Capital Allocation for Insurance Companies Stewart C. Myers James A. Read, Jr. Casualty Actuarial Society of the American Risk and Insurance Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE DEVIL IS IN THE TAILS: ACTUARIAL MATHEMATICS AND THE SUBPRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS.
Advertisements

Risk Measurement for a Credit Portfolio: Part One
Berlin, Fußzeile1 The Trade-off Between Risk and Return Professor Dr. Rainer Stachuletz International Markets and Corporate Finance Berlin School.
1 PROVISIONS FOR PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (MIS-35) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line Chapter Thirteen.
FINANCE 8. Capital Markets and The Pricing of Risk Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles Fall 2007.
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter.
11-1 Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Today Risk and Return Reading Portfolio Theory
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line Chapter Thirteen.
Portfolio Analysis and Theory
Chapter 6 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
FIN352 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Risk and Return (chapter 4)
An Economic Perspective on Capital Allocation George Zanjani Federal Reserve Bank of New York The views expressed in this presentation are those of the.
Asset Management Lecture 11.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line Lecture 11.
Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Corporate Finance 3e Ross, Thompson, Christensen, Westerfield and Jordan Slides.
Lecture 12 International Portfolio Theory and Diversification.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Return, Risk, and the Security Market Line Chapter Thirteen.
Credit Risk – Loan Portfolio and Concentration risk
FIN638 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management. FIN638 Vicentiu Covrig 2 How Finance is organized Corporate finance Investments International Finance Financial.
Managing Liquidity Banks can experience illiquidity when cash outflows exceed cash inflows. They can resolve any cash deficiency either by creating additional.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
11-1 Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
What Did We Learn? Conclusions from the Risk Premium Project Presentation made at the 2005 Casualty Actuarial Society’s Ratemaking Seminar March 2005 New.
1 Finance School of Management Chapter 13: The Capital Asset Pricing Model Objective The Theory of the CAPM Use of CAPM in benchmarking Using CAPM to determine.
Allocating the Cost of Capital CAS Spring Meeting May 19-22, 2002 Robert P. Butsic Fireman’s Fund Insurance.
© 2009 Cengage Learning/South-Western The Trade-off Between Risk and Return Chapter 6.
Capital Allocation Survey. Purpose of Allocating Capital  Not a goal in itself  Used to make further calculations, like adequacy of business unit profits,
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Version 1.2 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to:
Portfolio Management-Learning Objective
Lecture Presentation Software to accompany Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Seventh Edition by Frank K. Reilly & Keith C. Brown Chapter 7.
Some Background Assumptions Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Chapter 7.
FINANCE IN A CANADIAN SETTING Sixth Canadian Edition Lusztig, Cleary, Schwab.
Risk and Capital Budgeting Chapter 13. Chapter 13 - Outline What is Risk? Risk Related Measurements Coefficient of Correlation The Efficient Frontier.
Percentage of sales approach: COMPUTERFIELD CORPORATION Financial Statements Income statementBalance sheet Sales$12,000C AC A $5000Debt$8250 Costs9,800FA.
Chapter 7 – Risk, Return and the Security Market Line  Learning Objectives  Calculate Profit and Returns  Convert Holding Period Returns (HPR) to APR.
Chapter 11 Risk and Return. Expected Returns Expected returns are based on the probabilities of possible outcomes In this context, “expected” means average.
11-1 Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Corporate Finance 4e, by Ross, Thompson, Christensen, Westerfield & Jordan.
Chapter 06 Risk and Return. Value = FCF 1 FCF 2 FCF ∞ (1 + WACC) 1 (1 + WACC) ∞ (1 + WACC) 2 Free cash flow (FCF) Market interest rates Firm’s business.
Wenyen Hsu1 Agency Cost and Bonus Policy of Participating Policies Wenyen Hsu Feng Chia University
Economic Impact of Capital Level Kevin Zhang, Ph.D., FCAS CNA Insurance Companies.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management First Canadian Edition By Reilly, Brown, Hedges, Chang 6.
The Basics of Risk and Return Corporate Finance Dr. A. DeMaskey.
CHAPTER SEVEN Risk, Return, and Portfolio Theory J.D. Han.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible Web site, in whole or in part.
Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Assets Pricing Models
1 Estimating Return and Risk Chapter 7 Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management.
Pricing Integrated Risk Management Products CAS Seminar on Ratemaking San Diego, March 9, 2000 Session COM-45, Emerging Risks Lawrence A. Berger, Ph.D.
Myers Read Capital Allocation Discussion CAS Marco Island 2003 Gary G Venter.
2000 CLRS - September 18th CAS Fair Value Task Force White Paper Methods of Estimation Louise Francis Francis Analytics and Actuarial Data Mining, Inc.
Lecture 7 Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Opportunity Cost of Capital Managerial Finance FINA 6335 Ronald F. Singer.
Chapter 7 An Introduction to Portfolio Management.
3- 1 Outline 3: Risk, Return, and Cost of Capital 3.1 Rates of Return 3.2 Measuring Risk 3.3 Risk & Diversification 3.4 Measuring Market Risk 3.5 Portfolio.
2 - 1 Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt College Publishers. All rights reserved. Chapter 2: Risk & Return Learning goals: 1. Meaning of risk 2. Why risk matters.
Capital Allocation for Property-Casualty Insurers: A Catastrophe Reinsurance Application CAS Reinsurance Seminar June 6-8, 1999 Robert P. Butsic Fireman’s.
Risk & Return. Total return: the total gain or loss experienced on an investment over a given period of time Components of the total return Income stream.
Risk and Rates of Return Stand-Alone Risk Portfolio Risk Risk and Return: CAPM Chapter
Types of risk Market risk
Market-Risk Measurement
The Trade-off between Risk and Return
Portfolio Risk Management : A Primer
TOPIC 3.1 CAPITAL MARKET THEORY
Types of risk Market risk
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000
Global Equity Markets.
Introduction to Risk & Return
Presentation transcript:

Capital Allocation for Insurance Companies Stewart C. Myers James A. Read, Jr. Casualty Actuarial Society of the American Risk and Insurance Association Marco Island, Florida May 20, 2003 Bentley\General\8060\docs/PRS-PROP/SCM/Marco.Island-FL_5-03

2 Surplus for Insurance Companies Ž Capital = Surplus Ž Insurance companies hold capital (surplus) so that possibility of default is remote. <Surplus equals assets minus default-free liabilities. Ž But surplus is costly: <Double taxation of investment income <Agency and information costs Ž Insurance companies operate in many lines. Need to allocate costs for pricing, performance evaluation, etc. Ž Regulators may also have to allocate costs or to set surplus requirements line-by- line.

3 The Surplus Allocation Problem Ž Conventional wisdom: Surplus can not (should not) be allocated to lines of insurance. For a given configuration, the risk capital of a multi-business firm is less than the aggregate risk capital of the businesses on a stand-alone basis. Full allocation of risk- capital across the individual businesses of the firm therefore is generally not feasible. Attempts at such a full allocation can significantly distort the true profitability of individual businesses. ( Merton, R. C. and A.F. Perold, 1993, “Theory of Risk Capital in Financial Firms,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 6, ) Ž We show how surplus can (should) be allocated, given the line-by-line composition of business.

4 Surplus Allocation Example Default Value = Cost (PV) of complete credit backup Line 1$10038%$ 38 Line 2$10050%$ 50 Line 3$10063%$ 63 Total$300$150 Default Value$0.93 (0.31%) Marginal Surplus Surplus PV(Losses)Requirement Allocation

5 Surplus Allocation Example Ž Set each line’s surplus requirement so that its marginal contribution to default value is the same (0.31% of PV(Losses)). Ž Suppose PV(Losses) for line 3 increases to $101: Line 1$10038%$38.00 Line 2$10050%$50.00 Line 3$10163%$63.63 Total$301$ Default Value$0.933 (0.31%) Marginal Surplus Surplus PV(Losses)Requirement Allocation

6 Surplus Allocation Example Ž Surplus allocations for diversified firms are generally less than stand-alone surplus requirements. Default Values = 0.31% of PV (losses) Stand-alone requirements cannot be used to allocate surplus requirements in multi- line companies. (Here we agree with Merton and Perold.) Company 1$10043%$43 Company 2$10056%$56 Company 3$10172%$72 Total$171 Surplus Surplus PV(Losses)Percentage Required

7 Surplus Allocation Example Ž The surplus allocations for the three-line company are not correct for a two- or four-line company. Two-line Company (Here we agree with Merton and Perold.) Line 1$10040%$40 Line 2$10052%$52 Line 3——— Total$200$92 Default Value$0.62 (0.31%) Marginal Surplus Surplus PV(Losses)Requirement Allocation

