Presented to presented by Transportation leadership you can trust. FHWA Corridors and Gateway Concept Border Working Group April 23, 2013 Cambridge Sytematics,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
Advertisements

March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Prepared for Madison-Bond and Mid America Workforce Investment Boards By T. R. Carr and John Navin Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.
Manitoba International Gateway Strategy Manitoba Infrastructure & Transportation.
A Multimodal Goods Movement Strategy for Ontario Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group Fall Plenary November 7 – 8, 2012 James Perttula.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AASHTO Spring Meeting Transportation Economics and Logistics MAY 30, 2014 | LOUISVILLE KY.
“Does Moving from A to Z Matter?” Thoughts on Freight Corridors in the Southeast.
Marketing Plan Shipping on the Great Lakes The University of Toledo November 7, 2006 Intermodal Transportation Institute.
Freight Trends/Issues, Multimodal System Flows and Forecasts, and Policy Implications EU/US Forum April 2001 Gary Maring, USDOT.
© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)
California Freight Advisory Committee May 14, 2014.
Global Strategies for Success Prepared by The Tioga Group for Orangeburg County Economic Development Summit November 12, 2008.
Page 1© QR 2007 All Rights Reserved Unlocking Australia’s Export Supply Chain Bottlenecks Stephen Cantwell Group Executive General Manager, QR Freight.
The Business Environment Contextual environment Transactional/ Stakeholder environment Client Competitors Games Driving forces Driving forces Political.
Logistics and Regions. Trends The regions are becoming integrated in large-scale network economies (new markets conditions, reliance on global supply.
Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning An Executive Overview Presented by the Federal Highway Administration January 16, 2007 TX Border Partnership.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Freight and Land Use New FHWA Handbook and Workshops FHWA.
Global Appalachia Access and Opportunity in the Global Economy of the 21 st Century.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OFFICE. What is the International Relations Office? 2 T he Office was created in 1994 in response to the North American Free Trade.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
Network Appalachia Access to Global Opportunity in the 21 st Century.
The U. S. National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security Neema Khatri Office of International Affairs U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
NASCO Webinar Leslie Blakey, President Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
THE TEXAS FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM August 2015.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
Engaging Freight and Supply Chain Representatives in Public Sector Projects.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Network Appalachia Access to Opportunity in the Global Economy of the 21 st Century.
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
Greening the Trade Corridors in North America: Why Corridors and Why Green? Benjamin Teitelbaum CEC, April 22 nd.
International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus Georgia: Areas in the vicinity of Tbilisi airport Ministry of Economy and Sustainable.
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Northern California Goods Movement Challenges: The I-580 Altamont Corridor Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC Presentation to Congressman Richard Pombo.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
2015 Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium Stephanie Lane, Director CSX Industrial Development November 13, 2015.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region
30-Year National Transportation Policy Framework to the Future September 12,
Freight Partnerships = Economic Development and Freight Performance Pete Rahn Missouri Department of Transportation AASHTO 2009 Annual Meeting Palm Desert,
Rickey Fitzgerald PLS, GISP November 13, 2015 Transportation Symposium: Logistical Implementation.
Economic Development Plans Warringah & Pittwater.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Consulting & technology financial services | payments | government | transportation | healthcare Effective Supply Chain Network Management, Optimization.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
Goals and ObjectivesFeb. 20, 2014 TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS’ ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS Regional Freight Advisory Council.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
Freight Forum RTC Washoe March 31 st, The reliable, cost effective, and safe movement of goods and products across the State of Nevada and.
Border Wait-Time Emissions Analysis Study 1 Project Briefing Travis Black Federal Highway Administration November 14, 2012.
Our nation’s freight transportation system is a vast, complex network of almost seven million miles of highways and local roads, railways, navigable waterways,
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
Orientations towards the Scoping Paper H2020 Transport Programme Committee Brussels, 22 June 2016 SMART, GREEN and INTEGRATED TRANSPORT.
TfN Freight AND RAIL UPDATE
Economic Development Research Group, Inc.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
U.S. Maritime Administration
Access to Opportunity in the Global Economy of the 21st Century
Presentation transcript:

presented to presented by Transportation leadership you can trust. FHWA Corridors and Gateway Concept Border Working Group April 23, 2013 Cambridge Sytematics, Inc. Texas Transportation Institute.

