Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 4 divisions: No. 1 operator worldwide No. 1 private operator No. 1 in Europe for energy services Veolia Environnement Global leader in environmental.
Advertisements

Scott Reinert , P.E. Water Resources Manager El Paso Water Utilities
Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE
This presentation is an abbreviated version of the original PowerPoint presentation of June 23, This version was presented at the Commissioners’
The Maritime Alliance “Promoting the Maritime Community” Symposium on Desalination and Related opportunities Terry D. Smith Toray Membrane USA.
Topic 4 Financing Strategies. Topic 4: Financing Strategies Learning Objectives – (a) Analyze the various sources of borrowing available to a client and.
Membrane Applications in Water Treatment
CarolloPaperTemplateWithLogo.pptx/ Affordable Desalination Collaboration Findings Related to Regulatory Criteria, Process and Costs for Seawater Desalination.
UNRESTRICTED Financing of Nuclear Power Ala Alizadeh Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Nuclear Infrastructure Milestones Workshop November 2007 IAEA - Vienna.
Presented by: Kevin J. Spencer, P.G. R.W. Harden and Associates, Inc. Benefits and Challenges of Developing Brackish Groundwater Supplies WATER Supply.
Carlsbad Desalination Project
Solutions for Flaring & Venting CNG Marine Transportation
 Fifth Third Bank | All Rights Reserved Vessel Financing Choices for Ferry Operators.
Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE
1 South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination (SOCOD) Project, Ocean Desalination Costs and Recent Public Opinions November 2011 Status Update Karl Seckel,
Seawater Desalination and Water Supply Reliability in Marin County Louis Armstrong, URS Corporation.
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Steven P Janes Sherrards Solicitors London UK CASE STUDIES:
U.S Conference of Mayors August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
Eric S. Petersen Partner Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP New York, NY United States Conference of Mayors Mayors Water Council Meeting Washington,
Volvo Group North America, LLC Reuse of Wastewater - A Manufacturer’s Experience Steve Pierett, Env.Mgr. CEM, CRM, CP EnMS-Industrial.
Val S. Frenkel, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE.
Corporate 2012 MSSC Annual Salinity Summit Desalination Experience in Israel Presenter Name: Fredi Lokiec – EVP Special Projects 27 January 2012.
LBWD’s Prototype-Scale Testing of NF Membranes for Seawater Desalination Robert C. Cheng, Tai J. Tseng, Kevin L. Wattier February 17, 2011 MSSC National.
Lay-out of Proposed Scheme. Positives – Well located for integration into both NMBM Potable and Industrial supply infrastructure Can supplement either.
Water for Monterey County Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Description 1 Lyndel Melton, P.E. RMC Water and Environment.
Economic challenges of wastewater treatment and use in agriculture Javier Mateo-Sagasta, FAO Pay Drechsel, IWMI.
DESALINATION “…Water, water, everywhere, Nor any drop to drink.” The Rime of the Ancient Mariner - Samuel Taylor Coleridge Shane Walker CE Transboundary.
Nizar Kammourie General Manager SAWACO Water Desalination
FOR SIXTY YEARS WE HAVE BEEN TAKING THE POWER FROM WATER AND HANDING IT OVER TO NATIONS LINKING THE DOTS Bucharest, February 20, 2014.
July 2007 AMTA Event Type “Theme” Location - Date Improving America’s Water Through Membrane Filtration & Desalting America’s Authority in Membrane Technology.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Group 7: DESALINATION - A SUSTAINABLE OPTION? By: Matthew Harvey ( ); Richard Lea ( ); Callum Kerr ( );
Desalination Becomes A Reality In Tampa Bay Florida Jim Jensen Senior Project Manager PB Water Area Manager Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.
Infrastructure management system Managers and engineers need clear guidelines for life-cycle management of infrastructure systems for water, sewer, and.
1 Kansas Wind Energy A Municipal Utility Perspective KANSAS CITY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Blake Elliott – Director Electric Supply Planning September.
Texas Innovative Water 2010 Kevin Morrison, P.G. Project Coordinator / Water Resources What has SAWS Learned about Concentrate Disposal Options for Inland.
Economic challenges of wastewater treatment and use in agriculture Javier Mateo-Sagasta, FAO Pay Drechsel, IWMI.
1 Update Ocean Desalination Feasibility Studies Karl Seckel Assistant General Manager.
South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination (SOCOD) Project Dana Point/Doheny Beach, California November 2010 Status.
WSSB Capacity Enhancement Workshop1.  Definition: Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are a form of legally enforceable contracts between the public and.
Considerations for Brackish Groundwater Use as a Water Supply for Small Water Systems and Municipalities Eddie C. Livingston, MSCE, P.E. Livingston Associates,
1 Agnes Water / 1770 Integrated Water Project. 2 United Utilities Australia Carmine Ciccocioppo State Manager - Queensland United Utilities Australia.
Texas Innovation Water 2010 Seawater Desalination What is the benefit to the State from implementing the Brownsville Seawater Demonstration Project?
Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
 Project Capacity: 54 MGD  Water Purchase Agreement: 30-year take-if-delivered contract with San Diego County Water Authority for water purchase of.
MSSC 2011 Annual Salinity Summit February 17 – 18, 2011 Thirty Years of Success in Implementing Desalination By Roger K. Noack, P.E. HDR Engineering, Inc.
The Ethics of Desalination M.Flood E.Herman M.Stoughton.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
December 10, 2009 TOWN OF PALM BEACH WATER COMMITTEE Discussion of Water Plant Options.
Welcome Mr. Chwan-Chyuan WANG Engineer of Nothern Water Resources Office MOEA Taiwan.
Chapter 6 Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration
Desalination for Drinking Water Purposes TCEQ Trade Fair David A. Williams, P.E Robert W. Sims, P.E. Austin, Texas May, 2016.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Industrial Water Efficiency & Zero Liquid Discharge
1 Highland Water District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
Overview of Desalination Trends and Jaffna Project
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
1 | emwd.org Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR) Public Outreach and Preliminary Design Services Joe Mouawad, P.E. and Jolene Walsh August 11, 2016.
Recycled Water Project Basis of Design Report
Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE
Green Strategies for Desalination to Meet Future Potable Water Supply Needs while Minimizing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Cooperative Geological and Engineering.
Engineered Water Treatment Solutions
«Water Sector Reform in Kenya »
Seawater Desalination
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
Presentation transcript:

Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE International Training Program   1-4 February 2011 Lordos Beach Hotel Larnaca, Cyprus Day 2: Reverse Osmosis Desalination Systems – Design & Costs 15:30-16:30 Desalination Costs Nikolay Voutchkov, PE, BCEE Water Globe Consulting

Desalination Project Costs Key Components and Factors Construction Costs O&M Costs Total Cost of Water Production Methods to Minimize Costs TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Desalination Cost Components Capital Costs: Construction (Direct or “Hard”) Capital Costs; Indirect (“Soft”) Capital Costs. Operation & Maintenance Costs: Variable; Fixed. Cost of Water: Annualized Capital Costs; O&M Costs. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 3

Seawater Desalination Plant – Construction Costs RO System – 40 % to 60 % of Construction Costs Pretreatment – 15% to 20 % of Construction costs Discharge – 5 to 15 % of Construction Costs Intake – 5 to 20 % of Construction Costs TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 4

Indirect (Soft) Costs – 15 to 50 % of Total Capital Costs Cost Item % of Total Capital Costs Project Engineering 5.0 – 12.5 % Project Development 2.0 – 10.0 % Project Financing 3.0 – 17.5 % Contingency 5.0 – 10.0 % Total 15 – 50 % TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 5

Indirect Capital Cost Comparison Conventional Water Treatment Plant: Indirect Costs - 15 to 25 % of Capital Costs; Seawater Desalination Plant: Indirect Costs - 15 to 50 % of Capital Costs. Where Does the Difference Comes from? – Cost of Project Related Risks (Intake and Source Water Quality; Permitting; Technology; Reliability, etc.). This Difference Helps Understand Why Majority of the Large SRWO Projects Worldwide are Mainly Completed Under BOOT Delivery! TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 6

