PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec. 13 Recapping: 3 main points of Utilitarianism:  Actions are judged right or wrong solely on the basis of their.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Advertisements

Revision Notes Utilitarianism.
What is a normative theory?
RECAP – TASK 1 What is utilitarianism? Who is Jeremy Bentham?
L ECTURE 24: U TILITARIANISM. T WO TYPES OF ETHICAL THEORY Ethics Teleological Deontological Emphasises duty or the inherent moral value of an action,
Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism: Bentham and Mill
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 11 Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
4/15/2017 Utilitarianism 4/15/2017 ©Lawrence M. Hinman.
Utilitarianism Guiding Principle 5.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 13 Utilitarianism Chapter 7.
Chapter Seven: Utilitarianism
Teleological Ethics: Morality is determined by the consequences of actions u Hedonism: value (good) is pleasure/happiness l Egoism: my happiness is the.
Consequentialist Ethical Theories Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests Hedonism: we should pursue pleasures that are not mixed.
Utilitarianism Leadership & Ethics OC Bobby Kenning.
Standards of Conduct DoD’s Standards of Conduct
Consequentialist Ethical Theories u Egoism: the good is whatever promotes my long-term interests u Hedonism: the good is pleasure l Pursue pleasures not.
UTILITARIANISM: A comparison of Bentham and Mill’s versions
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
Setting the stage for Utilitarianism. Which is prior: the Good or the Right? n Can we develop a complete theory of the Good independently of the Right?
Utilitarian Approach. Utilitarianism The founder of classical utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham. According to Bentham human beings always try to avoid.
Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a relative ethical theory It based on the concept of utility Utilitarianism is a teleological/consequentialist theory.
Ethics of Administration Chapter 1. Imposing your values? Values are more than personal preferences Values are more than personal preferences Human beings.
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues
LO: to know about Mill’s approach to Utilitarianism HMK: Can you come up with an ethical situation and outline where Bentham and Mill would disagree on.
T HE U TILITARIAN A PPROACH Marcie Neils, Brandon Capelle, Aaron Zimbelman, & Nate Martin Monday 1:30-4:30 LP 5: Ethical Theory Presentation November 10,
Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
1 Consequentialism vs. Deontology Consequentialism: –the view that an act is right if and only if it will maximize (or is likely to maximize) good consequences.
Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill. When an objection is raised: When some objection is raised to a moral theory, if that objection is a good one, the proponent.
Consequentialism Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ) Principle of Utility: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness,
Utilitarianism Lesson # 4 Leadership and Ethics. Utilitarianism What is Utilitarianism?
Utilitarianism. Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters; pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we.
The Morality of Consequences. Utilitarian Ethics We ought to perform actions which tend to produce the greatest overall happiness for the greatest number.
Utilitarianism How ought we to act?.
Utilitarianism or Consequentialism Good actions are those that result in good consequences. The moral value of an action is extrinsic to the action itself.
What is Utilitarianism?
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec. 13 Recapping: 3 main points of Utilitarianism:  Actions are judged right or wrong solely on the basis of their.
Act and Rule Utilitariansim
Utilitarianism Forensics 8.6 November 14, 2014.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec. 14 Recapping... 3 main points of Utilitarianism:  Actions are judged right or wrong solely on the basis of.
Nicole Pongratz Allisen Jacques Shannon Griese Amber Teichmiller 4/13/2010.
Utilitarianism. Types of Theory Teleological Teleological The consequence of the moral act is the important thing.
UTILITARIANISM “A moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.” (Jeremy Bentham, Introduction.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
Philosophy 360: Business Ethics Chapter 3. Consequentialism: Is part of a theory about what makes certain actions right or wrong. In a nutshell: Actions.
Chapter 7: Ethics Utilitarianism
‘UTILITARIANISM FROM BENTHAM & MILL’ THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Morality in the Modern World
Preference Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives By the end of this lesson, we will have... Consolidated our knowledge of Act and Rule Utilitarianism by.
Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities and differences.
Moral Theory An explanation of why an action is right or wrong or why a person or a person’s character is good or bad Tells us what it is about an action.
J.S. Mill Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that.
Jan 29, 10 Ashley Tao. Tues 8-10pm Dundas Town Hall
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 16 Ethics #2: Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 10 Utilitarianism.
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
Lawrence M. Hinman, Ph.D. Director, The Values Institute University of San Diego 7/8/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman1 Utilitarianism.
 Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill  Reason not Revelation  Consequentialism – good or bad, right or wrong, are based on outcomes.
Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism - Introduction
10 mins challenge Exercise: You have 30 happiness points to distribute across nine things. Draw four columns marked Put these nine in the first column:
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism Phil. 321 Social Ethics Lawrence M. Hinman Summer 2010
Utilitarianism 1/2/2019 ©Lawrence M. Hinman.
Utilitarianism - Introduction
The Ethics of Utility The Utilitarian Theory :
Moral Theories: Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism.
Presentation transcript:

PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec. 13

Recapping: 3 main points of Utilitarianism:  Actions are judged right or wrong solely on the basis of their consequences  The only thing that counts is the amount of happiness or unhappiness produced by an action (all else is irrelevant)  Each person’s happiness counts the same

Jane Adams  The height of immorality is to make an exception of myself.

7.2 Is Pleasure the Only Thing that Matters? J. S. Mill:  “...happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end: all other things being desirable as a means to an end.”  But what is ‘happiness’?

But...what is happiness? The classical answer....  Happiness is pleasure (mental states that feel good)  Hedonism: pleasure is the one ultimate good; pain the one ultimate evil

But...what is happiness? The classical answer....  Happiness is pleasure (mental states that feel good)  Hedonism: pleasure is the one ultimate good; pain the one ultimate evil

But...what is happiness? Bentham’s answer:  “Prejudice apart, the game of push-pin is of equal value with the arts and sciences of music and poetry.”

But...what is happiness?  Bentham’s answer:  “Prejudice apart, the game of push-pin is of equal value with the arts and sciences of music and poetry.”

But...what is happiness?  Bentham’s answer:  “Prejudice apart, the game of push-pin is of equal value with the arts and sciences of music and poetry.”

But...what is happiness?  Bentham’s answer:  “Prejudice apart, the game of push-pin is of equal value with the arts and sciences of music and poetry.”

But...what is happiness?  Bentham’s answer:  “Prejudice apart, the game of push-pin is of equal value with the arts and sciences of music and poetry.”

But...what is happiness? J. S. Mill’s correction:  He added the quality of pleasures to the quantity  He advocated civilized pleasures (better a Socrates unsatisfied than a pig satisfied)

But...what is happiness? J. S. Mill’s correction:  He added the quality of pleasures to the quantity  He advocated civilized pleasures (better a Socrates unsatisfied than a pig satisfied)

But...what is happiness? J. S. Mill’s correction:  He added the quality of pleasures to the quantity  He advocated civilized pleasures (better a Socrates unsatisfied than a pig satisfied)

Abraham Lincoln: “Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.”  Pleasure requires the outside world...  Happiness is an inside job...

But...what is happiness?  Pleasure is a response to outside stimuli  Happiness is an overall judgment about your situation

The Dream of Utilitarianism: Bringing Scientific Certainty to Ethics

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman18 Part Two. Standards of Utility: A History of Utilitarianism (after Lawrence Hinman)

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman19 Intrinsic Value  Many things have instrumental value, that is, they have value as means to an end.  However, there must be some things which are not merely instrumental, but have value in themselves. This is what we call intrinsic value.  What has intrinsic value? Four principal candidates: Pleasure ○ Jeremy Bentham Happiness ○ John Stuart Mill Ideals ○ G. E. Moore Preferences ○ Kenneth Arrow and Peter Singer

1/12/2016 ©Lawrence M. Hinman20 Jeremy Bentham  Bentham believed that we should try to increase the overall amount of pleasure in the world.

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman21 Pleasure Definition: The enjoyable feeling we experience when a state of deprivation is replaced by fulfillment.  Advantages Easy to quantify Short duration Bodily  Criticisms Came to be known as “the pig’s philosophy” Ignores higher values Could justify living on a pleasure machine

1/12/2016 ©Lawrence M. Hinman22 John Stuart Mill  Bentham’s godson  Believed that happiness, not pleasure, should be the standard of utility.

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman23 Happiness  Advantages A higher standard, more specific to humans About realization of goals  Disadvantages More difficult to measure Competing conceptions of happiness

1/12/2016 ©Lawrence M. Hinman24 G. E. Moore Moore suggested that we should strive to maximize ideal values such as freedom, knowledge, justice, and beauty.  Advantages: The world may not be a better place with more pleasure in it, but it certainly will be a better place with more freedom, more knowledge, more justice, and more beauty.  Criticisms: Moore’s candidates for intrinsic good remain difficult to quantify.

