
1 Marketing Plans Strategic Marketing Plans – based on careful examination of a firm’s core business strategy and primary marketing objectives Tactical.
Where IOOS Meets the Land and Atmosphere: Assessing/Mitigating Risks of Current & Prospective Coastal Inundation/Erosion Alaskan Coastal Climatology Workshop.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1 Building Strong! THE ECONOMIST’S ROLE Ken Claseman Senior Policy Advisor for Economics Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
Chapter 2 – Business Forecasting Takesh Luckho. What is Business Forecasting?  Forecasting is about predicting the future as accurately as possible,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP FOUR: EVALUATE EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE PLANS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
1 Technological Innovations and Future Vision of Technical Support Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration and Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Foresight future floding Ian Meadowcroft, Environment Agency JimHall University of Bristol, Department of Civil Engineering Paul Sayers, HR Wallingford.
The aim / learning outcome of this module is to understand how to gather and use data effectively to plan the development of recycling and composting.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
Building the Digital Coast. Priority Coastal Issues Land use planning (growth management) Coastal conservation Hazards (flooding/inundation/storm surge)
Market research in Business
Research and Development US Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Program Area Review December 5, 2005 James Clausner ERDC Acting Technical Director.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE Navigation Data/Information Workshop July 7, 2005 Arlene L Dietz, Director, Navigation Data Center.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division One Corps.
Welcome To: PCC4: Economic Analysis In Planning U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Planners Core Curriculum.
M4 - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Multi-Purpose Projects Module M4: Telling the Plan Formulation Story.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
Assign Annual Demand for a Purpose CALSIM Simulation Compare the Long-term Average Annual Friant Unit Delivery to Benchmark Study CALSIM Simulation Completed.
Impact Analysis 2. Impact Prediction. Environmental Impacts The change in an environmental parameter, which results from a particular activity or intervention.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY Overall Goal – from purpose statement: “To improve the availability and reliability of (surface water) information needed for.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Boise River Feasibility Study Ellen Berggren, PMP Outreach Coordinator/ Project Manager Idaho Governor’s Roadless.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
Forecasting for Water Resources Planning. Learning Objective(s):  The student will:  Understand the need for forecasts.  Be able to describe what a.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
Monetizing Resilience Benefits in Economic Development Shifting Policies/ Investment For Efficiency and Resiliency Joshua Reyneveld Managing Director.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
1 “IWR-Planning Suite” Ch 6 Mod 5 See ICA Tutorial in Reference Folder ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING.
US Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento DistrictIntroductionIntroduction Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Phase II Supplemental Authorization –
1 Hydraulic and Hydrologic Considerations in Planning.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Copyright © 2004 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. All rights reserved.Developed by Cool Pictures and MultiMedia PresentationsCopyright.
1 Formulate Alternatives Planning Step 5. 2 Social Science Activities in Land Use Planning Planning Steps Social Science Activities Steps 1 & 2: Identify.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP 3 - FORMULATION BRAINSTORMING MANAGEMENT MEASURES Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
March Urban Flood Risk Management. March Objectives Understand the Nature of Flooding & Flood Damage Alleviation Understand the Nature of.
RECREATION AUTHORITY  P.L , Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended  P.L , “…require cost-sharing…”  P.L , “…est.
Kristin Gilroy, PhD International Center for Integrated Water Resources Management 24 February 2016 Climate Risk Informed Decision Analysis: Bridging the.
DEMAND FORCASTING. Introduction: Demand forecasting means expectation about the future course of the market demand for a product. Demand forecasting is.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study Collaboration Webinar Series #5: Policy Challenges and Institutional.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Data Collection Techniques
HEC-ResSim 3.3 New Features to Support Complex Studies
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
Introduction to Marketing Research
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Storm Risk Management
L1 Nature of forest management planning
North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study Collaboration Webinar Series #2: Ecosystem Goods and Services U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Storm Risk.
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP 2: INVENTORY AND FORECAST Planning Principles & Procedures – FY 11

BUILDING STRONG ® Objectives  Define inventory and forecast  Describe data collection process and requirements  Discuss forecasting techniques  Identify most important output of Step 2

BUILDING STRONG ® Why Inventory?  Describe historic and existing conditions  Refine and expand problems and opportunities  Define future without project condition

BUILDING STRONG ® How to Inventory  Information Gathering Strategy  Develop and describe in Project Management Plan (PMP)  Re-evaluate

BUILDING STRONG ® Information Gathering Strategy  Geographic Area  Relevancy  Quantity  Accuracy  Timing  Period of time

BUILDING STRONG ® Examples of Data Used in Planning Foundation characteristics Infrastructure Geologic formations Minerals Land classificationsDrainage patterns Aquifer characteristicsYields Rain gauge dataPrecipitation records Evaporation rates Gauging stations locations Stream flow recordsSediment loads Groundwater qualitySurface water quality Flora and faunaHistoric structures Endangered speciesSignificant resources Habitat typesPopulation Land usesStructure values Structure elevationsIncome distribution EmploymentCommodity demand StakeholdersCommodity movements Vessel fleet characteristics

BUILDING STRONG ® Example Data Flood Management Study Data NeededPurposeSuggested Sources Water surface elevations by flood frequency Define floodplain. Estimate damages/benefits. Formulate plans. Hydrologic/hydraulic analyses Property at risk of floodingEstimate damages/benefits. Formulate plans. Hydrologic/hydraulic analyses. Flooded area maps. Structure/Content valuesEstimate damages/benefits. Formulate plans Field surveys. Commercial data (Marshall & Swift, others)

BUILDING STRONG ® Example Data Flood Risk Management Study (Cont.) Data NeededPurposeSuggested Sources Depth-damage curvesEstimate damages/benefits. Generic curves. Site specific surveys. Ecological resources impacted by plans Develop mitigation measures. Published data. Resource agencies. Field surveys. Unit costsCost estimatesMCACES. Commercial sources.

