Hadronic physics “experimental” issues M. Sozzi NA62 Physics Handbook meeting CERN – 10/12/2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
: Section 3: Mixing and CP violation in (mostly) neutral mesons.
Advertisements

Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
Phenomenology of Charmless Hadronic B Decays Denis Suprun University of Chicago Thanks to C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner for enjoyable collaborations.
Salvatore Fiore University of Rome La Sapienza & INFN Roma1 for the KLOE collaboration LNF Spring School “Bruno Touscheck”, Frascati, May 2006 CP/CPT.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
The CP-violation experiments NA48 at CERN Manfred Jeitler Institute of High Energy Physics of the Austrian Academy of Sciences RECFA meeting Innsbruck,
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
R Measurement at charm resonant region Haiming HU BES Collaboration Charm 2007 Cornell University Ithaca, NY. US.
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
1 B Physics at CDF Junji Naganoma University of Tsukuba “New Developments of Flavor Physics“ Workshop Tennomaru, Aichi, Japan.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
26 February 2003 FNAL Director's Review Status of KTeV (E832) Introduction E832 Physics Results Status of Ongoing Analysis PhD Students Conclusions E.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
B. Lee Roberts, HIFW04, Isola d’Elba, 6 June p. 1/39 Future Muon Dipole Moment Measurements at a high intensity muon source B. Lee Roberts Department.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
EPS 2003 AachenDaniele Pedrini - Focus results1 FOCUS mixing and CPV results Recent results on charm from E831-FOCUS Daniele Pedrini (INFN-Milano) on behalf.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo Suppressed D 0 Decays Kalanand Mishra, G. Mancinelli, B. T. Meadows, M. D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Search for New Physics via η Rare Decay Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, NC, USA.
July 19th, 2003EPS HEP Aachen R. Fantechi Tests of Chiral Perturbation Theory in K S rare decays at NA48 Riccardo Fantechi INFN - Sezione di Pisa.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.
Initial State Radiation and Inclusive Hadron Production at B A B AR Fabio Anulli University of Perugia, INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf.
Hadronic results from KLOE E. Santovetti (INFN – Roma II) for the KLOE Collaboration European Physical Society International Europhysics Conference on.
FPCP 2003, Paris June 5 th, 2003M. Sozzi - Kaon physics Kaon Physics: Experimental Status and Perspectives Marco S. Sozzi CERN and Scuola Normale Superiore,
Recent CP violation measurements at CERN-NA48 experiment For the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations: Cagliari, Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edinburgh,
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Yingchuan Li Electroweak physics at EIC Brookhaven National Lab Feb. 3rd 2011, BNL.
Experimental setup Data taking Vus CPT a  had f 0 KLOE - May 20, The KLOE experiment at the Frascati  -factory.
New precise measurements of radiative charged kaon and hyperon decays Ermanno Imbergamo University of Perugia and INFN on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration.
Douglas Bryman University of British Columbia APS May 3, 2011.
Sandra Malvezzi - Charm Meson Results in Focus 1 Sandra Malvezzi I.N.F.N. Milano Meson Lifetimes, Decays, Mixing and CPV in FOCUS.
Precision measurements of Charged Kaon radiative decays in NA48/2 WIN'11 23rd International Workshop on WEAK INTERACTIONS AND NEUTRINOS Cape Town, South.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
4 July 2006Alan Norton, QCD Montpellier1 Search for direct CP Violation in charged K decays QCD Montpellier, July 2006 Alan Norton, CERN On behalf of the.
Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Haolai TIAN (On behalf of the BESIII Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 23rd Rencontre de Blois.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
G0 Backward Angle Request: Q 2 = 0.23, 0.48 GeV 2 Main points G0 goal is to measure G E s, G M s and G A e over range of momentum transfers with best possible.
ChPT tests at NA62 Mauro Raggi, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf of the NA62 collaboration X Th quark confinement and hadron spectrum Tum campus,
12/15/06 B. Casey 1  s and  s at the Tevatron Gernot Weber Mainz University On behalf of Brendan Casey Brown University and the DØ and CDF collaborations.
EXPERIMENTS INR/IHEP Protvino-Moscow, Russia Viacheslav Duk INR RAS BEACH 2006 Highlights on Rare Charged Kaon Decays ISTRA+ & KEK.
1 Measuring Im( t ) using K S - K L Interference in  0 e + e - Hogan Nguyen Fermilab November 10 th, 2009 Project X Physics Workshop Work presented here.
CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)
High p T hadron production and its quantitative constraint to model parameters Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory For the PHENIX Collaboration.
Monica Pepe INFN Perugia on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration (Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edimburgh, Ferrara, Firenze, Mainz, Northwestern, Perugia,
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
Marianna Testa University of Rome La Sapienza & INFN for the KLOE collaboration “XLIst Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories”,
K+e+γ using OKA detector
(Scuola Normale Superiore & INFN Pisa)
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
Presentation transcript:

Hadronic physics “experimental” issues M. Sozzi NA62 Physics Handbook meeting CERN – 10/12/2009

You said hadronic decays? Hadron (/hædr:on/): thick, stout, tough, hard, messy, complicated In principle the place where most interesting things can happen But hard to make sense of them

General experimental remarks In recent times, most “important” hadronic K decay results were obtained from dedicated precision experiments, not as byproducts of experiments designed for something else. This is due to what goes under the name of “systematics” Some K experiments are more “general-purpose” than others An impressive amount of K decaying into the detector is not all

Hadronic K decays in NA62? A performing and diverse detector is there (to suppress very different decay modes) BUT you need to trigger on interesting events NA62 is (being) designed for K +  π + νν decay measurement using an unseparated hadron beam. Requirements: O(10 10 ) suppression of backgrounds Large control samples for background control Simple trigger conditions (“factorization”) Aim: trigger on (single) charged-track events with no muons, no photons and no electrons. K→πνν:17 nm Kμ2Kμ2

RICHMUVCEDARLKRSTRAWSLAV L0 CTP GbE switch PC CDR L0 trigger Trigger primitives Data EB 1 MHz O(10 MHz) O(KHz) NA62 TDAQ - OVERVIEW 1 MHz L0 L1/2 O(<1ms) 2K 1K 200 8K 13K 2.5K 60K Event rate is comparable to LHC. Trigger rate can be even higher.

Hadronic K decays? Hadronic decay modes left through the trigger? HOPEFULLY NONE So: (1) A second phase of NA62 OR (2) Think hard about trigger improvements to accommodate a few potentially very interesting modes during πνν data-taking (we ARE actively pursuing this) ALSO (3) What about a neutral K high-intensity beam?

K + hadronic decays

CP/CPT violation in ∆  Need twin beams Need absolute flux normalization: probably not possible (but see later for 2πγ) Anyway generally suppressed asymmetries

CP violation in Dalitz plot Need twin beams ∆g not necessarily the best quantity (what is “g”?) Measured interference in ππγ opens up new possibility: Δ(∂σ/∂Eγ)

∆g CPV (NA48/2) 91M events 3.1G events π±π+π–π±π+π– π±π0π0π±π0π0

∆g CPV Significant interest in a 10 –4 level experiment (NA48/2) A 10 –5 level experiment: - could possibly be achieved in terms of statistics - would require > x100 control samples - would require a new dedicated design for systematic control - questionable interest? (in view of order-of-magnitude uncertainties in SM predictions, maybe except for Δg C ) Could think of better observables in the Dalitz plot

K  2π γ Reminder: INT could give (direct) CPV O(10 -4 ) in SM (among the largest) Also one of the few places where (exploiting CPT) we might get a combined π + π 0  and π + π 0 CPV rate asymmetry with cross-normalization Separation by photon spectrum K±  π±π0K±  π±π0 Don’t forget the “usual trick”: K ±  π ± π 0 e + e – opening up the possibility for E/M interference (CPV) Added bonus: K + /K – FSI elimination with twin beams New from NA48/2:

CPV in K ± →  ±    oAsymmetry can manifest itself in rates A N and Dalitz plot A W oIf  ≠0 then  + ≠   the number of events K + →      ≠ K - →      oTheoretical range 2·10 -6 to 1·10 -5 with 50<E  * <170 MeV. oSUSY contributions can push the asymmetry to in specific region of the Dalitz plot oPresent experimental knowledge: (0.9±3.3)% PDG08 oNA48/2 limit < 1.4x % CL based on 1.08 Million events INT M. Raggi

CPV in      at NA62 Assuming K + K – beam flux (no downscale) In NA62      events: 150M K M K – Can measure rate asymmetry down to precision Can measure Dalitz plot asymmetry T *  and W Can measure the  angle in the interference term K+/K– ratio measurement can use     normalization Systematic can be pushed down to by using 4 ratio as for       M. Raggi

CPV in K ± →  ±  Present PDG have no limit on asymmetry NA48/2 can reach a % limit NA62 might get (no downscale !!!): – K+ and K- –No evidence of systematic limit on the measurement –Can push the asymmetry limit down to M. Raggi

K± →π±e+e– K± →π±μ+μ–K± →π±e+e– K± →π±μ+μ– NA48/2 reached a limit of 2.1x10 −2 at 90% CL NA62 might collect: K + and K  Can reduce present limit by 1 order of magnitude The SUSY upper limit on the range of Can measure forward backward asymmetry M. Raggi

K  3π γ Dominated by IB at O(p 4 ) for unsuppressed decays (prediction only limited by knowledge of 3π), unlikely to extract direct weak part (low-energy constants)

2π  2π2π  2π - The “classic” hard way (K e4 ) - The “new” hard way (cusps) (see G. Colangelo, B. Bloch and D. Madigojine talks) However: here also some help from our theory colleagues is needed

What about neutral K ? (the land where CP violation rules) Nothing very well thought, but NA48 switched from neutral to charged during its life, while keeping most of the setup In principle an intense neutral beam is possible Again: when speaking about neutral K non-hadronic modes come to mind: π 0 νν, π 0 e+e–, π 0 μ+μ–. Each of them (if at all feasible) would be a new experiment in itself BUT

K 0 hadronic decays KSKS KLKL

K  3π EM cluster reconstruction inefficiency 0.7% systematic error K S (CPV): CPLEAR, NA48, KLOE – different techniques “Trivial” indirect CPV expected BR(K S  3π 0 ) ≈ BR(K L  3π 0 ) |ε| 2 (τ S /τ L ) ≈ 1.9·10 −9 Direct CPV small (?) (and however not precisely predictable)

K  2π:  © P. Boyle (or <2% Re(  ) semileptonics)

K  2π:  ’ χ 2 =5.3/3, consistency 14% (was 6.2/3, consistency 10%) Re(  ’/  ) = (16.4 ± 1.9) · 10 –4 Including Δ I=3/2 correction [EPJ C36 (2004) 37] [PDG scaled error] Direct CPV at ≈ 9 σ Despite the prime importance of this 10% measurement, it is not (yet) what you would choose as a quantitative test of the SM

CPT KSKS KLKL

Bell-Steinberger KLOE+ JHEP12(2006) 011 No direct CPT assumption π+π– phase dominates No significant contribution from 3π

Guinness Book of Records CPT Á la CP/T (1999): 0.5% (KTeV, KLOE, NA48) BR 1.5% (KTeV) reg. interference 1.5% using φ00, no dir CPT and no CPV outside 2π, or use Im(x) and Im(η 3π ) (CPLEAR, NA48, KLOE) 0.3% (KTeV) reg. interference

Vacuum interference experiment (hadronic environment close to target, as done in NA48) using π+π– only: pure K 0 beam best, e.g. low energy CEX: σ(K + n → K 0 p) ~ 40mb (120 MeV/c) → 40 μb (12 GeV/c) (CP/T proposal: 25 GeV/c separated K + beam) “Planck scale” test of CPT questionable (but nice and “durable” result) CPT limit experiment As a bonus: Lorentz symmetry violation with high-energy K decays

The Next Great Hadronic K Decay Experiment is not in sight (you knew that) (Tentative) conclusions However: many interesting K measurements were not foreseen at the beginning Worth keep trying, and you can help on this