PRELIMINARY PITAC FY00 Report to Congress on the Next Generation Internet (NGI) Initiative February, 2000 PITAC NGI Subcommittee Jim Gray, Bob Kahn (co.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Illinois at Chicago Annual Update Thomas A. DeFanti Principal Investigator, STAR TAP Director, Electronic Visualization Laboratory.
Advertisements

Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
High Performance Internet Service at the University of Michigan December 1999 Internet2 These slides are available from the U-M I2 Web page:
High Performance Internet Service at the University of Michigan April 2000 Internet2 These slides are available from the U-M I2 Web page:
EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) US Resource Centers Perspective: implementation and execution challenges Alan Blatecky Executive Director SDSC.
SDSC Computing the 21st Century Talk Given to the NSF Sugar Panel May 27, 1998.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
The Office of Information Technology Welcomes the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation.
14 July 2000TWIST George Brett NLANR Distributed Applications Support Team (NCSA/UIUC)
Internet2 A Project of the University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development VIEWNET April 1998.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
Documenting Network Design
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
Critical Emerging Network-Centric Applications Tele-control/tele-presence Defense Tele-medicine Remote plane/vehicle/robot control Distance learning Real-time.
Business Data Communications, Stallings 1 Chapter 1: Introduction William Stallings Business Data Communications 6 th Edition.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
What is CANARIE? CANARIE runs Canada’s only national high-bandwidth network for research & education Connects one million users at 1,100 institutions.
Internet2 and Abilene Advanced Networking in Higher Education Greg Wood Director of Communications.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Partnerships for Innovation Key Underlying Tenets ¬ Innovation happens locally - partnerships with state, regional and local governments and industry are.
Performance Monitoring - Internet2 Member Meeting -- Nicolas Simar Performance Monitoring Internet2 Member Meeting, Indianapolis.
The Research and Education Network: Platform for Innovation Heather Boyles, Next Generation Network Symposium Malaysia 2007-March-15.
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources Division of Research Infrastructure Extending.
The Singapore Advanced Research & Education Network.
Campus Cyberinfrastructure – Network Infrastructure and Engineering (CC-NIE) Kevin Thompson NSF Office of CyberInfrastructure April 25, 2012.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce Accelerating Emerging Technologies to the Marketplace.
DOE 2000, March 8, 1999 The IT 2 Initiative and NSF Stephen Elbert program director NSF/CISE/ACIR/PACI.
Information Resources and Communications University of California, Office of the President UC-Wide Activities in Support of Research and Scholarship David.
End-to-end Quality of Service over heterogeneous networks José Enríquez Gabeiras Telefónica I+D.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
A Framework for Internetworking Heterogeneous High-Performance Networks via GMPLS and Web Services Xi Yang, Tom Lehman Information Sciences Institute (ISI)
DataTAG Research and Technological Development for a Transatlantic Grid Abstract Several major international Grid development projects are underway at.
Department of Energy Office of Science ESCC & Internet2 Joint Techs Workshop Madison, Wisconsin.July 16-20, 2006 Network Virtualization & Hybridization.
The Future of the Internet and Internet2 IEC Executive 2001 Douglas E. Van Houweling President and CEO, UCAID IEC Executive
Internet2 Health Sciences Mary Kratz Internet2 Health Science Manager March Spring Member Meeting International Session.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ESCC Meeting July 21-23, 2004 Network Research Program Update Thomas D. Ndousse Program Manager Mathematical,
Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative or Why Fat Pipes aren’t Enough Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development 16 May 2001 See
Connecting Advanced Networks in Asia-Pacific Kilnam Chon APAN Focusing on Applications -
Internet 2 Applications Update Ted Hanss 8 October 1997 Washington D.C. Ted Hanss 8 October 1997 Washington D.C.
GRID Overview Internet2 Member Meeting Spring 2003 Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National.
Middleware Camp NMI (NSF Middleware Initiative) Program Director Alan Blatecky Advanced Networking Infrastructure and Research.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Introduction to Internet2 Laurie Burns Director of Member Activities, Internet2 AN-MSI Internet 2 Planning Conference University of Texas at El Paso April.
3 December 2015 Examples of partnerships and collaborations from the Internet2 experience Interworking2004 Ottawa, Canada Heather Boyles, Internet2
ESIP Vision: “Achieve a sustainable world” by Serving as facilitator and advisor for the Earth science information community Promoting efficient flow of.
Transforming Education Through Information Technologies Spanning the Digital Divide David Staudt, Spanning.
August 3, March, The AC3 GRID An investment in the future of Atlantic Canadian R&D Infrastructure Dr. Virendra C. Bhavsar UNB, Fredericton.
The OptIPuter Project Tom DeFanti, Jason Leigh, Maxine Brown, Tom Moher, Oliver Yu, Bob Grossman, Luc Renambot Electronic Visualization Laboratory, Department.
Internet2 End-to-End (e2e) Performance Initiative Laurie Burns Steve Corbató Internet2 Fall Member Meeting Atlanta, Georgia October 31, 2000.
What’s Happening at Internet2 Renee Woodten Frost Associate Director Middleware and Security 8 March 2005.
TeraPaths: A QoS Enabled Collaborative Data Sharing Infrastructure for Petascale Computing Research The TeraPaths Project Team Usatlas Tier 2 workshop.
University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development (UCAID) INET’98 21 July 1998 Geneva, Switzerland.
Roadmap to Next Generation Internet: Indian Initiatives Subbu C-DAC, India.
NSF Middleware Initiative Purpose To design, develop, deploy and support a set of reusable, expandable set of middleware functions and services that benefit.
G É ANT2 Development Support Activity and the Republic of Moldova 1st RENAM User Conference Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 14-May-2007 Valentino Cavalli.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
30 November 2001 Advisory Panel on Cyber Infrastructure National Science Foundation Douglas Van Houweling November 30, 2001 National Science Foundation.
Advanced research and education networking in the United States: the Internet2 experience Heather Boyles Director, Member and Partner Relations Internet2.
End to End Performance Initiative . Context for E2E Performance High performance backbones are in place Now, under certain conditions within particular.
UCAID/Internet2 A Presentation to the Kellogg Commission Michael M. Roberts 23 June 1998 Washington, D.C. Michael M. Roberts 23 June 1998 Washington, D.C.
Internet2 Spring Meeting NSF Middleware Initiative Purpose To design, develop, deploy and support a set of reusable, expandable set of middleware functions.
Internet2. Yesterday’s Internet  Thousands of users  Remote login, file transfer  Applications capitalize on underlying technology.
NITRD Networking and ITRD IT R&D CIC computing, info and comm HPCC and communication HPC high-performance computing George O. Strawn NITRD co-chair and.
March, The C3 GRID An investment in the future of Canadian R&D Infrastructure.
Next Generation Internet and the NSF-vBNS George O. Strawn Networking Division Director U.S. National Science Foundation.
Internet2 Applications & Engineering Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development.
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States
An Overview of the ITTC Networking & Distributed Systems Laboratory
Pfizer Internet2 Day Douglas E. Van Houweling President and CEO, UCAID
Presentation transcript:

