1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Keeping Up to Date: Accessing Your N&D Title I Funds For PAFPC Conference April 14, 2008 Don McCrone & Joe Hiznay.
Advertisements

1 Workshop Part I: Federal Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
OJJDP Performance Measurement Training 1 Incorporating Performance Measurement in the Formula Grant RFP and Application Format Presenter: Pat Cervera,
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
Workshop Part II: Subgrantee Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
Reporting & Evaluation Workshop Lauren Amos, Liann Seiter, and Dory Seidel.
1 (Almost) Everything You Need To Know About the Annual Count.
1 Planning and Funding Basics Lauren Amos and Liann Seiter, NDTAC Chandra Martin, Arkansas Department of Education.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
1 Salmon ND Community Call March 12, Agenda – Roll Call – Upcoming NDTAC Webinar Series Guest Speaker: Nick Read – Promising Practices: Youth.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
ND Community Call Salmon Community October 23, 2013.
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
1 Gold ND Community Call June 3, Agenda Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Adapting to the 2014 GED “That Time of Year”: Subgrantee Monitoring A Closer.
Title I, Part D State Plans Katie Deal, NDTAC State Liaison.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas.
1 Gold ND Community Call February 3, Agenda “That Time of Year”: CSPR Data Submission Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Questions from Community Members.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
1 ND Communities Meeting. 2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity:
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Annual Counts: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
Title ID Subpart 2 Introduction Coordinator Tutorial
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
TITLE I, PART D Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community November 4, 2015.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 2 LEAs and TACF Neglected,
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
1 Introductions Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3x5.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
Thoughts for today *Teacher: I want you to tell me the longest sentence you can think of Pupil: Life imprisonment! You know you can’t sleep in this workshop…would.
Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Association.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
ND Community Call Salmon Community April 16, 2014.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of Federal Educational Programs ECTAC ADMINISTRATOR’S MEETING SONYA G. MORRIS, BUREAU CHIEF MARCH 3, 2016.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community March 8, 2016.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community March 16, 2016.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
ND Community Call Salmon Community November 29, 2016.
N&D Community Call Salmon Community March 20, 2017.
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
Annual October Count of Children in
ND Teal Community Call February 18, 2014.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015

2 Agenda Welcome Review of our community’s Title I, Part D (TIPD) programs Technical assistance (TA) questions Federal monitoring Upcoming events and opportunities

3 Introductions New Community Members Welcome

4 Teal Community

5 Review of TIPD Programs

6 Compelling Requests Current Needs TA Questions

7 TA Questions: Neglect Programs (1) 1.Do most States use TIPD for their neglect programs? 2.Do other States using TIPA for their neglect programs also not report data for the CSPR?

8 States Using TIPD for Neglect Programs

9 Number of States Average Number of Neglect Programs Subpart 1 only86 Subpart 2 only1732 Both Subparts617 No Neglect Programs21n/a

10 TA Questions: Neglect Programs (2) 1.Do most States use TIPD for their neglect programs? 2.Do other States using TIPA for their neglect programs also not report data for the CSPR?

11 Part DPart A Funds may be used for a broader purpose than comparable services in a State or local neglect program. Funds are used within a local neglect facility to provide comparable services. Do Other States Using TIPA for Their Neglect Programs Also Not Report Data for the CSPR?

12 Do Other States Using TIPA for Their Neglect Programs Also Not Report Data for the CSPR? To our knowledge, there is no CSPR data collection for TIPA. Neglect programs that only receive TIPA funding should not be included in the TIPD section of the CSPR. However, if programs receive both TIPA and TIPD funds, only the students who benefit from the TIPD funding should be reported in the CSPR. This information is available in more detail in the CSPR Instructional Guide ( delinquent.org/resource/instructional-guide-reporting- title-i-part-d-data-cspr-sy ). delinquent.org/resource/instructional-guide-reporting- title-i-part-d-data-cspr-sy

13 TA Questions: Annual Count (1) 1.Should youth be adjudicated or court ordered in order to be counted as delinquent on the annual count? 2.Can our state change their Subpart 2 annual count window to maximize numbers? 3.The annual count generates a lot more funds for Subpart 2 short term facilities in my state. Is there a way to more evenly distribute funds to long term facilities?