Kenneth Arrow and Peter Singer  what has intrinsic value is preference satisfaction.  Advantages: it lets people choose for themselves what has intrinsic value. It simply defines intrinsic value as whatever satisfies an agent’s preferences. It is elegant and pluralistic. 1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman25

My view is that the preferences we should satisfy, other things being equal, are those that people would hold... if they were fully informed, reflective, and vividly aware of the consequences of satisfying their preferences.

1/12/2016 ©Lawrence M. Hinman27 The Utilitarian Calculus  Math and ethics finally merge: all consequences must be measured and weighed.  Units of measurement: Hedons: positive Dolors: negative

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman28 What do we calculate?  Hedons/dolors may be defined in terms of Pleasure Happiness Ideals Preferences  For any given action, we must calculate: How many people will be affected, negatively (dolors) as well as positively (hedons) How intensely they will be affected Similar calculations for all available alternatives Choose the action that produces the greatest overall amount of utility (hedons minus dolors)

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman29 Example: Debating the school lunch program Utilitarians would have to calculate: Benefits ○ Increased nutrition for x number of children ○ Increased performance, greater long-range chances of success ○ Incidental benefits to contractors, etc. Costs ○ Cost to each taxpayer ○ Contrast with other programs that could have been funded and with lower taxes (no program) Multiply each factor by ○ Number of individuals affected ○ Intensity of effects

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman30 How much can we quantify?  Pleasure and preference satisfaction are easier to quantify than happiness or ideals  Two distinct issues: Can everything be quantified? ○ Some would maintain that some of the most important things in life (love, family, etc.) cannot easily be quantified, while other things (productivity, material goods) may get emphasized precisely because they are quantifiable. ○ The danger: if it can’t be counted, it doesn’t count. Are quantified goods necessarily commensurable? ○ Are a fine dinner and a good night’s sleep commensurable? Can one be traded or substituted for the other?

1/12/2016 ©Lawrence M. Hinman31 “…the problems of three little people don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world.”  Utilitarianism doesn’t always have a cold and calculating face— we perform utilitarian calculations in everyday life.

7.3: Are Consequences all that matter?

Are Consequences all that matter?

Peeping Tom...

Are Consequences all that matter? Rachels says NO...there must be other considerations....  Justice  Rights  The Past

7.4: Should we be equally concerned for everyone? Utilitarianism may be...  Too demanding... who among us would give up all of our ‘luxuries’ to help the far-away poor?  Too disruptive of our personal relationships... who among us doesn’t put family first?

7.5: Defending Utilitarianism 1. Denying that the consequences would be good Substituting rule-utilitarianism for (old fashioned) act-utilitarianism So called “Common Sense” can be very wrong...

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman38 Comparing Act and Rule Utilitarianism  Act utilitarianism Looks at the consequences of each individual act and calculates utility each time the act is performed.  Rule utilitarianism Looks at the consequences of having everyone follow a particular rule and calculates the overall utility of accepting or rejecting the rule.

The Third Defence.... Common sense is wrong – tough luck 1. All values have a utilitarian basis Our gut reactions can’t be trusted in exceptional cases We should focus on all the consequences...

Summing up: Utilitarian Values  The purpose of morality is to make the world a better place.  Morality is about producing good consequences, not having good intentions  We should do whatever will bring the most benefit (i.e., intrinsic value) to all of humanity.

Summing up: What's significant  Consequences matter: the happiness or unhappiness that result from our actions is a morally relevant consideration.  The emphasis on impartiality must be central to any viable morality.  Moral intuitions about cases are not infallible.

Summing up: What might be wrong  Consequences are not all that matter.  Considerations of rights and justice matter in ways the Utilitarian can't account for.

1/12/2016©Lawrence M. Hinman43 The Dream of Utilitarianism: Scientific Certainty in Ethics If we can agree that the purpose of morality is to make the world a better place… and….. If we can scientifically assess various possible courses of action to determine which will have the greatest positive effect on the world… Then… We can provide a ‘scientific’ answer to the question of what we ought to do.

Ursula K. LeGuin The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas….

 In what way do we share the dilemma of the people of Omelas in our current economic and political world?  Would it be worth the life of one innocent child to free the world from Cancer or AIDS?  How does literature aid our moral thinking?

 "What shall we do and how shall we live? According to Plato and Tolstoy and other reliable observers, this is our most important question! We should not trust any philosophy that makes this question appear foolish." [Peter Singer, The Player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal Theory, 94 Yale L. J. 1, 3 (1984)]

Attendance Question....  Would you stay in Omelas?  Why or why not?