PRELIMINARY PITAC FY00 Report to Congress on the Next Generation Internet (NGI) Initiative February, 2000 PITAC NGI Subcommittee Jim Gray, Bob Kahn (co chair) Ching-chih Chen, Dave Cooper, Dave Farber, Joe Thompson, Raj Reddy Slides based on presentation by George Strawn, LSN co-chair

2 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Congressional Charge to the PITAC The Next Generation Internet Research Act (10/98), requires PITAC to review the implementation of the Next Generation Internet (NGI) initiative and report annually on: Advanced Networking Research: Progress in NGI-funded advanced networking research NGI Testbeds: Progress in implementing high-performance network testbeds, NGI Applications: Progress in developing high-performance network applications Geographic Reach: Addressing geographic penalties faced by rural institutions Minority- and Small- College Reach: Addressing access by historically black and Hispanic-serving institutions and colleges and universities with fewer than 5,000 students Technology Transfer: Flow of NGI ideas to industry Agency Coordination: Effectiveness of coordination among the NGI agencies IT Leadership: The extent to which Federal research support will maintain U.S. IT leadership

3 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Next Generation Internet (NGI) Initiative 10/24/98 act Amended High Performance Computing Act (1991) Do high performance computing, human-centered computing, dependable systems, training, education, and research + focused on network infrastructure + interoperation among Federal computer nets + reduce geographic penalty + develop network management tools. + promote network standards Directs NSF, DOE, NIH, NASA, NIST to: Increase Internet capabilities Deploy next generation test beds connecting research sites Develop next generation applications that meet national goals and agency mission needs