Intake Construction Costs – Key Factors Very Dependent on Source Water Quality Usually Between US$50 and 100/m³/day Beach Well Intakes Usually Less Costly Horizontal and Slant Wells Comparable to Open Intakes Infiltration Galleries Often are More Expensive than Open Intakes TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Open Intakes Construction Costs TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Well Intakes Construction Costs TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Pretreatment Construction Costs Very Dependent on Source Water Quality & Type of Treatment Technologies Usually Between US$100 and 300/m³/day High Quality Well Water Sources Require Only Cartridge Filtration (Low Cost Pretreatment) Single-stage Granular Media Filtration Usually is Less Costly than Membrane Pretreatment TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Seawater Pretreatment Construction Costs SWRO Plant BWRO Plants w/ Sallow & Deep Wells TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

SWRO System Construction Costs Dependent on Source Water Quality & Target Product Water Quality Usually Between US$300 and 1,000/m³/day Single-stage/Single Pass SWRO System is Least Costly Additional Costs for Two-Pass/Two-Stage RO System May Vary Between 15 and 30 % of the These of Single Pass/Single Stage SWRO System TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Costs of Key RO System Components Construction Cost (US$/item) 8-inch SWRO Membrane Element US$450 –US$600/element 8-inch SWRO Pressure Vessel US$4,000 - US$6,000/vessel RO Train Piping US$200,000 – US$600,000 /RO Train RO Train Support Frame US$150,000-US$400,000/RO Train RO Train Instrumentation & Controls US$20,000 – US$90,000/RO Train High Pressure Pumps US$150,000 – US$800,000/RO Train TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Post-treatment Construction Costs Dependent on Target Water Quality: Hardness Alkalinity pH Need for Addition of Corrosion Inhibitors Type of Disinfection Need for Addition of Fluoride & Magnesium in the Drinking Water Usually Between US$20 and 50/m³/day TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Post-treatment Construction Costs TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Concentrate Disposal Construction Costs Disposal Method Construction Cost (US$ Million/ML/d) New Outfall w/Diffusers 0.50 – 1.50 Power Plant Outfall 0.05 – 0.15 Sanitary Sewer 0.03 – 0.10 WWTP Outfall 0.08 – 0.45 Deep Well Injection 0.65 – 1.65 Evaporation Ponds 0.75 – 2.50 Zero-Liquid Discharge 3.50 – 7.50

Key Capital Cost Components – 40,000 m3/day Plant w/ Low-Cost Intake & Outfall Cost Item Cost (US$) % of Total Intake 2.76 MM 4.8 % Pretreatment 4.64 MM 8.0 % RO System Equipment 18.56 MM 32.0 % Post Treatment 1.16 MM 2.0 % Concentrate Disposal 1.45 MM 2.5 % Buildings 1.74 MM 3.0 % Waste and Solids Handling 0.87 MM 1.5 % Electrical & Instrumentation 1.30 MM 2.2 % Other Items 2.90 MM 5.0 % Total Construction (Direct) Costs 35.38 MM 61 % Engineering Services 5.80 MM 10.0% Development, Financing & Contingency 16.82 MM 29 % TOTAL $58.0 MM 100 % TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Capital Costs and Plant Size TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Annual O&M Cost Breakdown Cost Item Range (% of Total O&M Costs) Variable O&M Costs 50.5 – 85.0% Fixed O&M Costs 15.0 – 49.5% Total 100 % TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 19

Variable O&M Costs Cost Item (% of Total O&M Costs) Power 35.0 – 58.0 % Chemicals 5.5 – 9.0 % Membranes & Cartridges 6.5 – 11.0 % Waste Stream Disposal 3.5 – 7.0 % Total 50.5 – 85 % TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 20

Fixed O&M Costs Cost Item (% of Total O&M Costs) Labor 4.0 – 11.0 % Maintenance 3.0 – 13.0 % Environmental & Performance Monitoring 1.0 – 5.0 % Indirect O&M Costs 7.0 – 20.5 % Total 15.0 – 49.5 % TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 21