14 Who Is Included in LEA’s Delinquent Count? Per the statute (Subpart 3: Sec. 1432: Definitions), youth who are delinquent have been adjudicated to be delinquent or in need of supervision.Subpart 3: Sec. 1432: Definitions The count is based on an eligible facility’s October caseload. Any child or youth residing in an eligible institution may be counted if the youth: –Is 5-17 years old during the count window and –Has not also been counted in the State agency (SA) annual count or other Title I funding stream count. NDTAC’s annual count toolkit includes a requirements checklist to help you determine count eligibility for LEAs/SAs, facilities, and children/youth, as well as the count window.annual count toolkitrequirements checklist

15 TA Questions: Annual Count (2) 1.Should youth be adjudicated or court ordered in order to be counted as delinquent on the annual count? 2.Can our state change their Subpart 2 annual count window to maximize numbers? 3.The annual count generates a lot more funds for Subpart 2 short term facilities in my state. Is there a way to more evenly distribute funds to long term facilities?

16 LEA / Subpart 2 Annual Count: Count Window September SMTWTFS October SMTWTFS November SMTWTFS An LEA’s S2 count window can start as early as September 2nd or as late as October 31st. The window must be for 30 consecutive days and at least one day of that window must be in October. The SEA may set the window for all LEAs, or it may allow LEAs and facilities to choose their windows independently.

17 TA Questions: Annual Count (3) 1.Should youth be adjudicated or court ordered in order to be counted as delinquent on the annual count? 2.Can our state change their Subpart 2 annual count window to maximize numbers? 3.The annual count generates a lot more funds for Subpart 2 short term facilities in my state. Is there a way to more evenly distribute funds to long term facilities?

18 Section M-1 of Nonregulatory Guidance The SEA has the option of awarding subgrants to eligible LEA s by formula or through a discretionary grant process. If an SEA chooses to award Subpart 2 subgrants on a discretionary basis, it may establish criteria or priorities or both, consistent with State requirements for awarding grants. If an SEA distributes funds through a formula, it may allocate funds proportionately among the eligible LEAs based on each LEA ’s proportionate share of children in correctional facilities or delinquent institutions. In either case, the SEA must develop procedures for determining and notifying LEAs within the State that they are eligible to receive Subpart 2 funds.

19 TA Questions: Current Needs Drafting formal agreements –Looking for templates and/or examples Building and maintaining strong relationships with SAs –As a new TIPD coordinator –With new SA contacts –When there are concerns (e.g. carryover requests, data not improving)

20 Federal Monitoring

21 Monitoring plan: Office of Safe and Healthy Students (OSHS) Monitoring Plan for Homeless and Neglected or Delinquent Education Programs – US Department of Education (ED) Revised December 2014 Reflects reorganization that moved the TIPD program to OSHS Federal Monitoring

22 Federal Monitoring Monitoring indicators: Used by ED to determine degree of implementation of federal programs and activities administered by SEAs in three areas: I.Standards, Assessment, and Accountability II.Instructional Support III.Fiduciary Criteria ensure consistent application of standards across monitoring teams and states Provide guidance for all states re: purpose and intended outcomes of monitoring by describing what is being monitored and providing criteria for judging the quality of implementation (acceptable evidence)

23 Resources Federal monitoring: A Guide to Meeting Compliance Requirements for the Title I, Part D Program, NDTACA Guide to Meeting Compliance Requirements for the Title I, Part D Program OSHS Monitoring Plan for Homeless and Neglected or Delinquent Monitoring Programs, EDOSHS Monitoring Plan for Homeless and Neglected or Delinquent Monitoring Programs December 2014 quarterly call materials, ED/NDTAC February 2015 community call, NDTACFebruary 2015 community call Subgrantee monitoring: Tips for Subgrantee Monitoring, NDTACTips for Subgrantee Monitoring topical call series on subgrantee monitoring tools, NDTAC topical call series on subgrantee monitoring tools

24 NDTAC and State Events What’s New for NDTAC Upcoming Events and Opportunities

25 Upcoming Events Community calls February 2016 July 2016 Other events – TBD Topical calls Webinars Conference Calls with ED Other events in the community?

26 What’s New for NDTAC State plans extranet site and pilot program Conference presentations