4 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NGI Program NGI was a three year FY98-FY00 program funded at $100 million per year with optional continuation for two more years Administration proposes continuation in FY01-02 part of $594M ITR&D plus-up. The FY98-FY00 NGI program has three goals: Advanced networking research — the three major areas are: — Network growth engineering — End-to-end quality of service — Security Two testbeds: — The 100x testbed would include 100 sites and have end-to-end performance 100 times faster than the Internet of 1997 — The 1,000x testbed would include 10 sites and have end-to-end performance 1,000 times faster than the Internet of “revolutionary” applications that require NGI technologies

5 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NGI Budget Profiles (Dollars in Millions) FY98FY99FY00 Agency RequestedActualRequestedActualRequestedEstimate DARPA$40$42$40$45$40$36 NSF DOE NASA NIH/NLM NIST TOTAL$100$85$110$105$100$86

6 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NGI Budget Profiles (Dollars in Millions) 80% funding (actual/promised) Funding was random NSF domain name money DOE surprises Some funding was “reprogrammed” money Agencies & Scientists need long-term stability

7 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee PITAC’s Assessment of the NGI (1) The NGI program has achieved many of its FY98- FY00 goals and is likely to achieve most of those goals in FY02 NGI funding shortfalls delayed or eliminated some activities FY98 NSF funding delayed till early FY99 — Testbed deployment and applications development effectively delayed one full year DOE received no NGI funds in FY98 or FY00 — There has been less NGI R&D in network engineering, measurement, performance, and middleware There has been less R&D in NGI applications technologies: –Collaboratories –Remote operation of advanced scientific instruments

8 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee The NGI agencies have developed and documented more than 90 NGI applications More NGI applications are being developed without explicit NGI funding At universities — through their access to NGI testbeds Jointly by universities and industry NGI Networking Applications (1)

9 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NGI Networking Applications (2) Applications Technologies Collaboration Technologies32 Digital Libraries 6 Distributed Computing 6 Remote Operations17 Security and Privacy 4 Disciplinary Applications Basic Science37 Crisis Management 1 Education13 Environment15 Federal Information Services 4 Health Care28 Manufacturing 9 The 90+ documented NGI applications organized according to the categories in the NGI Implementation Plan (many applications belong to more than one category):

10 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NGI’s Advanced Networking Research (1) NGI agencies have a strong, balanced collection of networking research projects that address most key topics: Network growth engineering — Network modeling — Monitoring, control, analysis, and display –Adaptive network management –Bandwidth and traffic management –Middleware for visualization applications –Monitoring and analysis of IP packet flow and performance –Resource management –Scheduling –Test and measurement tools –Web performance — Integration –Application to network interfaces –Protocols and standards — Data delivery –Group communications –Hybrid land-based, wireless, and satellite networks –Multicast –Multimedia networking

11 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NGI’s Advanced Networking Research (2) Network growth engineering (continued) — Managing lead user infrastructure –Networks for data intensive applications –Optimizing distributed application performance –Smart environments End-to-end quality of service — High performance routing and switching — Managing denial of service — Managing quality of service in hybrid land-based, wireless, and satellite networks — Multi-protocol label switching — Performance trade-offs — Reservation of service — Testbeds (in cooperation with Internet2 and industry) Network security — Standards such as PKI — Testbeds New technologies — Hybrid land-based, wireless, and satellite networks — Optical networking technologies — Ultra high bandwidth on demand

12 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee The NGI program has established two testbeds : The 100x NGI testbed connects more than 150 sites (goal was 100) The 1,000x Supernet testbed will connect 15 sites (goal was 10) The 100x testbed includes: Federal NGI networks — NSF’s vBNS — DOE’s ESnet — NASA’s NREN — DoD’s DREN The academic sector’s (Internet2) Abilene (Qwest, Nortel, Cisco, and the University of Indiana) network NGI Testbeds

13 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NASA NGIX-West — OC-3/OC-12 ATM and planned OC-48 packet over SONET connectivity point with performance measurement capabilities Multicast Internet eXchange (MIX) — Test and deploy protocols that scale NREN Multicast — Native multicast data distribution over wide area networks NREN OC-48 — 2+ Gbps aggregate flow among three endpoints CEOS/GOIN Earth Science International Demonstrations Additional NGI Testbeds (1)