Indirect O&M Costs – 7 to 20.5 % of Total Costs Administrative Costs; Operations Insurance; O&M Reserve Funds Required by Investor (Project Risks); Contingency; Staff Training and Professional Development; Operator Fees. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 22

O&M Costs & Cost of Water 40,000 m3/day Plant w/ Low-Cost Intake & Outfall Cost Item Cost (US$/yr) % of Total Energy 3.24 MM/yr 55.5 % Chemicals 0.35 MM/yr 6.0 % Replacement of RO Membranes & Cartridge Filters 0.62 MM/yr 10.6 % Waste Stream Disposal 0.26 MM/yr 4.4 % Total Variable Costs 4.47 MM/yr 76.5 % Labor 0.33 MM/yr 5.7% Maintenance 0.38 MM/yr 6.5 % Environmental & Performance Monitoring 0.09 MM/yr 1.5 % Other O&M Costs 0.57 MM/yr 9.8 % Total Fixed Costs 1.37 MM/yr 23.5% TOTAL ANNUAL O&M COSTS $5.84 MM/yr 100 % Annual O&M Costs = US$5.84 MM/(40,000 m³/dayx365 days) = US$0.40/m³ TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Cost of Water 40,000 m3/day Plant w/ Low-Cost Intake & Outfall Annual O&M Costs = US$5.84 MM/yr ($0.40/m³) Capital Costs, Cap = US$58 MM Capital Cost Recovery Factor, CRF = [(1+i)ᵐ - 1] / [ix(1+i)ᵐ] Where: m – period of repayment of capital expenditures; i – interest rate of capital For example, for m = 20 years & i = 5% CRF = [(1+0.05)²º - 1] / [0.05 (1+0.05)²º] = 12.462 Annualized Capital Costs = Cap/(CRF x Qp x 365 d) = US$58 MM/(12.462 x 40,000m³/d x 365 d) = $0.32/m³ Cost of Water = $0.40 + $0.32 = $0.72/m³ TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Cost Comparison of 100 ML/d SWRO Plant with Conventional and Membrane Pretreatment TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Comparison of O&M costs and Costs of Water Production – 100 ML/d SWRO Plant Conventional Pretreatment Membrane Pretreatment TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Cost of Water Production TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 27

Cost of Water of Recent Desalination Projects TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Costs of Recent US SWRO Projects Status Capital Cost (US$) Annual O&M Cost (US$/kgal) Cost of Water (US$/kgal) 0.6 MGD Sand City, CA In Operation since 2010 US$11.9 MM US$1.15/kgal US$2.91/kgal 25 MGD Tampa Bay, FL In Operation since 2008 US$138 MM US$1.54/kgal US$3.48/kgal 50 MGD Carlsbad, CA In Financing US$350 MM US$1.75/kgal US$4.00/kgal 2.5 MGD Santa Cruz, CA In Planning US$59-64 MM US$3.94/kgal US$7.6-8.0/kgal Brownsville Demo Project, TX US$22.5 MM US$2.80/kgal US$4.38/kgal 25 MGD-80 MGD Coquina Coast, FL US$180 MM -US$560 MM US$1.99/kgal US$4.47/kgal (US$5.35-US$6.10 w/ conveyance) TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Key Factors Affecting Costs Source Water Quality - TDS, Temperature, Solids, Silt and Organics Content. Product Water Quality – TDS, Boron, Bromides, Disinfection Compatibility. Concentrate Disposal Method; Power Supply & Unit Power Costs; Project Risk Profile; Project Delivery Method & Financing; Other Factors: Intake and Discharge System Type; Pretreatment & RO System Design; Plant Capacity Availability Target. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 30

