 Six designs (OR25, OR26, OR27, OR28, OR29, OR30) for 2D [ 1 H, 15 N] HSQC screening  OR28 for structure determination Gaohua Liu 1, Nobuyasu Koga 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Site Prediction Selects Correct Protein Models Vijayalakshmi Chelliah Division of Mathematical Biology National Institute.
Advertisements

3D Molecular Structures C371 Fall Morgan Algorithm (Leach & Gillet, p. 8)
Protein Structure Prediction using ROSETTA
Update on PDB Data Deposition Specifications
Using two recently-developed molecular dynamics protocols for protein folding Timothy H. Click Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Oklahoma.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction
Structural Genomics – an example of transdisciplinary research at Stanford Goal of structural and functional genomics is to determine and analyze all possible.
Structural bioinformatics
Computer Simulation in Plant Breeding Introduction Outline Application I: Breeding Method Application II: Gene Mapping Application III: Genetic Modeling.
Structure Prediction. Tertiary protein structure: protein folding Three main approaches: [1] experimental determination (X-ray crystallography, NMR) [2]
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU Homology Modeling Anne Mølgaard, CBS, BioCentrum, DTU.
Pathways Bioinformatics & Biomolecular Center at the City College of New York Marshak Science Building, Room 1102 Tel: 212/ Fax: 212/
Protein structure determination. Tertiary protein structure: protein folding Three main approaches: [1] experimental determination (X-ray crystallography,
Thomas Blicher Center for Biological Sequence Analysis
Methods Used to Determine RNA Conformational Classes Bohdan Schneider Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry Academy of Sciences of the Czech.
Summary Protein design seeks to find amino acid sequences which stably fold into specific 3-D structures. Modeling the inherent flexibility of the protein.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU Homology Modelling Thomas Blicher Center for Biological Sequence Analysis.
GTL Facilities Characterization and Imaging of Molecular Machines Lee Makowski.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction Structural Bioinformatics.
Computational Design of Ligand-binding Proteins with High Affinity and Selectivity Liping Xu Literature Report.
Homology Modeling David Shiuan Department of Life Science and Institute of Biotechnology National Dong Hwa University.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction
Forces and Prediction of Protein Structure Ming-Jing Hwang ( 黃明經 ) Institute of Biomedical Sciences Academia Sinica
23 May June May 2002 From genes to drugs via crystallography 19 May 1996 Experimental and computational approaches to structure based.
Development of Bioinformatics and its application on Biotechnology
Practical session 2b Introduction to 3D Modelling and threading 9:30am-10:00am 3D modeling and threading 10:00am-10:30am Analysis of mutations in MYH6.
Structural Bioinformatics R. Sowdhamini National Centre for Biological Sciences Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bangalore, INDIA.
De novo Protein Design Presented by Alison Fraser, Christine Lee, Pradhuman Jhala, Corban Rivera.
Structural biology should be computable! Protein structures determined by amino acid sequences Protein structures and complexes correspond to global free.
HTP Construct Optimization using Bioinformatics Coupled with Amide Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange (DXMS) and HTP NMR screening Yuanpeng (Janet) Huang Northeast.
Protein Design CS273: Final Project Charles Kou Crystal structure of top7 – A novel protein structure created with RosettaDesign.
Chem. 860 Molecular Simulations with Biophysical Applications Qiang Cui Department of Chemistry and Theoretical Chemistry Institute University of Wisconsin,
Influence of Environments on Membrane Protein Structure Gregory S. Boebinger, Florida State University, DMR NMR User Program, FSU, Tallahassee.
Protein Structure & Modeling Biology 224 Instructor: Tom Peavy Nov 18 & 23, 2009
Multiple Mapping Method with Multiple Templates (M4T): optimizing sequence-to-structure alignments and combining unique information from multiple templates.
Data Integration and Management A PDB Perspective.
Domains or not domains? ShuoYong Shi, Indraneel Majumdar and Nick V. Grishin Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of.
Six plasmids for NC5 sample expression and 2D [ 1 H, 15 N] HSQC screening  Rossmann2x3_58: OR25  Rossmann2x3_59: OR26  Rossmann2x3_61: OR27  Rossmann2x3_71:
Computational engineering of bionanostructures Ram Samudrala University of Washington How can we analyse, design, & engineer peptides capable of specific.
Using structure in protein function annotation: predicting protein interactions Donald Petrey, Cliff Qiangfeng Zhang, Raquel Norel, Barry Honig Howard.
Protein Design with Backbone Optimization Brian Kuhlman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Protein Structure Database for Structural Genomics Group Jessica Lau December 13, 2004 M.S. Thesis Defense.
How NMR is Used for the Study of Biomacromolecules Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis Interactions between biomolecules Structure determination.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction Structural Bioinformatics.
Forces and Prediction of Protein Structure Ming-Jing Hwang ( 黃明經 ) Institute of Biomedical Sciences Academia Sinica
Protein Structures from A Statistical Perspective Jinfeng Zhang Department of Statistics Florida State University.
7. Protein Design 1. Protein design 2 Structure prediction and design are inverse problems.
Bioinformatics & Structural Biology M 生技所 研一 劉怡萱 M 生技所 研一 劉怡萱.
Abstract Our research mainly applies Maximum Likelihood Method (MLE), Dynamic Programming, and Neighbor Joining Method in an attempt of shortening the.
Nehad A. El Sayed, Amal A. H. Eissa, Reem K. Arafa and Ghada F. El Masry* Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University.
