Physics Education Research at CU S.J. Pollock SPS Fall 05 or why do I keep filling out those online surveys at the start of every course?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Directors Conference Sept 2007 Carol Diedrichsen Gwen Pollock Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum for English.
Advertisements

Interactive Learning in the Classroom: Building on a Base Physics Department With support from: FTEP,
Nathaniel Lasry 1,2,3, Elizabeth Charles 2,3,4, Chris Whittaker 3,4 2 Abstract Technology-rich classrooms like SCALE-UP or TEAL are designed to be centered.
Purpose of Scientific Education / Was: Training the next generation of scientists / Now: Preparing a scientifically literate populace and workforce in.
Teaching Freshman Calculus-Based Physics Using the LOGIC Model Amin Jazaeri, Ph.D. COS Science Accelerator & School of Physics, Astronomy and Computational.
Improving on the Recitation Section: Tutorials in Introductory Physics Wed Brown Bag SJP Fa '05.
Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going? Using Student Surveys to Assess and Improve Literature Courses Kelly Douglass, PhD Asst. Professor, English Riverside.
Science Framework, And Next Generation Science Standards.
When Top Down Meets Bottom Up: Supporting Educational Transformation in a Physics Department Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein, Katherine Perkins, Stephanie.
Conceptual Science for MLS courses Kyle Forinash Indiana University Southeast.
Physics Education Research in Action: or What’s all this fuss about clickers? Sat. Physics Series Feb Steven Pollock Physics Department University.
INTERACTIVE LEARNING IN THE LECTURE-CLASS SETTING Alan Slavin Department of Physics and Jonathan Swallow (deceased) Instructional Development Centre TRENT.
2008 National CASTL Institute Blogging in the Physics Classroom Gintaras K. Duda & Katherine Garrett.
Carl Wieman UBC & CU Colorado physics & chem education research group: W. Adams, K. Perkins, K. Gray, L. Koch, J. Barbera, S. McKagan, N. Finkelstein,
Studying Student Beliefs About Science: their importance and what affects them their importance and what affects them We have developed and validated surveys.
Building on a Base: tools, practices, and implications from physics education research (PER) S.J. Pollock N.D. Finkelstein Physics Department Thanks for.
Tracking Transformed Courses: Impacts of Tutorials, Instructor, Text, … SJP Summer '05.
Examining the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder.
PFPF 9/21 Preparing for the micro-teach and ideas behind educational practice: The good the bad and the ugly Steve Pollock, Chris Keller, Noah Finkelstein.
Does the universe go on forever? Could it have an “edge?” What would be on the other side? Is there other intelligent life out there in the universe? On.
Why should we change how we teach physics? Derek Muller & Manju Sharma Sydney University Physics Education Research (SUPER)
I) The new importance of science education. II) Research illuminating the problem. III) Vision of the solution. (Not medieval science, why medieval science.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Measuring Students’ Beliefs about Physics in Saudi Arabia H. Alhadlaq 1, F. Alshaya 1, S. Alabdulkareem.
Institute for innovation and development of learning process
Lessons from America A success story in high school physics education. Presented by Barbara McKinnon, JMSS.
Modeling Instruction Lessons from America. Mechanics Modeling Workshop 90 hours of professional development consisting of intensive immersion in the mechanics.
Physics I MOOC – Educational Outcomes David Lieberman*, Michael Dubson ¶, Katherine Goodman ¶, Ed Johnsen ¶, Jack Olsen ¶ and Noah Finkelstein ¶ * Department.
PER-based Techniques in a Large Lecture Modern Physics Course for Engineers Sam McKagan, Katherine Perkins, and Carl Wieman University of Colorado at Boulder.
Melissa Otis Faculty Advisor: Dr. Chris Bauer Department of Chemistry, University of New Hampshire Peer-Led Team Learning in General Chemistry Background.
Physics Education Research-Based Reform at a Multicultural Institution Richard Steinberg City College of New York This work is supported by NSF and FIPSE.
The Impact of the History of Physics on Student Attitude and Conceptual Understanding of Physics Often the pre and posttest show negative shift in introductory.
Teaching and Learning Physical Science in Urban Secondary Schools: Assessing the Assessments Joan Whipp, Michael Politano, Michele Korb – Marquette University.
A. Erzberger, April, 2003 Inquiry & Scientific Research.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Using Discipline Specific Action Research to Inform Curriculum Development & Classroom Practice A Case Study: Workshop Physics.
CT 854: Assessment and Evaluation in Science & Mathematics
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
Physics Education Research (PER): The PER-Friendly Classroom and The Importance of Reasoning Brian A. Pyper Ph.D. Director of Physics Education BYU-Idaho.
Assessing multiple research-based transformations in second semester physics. Steven J. Pollock University of Colorado at Boulder ( per.colorado.edu) We.
Physics Education is more than techniques John M. Clement.
Philip W. Young Dept. of Chemistry & Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, WI Correlation between FCI Gains and.
Learning Gains in Physics in Relation to Students' Mathematics Skills David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University.
Physics Concept Surveys TDSB physics team May 28, 2004.
The Persistence of the Gender Gap in Introductory Physics Lauren Kost Steven Pollock, Noah Finkelstein Department of Physics, University of Colorado at.
P.W. Young University of Wisconsin-Platteville Sponsored by NSF-DUE CCLI #
Choice and Application of Keypads to Small Classes Paul Williams Department of Physics Austin Community College Austin, Texas
Learning Gains, Student Attitudes, and impacts on LA’s in Phys 1110 (Sp ‘03) S. Pollock With NSF/STEM-TP support.
~ 25 years ago– Why grad students coming into my lab so good in physics courses, but do not know how to do physics? A scientific approach to teaching science.
Introductory Course Reform at Oregon State: promoting sustainable reform Dedra Demaree, Oregon State University Sissi Li, Oregon State University And the.
BIOLOGY CONCEPT INVENTORIES: Development and Use.
Implications of the inclusion of students collaborative group work on advanced course materials in introductory physics courses Sunil Dehipawala and Vazgen.
Interactive Classroom: Why Use a Classroom Response System.
Girls and Physics Chris Meyer York Mills C. I.
Attitudes, Beliefs, and Content Knowledge Edward A. Von Iderstein Kathleen A. Falconer SUNY College at Buffalo.
Carl Wieman UBC & CU Colorado physics & chem education research group: W. Adams, K. Perkins, K. Gray, L. Koch, J. Barbera, S. McKagan, N. Finkelstein,
Changing student attitudes about science and their confidence in understanding real-world connections Annia Fayon Department of Postsecondary Teaching.
Carl Wieman Colorado physics & chem education research group: W. Adams, K. Perkins, K. Gray, L. Koch, J. Barbera, S. McKagan, N. Finkelstein, S. Pollock,
Philip W. Young Dept. of Chemistry & Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, WI Correlation between FCI Gains and.
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
College Readiness: What skills do they need?
AAPT 2017 National Conference
How well do they work? Could they work at your institution?
Wendi Wampler1, Lynn Bryan2,1, & Mark Haugan1
Interactive Classroom: Using a Classroom Response System
Flipped Classes: A Low-Stakes Opportunity for Problem
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Gender Differences in High School Preparation for University Introductory Physics Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University of.
Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance Jennifer Docktor, Kenneth Heller, + UM PER Group University.
Lindgren Robb, Tscholl Michael, Wang Shuai, Johnson Emily Presented By
Choice and Application of Keypads to Small Classes
Presentation transcript:

Physics Education Research at CU S.J. Pollock SPS Fall 05 or why do I keep filling out those online surveys at the start of every course?

PER We want to study the LEARNING of science… in a scientific way Develop curricula and test them Collect data - conceptual surveys (pre/post is best) beliefs about science and learning ( “” ) Develop theoretical frameworks…

Pieces Coherence By Authority Independent (experiment) structure learning Novice Expert Formulas & “plug ‘n chug” Concepts & Problem Solving content think about science like a scientist Learning goals?

“Content” Force Concept Inventory (and many others) Research based Experts (especially skeptics!) => necessary (not sufficient) indicator of understanding.

Sample question

Force Concept Inventory (FCI) R. Hake, ”…A six-thousand-student survey…” AJP 66, (‘98). = post-pre 100-pre traditional lecture FCI I

Force Concept Inventory (FCI) R. Hake, ”…A six-thousand-student survey…” AJP 66, (‘98). = post-pre 100-pre red = trad, blue = interactive engagement F C I II

Force Concept Inventory (FCI) R. Hake, ”…A six-thousand-student survey…” AJP 66, (‘98). = post-pre 100-pre Fa03/Sp04 Fa98 red = trad, blue = interactive engagement F C I at C U

CU reformed course Fa 03

Phys 1110 normalized gains gain(1)=.66 +/-.02

Phys 1110 normalized gains gain(1)=.66 +/-.02 g(2)=.585 +/ points lower => (more than half a letter grade)

Phys 1110 normalized gains gain(1)=.66 +/-.02 g(2)=.585 +/-.02 g(3)=.45 +/ points lower gain (!) Course (3) (trad recit.) => significantly lower gains. (but still, double nat’l standards!)

1120 E&M pre/post

~40% ~75% * Mazur, E. Peer Instruction, Prentice Hall

Attitudes and Beliefs Assessing the “hidden curriculum” Ex: “I study physics to learn knowledge that will be useful in life.” “T “To learn physics, I only need to memorize solutions to sample problems”

W. Adams 2003, replicating Redish, Steinberg, Saul AJP 66 p. 212 (‘98) (Typical) attitude shifts

Concepts Reality W. Adams 2003, replicating Redish, Steinberg, Saul AJP 66 p. 212 (‘98) (Typical) attitude shifts

Shift (%) (“reformed” class) (All ±2%) CLASS categories Real world connect... Personal interest Sensemaking/effort... Conceptual Math understanding... Problem Solving Confidence Nature of science Engineers: -12 Phys Male: +1 Phys Female: -16

But it’s possible to do better Low learning gain high learning gain Blue= pre Red= post Data from instructor attending (somewhat) to “hidden curriculum”)

But it’s possible to do better Low learning gain high learning gain Blue= pre Red= post Data from instructor attending (somewhat) to “hidden curriculum”)

But it’s possible to do better Low learning gain high learning gain Blue= pre Red= post Data from instructor attending (somewhat) to “hidden curriculum”)

But it’s possible to do better Low learning gain high learning gain Blue= pre Red= post Data from instructor attending (somewhat) to “hidden curriculum”)

Expectations/Beliefs matter low high pre CLASS (overall)

1-Tut 3-Trad 2-Workbook “Beliefs” survey: CLASS pre/post

Trad’l Models of Education

Theory: Trad’l Model of Education Instruction via transmission IndividualContent (E/M)

Theory ingredients - to think about Construction of knowledge Resources Cognitive psych: “in the individual” head Context (setting, norms and practices) Learning is social (and political!)

Questions?!