Source Water Quality & Costs Water Source (TDS, ppt /Temperature, ºC) Construction Costs O&M Costs Cost of Water Pacific/Atlantic Ocean (33.5 ppt /18 ºC) 1.00 Caribbean (36 ppt /26 ºC) 1.04-1.35 1.02-1.10 1.03-1.22 Mediterranean (38 ppt /24 ºC) 1.06-1.40 1.04-1.15 1.05-1.28 Gulf of Oman/Indian Ocean (40 ppt /30 ºC) 1.15-1.50 1.10-1.25 1.12-1.38 Red Sea (41 ppt /28 ºC) 1.18-1.55 1.12-1.28 1.15-1.42 Arabian Gulf (45 ppt /26 ºC) 1.25-1.60 1.15-1.33 1.20-1.48 TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Product Water Quality & Costs Target WQ Constr. Costs O&M Costs Cost of Water TDS/Cl = 500/250 mg/L; Boron = 1 mg/L. 1.0 TDS/Cl = 250/100 mg/L; Boron = 0.75 mg/L. 1.15-1.25 1.05-1.10 1.10-1.18 TDS/Cl = 100/50 mg/L; Boron = 0.5 mg/L. 1.27-1.38 1.18-1.25 1.23-1.32 TDS/Cl = 30/10 mg/L; Boron = 0.3 mg/L. 1.40-1.55 1.32-1.45 1.36-1.50 TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 32

Key Project Risks and Costs Permitting Risks – Very High for Large Plants; Source Water Risks – High for Most Large Plants; Technology Risks – High, Especially for New Technologies with Limited Track Record; Operational Risks – High – Experienced Operator Needed; Desalinated Water Demand Risks – High When Cost of Desalinated Water Significantly Higher than That of Existing Supplies; Power Supply & Entitlement Risks – Moderate; Regulatory Risks – Moderate; Construction Risks – High – Limited Experience; Financial Risks – High. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 33

Project Financing Alternatives Government Financing: Key Advantage - Lowest Cost for the Final User; Key Disadvantages – Scarce & Limited. Bonds and Construction Loans: Key Advantage – Low Cost Funds (3 to 8 % rate); Key Disadvantages – Limited by the Credit Capacity of the Water Agency & Complex Approval Process. Private Project Finance: Key Advantage – Utility Responsible to Pay for Services & Borrowing Capacity Not Impacted; Key Disadvantages – Usually More Expensive for Small and Low-Risk Projects. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 34

Project Delivery Alternatives Design-Bid-Build (DBB): Key Benefit - Utility Owns All Assets; Key Disadvantages – Utility Takes All Risks and Reduces Borrowing Capacity. Design-Build-Operate (DBO)/”Alliance”: Key Benefit – Utility Owns All Assets; Key Disadvantages – Utility Shares Some Construction & Operations Risks and Reduces Borrowing Capacity. Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT): Key Benefit – Utility Transfers Most Risks to Private Sector and Only Pays for Water it Receives; Key Disadvantages – Utility Does Not Own the Assets. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 35

Risk Allocation Profiles for BOOT & Alliance (DBO) Project Delivery Type of Project Risk BOOT Alliance/DBO Permitting Private Public Source Water Shared Technology Operations Water Demand Public (Take or Pay – Private Equity at Risk) Power Supply Construction Financial TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 36

Worldwide the Lowest Cost of Desalinated Seawater Has Been Delivered Under BOO/BOOT Contracts! TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 37

Largest SWRO Desalination Projects Worldwide SWRO Plant Cost of Water (US$/m³) Power Use (kWh/m³) & TDS Ashkelon, Israel – 330 ML/d (Largest in The World) – BOOT 0.53 3.8 (40 ppt) Point Lisas, Trinidad – 130 ML/d (Largest in The Americas) - BOOT 0.72 4.8 (38 ppt) Tuas, Singapore – 136 ML/d (Largest in Asia) - BOOT 0.48 4.3 (33 ppt) Barcelona, Spain – 200 ML/d (Largest in Europe) BD+O 1.16 4.4 Fujariah, UAE – 170 ML/d (Largest in the Middle East) - BOOT 0.90 4.5 (38.5 ppt) Sydney, Australia – 250 ML/d (Largest in Australia) – DBO (Alliance) 2.29 4.2 (36 ppt) TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 38

