ONE OR MANY? ASSESSING DIFFERENT DELIVERY TIMING FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES RELEVANT TO ASSIGNMENTS DURING THE SEMESTER. A WORK IN PROGRESS June 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I NTERNATIONAL S TUDENTS : ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL Mr Phil Lewis – Coventry University Dr Gill Cooke – Coventry University.
Advertisements

JASON EZELL TOWSON UNIVERSITY TEACHING AS VIRTUAL REPERTORY: TUNING EMBEDDED INSTRUCTION TO THE ONLINE COURSE.
Information Competence Assessment Using First Year and Upper Division Writing Samples Amy Wallace Interim Dean of the Library California State University,
Information Literacy Defined A set of abilities that requires individuals: recognize what information is needed have the ability to locate, evaluate,
BEST PRACTICES IN INFORMATION LITERACY ASSESSMENT Yvonne Mery, Vicki Mills, Jill Newby, University of Arizona Libraries February 11, 2009.
Rubric Assessment of Student Responses to an Information Literacy Tutorial Megan Oakleaf Librarian for Instruction & Undergraduate Research Steve McCann.
Magia G. Krause Ph.D. Candidate School of Information University of Michigan Society of American Archivists Annual Meeting August 14, 2009 Undergraduates.
Announcements ●Exam II range ; mean 72
Group Project CVEN Mixing and Transport in the Environment. A River Dye Study.
A systems approach to designing a customized information delivery system Staying relevant to researchers Amy S. Van Epps Purdue University ASEE Annual.
Information Literacy for a Freshman Engineering Studies Course Larry Schmidt Science/Engineering Librarian Charles W. Dolan H. T. Person Professor Department.
Want Better Papers? Start With Better Sources By Susan Hurst Joseph Leonard Lilly Conference, Miami University November 18, 2005.
1 Hitting a Moving Target: Curriculum Mapping, Information Literacy and Academe Kristen A. Bullard The University of Tennessee – Knoxville Assistant Professor.
EFFECTIVE GROUP PRESENTATIONS creating unity from diversity.
Math/Computer Science Technical Writing Course. The Students Junior and Senior Computer Science Majors Junior and Senior Math Majors, mainly Math Education.
Joli McClelland Instruction & Web Design Librarian Queens University of Charlotte
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
Critical Thinking and Information Literacy: Assessing Student Performance Work in Progress Critical Thinking and Information Literacy: Assessing Student.
Instructional Community of Practice Discussion Dream Information Literacy Curriculum December 9, 2014.
Call to Write, Third edition Chapter Twelve, The Research Process: Critical Essays and Research Papers.
Statistics Course Redesigns at NCSU Roger Woodard.
Digital Marketing Essentials
* The goal of this phase is to find credible and valid academic research from sources that will support your hypothesis. * In citing secondary sources,
Assessment of a Team-Based Embedded Librarianship Model Leo Lo, Research & Development Librarian Jason Coleman, Undergraduate & Community Services Librarian.
Assessment cont’d tues oct 15. notes status reports [handout] instruction experience project – context description and needs assessment (due Tuesday)
Instruction & Assessment Plan, Melissa Bowles-Terry April 4, 2011.
Consider the types of sources valued in your discipline: Primary sources? Books (how vetted?) Journals – peer review?
Research in Communicative Disorders 1 Parts of A Research Paper Introduction Methods Results Conclusion/Discussion References and Citations.
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Information Literacy. Information Literacy includes: The ability of a student to: 1.Identify the need for information Select a topic 2.Access information.
Assessment Summative Versus Formative. What is Assessment Assessment measures if and how students are learning and if the teaching methods are effectively.
C OM 249 T HEORY P RESENTATIONS. TEAMS Theory T EAM P ROJECT Annotated Bibliography An annotated bibliography due October 5. Annotations are short explanations.
ACADEMIC SUCCESS STARTS WITH INFORMATION LITERACY A Pilot Program.
Embedding information literacy in an undergraduate Management module: reflecting on students’ performance and attitudes over two academic years Clive Cochrane.
Your Research Paper Guidelines
ICOLIS 2007 AN ATTEMPT TO MAP INFORMATION LITERACY SKILLS VIA CITATION ANALYSIS OF FINAL YEAR PROJECT REPORTS N.N. Edzan Library and Information Science.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Business and Management Research
Critical ‘Need-to-Know’ Information PHASE 3 – SECONDARY RESEARCH REPORT.
Tastes Great, Less Filling: How to Design and Deliver Substantial Instruction to Large Enrollment Classes Without Being Overwhelmed STEPHANIE JH MCREYNOLDS.
Information Literacy Module for FYI Available to any FYI Tony Penny, Research Librarian – Goddard Library Research & Library Instruction Services We support.
Annotated Bibliography The need to know… (Senior Project)
Librarians’ Presence in Online Courses: What Have You Learned? Amy Burns and Julie Obst Central Piedmont Community College.
College Level Cooperatively Taught Information Literacy and Subject Area Course Background and Assignments.
Mary L. Strife, Marian G. Armour-Gemmen, Robin A.M. Hensel 120 th ASEE Annual Conference Atlanta, GA June 2013.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Ma Lei Hsieh Instruction Librarian Rider University Patricia H. Dawson Science Librarian Rider University VALE User.
SE 521 Dr. Lola Taylor Unit one. INTRODUCTION This week's seminar will focus on getting acquainted and understanding the expectations for the course.
Lia Vella Colorado School of Mines June 28, 2015
HUMA 1970: Introduction to Library Research Timothy Bristow Research & Instruction Librarian, Scott Library.
Moving Beyond the Traditional One-Shot Library Instruction Session Bonnie L. Fong Physical Sciences Librarian Library2.012 Conference October 4, 2012.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan For Associate’s Degree in Library Skills (Donna Roy)
Reviewing Syllabi to Document Teaching Culture and Inform Decisions Claudia J. Stanny Director, Center for University Teaching, Learning, & Assessment.
Barbara Quintiliano Presented at ACRL/DVC Fall Program November 12, 2010.
For more course tutorials visit PSYCH 625 Entire Course PSYCH 625 Week 1 Individual Assignment Basic Concepts in Statistics Worksheet.
EDU 623 Week 2 Assignment Writing and Researching Skills Self Assessment Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
Information literacy instruction and assessment : a collaborate design
WRITING A SUCCESSFUL RESEARCH PAPER
Getting Started: Beginning the Assessment Cycle in a New STEM Class
As Good As It Gets…For Now:
PSYCH 625 MENTOR Experience Tradition / psych625mentor.com.
NSG 512Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 390 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
NSG 512 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
NSG 512 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
الأستاذ المساعد بقسم المناهج وطرق التدريس
Mapping the ACRL Framework and Nursing Professional
Student evaluations of teaching
Tasks & Grades for MET5.
Into the weeds: Understanding scientific articles
Presentation transcript:

ONE OR MANY? ASSESSING DIFFERENT DELIVERY TIMING FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES RELEVANT TO ASSIGNMENTS DURING THE SEMESTER. A WORK IN PROGRESS June 11, 2012 Amy S. Van Epps and Megan R. Sapp Nelson Engineering Librarians, Purdue University

INTRODUCTION

OPPORTUNITY 3 Information Literacy opportunity with different sections of the same first year course Fundamentals of Speech Communication Associated with engineering learning communities Different delivery models a single, 50 minute lecture early in the semester four, approximately 12 minute lectures to be offered just before each assignment was given Material presented was coordinated LibGuide to minimize variation

RESEARCH QUESTION 4 Is there a noticeable difference in the quality of citations in student assignments when “just-in-time” instruction is used as opposed to a “one-shot” session? Hypothesis Sections which received the just-in-time instruction would have better citations, both in quantity and quality than the section which received the one-shot session.

METHODS AND SAMPLE

METHODS 6 Study Group All students in 3 sections of the course Data Outlines with references required for each assignment Data received by librarians after anonymized Reference Analysis Done using a framework to identify resource type and quality of intended audience and purpose

SAMPLE SELECTION 7 Sampling Random sample of outlines for coding Analysis Set 5 bibliographies for each assignment (1-3) per team 3 bibliographies for final assignment per team 36 bibliographies 233 references 124 references from just-in-time set; 109 from one-shot

Based on the work of Wertz et al (2011) Resource typeQuality Book Periodical Web Facts & Figures Unknown Inter-rater reliability, consensus estimate 84.1 percent agreement CODING FRAMEWORK 8 Scholarly Popular Informative Biased Medium High Low

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

RESULTS 10 Average number of references per outline All assignments required a minimum of 3 references. Just-in-time (n=124)One-Shot (n=109)Total (n=233) Individual Assignments (#1-3) * Group Assignment (#4) All assignments * Statistically significant difference (p<.05)

QUALITY OF RESOURCES USED 11 * Statistically significant difference (p<.05) Quality Embedded n=124 One-Shot n=109 Significance High*43.6%22.9%(Z= 3.31, p<.001) Medium*51.6%65.2%(Z= -2.06, p<.05) Low*2.4%9.2%(Z= 2.24, p<.05) Unknown2.4%2.7%(Z= -0.16, p=.873) High, medium, and low quality sources all show statistically significant differences between sections.

COMPLETENESS OF CITATIONS 12 Difference for Incomplete May reflect differences between raters more than differences in student abilities. APA format was not taught by the librarians complete reference = presence of all elements * Statistically significant difference (p<.05 ) CompletenessEmbed.One-ShotSignificance Complete55.7%60.6%(Z= , p=.453) Improper29.8%32.1%(Z= -0.37, p=.712) Incomplete*12.1%4.6%(Z= 2.03, p<.05) Unknown2.4%2.7%(Z= -0.16, p=.873)

TYPE OF RESOURCE 13 Significantly different distribution of resources between sections. One-shot students use many more web resources. Just-in-time students split between journals and web resources. * Statistically significant difference (p<.05) TypeEmbed.One-ShotSignificance Monograph6.5%4.6%(Z= 0.617, p=.535) Periodical*48.4%9.2%(Z= 6.52, p<.001) Web*41.9%83.5%(Z= -6.50, p<.001) Interpersonal0% Unknown2.4%2.7%(Z= -0.16, p=.873) Fact & Fig.0.8%0%

DISCUSSION 14 An apparent benefit can be see with just-in-time teaching Use of more high quality resources Use of more periodicals Frequently visits = opportunity for follow-up Overall use of popular and informative resources Medium quality; 59.9%  not surprising to the authors Speech communication is well suited to popular resources Less requirement of research or scholarly publications than design assignments or research papers 93.4% of the resources used were classified as informative

CONCLUSION

16 A correlation exists embedded just-in-time teaching approach and the quality of reference sources used can be seen. Still unknown… if the library instruction model is responsible for the difference

QUESTIONS?