14 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee DOE EMERGE — ESnet/MREN Regional Grid Experimental testbed — Authentication, collaboratories, e-commerce, Globus, health sciences, multicast, QoS, remote instruments, scheduling, security, standardized tool sets, visualization, weather — 100 Mbps end-to-end connectivity to five universities, four DOE laboratories, and STAR TAP Multi-agency Qbone DOE — QUALIT architecture for IP differentiated services NASA — QoS mechanisms, interoperability, testing, and applications prototyping — NGIX-West connects multiple university networks nationwide NSF’s vBNS backbone Additional NGI Testbeds (2)

15 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Outstanding Concerns NGI applications that exploit NGI services emerging. LSN census shows 96 Registers app bandwidth, latency, QOS needs “Bridging the gap” Internet2 is sponsoring a Gbps app contest. End-to-end is the problem: Campus is now the bottleneck — backbone is Gbps, LAN is often 10Mbps (!) — Firewalls, proxy,… add bottlenecks and delays; they also add security! Web100 Census of NGI test bed partners by mid march.

16 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Minority and Small College Reach The NGI was not funded to address Internet access for historically black, Hispanic-serving, Native American, or small colleges and universities. However, as part of its standard peer review process, NSF has awarded High Performance Connection grants to two historically black and five Hispanic-serving institutions. This is one more than last year. NSF made a four-year $6 million award to EDUCAUSE to help minority-serving institutions develop campus infrastructure and national connections. Award addresses Hispanic, Native American, and Historically Black Colleges and Universities Scope includes: Executive awareness, vision, and planning, Remote technical support centers, Local network planning, Local consulting and training, Satellite/wireless pilot projects, New network technologies: Prototype installations, Grid applications

17 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Geographic Reach (1) There are more than 200 NGI sites Every state in the U.S. has at least one NGI site (as shown in the map on the next slide) These include 40 sites in the 19 states in the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) Connectivity to Alaska and Hawaii has substantially improved (DC) NSF High Performance Connections Awards by State -- 9/27/99 Non-EPSCoR EPSCoR 3

18 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Technology Transfer (1) NGI technology transfer to U.S. industry is substantial — immediate & direct flow of NGI ideas to industry U.S. industry participates in NGI programs and projects The NGI testbeds are managed through cooperative agreements between NGI agencies and telecommunications companies — MCI WorldCom deploys NSF’s vBNS — Sprint deploys research components of NASA’s NREN and DOE’s ESnet — AT&T deploys DoD’s DREN — Qwest will provide DOE’s ESnet — The university/industry Abilene network in which Cisco, Nortel, Qwest, and the University of Indiana participate, is part of the NGI testbeds These companies are free to commercialize NGI technologies that they develop Many startups are springing from NGI programs. Network Elements, EOSpace, Optical Micro-Machines (OMM), Photonex, Sycamore, Corvis

19 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Technology Transfer (2) U.S. industry participates in NGI applications testbeds for the development of standards — For example, the joint NGI/Internet2/industry national and international scale Qbone differentiated services testbed U.S. industry participates in NGI meetings and workshops — Bridging the Gap Workshop — DARPA/NSF/NIST Networking Research Principal Investigator (PI) Meeting — DOE PI Meeting — Public Key Infrastructure for Advanced Networking Technologies Workshop — End-to-End Gigabit Networking Workshop (future)

20 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Technology Transfer (3) Continued NGI technology transfer is enabled by having 150 universities, where new generations of industry workers are educated, also participate directly in NGI programs, projects, and workshops More than 100 universities are connected to the NGI testbeds Researchers, students, and employees at these universities collaborate with industry and Government personnel in: — Deploying, operating, measuring, and improving the performance of the NGI testbeds — Developing advanced applications that are run over the NGI testbeds

21 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Technology Transfer (4) Start-up companies are formed as NGI PIs and researchers join new companies as chief technologists This has some negative consequences: Fewer university researchers Fewer educators of future generations of networking and applications researchers Fewer Government program managers