Year 2004/09 The Five Lowest Cost SWRO Project Bids Worldwide SWRO Plant Cost of Water (US$/m³) Power Use (kWh/m³) & TDS Sorek, Israel – 411 ML/d BOO (startup – 2014) 0.53 3.7 (40 ppt) Mactaa, Algeria – 500 ML/d BOOT (startup – 2013) 0.56 Hadera, Israel – 330 ML/d BOO/co-located (startup – 2009) 0.60 Cap Djinet, Algeria – 100 ML/d BOO (startup – 2010) 0.72 4.0 (38 ppt) Carlsbad, USA – 189 ML/d BOO co-located (startup – 2012) 0.74 2.9 (33.5 ppt) TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 39

What All Recent BOOT Projects Have in Common? All Yielded the Lowest Costs and Power Use of Desalinated Water in Their Respective Markets; Plant Performance & Permitting Risks Reside with the Private Sector; Debt Repayment is Private Sector Obligation; Private Sector Only Gets Paid for Delivering Product Desalinated Water; Public Utility Can Buy Out (Transfer) Project Ownership Once Plant Has Proven Its Long-term Performance. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 40

Ashkelon – Lowest Cost of Water Worldwide – How Did They Do It? TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 41

Ashkelon – How Did They Do It? Low Cost Conventional Pretreatment – Single Stage Dual Media Filters; Large Size (20-micron) Cartridge Filters; Three-Center RO Design w/ Pressure Exchangers: Low Cost Post-Treatment – Calcite Filters & Blending; Self-Power Generation – 80 MW Gas Generators and Purchase of Rights to Gas Field Use; Discharge Collocation with Power Plant in Well Mixed Tidally Influenced Zone – No Need for Outfall. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 42

Sydney and Huntington Beach Desal Plant Construction Costs 250 ML/d Huntington Beach 189 ML/d/(250 ML/d) US$ Desalination Plant 492 310 (410) Intake and Outfall 230 16 (21) Delivery 557 110 (146) Project Costs 260 61 (81) Total Capital Costs 1,539 497 (658) Note: Sydney Costs Source – WDR - July 2007 TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 43

Perth & Sydney SWRO Plants Cost Breakdowns   Perth Sydney Capacity (ML/d) 125 250 Distance from intake (km) < 1 4.5 Distance to delivery (miles) 26.2 14.3 Total Capital Cost ($M) $325 $1,539 Total Capital Cost – Desal Plant ($M) $281 $982 Total Capital Cost - Delivery ($M) $44 $557 Annualized Capital Cost ($M/yr) $25 $120 Total Annual O&M Costs ($M/yr) $17 $46 Annual O&M Cost – Desal Plant ($M/yr) $16 $42 Annual O&M Cost – Delivery ($M/yr) $1 $4 Cost of Water – Capital Component ($/m3) $0.70 $1.65 Cost of Water – O&M Component ($/m3) $0.44 $0.58 Cost of Water – Delivery Component ($/m3) $0.02 $0.06 Total Water Cost, $/m3 $1.16 $2.29 adapted from Waterlines:NWC Australia

Be Careful When Comparing Costs! Projects Differ By: Source Water Salinity and Temperature; Product Water Quality; Unit Cost of Construction, Labor and Permitting; Cost of Capital; Unit Cost of Power; Source of Equipment Supply; Project Completion Schedule. Projects Have to Be Normalized for These and Other Factors for Accurate Comparison. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 45

Typical Cost and Energy Ranges (Medium & Large SWRO Plants) Classification Cost of Water Production (US$/kgal) SWRO System Energy Use (US$/kgal) Low-End Bracket 2.0 - 3.0 9.5 – 10.5 Medium Range 3.5 – 5.0 11.0 - 12.0 High-End Bracket 6.5 - 11.5 12.5 – 14.0 Average 4.0 11.5

Common Features of Low-Cost Desalination Projects Low Cost HDPE Open Intakes or Beach Wells; Near-Shore/On-Shore Discharges w/o Diffuser Systems or Co-discharge w/ Power Plant of WWTP Outfalls; Point of Product Water Delivery within 5 Miles of Desalination Plant Site; RO System Design w/ Feed of Multiple Trains by Common High Pressure Pumps and Energy Recovery Systems; Turnkey (BOOT, BOO) Method of Project Delivery.