8 Line 1$10038%$38 Line 2$10050%$50 Line 3$10063%$63 Total$300 Default Value$0.93 Default Value/PV(Losses)0.31% Panel A: Marginal Surplus Requirements for Three Lines of Insurance PV(Losses)Marginal Surplus RequirementSurplus Allocation Line 1$100$43 Line 2$100$56 Line 3$100$72 Total$300$171 Panel B: Stand-Alone Surplus Requirements for Each Line PV(Losses)Stand-Alone Surplus Requirements Case 1$0$100$100$115$35 Case 2$100$0$100$104$46 Case 3$100$100$0$ 92$58 Total$200$200$200 Default Value$0.62$0.62$0.62 Default Value/PV(Losses)0.31%0.31%0.31% Panel C: Total Surplus Required for Each Line, Given the Other Two Lines PV(Losses)PV(Losses)PV(Losses)RequiredReduction from Line 1Line 2Line 3SurplusPanel A Examples of Surplus Allocations Ž Panel A shows marginal surplus requirements for three lines of insurance. Surplus allocations based on these marginal requirements add up to the total surplus carried by the firm. Ž Panel B shows the stand-alone surplus requirements for each line. Ž Panel C shows the total surplus required by each line, given the other two lines. Ž In all cases default value is held constant at 0.31% of PV(losses).

9 Preview Given the line-by-line composition of business: Ž Marginal default values add up to firm-wide default value. Ž Set surplus requirements so that every line’s marginal default value is the same. Ž Use these line-by-line surplus requirements for pricing, calculating required overall surplus, etc.

10 The Default Option Ž Limited liability implies equity has option to default Ž Default is an exchange option—an option to exchange assets for liabilities Assets (V) Default Option (D) PV Losses (L) Equity (E)

11 Value of Default Option Consider the default option in a one-period (two-date) setting, assuming distribution of asset/liability values is lognormal * Default value for company (d  D/L) depends on Ž Surplus ratio (s  S/L) Ž Variance of losses (  L 2 ) Ž Variance of asset returns (  V 2 ) Ž Covariance of losses and asset returns (  LV ) * This assumption is convenient but not necessary for our results.

12 Default Risk for Multi-Line Companies For companies that write insurance in more than one line, variance of aggregate losses depends on Ž Variance of losses by line (  i 2 ) Ž Correlation of losses across lines ( )  Ž Composition of business (x i  L i /L)

13 Default Risk for Multi-Line Companies(continued) Covariance of losses with asset returns depends on Ž Variance of losses by line (  i 2 ) Ž Variance of asset returns (  V 2 ) Ž Correlation of losses by line with asset returns ( ) Ž Composition of business (x i )

14 Default Values for Lines of Business Marginal default values (d i   D/  L i ) for lines of business depend on marginal surplus requirements and risk Ž Surplus contribution for line (s i ) Ž Covariance of losses with losses on other lines (  ij ) Ž Covariance of losses with returns on assets (  iV ) Ž Composition of portfolio (x i )

15 Marginal Default Values Add Up Ž Covariances of portfolio components add up: Ž Weighted marginal default values add up to default value for company: Ž Therefore default values can be allocated uniquely to lines of business. Ž “Adding up” result assumes losses and investment assets have well defined market values. If so, result holds for any joint probability distribution of losses and investment returns.

16 Retail Insurance Ž In retail insurance markets, default risk is absorbed by an industry pool Ž Surplus requirements are typically the same for all lines of insurance, so marginal default values vary by line Ž This implies that the pool subsidizes high-risk lines of business <Insurance companies “collect” default insurance with value equal to default value for own portfolio <Companies “pay” default value for pool

17 Surplus Allocation Ž All policy holders bear the same default risk. Ž The correct formula for surplus allocation is obtained by setting marginal default values equal to default value for firm (d i = d). Ž Eliminates intra-firm cross subsidies.

18 Default Value and Surplus Allocations Risky Assets, Base-Case Correlations Panel A: Portfolio Assets & Liabilities Panel B: Line-by-Line Allocations Line 1$10033%10.00% Line 2$10033%15.00% Line 3$10033%20.00% Liabilities$300100%12.36% Assets$450150%15.00% Surplus$15050% Lognormal Results Asset/Liability Volatility21.63% Default/Liability Value0.31% Delta Vega Normal Results Standard Deviation of Surplus28.18% Default/Liability Value0.43% Delta Vega CorrelationsRatio to Liabilities Standard Deviation Line 1Line 2Line 3 Covariance with Liabilities Covariance with Assets Line 10.02%0.18%38%41% Line 20.30%0.42%50%50% Line 30.62%0.68%63%59% Liabilities0.31%0.43%50%50% Default/Liability Value (Uniform Surplus) Surplus/Liability Value (Uniform Default Value) LognormalNormalLognormalNormal