Generating, Maintaining, and Exploiting Diversity in a Memetic Algorithm for Protein Structure Prediction Mario Garza-Fabre, Shaun M. Kandathil, Julia.
Computer-Based Redesign of a β Sandwich Protein Suggests that Extensive Negative Design Is Not Required for De Novo β Sheet Design  Xiaozhen Hu, Huanchen.
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (April 2011)
Protein Disorder Prediction
De Novo Design of Foldable Proteins with Smooth Folding Funnel
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Fernando Corrêa, Jason Key, Brian Kuhlman, Kevin H. Gardner  Structure 
by T. M. Jacobs, B. Williams, T. Williams, X. Xu, A. Eletsky, J. F
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Putative targets of miRNAs directly induced by p53 with down-regulated mRNA- and de novo protein synthesis or reduced de novo protein synthesis only. Putative.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Binchen Mao, Rongjin Guan, Gaetano T. Montelione  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Yan Xia, Axel W. Fischer, Pedro Teixeira, Brian Weiner, Jens Meiler 
Presentation transcript:

 Six designs (OR25, OR26, OR27, OR28, OR29, OR30) for 2D [ 1 H, 15 N] HSQC screening  OR28 for structure determination Gaohua Liu 1, Nobuyasu Koga 2, Rie Koga 2, Rong Xiao 1, Haleema Janjua 1, Keith Hamilton 1, Thomas Acton 1, John Everett 1, David Baker 2, Gaetano T. Montelione 1 1 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854; 2 Department of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA NMR Structures of De Novo Designed “Ideal Structure” Proteins I.Background Structural characterization of designed proteins is a critical (and often neglected) step in validating computational design methodology. Many of the groups involved in computational protein design have limited resources for 3D structure determination, and structural genomics platforms are ideally suited for collaborative projects aimed at accelerating the field. Designed proteins are often relatively small, making them especially well suited to NMR structure determination. Computational design also often yields imperfect core packing (and marginal thermal stability), which may prevent crystallization, and also rendering NMR structure determination challenging due to exchange broadening effects. None the less, NMR has traditionally been invaluable for characterizing the structures of designed proteins (Kuhlman et al., 2003). Purpose  Establish rational methods to design structures de novo.  Reveal principles of how amino acid sequence determines native 3D-structure  Utilize designed structural scaffolds to introduce functional sites Targets  Four different folds were targeted Methods  Protein candidates with different primary sequences were computational designed and pre- selected based on computational energy at University of Washington.  Unlabeled or 15 N labeled protein samples were prepared for selected protein candidates and were further screened by NESG at Rutgers using 1D NMR or 2D [ 15 N- 1 H] - HSQC.  Suitable protein candidates were then selected for structure determination by NMR or/and X-ray. Ferredoxin-like OR15, PDB 2kl8 Rossmann2x2 OR16, 2kpo Rossmann2x3 (Flavodoxin-like) OR28, 2l69 OR36, 2lci Rossmann3x3 OR32, 2l82 II. NMR Screening and Structures ii) OR16, designed Rossmann2x2 fold protein, agrees with design H4 H1 H2 H3 F44 Y3 L1 V4 L5 I6 I7 L2 L41 L37 H1 H2 V31 I14 L28 H4 H3 F95 L54 L56 I92 L69 I75 A70 A66 V57 L63 I51 V53 V82 A88 I55 Red: Design Green: NMR, PDB 2KPO RMSD of C  1.06 Å Design:red NMR:green, PDB 2KI8 Red: Design Green: NMR, PDB 2KI8 RMSD of C  0.99 Å i) OR15, designed Ferredoxin-like protein, agrees with design iii) OR28 and OR36 (not shown), designed Rossmann2x3 fold proteins, disagree with design β1 & β3 swapped β1β1 β3β3 Design NMR CS-Rosetta iv) OR32, designed Rossmann3x3 fold protein, disagrees with design Ten unlabeled samples (NSM1-10) for 1D 1 H NMR screening NSM5(OR31) and NSM10(OR32) for 2D [ 1 H, 15 N] HSQC screening OR32 for structure determination β1 & β4 swapped β1β1 β4β4 Design RPF Precision Map III. Summary To date, solution NMR structures have been determined for five targets of four folds. The Ferredoxin-like protein (NESG ID OR15); Rossmann 2x2 fold protein OR16; Flavodoxin-like proteins OR28 and OR36, Rossmann 3x3 fold protein OR32. The experimental NMR structures of OR15 and OR16 are in excellent agreement with their designed models. However, structures of the three proteins OR28, OR36 and OR32 turn out to be P-loop NTPase fold structures that have two  -strands swapped compared to designed models. These NMR experimental structures provide unique valuable information on how to improve the protein design strategies. Reference: Kuhlman, B., Dantas, G., Ireton, G.C., Varani, G., Stoddard, B.L., and Baker, D. (2003). Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302, OR25 OR26 OR27 OR28 OR29 OR30, no expression NMR Red: Design Green: NMR, PDB 2L69 RMSD of C  ~3.4 Å Red: Design Green: NMR, PDB 2L82 RMSD of C  ~2.9 Å NMR OR31 OR32 NSM1NSM2NSM3NSM4 NSM6NSM5 NSM9 NSM10 NSM7NSM8 CS-Rosetta NMR RPF Precision Map  OR28 NMR structure turns out to be P-loop NTPase fold structure that has two  strands swapped compared to designed model.  OR32 NMR structure turns out to be P-loop NTPase fold structure that has two  strands swapped compared to designed model.