Presentation to the Child Care Commission November 17, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JACK OCONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Draft for Advisory Committee discussion on Californias Early Learning Quality Improvement.
Advertisements

1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
Invest in Children Child Care Quality Fund: Accreditation and Literacy
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 Inclusive Classrooms and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding April 2, 2012.
1 Increasing Access to Higher Education for Early Educators with Limited English Proficiency.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.
Massachusetts Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) December 2009.
The Massachusetts Child Care Quality Cost Model Anne MitchellAndrew Brodsky Presentation to the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care September.
Quality Rating & Improvement Systems Powerful Policy for Improving and Unifying Early Care and Education Anne Mitchell Early Childhood Policy Research.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
Tennessee Child Care Evaluation Program
BIRTH THROUGH 3 RD GRADE (B3) KCUSD Implementation.
Picture here “ Commitment to Quality Education for All ”
LearningGames and Early Childhood Curriculum Connecting Center-Based and Home Learning Using a Comprehensive Curriculum Hilary Parrish Product Development.
1 Nebraska’s Pathway to Early Learning Guidelines.
Stanislaus County CARES Plus Information Session.
OREGON EARLY LEARNING SYSTEM UPDATE Government to Government Meeting September 19, 2013 PRESENTED BY +MEGAN IRWIN [Early Learning System Design Manager]
A Quality Rating System
Going from Good to Great: Promoting Provider Participation in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) and Accreditation Programs Track: Child Care.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
TWC Child Care Services. » The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) is the Lead Agency for the federal Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) » TWC delegates.
Family Child Care Quality: Implications for Children with Disabilities Michael Gamel-McCormick Center for Disabilities Studies University of Delaware Annual.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
The Revised Strengthening Families Self-Assessments: What’s Different?
Childcare Quality and Early Learning Gail E. Joseph, Ph. D
Colorado Shines CCAP Pilot Readiness Assessments
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
Wisconsin’s Read to Lead Initiative NGA Building State Systems.
Points & Rating System Recommendations May 2012 Prepared by Samuel A. Stephens Center for Assessment and Policy Development 1.
Components of Quality Program Assessment Tools.  “Inclusion has legal status in legislation mandating educational services for all children with disabilities.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
GEORGIA’S PRE-K PROGRAM Bright from the Start: Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning Marsha H. Moore, Commissioner.
2012 Implementation: A QUALITYstarsNY Recruitment Session.
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Child Care Basics Module 3.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
1 QUALITYstarsNY Field Test Community Information Session 2010 WELCOME!
A Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) for Early Care and Education Settings.
Collaborative Assessment Tool.  Overview of the CAT ◦ History of CAT ◦ Purpose of CAT  Structure of the CAT ◦ Reflective Practice ◦ The Process ◦ Documentation.
1 Quality of Play: Progress and Challenges. 2 Introduction Key Sure Start objective: Improving the ability to learn Core Sure Start service: Support for.
North Carolina Division of Child Development The Road to NC’s Star Rated License Lorie Pugh Policy and Planning Consultant Regulatory Services Section.
1 Massachusetts’ Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Responses to Public Input on Standards.
EDU 262 NC Star Rated Licensing. History In September 2000, the Division issued star rated licenses to all eligible Child Care Centers and Family Child.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
EEC Board Preliminary Recommendations Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
1 Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment. Common Core Pre-K Standards Mounting evidence supports that a child’s earliest years, from birth to age eight,
Participation, Pathways, and Supports for Infants and Toddlers.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 13 Using Program Assessments to Look at Children in Groups “Pointing the finger of blame at others.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
1 Massachusetts’ Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS): Overview and Update.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Collaboration Between 619 and Delaware Stars Verna Thompson and Rena Hallam.
Trends in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems September 2013.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
Improving Teaching Quality in Kindergarten: The impact of a Coaching Initiative February 19, 2016 Presentation to Eastern Education Research Association.
Indiana Paths to QUALITY™ Child Care Quality Rating and Improvement System: Outcomes for Children and Child Care Providers James Elicker, Zachary Gold,
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Current Activities to Support Dual Language Learners and Early Education and Care and Out of School Time Staff October 2010.
STEM Innovative Curriculum in Preschool Programs
New Prospect Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to the Child Care Commission November 17, 2015

Validation Study Sample Programs in the Sample Child Care Centers: 163 Family Child Care Homes: 52 Classrooms Participating in Assessments 169 Preschool Classrooms 134 Toddler/Infant Classrooms Children Participating in Child-Outcomes Study N= 738 (of this 42 are Spanish-speaking children) Collecting child outcome data on 3-5 year old children only 2

