Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
Advertisements

Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Yingchuan Li Weak Mixing Angle and EIC INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider Energies Sep. 17th 2010.
5 th Rencontres du Vietnam - Aug. 7, 2004 Polarized Positrons…E166 A.W.Weidemann 1 Introduction (What, who) Motivation (Why) Experiment and Polarimetry.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) K.T. McDonald, J.C. Sheppard, Co-Spokespersons SLAC Experimental Program Advisory.
01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL1 Multiparameter Fits in tt Threshold Scan Manel Martinez, IFAE (Barcelona) Ramon Miquel, LBNL (Berkeley) Introduction. The.
Machine-Detector Interface MDI Panel Report MDI Panel is one of several World-Wide Study (WWS) panels (R&D, Detector costing, MDI, 2 IRs) Interim panel.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
ILCSC Review of ILCSC Parameters Subcommittee Report Parameters subcommittee of the ILCSC Dongchul Son Center for High Energy Physics Kyungpook National.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, % e+ Poalarization 1 Physics with an initial positron polarisation of ≈30% Sabine Riemann (DESY)
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
Model-independent WIMP searches at ILC with single photon Andrii Chaus (CEA/DESY), Jenny List (DESY), Maxim Titov (CEA) BSM Session, Belgrade, Serbia,
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
1 The Longitudinal Polarimeter at HERA Electron Polarization at HERA Laser System & Calorimeter Statistical and Systematic Precision Laser Cavity Project.
Parameters 2003 mandate questions to working groups summary of answers preliminary conclusions R.-D. Heuer for the members of the ‘parameter group’ : S.
FNAL Users’ Meeting, 06/02/03, p. 1 Top and Electroweak Results from CDF Igor Volobouev LBNL for the CDF Collaboration.
Probing the Majorana Nature and CP Properties of Neutralinos Yeong Gyun Kim (Korea University) In collaboration with S.Y.Choi, B.C.Chung, J.Kalinoswski.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
Polarisation monitoring Sabine Riemann, Andreas Schälicke, Andriy Ushakov (DESY) Positron Source Group Meeting, October, 2009 University of Durham.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) The International Polarized Positron Production Collaboration K.T. McDonald, J.C.
Precision electroweak physics Roberto Tenchini INFN-Pisa 5th Rencontres du Vietnam Particle Physics and Astrophysics Hanoi August 5 to August 11, 2004.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Updated m W Measurement from Threshold Scan Using Polarized e - and e + at ILC Graham W. Wilson University of Kansas Nov 5 th LCWS2015 Meeting Whistler,
Report from India Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics XIII Jan 14-20, TIFR, India Naohito Saito RIKEN/ RIKEN BNL Research Center.
Polarized positrons at the ILC: physics goal and source requirements EuCARD Workshop “Spin optimization at lepton accelerators” 13 February 2014 Sabine.
IWLC10, Geneva, 20/10/10 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick 1 Impact of polarized positrons for top/QCD and electroweak physics Gudrid Moortgat-Pick Hamburg University.
16/17 August 2005 Tobias Haas: HERA II An Introduction to HERA Physics DESY Summer Student Program 16/17 August, 2005 Tobias Haas DESY, Hamburg.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 2. 2 Last Lecture Use EW Lagrangian to make predictions for width of Z boson: Relate this to what we can measure: σ(e+e−
Summary of Group C B. Barish, F. Boruzmati, A. Cohen, M. Endo, K. Fujii, M. Ibe, A. Ishikawa, S. Kanemura, E. Kato, R. Kitano, J. Lykken, M. Nojiri, T.
06/30/05 Mathieu Agelou – LowX’05 1 Sensitivity to PDFs at the Tevatron. Mathieu Agelou CEA – Saclay Low x workshop, Sinaia, Romania.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
Search for Higgs portal Dark matter Tohoku Ayumi Yamamoto 11/5 2011/11/51.
Moller Polarimeter Q-weak: First direct measurement of the weak charge of the proton Nuruzzaman (
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Proton Polarimetry Proton polarimeter reactions RHIC polarimeters.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima /11/5 Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University 高橋 徹 広島大学.
November 20, 2008 A. Brachmann Slide 1 Sources Session Summary LCWS 2008 A. Brachmann, J. Clarke.
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
Polarized positrons at low energies: Physics goal and source requirements Sabine Riemann, DESY Zeuthen Outline: ILC as Higgs factory At the top-quark threshold.
Positron polarization at the ILC: RDR vs. SB2009 Sabine Riemann, DESY Zeuthen International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, Geneva October 25-29, 2010.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
RHIC pC Polarimeters in Run9: Performance and Issues A.Bazilevsky for the RHIC CNI Group Polarimetry Worshop BNL, July 31, 2009.
11/18/2008 Global Design Effort 1 Summary for Gamma-Gamma Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University November 20, 2008 LCWS08 -- UIC, Chicago.
Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.
Jefferson Lab PAC 30 1 August 23, 2006 PR (Hall A) ● PR (Hall C) Measuring the Neutron g 2 and d 2 at 12 GeV PR (Hall A) ● PR
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Model-independent WIMP searches at ILC with single photon
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
WW CROSS SECTIONS AND |Vcs| On behalf the LEP collaborations
Overview of Polarimetry
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Triple Gauge Couplings and Polarization at the ILC
High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M collider by Yury Tikhonov KEDR&VEPP-4M collaboration Budker INP, Novosibirsk Outlook Introduction.
Gordon Cates, Xiaochao Zheng, Yuxiang Zhao LOI
At a Future Linear Collider
Kazuya Aoki For the PHENIX Collaborations. Kyoto Univ. / RIKEN
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
How to optimize the ILC energy for measuring ZH
Presentation transcript:

Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 2 Outline ILC Baseline Design  positron polarization >30% Advantages of e+ polarization: Enhancement / suppression of processes Precision physics Higher sensitivity to new physics phenomena …  Use it for physics Required precision for measurements Slow positron helicity reversal Fast positron helicity reversal Summary Proposals for fast flipping  see next talk by Ken

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 3 Minimal Machine: Running Strategy Physics between 200 GeV and 500 GeV Luminosity: Year 1-4: L int = 500 fb -1 Energy stability and precision below 0.1% Electron polarization > 80% (e- helicity reversal randomly train by train) ee  HZ at 350 GeV (mH≈120 GeV) few 10 4 ee  tt at 350 GeV 10 5 ee  qq (  ) at 500 GeV 5·10 5 (1·10 5 ) ee  WW at 500 GeV 10 6  High statistical precision at per-mille level !! Uncertainties: Polarimeter:  P e- /P e- =  P e+ /P e+ = 0.25% (see ILC-NOTE ) O(10 -3 )

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 4 Precision processes: e+e-  ff, tt e+e-  W+W- but not , Z J=1 J=0

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 5 s-channel cross sections with pol beams Can perform independent measurements and determine simultaneously Pe-,Pe+, A LR,  u or use + - and - + pairing and polarization measurements: =0 (SM) if both beams 100% polarized Standard Model s-channel P eff > P e+,P e-

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 6 Slow helicity reversal e+ helicity flip less frequent than e- helicity reversal e- trains e+ trains         Half of measurements spent to ‘inefficient’ helicity pairing  - - and  ++ Have to combine  + - and  - + measured in different runs with different luminosities  Large systematic uncertainties due to – luminosity variations – polarization variations – variations of detector efficiencies – …

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 7 Slow helicity reversal Have a ‘quadratic’ term; term P e- P e+  need to understand correlations ! systematic errors have to be known and small  Need long-term stability at the level of (few) 10 -3

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 8 Fast helicity reversal Left-Right Asymmetry is a ‘robust’ quantity, most systematic effects cancel if –equal luminosities delivered to + and – helicities –equal polarization for + and – helicities Both realized at SLC due to fast random helicity flip ILC:

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 9 Fast flipping: s-channel ALR with pol e+ beams Measurements with equal + - and - + pairing only (no - -, no ++) Left-Right asymmetry Error propagation  (80%,30%): F= 0.5 (80%,60%): F=0.25 P eff

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 10 Fast flipping: s-channel cross sections with pol e+ beams Measurements with equal + - and - + pairing only (no - -, no ++) P e+, = 0 P e+, > 0: enhancement ~(1+P e- P e+ )  (80%, 30%): ~25% gain in eff lumi but add. uncertainty  u ~0.07%  (80%, 60%): ~50% gain in eff lumi but add. uncertainty  u ~0.11%

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 11 Z pole running GigaZ as not highest priority in ILC schedule Is important for checks of –electroweak symmetry breaking (sin 2  W ) –Understanding of LHC results ? Z pole running with calibration data ?! Studies are under way Need all four combinations  +-/-+  ±± to determine simultaneously A LR and effective polarization with reasonable precision –Polarimeters needed for time-dependent precise relative polarization monitoring

17 Nov 2008, Chicago, ILC08 Fast or slow positron spin flipping 12 Summary With fast helicity reversal –substantially smaller systematic uncertainties –‘in phase’ with electrons  increase of lumi (>25%) –smaller polarization error  High precision and best flexibility for new physics Large syst. uncertainties with slow helicity reversal could reduce physics output substantially –Realistic stability (Lumi, Pol) in ILC ? GigaZ: does not work with slow helicity flipping Destroying the e+ polarization ? –Needs some effort to do that (damping time not sufficient) –Zero e+ polarization has to be verified can be measured with absolute error of 0.13% (J. List)  Additional uncertainty for observables Conclusion: Keep the e+ pol and perform fast spin flip To be considered: e+ polarization with 250 GeV undulator