Project Objective Identify and document multimodal gateway and corridor needs, trends and opportunities to ensure U.S. and North American competitiveness for consideration in the development of future national infrastructure plans.

Conducting Research on Corridors and Gateway Concept Stakeholder Input Research on Driving Trends International Literature Review and Comparisons

Input from Public/Academic Forum Major Trends Impacting Future Needs Changes in sourcing patterns and distribution networks Energy availability and costs Logistics Socio-demographic changes Global trade and geopolitical climate Economic Regulations – trucking and security Energy policy Policy Passenger/freight interaction Increase use of intermodal Mode specific constraints impact whole system Infrastructure

Input from Public/Academic Forum 5 Action oriented plan Quantification of performance gains Nationally organized, locally executed Focus on fewer, nationally significant projects True multimodal approach Trade-off identification and mitigation Key Considerations for Developing a National Plan

P RIVATE SECTOR OUTREACH 6

Summary of Outreach Events Newark Indianapolis Houston Anaheim Where June to November 2012 When CarriersShippers Facility operators Who

Outreach Participants

Four Areas of Input What are current conditions and needs? What are future needs given current trends? What are future needs given alternative futures? » Future Freight Flows scenarios » No brainers, no regret, contingent Federal role and key considerations

Current Conditions and Needs Emphasize non-traditional infrastructure such as specialized labor and communication technologies Take into account the entire supply chain from point of origin to point of destination Follow private money Tackle existing bottlenecks and urban area congestion Emphasize importance of cross border gateways, border operations, and waterways Address policy disconnects between metropolitan, state, and national organizations Redundancy

Future Needs Based on Current Trends Need to focus on ports national but with emphasis on east coast Resurgence of Mexico Increasing need for additional rail investment – passenger vs. freight Address bottlenecks at last mile Labor shortage – truck drivers Harmonization of polices across different modes Restrictions on truck size and weight Growing near-shoring activities Existing transportation policies such as Jones Act inhibiting U.S. competiveness Align public private needs and policy predictability

12 Four Future Freight Flow Scenarios

Key Ideas 13 Fast paced, Interconnected, Chaotic, Minimal Government intervention, Commercial Heavy handed, Regulated, Slower pace, Feel of 1970’s PBS broadcast, Strong government Self-Reliance, Merging cultures, Trading Blocs, Re-domestication of manufacturing Mfg. clusters, Make close to consumption, Dispersed demographics, Nuclear renaissance

Differences Between Scenarios 14

15 Contingent Implications Scenario Implications Robust Implications Acid testing current strategy No Gainer No Brainer No Regret New strategy development process Detailed Review Risk Management Sensors in the Ground Cross-Scenario Comparisons

Cross Scenario Comparisons

Cross-Scenario Comparisons No brainers Gulf Coast ports North-south corridors Southeastern border crossings No regrets Southeastern ports and east-west corridors Northwestern border crossings Southwestern border crossings Contingent Northern east-west corridors Northeastern Coast ports and land borders West Coast ports

Federal Role Federal role importance is divided among the participants at each event Overarching sentiment of need for policies to harmonize across modes

N ATIONAL G ATEWAY AND C ORRIDOR C ONCEPT D EVELOPMENT 19

Most Important Considerations Volume Export chains Energy production/distribution Important Considerations Agriculture production/distribution Key import and export commodities Emerging trade lanes and partners Existing trade lanes and partners Neutral Redundancy in system Value of freight 20 Private Sector Input on Key Considerations

Project Outcomes Private sector input on » Current needs » Future needs based on alternative futures » Key considerations for evaluation of national priorities Insights on potential and private sector differences Building block for development of national gateway and corridor plan 21

Next Steps Draft report April 2013 Final report May 2013