Key Reasons for Cost Disparity Between High-End & Low-end Cost Projects (US$2.0 – 3.0 vs. US$6.5-11.5/kgal) Desalination Site Location (NIMBI vs. Science Driven) Costly Plants Have Overly Long Product Water Delivery Pipelines 120 MGD Melbourne Plant – Cost of Plant/Delivery + Power Supply Systems = US$1.7 BB/1.1 BB (50 miles) 66 MGD Sydney SWRO Plant – Cost of Plant/Delivery System = US$560 MM/US$490 MM (10 miles of underground tunnel under Botany Bay). Environmental Considerations Complex Intakes & Diffuser Systems Phasing Strategy Intake and Discharge System Capacity; Pretreatment & RO System Design; Labor Market Pressures Method of Project Delivery & Risk Allocation TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 48

Where Future Cost Savings Will Come From? TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 49

Main Areas Expected to Yield Cost Savings in the Next 5 Years (20 % Cost Reduction Target) Improvements in Membrane Element Productivity: - Polymetric Membranes (Incorporation of Nano-particles Into Membrane Polymer Matrix) – CSIRO & UCLA; - Larger Membrane RO Elements (16” Diameter or Higher). Increased Membrane Useful Life and Reduced Fouling: - Smoother Membrane Surface – Carbon Nanotube Membranes – CSRO & University of Texas (Austin). - Increased Membrane Material Longevity; - Use of Systems for Continuous RO Membrane Cleaning; - UF/MF Membrane Pretreatment. Commercial Forward Osmosis Systems; Co-Location With Power Plants; Regional Desalination and Concentrate Disposal; Larger RO Trains and Equipment; Full Automation of All Treatment Processes. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 50

Nano-Structured SWRO Membranes TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

Potential to Reduce 60 to 80 % of Energy Costs & 15 to 25 % of Cost of Water OASYS TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 52

Research Directions to Meet the Long-Term 80 % Cost Reduction Goal Improve Membrane Useful Life and Productivity; Develop Corrosion Resistant Non-Metallic Materials to Replace High-Quality/High Cost Stainless Steel RO Piping; Reduce Pretreatment Costs; Develop New-Generation Energy Recovery Systems; Introduce Low-Cost Technologies for Beneficial Concentrate Use and Disposal; Explore New Technologies for Seawater Desalination Different from RO and Thermal Evaporation. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 53

Aquaporine-Based Desalination TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)

“The Best” of Seawater Desalination Present Status & Future Forecasts Parameter Today Within 5 Years Within 20 Years Cost of Water (US$/m³) US$0.6-0.8 US$0.5-0.6 US$0.1-0.2 Construction Cost (Million US$/ML) 1.2-2.4 1.0-2.0 0.5-1.0 Power Use (kWh/m³) 2.8-4.0 2.5-3.5 2.0-2.5 Membrane Productivity (gallons/day/membrane) 5,000-12,000 8,000-15,000 20,000-40,000 Membrane Useful Life (years) 5-7 7-10 10-15 Plant Recovery Ratio (%) 45-50 50-55 55-65 TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 55

Concluding Remarks The Ocean Will Become One of the Key Sources of Reliable and Draught-Proof Coastal Water Supply in the Next 10 to 20 Years; Large-scale Seawater Desalination is Economical Today and Will Become Even More Cost-Competitive in the Future; The Future of Seawater Desalination Is Bright – 20% Cost of Water Reduction in the Next 5 Years; Long-term Investment In Research and Development Has the Potential to Reduce the Cost of Desalinated Water by 80 % In the Next 20 Years. TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com) 56

Seawater Desalination Costs Questions? TechnoBiz Training Program (www.technobiz-asia.com)