Child Outcome Measures Social-Emotional Skills Teacher-Child Rating Scale Language & Literacy Skills (English) Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Achievement Subscales: 1.Letter Word 2.Picture Vocabulary Language & Literacy Skills (Spanish) Bateria-III Subscales: 1.Letter Word 2.Picture Vocabulary Math Skills (English or Spanish) Applied Problems Subscale of either Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Achievement or Bateria-III Executive Function Head, Toes, Knees, Shoulders Pencil Tap measures 3

EQuIPS in FCCH Measurement design more FCCH-friendly Focus on interactions with children, family partnerships Less focus on materials FCCH-specific design features Attempting to capture uniqueness of FCCHs Mixed age groupings and interactions Family connections FCCH-tailored interview questions Allow providers to highlight program strengths Opportunities to explain interactions, practices 4

Presentation to the Child Care Commission November 17, 2015

Background and History Current QRIS was over a decade old Over 8000 programs participating in QRIS (2010) Convened a cross-sector advisory committee Reviewed aver 300 recommendations Suggested a hybrid system 6

Considerations Addressed in Recommendations for Overall Structure Majority of programs are at the 3 Star level or higher Variation between programs that are rated at the same Star level Provider choice in how requirements are met is important Need a mechanism to recognize providers who are exceeding requirements and providing higher quality care 7

Components of the Recommended Hybrid System Core requirements met by everyone at every level Block requirements (every other level) Program and environment Ratios and group size Education and professional development Points Block points Specialization points 8

Conceptual Framework for QRIS Program & Environment Ratios & Group Size Education & Professional Development POLICIES Admin Practices, Family Engagement, Cultural Responsiveness, Inclusion, PD Plans SPACE, SAFETY, COMPLIANCE, etc. Block Requirements (increase with levels) Core Requirements (maintained at all levels) 1 st Level (Basic Licensing Requirements)

Conceptual Framework for QRIS Program & Environment Ratios & Group Size Education & PD POLICIES Admin Practices, Family Engagement,Cultural Responsiveness, Inclusion, PD Plans SPACE, SAFETY, COMPLIANCE, etc. 1 st Level Block Requirements (increase with levels) Core Requirements (maintained at all levels) Basic Licensing Requirements 2 nd Level Specialization Could Include CSEFEL Infant Toddler School Age STEM The Arts ETC. All requirements of Level 1, plus points that lead toward the Level 3 standards. Points must be earned in at least 2 of these 4 categories (Program & Environment; Ratios & Group Size; Education & PD; Specialization)

Conceptual Framework for QRIS Program & Environment Ratios & Group Size Education & PD POLICIES Admin Practices, Family Engagement,Cultural Responsiveness, Inclusion, PD Plans SPACE, SAFETY, COMPLIANCE, etc. 1 st Level Block Requirements (increase with levels) Core Requirements (maintained at all levels) Basic Licensing Requirements 2 nd Level Specialization Could Include CSEFEL Infant Toddler School Age STEM The Arts ETC. All requirements of Level 1, plus points that lead toward the Level 3 standards. Points must be earned in at least 2 of these 4 categories (Program & Environment; Ratios & Group Size; Education & PD; Specialization) 3 rd Level* Program & Environment Ratios & Group Size Ed/ PD Requirements in P&E, Ratios/Group Size, Ed/PD, PLUS Specialization * ERS or other quality measure required at this level. Also, it is expected that program accreditation will be added to the model during the pilot phase, most likely at levels 3-5.

Conceptual Framework for QRIS Program & Environment Ratios & Group Size Education & PD POLICIES Admin Practices, Family Engagement, Cultural Responsiveness, Inclusion, PD Plans SPACE, SAFETY, COMPLIANCE, etc. 1 st Level Block Requirements (increase with levels) Core Requirements (maintained at all levels) Basic Licensing Requirements 2 nd Level Specialization Could Include CSEFEL Infant Toddler School Age STEM The Arts ETC. All requirements of Level 1, plus points that lead toward the Level 3 standards. Points must be earned in at least 2 of these 4 categories (Program & Environment; Ratios & Group Size; Education & PD; Specialization) 3 rd Level* Program & Environment Ratios & Group Size Ed/ PD 4 th Level* All requirements of Level 3, plus points that lead toward the Level 5 standards. Points must be earned in at least 2 of these 4 categories (Program & Environment; Ratios & Group Size; Education & PD; Specialization) Potential Programs of Distinction at the 4 th and 5 th Levels 5 th Level* Program & Environment Ratios & Group Size Ed/ PD Requirements in P&E, Ratios/Group Size, Ed/PD, PLUS Specialization * ERS or other quality measure required at this level. Also, it is expected that program accreditation will be added to the model during the pilot phase, most likely at levels

Recommendations for Implementation Work with partners to evaluate, prioritize, disseminate, and implement the recommendations Collect additional input/feedback on the recommendations Conduct a pilot/validation study to collect data that will inform decisions about future requirements (ELC) Develop a plan for transitioning to a new structure and implementing additional recommendations 13