F.Consolaro 1, P.Gramatica 1, H.Walter 2 and R.Altenburger 2 1 QSAR Research Unit - DBSF - University of Insubria - VARESE - ITALY 2 UFZ Centre for Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Robert Gordon University School of Engineering Dr. Mohamed Amish
Advertisements

Analysis of High-Throughput Screening Data C371 Fall 2004.
C A INTRODUCTION An Environmental Quality Objective (EQO), intended as a real “No Effect Concentration” (NEC), is not accessible experimentally. The usual.
Aggregating local image descriptors into compact codes
An Introduction to Multivariate Analysis
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning: Kernel Methods.
CLUSTERING PROXIMITY MEASURES
MODELLING OF PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES FOR ORGANIC POLLUTANTS F. Consolaro, P. Gramatica and S. Pozzi QSAR Research Unit, Dept. of Structural and Functional.
PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE QSAR APPLICATION DOMAIN Nina Jeliazkova 1, Joanna Jaworska 2 (1) IPP, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria (2)
Metrics, Algorithms & Follow-ups Profile Similarity Measures Cluster combination procedures Hierarchical vs. Non-hierarchical Clustering Statistical follow-up.
AEB 37 / AE 802 Marketing Research Methods Week 7
Statistics for Marketing & Consumer Research Copyright © Mario Mazzocchi 1 Cluster Analysis (from Chapter 12)
ABSTRACT The BEAM EU research project focuses on the risk assessment of mixture toxicity. A data set of 124 heterogeneous chemicals of high concern as.
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) Gijs Schaftenaar.
Bioinformatics IV Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) and Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) Martin Ott.
Lecture 09 Clustering-based Learning
Clustering and MDS Exploratory Data Analysis. Outline What may be hoped for by clustering What may be hoped for by clustering Representing differences.
Microarray Gene Expression Data Analysis A.Venkatesh CBBL Functional Genomics Chapter: 07.
Non ionic organic pesticide environmental behaviour: ranking and classification F. Consolaro and P. Gramatica QSAR Research Unit, Dept. of Structural and.
Molecular Descriptors
Molecular Information Content
Similarity Methods C371 Fall 2004.
RESULT and DISCUSSION In order to find a relation between the three rate reaction constant (k OH, k NO3 and k O3 ) and the structural features of chemicals,
Surveillance monitoring Operational and investigative monitoring Chemical fate fugacity model QSAR Select substance Are physical data and toxicity information.
A unifying model of cation binding by humic substances Class: Advanced Environmental Chemistry (II) Presented by: Chun-Pao Su (Robert) Date: 2/9/1999.
ABSTRACT Bioconcentration by aquatic biota is an important factor in assessing the environmental behaviour and potential hazard evaluation of a chemical,
Data Reduction. 1.Overview 2.The Curse of Dimensionality 3.Data Sampling 4.Binning and Reduction of Cardinality.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS - Missing values of the principal physico-chemical properties are predicted by validated regression models by using different kinds.
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics Irene Kouskoumvekaki Associate Professor December 12th, 2012 Biological Sequence Analysis course.
3D- QSAR. QSAR A QSAR is a mathematical relationship between a biological activity of a molecular system and its physicochemical parameters. QSAR attempts.
The aquatic toxicity values of 57 esters, with experimental and predicted LC50 in fish, EC50 in Daphnia and seaweed and IGC in Entosiphon sulcatum, were.
Paola GRAMATICA a, Paola LORENZINI a, Angela SANTAGOSTINO b and Ezio BOLZACCHINI b a University of Insubria, Dep. of Structural and Functional Biology,
DESIRABILITY OF POPs ACCORDING TO THEIR ATMOSPHERIC MOBILITY The main goal pursued in this work is the formulation of a POP ranking by atmospheric mobility.
TOXICITY MODELLING OF “EEC PRIORITY LIST 1” COMPOUNDS TOXICITY MODELLING OF “EEC PRIORITY LIST 1” COMPOUNDS Council Directive 76/464/EEC of the European.
Martin Waldseemüller's World Map of 1507 Zanjan. Roberto Todeschini Viviana Consonni Davide Ballabio Andrea Mauri Alberto Manganaro chemometrics molecular.
Paola Gramatica, Elena Bonfanti, Manuela Pavan and Federica Consolaro QSAR Research Unit, Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of.
A B S T R A C T The study presents the application of selected chemometric techniques to the pollution monitoring dataset, namely, cluster analysis,
Chemical Reactions in Ideal Gases. Non-reacting ideal gas mixture Consider a binary mixture of molecules of types A and B. The canonical partition function.
Molecular Specification Anan Wu Typical Gaussian Input Molecular specification This input section mainly specifies the nuclear positions.
