SCH Controls Readiness Review- Cryostat Nov 4-5, 2015 Kurt Cantrell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19th – 20th of September 2007Cryogenic Expert Meeting at GSI, Jan Patrick Meier1/11 Cryogenic Experts Meeting at GSI, 2007 The SIS 100 Cryogenic Jumper.
Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
AMS-02 Cryosystem Phase III Flight Safety Review January 12, 2010 Phil Mott.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
Status of VLPC Cryo-Cooler Cryostat Design Russ Rucinski (Alan Bross) Fermilab.
Update Hardware for conductive cooling of the quench resistors has been fabricated at LBNL. Preparation for installation to start this week. Installation.
Cryomodule Concept for the ODU RF Dipole Crab Cavity Tom Nicol* - Fermilab December 10, 2013 * With lots of help from HyeKyoung, Tom J, Shrikant, Ofelia,
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Status and Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL June 15, 2007.
Fermilab requirements and recent FEA Analyses PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN 06/05/2015 Page 1 CERN, May 6th 2015.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
24 January 2014 LARP VTF Follow-up Meeting P. Kovach VTF 1 LARP Vertical Test Facility Vertical Dewar Design, Magnet Prep And Installation Paul Kovach.
Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Spectrometer Solenoid Overview Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.
1 MME3360b Assignment 04 10% of final mark 6 problems, each worth 16.7% of assignment mark Due April 9 th, 2012.
1 WANG,Li/SINAP WANG Li, WANG ShuHua, LIU YiYong, SUN Sen, HU Xiao, YIN LiXin Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS, Shanghai , China Shanghai.
Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE
February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IRQ Inner Triplet Review Q1, Q2, and Q3 Mechanics T. Nicol April 24-25, 2007.
NCSX Operation of the C1 Modular Coil in the Coil Test Facility Peer Review June1, 2006 NCSX.
SCH Controls Readiness Review – Cold Mass Iain Dixon November 4, 2015.
12/02/99Team #12 Optimized Magnet Support EML 4551 Optimized Magnet Support EML 4551 Senior Design Dr. Luongo 12/02/99 Deliverable #3 Team #12 David Moore.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Restoring Komag Yasuhiro Makida Consideration of restoring and modifying Komag for a stand alone operation without the refrigerator. Contents 1.Magnet.
Plan for test station Marta Bajko For the Technical Review of FReSCa2 June 2015 Saclay Paris.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Phil MottAMS-02 Phase II Safety Review1 Vacuum Case Mechanical Design Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) - 02 Phase II Flight Safety Review Vacuum Case.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Recovery Review - December 3-4, Steve Virostek MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Assembly.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Cooling Circuit Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab February 29, 2012 MICE Coupling Coil Cryostat Design Review Lawrence Berkeley National.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
14-Jun-161 Status of Horizontal Test Stand (HTS-2) Development Efforts Pradeep Kush, Prashant Khare, RRCAT, India Team Members: S.Gilankar, Rupul Ghosh,
Overview of the ESS Linac Cryogenic Distribution System
MICE Coupling Coil Fabrication Steps to Complete Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Toward a Reasoned Design.
Panda Solenoid Content Interface Box Cold Mass Layout Cooling Lines
Status of the PANDA Magnet mechanics (yoke & cryostat)
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
Crab Cavity HOM Coupler Specification Drawings & Tolerances
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
LARP Vertical Test Facility
Design of Distribution Feedbox at LHC P7
MICE Coupling Coil Update
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield & MLI
SC1R Cold Box PDR Assembly Sequence
Status of QQXF cryostat
SNS PPU Cryomodule Design Overview
JLAB CHL 2K COLD BOX REPLACEMENT
Presentation transcript:

SCH Controls Readiness Review- Cryostat Nov 4-5, 2015 Kurt Cantrell

Overview Cryostat Overview Quality Control - Manufacturing Procedures Quality Control - Testing Cryostat Design Structural Design Requirements Risk Assessment 2

Cryostat Overview 3 Cryostat Performance Goals: Provide vacuum insulation for the outsert coil Provide radiation barrier for the outsert coil Provide for cryogen services, instrumentation and power feedthrus for the outsert coil Support cold mass weight Support coil misalignment loads Support fault forces Provide for interface with outsert coil, housing and hydrant Structural Design Criterion ASME PVC Section VIII, div. 2 ASME B31

Cryostat- Manufacturing Procedures 4 Cryostat was fabricated at Criotec Impianti in Chivasso, Italy (not a holder of ASME PVC stamp) Fabricated to NHMFL drawings which were designed to the ASME B&PVC section VIII, div. 2 and ASME B31 Communication Videoconference every two weeks Frequent traffic Personnel were present to check for manufacturing issues and during assembly fit-up Personnel were present during important test stages Drawing review Various drawing revisions were made by Criotec Change to metric material thickness or other European standards Minor material property changes Facilitate manufacturing to how they are accustomed Thermal bore tube shield design to follow the style implemented for the HZB cryostat Tracking Engineering Changes A drawing tracking form is filled out to track changes A change to the revision number is made in the drawing block A model is sent to NHMFL for approval

