Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Target chase, decay and absorber cooling for LBNE A. Marchionni, Fermilab 8th International Workshop on Neutrino Beams & Instrumentation CERN, November.
Advertisements

1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
FLUKA status and plan Sixth TLEP workshop CERN, October 2013 F. Cerutti #, A. Ferrari #, L. Lari *, A. Mereghetti # # EN Dept. & *BE Dept.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Beam Loss in the Extraction Line for 2 mrad Crossing Angle A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
G2p Safety Readiness Review January 17, 2012 Expected Radiation Exposure Levels from Activated Local Dump George Kharashvili, Radiation Control.
Irradiation Studies of Optical Components CERN, ~ April 15-24, GeV proton beam 4 x proton Irradiation dose: equivalent to 40 pulses.
Air activation inside and around the SPS beam dump M. Baudin H. Vincke DGS-RP-AS.
Preliminary studies for Muon shield modification to accommodate LCLS II Alev Ibrahimov December, 2010 BSY.
PSB dump endoscopy 30 th May 2013 Alba Sarrió on behalf of EN-STI-TCD Thanks to Pascal Mesenge (EN-MME)
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
ISIS Target studies Could a used ISIS target provide fusion relevant irradiated tungsten material properties? Tristan Davenne 20 th May nd Radiate.
A NON LINEAR TRANSPORT LINE FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF F18 PRODUCTION BY THE TOP LINAC INJECTOR C. Ronsivalle, L. Picardi, C. Cianfarani, G. Messina, G.L.
Question and Answer 1) A weighted Monte-Carlo ray trace of particles exiting the target/magnet assembly for all primary beam energies showing: a) Where.
Spasimir Balev /CERN/ mrad 3 LKr simulation: – very slow, so only events with interesting topology are fully simulated: –  + with.
Radiation Protection considerations concerning a future SPS dump design Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
Estimation of temperature increase in the dump through Monte – Carlo simulations and rough calculations N. Charitonidis (EN/MEF)
JAERI nuclear analyses for IFMIF T. Umetsu, M. Yamauchi and M. Sugimoto Presented by Takeo NISHITANI Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) IAEA Technical Meeting.
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
F. Regis, LINAC4 – LBS & LBE LINES DUMP DESIGN.
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
Update for muon studies Helmut Vincke. Additional dump calculations Two options were studied: Option 1: beam is bend by 2 degree towards soil and beam.
Neutron Flux Measurement at the CYRIC T. Horiguchi and A. Ishikawa (Tohoku University) For the FPCCD group.
Status of Radiation Protection Studies for the Linac4 beam dumps Joachim Vollaire DGS/RP.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
PSB dump replacement 17 th November 2011 LIU-PSB meeting Alba Sarrió.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Presentation at BBC, Linac 4 Commissioning Dump at 50 and 100MeV 1 Øyvind Dahle Lauten, EN-STI.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
New SPS scraping system: preliminary RP remarks Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
Radiation Protection studies for the Linac4 / Linac2 interface Joachim Vollaire, DGS-RP 28/09/2015 Linac4 Coordination Meeting.
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
AWAKE: D2E for Alexey beam properties Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke DGS/RP.
Characterization of the nTOF Radioactive Waste M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
BOOSTER COLLIMATION AND SHIELDING Proton Source Workshop Fermilab December 7-8, 2010 Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab Accelerator Physics Center.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
D.Macina TS/LEATOTEM Meeting25/02/2004 Roman Pot test at the SPS Test of the Roman Pot prototype in the SPS proposed in December 2003 (CERN/LHCC ):
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
HIRADMAT/ IRRADITION facilities Overall view with the biggest object to irradiat, T9 shielding with TED inside and the beam dump with 12 meters of cast.
The target handling concept of the pbar- separator at FAIR M. Helmecke, V. Gostishchev, R. Hettinger, K. Knie 6th High Power Targetry Workshop Oxford.
Status of the FAIR pbar target: Target handling study (M. Helmecke)
beam delivery with SC magnets
General overview, layout of the pbar separator Target handling concept FLUKA calculations - for the target station - for the shielding flask Status of.
Heating and radiological
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Induced-activity experiment:
Forward Tagger Simulations
CLAS12 Beamline Configurations
Emergency dumping of proton and ion beams in SIS100 F
Studies on Energy Deposition and Radiation for the 4horn system
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Beam dump for J-Parc neutrino facility
LS 1 start date 12th June Schedule Extension 2012 run Extension of 2012 run approved by the DG on 3rd July 2012.
TRANSPORTATION CASK AND CONCRETE MODULE DESIGN FOR MANAGING NUCLEAR SPENT FUEL PRODUCED IN BUSHEHR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT A.M. TAHERIAN Iran Radioactive Waste.
Presentation transcript:

Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP

Irradiation scenarios calculated Cooling times: 1 hour 1 day 1 week 1 months 4 months 2 years Operation: 20 years with 2E18 protons distributed over 365 days followed by 1 day of operation with 5E12 protons/s 1 operation and 6 cool down scenarios were considered:

Top view cut, beam line level Optimization: 185 cm of shielding on sides and top 170 cm upstream and downstream Optimization of marble and iron layers Additional 10 cm iron on the side to address 24 Na issue after intense irradiation Back view cut, hot spot level Optimized shielding design

Mask to shield QD519 1m long stainless steel 30cm diameter mask would absorb ~2.5GeV per 450 GeV primary proton. This corresponds to a factor ~5 reduction of energy that escapes the dump/reaches the downstream quadrupole. Peak energy deposition seen in the mask itself <10J/cm 3 which corresponds to a temp increase of less than 2 K

Mask to shield QD mm 1 m0.5 m 7682 mm between dump and QD m between mask and QD519 Beam pipe inner diameter: – Ø 100 mm between dump and mask – Ø 83 mm in mask and QD519 Shielding : – 300 mm iron – 200 mm marble – 1m long, square section

Operation 1: 20 years with 2E18 protons per year, followed by 1 day of operation with 5E12 protons/s + 1 hour of cooling. µSv/h With mask Without mask

Operation 1: 20 years with 2E18 protons per year, followed by 1 day of operation with 5E12 protons/s + 1 week of cooling. µSv/h With mask Without mask

Conclusions Boundary conditions for a dump taking 2E18 protons per year. Dump is surrounded by a sandwich structure consisting of: 1. Concrete shielding: 0.35 m top and bottom, 0.45 m lateral, ~0.6 m upstream and downstream. 2. Iron shielding: 1.0 m lateral, top, upstream and downstream. 3. Marble shielding (or concrete): 0.4 m lateral, upstream and downstream, 0.5 m on top (0.6 m in top corners). A mask is added on the beam line between the dump and QD519 to shield the latter: 1.83 mm inner diameter, same as in QD519 (the beam line between the dump and the mask would be of 100 mm inner diameter). 2.The shielding is currently of square section, 30 cm iron followed by 20 cm marble. The total length is 1 m. This will allow to work without restrictions after beam operation outside the dump area (acceptable radiation levels).