MACHINE LEARNING 8. Clustering. Motivation Based on E ALPAYDIN 2004 Introduction to Machine Learning © The MIT Press (V1.1) 2  Classification problem:
Organic Chemistry for Nursing students Chapter 1 Introduction into organic chemistry Bonding and isomerism 1.
Virtual Screening C371 Fall INTRODUCTION Virtual screening – Computational or in silico analog of biological screening –Score, rank, and/or filter.
ABSTRACT The behavior and fate of chemicals in the environment is strongly influenced by the inherent properties of the compounds themselves, particularly.
P. Gramatica and F. Consolaro QSAR Research Unit, Dept. of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
QSAR AND CHEMOMETRIC APPROACHES TO THE SCREENING OF POPs FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERSISTENCE AND LONG RANGE TRANSPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERSISTENCE AND LONG.
Organic pollutants environmental fate: modeling and prediction of global persistence by molecular descriptors P.Gramatica, F.Consolaro and M.Pavan QSAR.
Selecting Diverse Sets of Compounds C371 Fall 2004.
Log Koc = MW nNO – 0.19 nHA CIC MAXDP Ts s = 0.35 F 6, 134 = MW: molecular weight nNO: number of NO bonds.
Section 6.1 Atoms and Moles 1.To understand the concept of average mass 2.To learn how counting can be done by weighing 3.To understand atomic mass and.
MUTAGENICITY OF AROMATIC AMINES: MODELLING, PREDICTION AND CLASSIFICATION BY MOLECULAR DESCRIPTORS M.Pavan and P.Gramatica QSAR Research Unit, Dept. of.
P. Gramatica 1, H. Walter 2 and R. Altenburger 2 1 QSAR Research Unit - DBSF - University of Insubria - VARESE - ITALY 2 UFZ Centre for Environmental Research.
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics
Mixture Pure substances REVIEW. Mixtures: 1.Two or more _____________or _____________ NOT chemically combined 2.No reaction between substances. 3.Mixtures.
BEAM Bridging Effect Assessment of Mixtures to ecosystem situations and regulation University of Bremen, Germany University of Göteborg, Sweden University.
Methods of multivariate analysis Ing. Jozef Palkovič, PhD.
Toxicity vs CHEMICAL space
Self-Organizing Network Model (SOM) Session 11
Deep Feedforward Networks
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES MODELLING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS
Hierarchical Classification of Calculated Molecular Descriptors
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Virtual Screening.
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Clustering and Multidimensional Scaling
P. Gramatica1, F. Consolaro1, M. Vighi2, A. Finizio2 and M. Faust3
Elements Element- A pure substance that cannot be broken down into any other substances by ordinary chemical or physical means Elements are pure substances,
Multidimensional Scaling
M.Pavan, P.Gramatica, F.Consolaro, V.Consonni, R.Todeschini
Clustering The process of grouping samples so that the samples are similar within each group.
3.2. SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
Presentation transcript:

F.Consolaro 1, P.Gramatica 1, H.Walter 2 and R.Altenburger 2 1 QSAR Research Unit - DBSF - University of Insubria - VARESE - ITALY 2 UFZ Centre for Environmental Research - LEIPZIG - GERMANY Web: INTRODUCTION Environmental exposure situations are often characterized by a multitude of heterogeneous chemicals with different mechanisms of action and type of effect. The EEC priority List 1 (Council Directive 76/464/EEC) consists of heterogeneous environmental chemicals with mostly unknown or unspecific modes of action, so it was used to select components for mixture experiments in the EEC PREDICT (Prediction and Assessment of the Aquatic Toxicity of Mixtures of Chemicals) project. A list of 202 compounds was studied for structural similarity to identify the most representative and dissimilar chemicals and to find an objective method to group them on the basis of their structural aspects. These chemicals have been then tested for their algal toxicity and the experimental results have been modelled by the already cited molecular descriptors. The comparison with analogous models obtained on congeneric environmental chemicals will be discussed. STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTION OF COMPOUNDS Molecular descriptors represent the way chemical information contained in the molecular structure is transformed and coded. Among the theoretical descriptors, the best known, obtained simply from the knowledge of the formula, are: molecular weight and count descriptors (1D-descriptors, i. e. counting of bonds, atoms of different kind, presence or counting of functional groups and fragments, etc.). Graph-invariant descriptors (2D- descriptors, including both topological and information indices), are obtained from the knowledge of the molecular topology. WHIM molecular descriptors [1] contain information about the whole 3D-molecular structure in terms of size, symmetry and atom distribution. All these indices are calculated from the (x,y,z)-coordinates of a three-dimensional structure of a molecule, usually from a spatial conformation of minimum energy: 37 non- directional (or global) and 66 directional WHIM descriptors are obtained. A complete set of about two hundred molecular descriptors has been obtained [2]. [1] Todeschini R. and Gramatica P.; Quant.Struct.