19 Default Value and Surplus Allocations Safe Assets Case Panel A: Portfolio Assets & Liabilities Panel B: Line-by-Line Allocations Line 1$10033%10.00% Line 2$10033%15.00% Line 3$10033%20.00% Liabilities$300100%12.36% Assets$450150% 0.00% Surplus$15050% Lognormal Results Asset/Liability Volatility12.36% Default/Liability Value0.00% Delta Vega Normal Results Standard Deviation of Surplus12.36% Default/Liability Value0.00% Delta Vega CorrelationsRatio to Liabilities Standard Deviation Line 1Line 2Line 3 Covariance with Liabilities Covariance with Assets Line %0.00%23%29% Line 20.00%0.00%49%49% Line 30.01%0.00%78%72% Liabilities0.00%0.00%50%50% Default/Liability Value (Uniform Surplus) Surplus/Liability Value (Uniform Default Value) LognormalNormalLognormalNormal

20 Panel A: Portfolio Assets & Liabilities Panel B: Line-by-Line Allocations Line 1$10033%15.00% Line 2$10033%15.00% Line 3$10033%15.00% Liabilities$300100%9.49% Assets$450150%15.00% Surplus$15050% Lognormal Results Asset/Liability Volatility20.12% Default/Liability Value0.20% Delta Vega Normal Results Standard Deviation of Surplus27.04% Default/Liability Value0.34% Delta Vega CorrelationsRatio to Liabilities Standard Deviation Line 1Line 2Line 3 Covariance with Liabilities Covariance with Assets Line 10.20%0.34%50%50% Line 20.20%0.34%50%50% Line 30.20%0.34%50%50% Liabilities0.20%0.34%50%50% Default/Liability Value (Uniform Surplus) Surplus/Liability Value (Uniform Default Value) LognormalNormalLognormalNormal Default Value and Surplus Allocations Geographic Diversification Case

21 Panel A: Portfolio Assets & Liabilities Panel B: Line-by-Line Allocations Line 1$10033%15.00% Line 2$10033%15.00% Line 3$10033%15.00% Liabilities$300100%14.49% Assets$450150%15.00% Surplus$15050% Lognormal Results Asset/Liability Volatility22.91% Default/Liability Value0.43% Delta Vega Normal Results Standard Deviation of Surplus29.18% Default/Liability Value0.52% Delta Vega CorrelationsRatio to Liabilities Standard Deviation Line 1Line 2Line 3 Covariance with Liabilities Covariance with Assets Line 10.43%0.52%50%50% Line 20.43%0.52%50%50% Line 30.43%0.52%50%50% Liabilities0.43%0.52%50%50% Default/Liability Value (Uniform Surplus) Surplus/Liability Value (Uniform Default Value) LognormalNormalLognormalNormal Default Value and Surplus Allocations Long Tail Case

22 Robustness of Marginal Default Values Ž Marginal default values depend on mix of business as well as line-by-line risk. Are they robust to changes in mix? Ž Experiment: Consider surplus allocations for hypothetical companies with N and N+1 identical lines of business.

23 Two-Line Company

24 Four-Line Company

25 Ten-Line Company

26 Solvency Regulation Ž Define a “base-case” composition of insurance business and asset risk along with marginal surplus requirements consistent with uniform default value. Ž If a company deviates from base-case composition or asset risk, adjust surplus requirements to keep default value constant.

27 The Efficient Composition of Business Ž Diversification provides financial benefits in the form of reduced risk and surplus requirements. Ž Diversification entails real costs. (Diminished focus? Administrative friction?) Ž Efficient composition of business represents a trade-off between financial benefits and real costs. <May not be unique <May not be sharply defined

28 The Benefit-Cost Trade Off The Trade off of reduced surplus requirements against operating andadministrative costs determines the efficient composition of business.As more lines are added, diversification decreases required surplus,but operating, administrative, and perhaps agency costs increase.Figure 2Present Valueof costs Efficient Compositionof BusinessIncreasedDiversificationMarginal operatingand administrative costsReduction in costof Required Surplus The Trade off of reduced surplus requirements against operating andadministrative costs determines the efficient composition of business.As more lines are added, diversification decreases required surplus,but operating, administrative, and perhaps agency costs increase.Figure 2Present Valueof costs Efficient Compositionof BusinessIncreasedDiversificationMarginal operatingand administrative costsReduction in costof Required Surplus Present Value of Costs Efficient Composition of Business Increased Diversification Marginal Operating and Administrative Costs Reduction in Cost of Required Surplus

29 Conclusions Ž Surplus can be allocated uniquely. Ž Allocations appear robust for multi-line companies. Ž Computational challenges remain. Ž What about other financial intermediaries?

30