Cryostat- Manufacturing Procedures 5 Example of Engineering Tracking Form

Cryostat-Quality Control -Testing Assembly DescriptionTest DescriptionLocation Major structural partsNDE of weldsCriotec Impianti Vacuum VesselHelium leak check at room temperature to 3E-9 mbar-l/sCriotec Impianti Warm Bore TubeHydrostatic pressure test to 67.5 barg (1.3x MAWP)Criotec Impianti LN2 Shields Plumbing and Bore Tube Shield Hydrostatic pressure to 7.5 barg (1.3x MAWP)Criotec Impianti LN2 Shields Plumbing and Bore Tube Shield Helium leak check at 77 K to 3E-9 mbar-l/sCriotec Impianti SHe and LN 2 ServicesThree thermal cyclesCriotec Impianti SHe ServicesHydrostatic pressure to 27 barg (1.3x MAWP)Criotec Impianti LN2 Shields Supply/Return (and associated plumbing) Hydrostatic pressure to 7.5 barg (1.3x MAWP)Criotec Impianti LN2 Tank (and associated plumbing)Hydrostatic pressure to 3 barg (1.3x MAWP)Criotec Impianti SHe and LN 2 ServicesHelium leak check at room temperature to 3E-9 mbar-l/sCriotec Impianti Insert housing/hydrantHydrostatic pressure test to 67.5 barg (1.3x MAWP) RV Industries Completed SHe circuitHelium leak test by pumping on vacuum vessel while circuit under 150 psiNHMFL Completed LN2 circuitHelium leak test at 15 psi differentialNHMFL Vacuum vesselHelium leak testNHMFL 6 Tests Performed Post Fabrication

Cryostat Design-Vacuum Vessel 7 Requirements High Vacuum Inside Fault Load, Strongback Service penetrations Design Welded/Bolted Construction Warm O-Ring Seals

Cryostat-Mechanical Loads 8 Fault Load Path

Cryostat Design-Bore Tube/Strongback 9 Requirements Fault Load Radial Stiffness for 40 Bar Over Pressure Return water Operation-30 bar water inside High Vacuum Outside Design Double Wall Machined Weldment/Forging Axisymmetric Water Supply Water Return Fault Load

Cryostat Design-Bore Tube/Strongback FEA 10 The SCH insert housing is a double wall structure containing coils inside, and supported by cryostat main frame structure Cooling water enters in the housing, passing through coils, and flows out in between the double walls FEA model is extracted for cornerstone structures along the loading path Structural load path

Cryostat Design-Bore Tube/Strongback FEA 11 Structural meshes scale factor, 50 Boundary conditions Rib and weld function in difference load scenarios

Cryostat Design-Bore Tube/Strongback FEA: Deflection Example 12 1)During normal operation, the distance between double walls will shrink <0.01mm in the top and shrink <0.05mm in the bottom 2)Outer wall will move mm toward inner wall in the top, and 0.044mm toward cryostat in the bottom 3)Inner wall will move mm toward outer wall in the top and 0.088mm toward outer wall in the bottom Normal operation radial deflection 1)In current model, during normal operation the length of the outer wall shrink approximately 0.034mm as well as the outer wall will shrink 0.056mm (the compliance of the threaded ring and the cryostat are not considered) 2)The offset between the D coil and the outsert is approximately 0.022mm. Normal operation axial deflection

Cryostat Design-Insert Hydrant FEA 13

Cryostat Design-Cold Mass Support Columns 14 Requirements Axial Stiffness Fault Load (Tension/Compression) Minimum conduction load 300 K to 4 K Design 88 K Intercept Integral Manifolds Machined Weldment 1.3 watts/Column to He 7 watts/Column to N2 Buckling stability of the Columns Tresca stress FEA detail

Cryostat Design-Warm Columns 15 Requirements React Vacuum Loads Weight System Ground Design Constant Cross-section 88 k Shield Bolted w/ adjustment Machined Weldment The vacuum load to the SCH structure is supported by cryostat OD wall, warm columns, and the bore tube. From FEA, the bore tube share 19% of the total vacuum load.

Cryostat Design-Warm to Cold Links 16 Analysis -Linear stress/strain -Magnetic stiffness

Cryostat Design-Permanent Frame (External consultant David H. Melvin, Inc. analysis results) 17 Analyzed to conform to the AISC design code by licensed State of Florida PE Loads considered: -Vertical load of ~ 220 kN -Side load of ~ 20 kN Displacement (in) Frame stress plot Known loads external: Side loads: 5 kN: 10 mm offset from iron shield Cooling water loads (load share with plumbing) 26.6 kN bus bar load Vertical loads: System weight of 205 kN downward 12 kN downward due to offset with iron shield 38 kN downward due to rebar in the floor Action options: -Re-analyze frame considering all loads -Proof test frame using known side loads

Cryostat-Venting Safety 18 Protective barrier around HTS leads and cryogenic services/vents 6” pipe weight-loaded vent on vacuum vessel for loss of cryogen containment GN2 vent line carries all GN2 outside

Cryostat-Risk Assessment 19

Thank You!