-Act.Relat. 1997, 16, [2] Todeschini R. and Consonni V. - DRAGON - Software for the calculation of the molecular descriptors., Talete srl, Milan (Italy) Download: CHEMOMETRIC METHODS Several chemometric analyses have been applied to the compounds (represented by molecular descriptors) to group the more similar ones, in accordance with a multivariate structural approach, and with the final aim to highlight the structurally most dissimilar compounds. The analyses performed are: Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: hierarchical clustering was performed with the aim of finding clusters of the studied compounds in high dimensional space, using molecular descriptors as variables. Different distance metrics (Euclidean, Manhattan, Pearson) and different linkages (Complete, average, single, etc.) were used and compared to find the best way to cluster these compounds. Principal Component Analysis (PCA): Principal Component Analysis (PCA): this analysis was used to calculate just a few components from a large number of variables. These components allow the highlighting of the distribution of the compounds according to structure, and find the similarity between compounds assigned to the same cluster. Kohonen Maps: Kohonen Maps: this is an additional way of mapping similar compounds by using the so-called “self-organized topological feature maps”, which are maps that preserve the topology of a multidimensional representation within a toroidal two- dimensional representation. The position of the compounds in this map shows the similarity level of the structure of the EEC List 1 compounds. 100 Similarity Dendrogram of hierarchical cluster analysis. Euclidean distance - complete linkage. Variables = first 10 structural principal components Benzene derivatives (2) Chloroaliphatic compounds (7) DDT - PCBs (11) Organo-phosphates (12) Phen.-Triaz. (10) PAH (15) Chlorinated aliphatics (9) 0 These different chemometric approaches have shown that the structurally most dissimilar compounds are: N. Substance Chemical Class 1atrazine Triazine 2biphenyl Aromate 3chloralhydrat Chlorinated aliphatics 42,4,5-trichlorophenol Benzene derivative 5fluoranthene PAH 6lindane HCH 7naphthalene PAH 8parathion Organophosphate 9phoxime Organophosphate 10tributyltin chloride Organotin 11triphenyltin chloride Organotin REGRESSION MODELS QSAR models were developed by Ordinary Least Square regression (OLS) method. The selection of the best subset variables for modelling the algal toxicity of the studied compounds was done by a Genetic Algorithm (GA-VSS) approach and all the calculations have been performed by using the leave-one-out (LOO) and leave-more- out (LMO) procedures and the scrambling of the responses for the validation of the models. R 2 = 78 Q 2 LOO = 62.1 Q 2 LMO = 61.7 SDEP = SDEC = nO is the number of O atoms and IDE is the mean information content on the distance equality. A QSAR model has been obtained, with acceptable fitting properties but without an adequate predictive capability. This is probably due to the presence of structurally dissimilar and with unknown mechanism of action chemicals. HETEROGENEOUS COMPOUNDS CONGENERIC COMPOUNDS (NITROBENZENES) HETEROGENEOUS + CONGENERIC COMPOUNDS R 2 = 93.9 Q 2 LOO = 91.8 Q 2 LMO = 87.5 SDEP = SDEC = CONCLUSIONS The chemometric analyses here applied have been turned up to be very useful in ranking the studied chemicals in according to their structural similarity or dissimilarity. In modelling of structural heterogeneous compounds with unknown mode of action, not very satisfactory QSAR models have been obtained. The role of specific parameters, such as directional WHIMs, capable to describe particular molecular features relevant for explaining the specific mode of action, is always important in QSAR models for congeneric chemicals. Increasing heterogeneity increases the role of structural and topological descriptors, accounting for general molecular features, not related to specific mode of action. nOH is the number of OH groups, Sp is the sum of polarizabilities and Ds is the 3D-WHIM considering the global electrotopological distribution. The information explained by these descriptors are related to the electronic distribution of the molecular atoms and are more specific in respect to the mode of action than the selected descriptors in the heterogeneous set models. The quality of this model is very satisfactory both in fitting and in prediction. nO is the number of O atoms, IDDM is the mean information content on the distance degree magnitude while E1e is a directional 3D-WHIM descriptor of atomic distribution weighted on the electronegativity. Here are selected a topological descriptor (IDDM) that probably represents the heterogeneous compounds and a 3D- WHIM descriptor (E1e) that probably represents the homogeneous compounds. The performances of this model are satisfactory, considering that the data set is composed by structurally different compounds and that for many of them the mechanism of action is unknown. R 2 = 77 Q 2 LOO = 69.7 Q 2 LMO = 69.7 SDEP = SDEC = RANKING OF “EEC PRIORITY LIST 1” FOR STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY AND MODELLING OF ALGAL TOXICITY