22 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Interagency Coordination (1) Large Scale Networking Coordinating Group (LSN CG) Coordinates multi-agency NGI R&D Participants include NSF, DARPA, NIH, DOE’s Office of Science, NASA, NIST, AHCPQ, NIST, NOAA, EPA LSN Teams Joint Engineering Team (JET) High Performance Networking Applications Team (HPNAT) Network Research Team (NRT) Internet Security Team (IST) Participants: LSN agencies Cisco, Gigapop operators, MCI WorldCom, Qwest, UCAID/Abilene, and university networking departments National Coordination Office for Computing, Information, and Communications (NCO/CIC) Coordinates LSN and NGI program planning, budgeting, and assessment Supports LSN CG and the LSN Teams Provides single point of contact for information about the NGI program

23 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Interagency Coordination (2) Coordinated projects Coordination is accomplished through informal mechanism — Joint agency funding of projects has proved to have high administrative barriers — Agencies jointly developed the NGI Implementation Plan — Agencies serve on other agencies’ peer review panels and participate in joint PI reviews, thereby assuring that program implementations remain coordinated — examples are: –DOE PI Meeting –DARPA/NSF/NIST Networking Research Principal Investigator Meeting –Agencies coordinate assessment and planning at joint workshops –Bridging the Gap Workshop –Public Key Infrastructure for Advanced Networking Technologies Workshop (future) –End-to-End Gigabit Networking Workshop (future) — Individual agency NGI testbed networks interoperate and peer at NGI- West, NGI-Midwest, and will do so at the future NGI-East

24 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee NGI program helps maintain U.S. leadership in advanced networking capabilities by funding R&D in leading-edge technologies and applications University researchers train the next generation of scientists and researchers. Academic ideas will be cornerstones of future industries. NGI Leadership

25 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Most Significant Agency Accomplishments DARPA Optical networking Applications on the 1,000x Supernet testbed NSF 100x testbed Broad spectrum of applications under development DOE — Collaboratory technologies and tools Examples are China Clipper tools and Combustion Corridors NASA — NGIX-West NIST — Collaboration with manufacturers for standards NIH/NLM Health care applications Community awareness of NGI’s potential usefulness

26 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee PITAC Assessment of the NGI (1) NGI agencies responded to FY99 PITAC recommendations: Measure network performance at NGI sites — NLANR is implementing standardized measurement platforms for throughput, latency, and jitter at 97 NGI sites — Measuring throughput on the NGI backbone — Developing automated standard formats for reporting performance data — Web100 work Increase emphasis on end-to-end applications — Bridging the Gap workshop focused networking research on app needs Demonstrate Gbps (Gigabits or 1,000 bits per second) applications — SC99 HDTV demonstration of 2.4 Gbps throughput, 54.7 TB (Terabytes or trillions of 8-bit bytes) of data transferred

27 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee PITAC Assessment of the NGI (2) The NGI program is also responding to the recommendations for R&D in Scalable Information Infrastructure that were made in the PITAC February 1999 report “Information Technology Research: Investing in Our Future” Collect and analyze performance data — NGI performance measurement program Model and simulate network behavior — DARPA and NSF research programs Conduct R&D in optical, wireless, and wired technologies — DARPA Supernet program Conduct R&D on scaling the Internet — DARPA and NSF research programs

28 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Fund the NGI agencies at their full Presidential requests in FY01 and FY02 The research community needs stable multi-year funding in order to fully realize their potential contributions to advanced networking Complete the NGI program according to the plans set forth in the FY98 NGI Implementation Plan as updated in: NGI planning documents Agency NGI solicitations HPCC/CIC/IT R&D Supplements to the President’s Budget (Blue Books) HPCC/CIC/IT R&D Implementation Plans PITAC’s NGI Recommendations to Congress (1)

29 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee PITAC’s NGI Recommendations to Congress (2) As stated in our 1999 NGI review, PITAC recommends that Congress consider funding a new program in which NGI research institutions act as aggregators and mentors for nearby smaller or disadvantaged institutions. Since this would be primarily infrastructure, not networking research, it should not be part of the NGI or IT R&D programs.

30 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee PITAC’s NGI Recommendations to NGI Agencies It’s the apps!!! Encourage, cajole, force,… focus on apps. That use high-bandwidth, low-latency, QoS, security,… Apps need end-to-end and ubiquitous NGI Measure end-to-end Fix end-to-end problems Continue great progress on networking research

31 2/25/00: PITAC NGI subcommittee Internet Security/Dependability DOS attacks on commercial sites recently. What can USG do to improve the situation? Is enough research underway to improve the situation? Does PITAC have any recommendations in this area?