BUILDING STRONG ® Data Collection  Potential sources: ► Primary From original research ► Secondary Collected by others Internet

BUILDING STRONG ® Planners Website Planner's Study Aids: Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Ecosystem Restoration Flood Risk Management Hydropower Navigation Recreation Water Supply/Water Quality Watershed Formulation and Evaluation

BUILDING STRONG ® For Additional Information on Available Data  Flood Risk Management ► Stuart A. Davis, IWR ► Eric Thaut, SPD  Deep-Draft/Inland Navigation ► Ian Mathis, IWR ► Navigation Data Center, IWR ► Wesley Walker, LRD ► Bernard Moseby, SAM  Ecosystem Restoration ► Jodi Staebell, MVR

BUILDING STRONG ® Criteria to Identify Data Needed  Required ► Laws ► Policies ► Regulations  Nice to Know

BUILDING STRONG ® Helpful or Harmful?  Recent reports  Checklists  “Typical” study  Available information  Templates

BUILDING STRONG ®

Inventory and Forecast  Four Conditions: ► Existing condition. ► Historic condition. ► Future without condition. ► Future with condition.  Target

BUILDING STRONG ®

Inventory and Forecast  Four Conditions: ► Existing condition. ► Historic condition. ► Future without condition. ► Future with condition.  Target.  Three types of comparisons: ► With-and-without analysis. ► Before-and-after analysis. ► Gap analysis.

BUILDING STRONG ®

Inventory and Forecast  Four Conditions: ► Existing condition. ► Historic condition. ► Future without condition. ► Future with condition.  Target  Three types of comparisons: ► With-and-without analysis (Col. 5 - Col.4). ► Before-and-after analysis (Col. 5- Col. 3). ► Gap analysis (Col. 5- Col. 1).

BUILDING STRONG ® FORECASTING

BUILDING STRONG ® References  ER , Appendix E, Paragraph E-3a(2)  ER , Appendix E, Sections II and X ► Specific guidance for each Civil Works mission Without Project Condition Handbook Handbook on Deep Draft Forecasting

BUILDING STRONG ® What is a Forecast and Why Do it?  What: Informed guess about the future, a future condition or scenario  Why: Anticipate future conditions that are uncertain.  To define the base condition, the future without project condition and the future with projects condition

BUILDING STRONG ® Forecasts are based on:  Data  Expertise and Experience  Assumptions

BUILDING STRONG ® What do we forecast?  Variables  Scenarios (Conditions)

BUILDING STRONG ® Variables to forecast: those that affect decisions

BUILDING STRONG ® Conditions to Forecast  Base Condition - condition at the time of implementation (base year)  Without Condition - condition if no action takes place (period of analysis)  With Condition - condition if a particular course of action is taken (period of analysis)

BUILDING STRONG ® Forecast Without Project Condition  Primary outcome of Step 2.  Forecast of the future, without any action to solve the problem at hand. Does not mean “no change”.  Most likely condition or use RBA  Used for plan evaluation (with vs. without)

BUILDING STRONG ® Assumptions  Data, expertise and experience help make an informed forecast and thus reduce uncertainty.  Assumptions address the remaining uncertainty.  When uncertainty is significant, assumptions are also significant.

BUILDING STRONG ® Annual Hotel Revenues

BUILDING STRONG ® Forecasting Methods  Quantitative ► Percentage growth ► Regression ► Simulation ► Mathematical programming  Qualitative ► Subjective judgment ► Expert opinion

BUILDING STRONG ® Criteria to Select Forecasting Method  Purpose  Reliability of Data  Level of Disaggregation  Uncertainties and Scenarios  Short vs. Long Term

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing at base yr

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing at base yr Target

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing at base yr Target Future Without (ER) Future Without (FDR/NAV)

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing at base yr Target Future Without (ER) Future with Plan A

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing Target Future Without (ER) Future with Plan A

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing Target Future Without (ER) Future with Plan A Before& After

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing Target Future Without (ER) Future with Plan A With & Without

BASE YRTIME+20 YEARS Existing Target Future Without (ER) Future with Plan A With & Without Gap

BUILDING STRONG ® Summary  In Step 2, data collected is used to verify or re-define problems and opportunities identified in Step 1  Future without project condition is primary outcome of Step 2  Collect only information you need and use it  “Without” or “No Action” does not mean no change  Assumptions matter.

BUILDING STRONG ® Forecaster’s Motto OFTEN WRONG BUT NEVER IN DOUBT