Developments in new farm typology. Background EC Farm Structure Survey in 2010 (full) and 2013 and 2016 (partial). Previously 2000 (full) and partial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAP conference – Interpretation and Thematic Analysis 17 April 2013 RURAL AND ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND ANALYTICAL SERVICES (RESAS)
Advertisements

ELPEN MEETING Athens, March 2001 Progress report Technical aspects of ELPEN.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural Census Concepts and Definitions Section A 1.
Current Status of National Accounts Cambodia Oeur Sophal and Yim Saonith National Institute of Statistics Cambodia International Workshop From Data to.
Projections of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: an Irish example Trevor Donnellan FAPRI-Ireland Partnership Rural Economy Research Centre, Teagasc.
Two more major changes Introduction of Cattle Tracing System data and Review of TIFF methodology.
Typology Impacts and plan. Background EC has a set of rules about how to (i) value activity and (ii) allocate a farm type. These operate on a 10 year.
May 2001European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2 1 European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General 28th February 2003 Inventory.
Sample Design and Efficiency Considerations.  Sampling is a powerful statistical tool that can be used to provide good quality estimates at a lower cost.
Like – But Oh, How Different: The effect of different questionnaire formats in the 2005 Census of Agriculture Content Test. Jaki S. McCarthy National Agricultural.
Von Thunen Model Access to Markets.
Economics of transition Agriculture and the agricultural reform in Bulgaria and Romania. Leen Schroven Silvie De Roose Joris Motmans Lourens van Dijk Roxane.
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
“New” Community Typology of Agricultural Holdings & the Calculation of Standard Outputs (SO) A.Kinsella.
Australia’s Great Barrier Reef Region (GBR) Land based surveys A way forward.
Near East Regional Workshop - Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses. Amman, Jordan, June 2012 Improving Efficiency.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Integrating Agriculture into National Statistical Systems Section A 1.
Near East Regional Workshop - Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses. Amman, Jordan, June 2012 Population and Housing.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Handbook on Supply and Use Table: Compilation, Application, and Good Practices.
Agriculture statistics in Israel in Israel Jamal Medlege Hana Tubi, MOAG CBS may 2011.
Measurement of Agricultural Output in the Australian System of National Accounts: Methods and Issues Authors: Rick Brunton and Carol Trickett Presenter:
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Chapter 6: Chapter 6: Data Sources for Compiling SUT Ramesh KOLLI Senior Advisor.
DOMESTIC ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION GIOVANNI SIGNORELLO GIUSEPPE CUCUZZA and GIOACCHINO PAPPALARDO UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA.
Review of June Agricultural Census of Minor Holdings Adam Krawczyk Rural & Environment Analytical Services Scottish Government 17 th November 2009.
What is the Best Indicator of Work Performed in Agriculture? IACS-4 Beijing October 2007 Pál Bóday - Éva Laczka.
Calculating regional gross nutrient balances Anne Miek Kremer & Kees Olsthoorn from statistical and administrative data Statistics Netherlands A Working.
1 Agricultural Statistics Liaison Group October 12 th 2011 CSO: Update on Census of Agriculture 2010 & CSO outputs (Hilda McCarthy)
Martin Pantel Business Surveys Methods Division Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys June 2007 Classifying Agricultural Operations for.
LIVESTOCK AND DAIRY DEVELOPMENT ROLE OF SOCIAL SECTOR AND RURAL COMMUNITY IN PAKISTAN Arif Mahmood Cheema Member (National Accounts) PAKISTAN BUREAU OF.
Organic Production Research Conference Tullamore, 2 nd December 2008 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF ORGANIC FARMING L. Connolly J. McDonnell B. Moran.
The use of impact indicators for the evaluation of support for investment in agricultural holdings : case study of the Rural Development Programme for.
Estimating Supply Response in the EU Carlos Arnade, David Kelch, and Susan Leetmaa ERS Economists.
An assessment of farmer’s exposure to risk and policy impacts on farmer’s risk management strategy 4 September September th EAAE seminar.
Rural Economy Research Centre Situation and Outlook Conference, 9th December 2008 SITUATION AND OUTLOOK FOR CATTLE & SHEEP 2008/2009 J. Breen, K. Hanrahan,
PRESENT STATUS AND SCOPE OF DAIRY FARMING IN PAKISTAN
Teagasc: National Farm Survey An Overview Agricultural Statistics Liaison Group (ASLG) Date: Wednesday October 12th, 2011 Time: 1.30pm Venue: Department.
Luxembourg, 25 June Meeting of the Task Force “Agricultural land prices and rents” 25 June 2009.
STREAMLINING BUREAUCRACY JUNE CENSUS & SINGLE APPLICATION FORM Adam Krawczyk, RERAD 4 th November 2008.
IN - DEPTH SURVEYS IN THE AGRICULTURAL CENSUS PROGRAM FIJI ISLANDS EXPERIENCE.
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department Agricultural Census Economic.
1 « Agri-environmental indicators: Nitrogen balance at NUTS IV level. A case study in Greece » NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF GREECE.
The Measurement of Direct Value of Forage Production Ken Belcher Department of Bioresource Policy, Business and Economics November 20, 2008.
Developments in new farm typology. Background EC Farm Structure Survey in 2010 (full) and 2013 and 2016 (partial). Previously 2000 (full) and partial.
Gaseous Emissions from Irish Agriculture Trevor Donnellan FAPRI-Ireland Partnership Teagasc Dublin.
A Hedonic Price Model of Self-Assessed Agricultural Land Values Jeremey Lopez***, Stephen O’Neill, Cathal O'Donoghue*, Mary Ryan* * Teagasc Rural Economy.
Leading the way in Agriculture and Rural Research, Education and Consulting The impacts of CAP reform on Scottish farms Shailesh Shrestha, Bouda Vosough.
Calculating the use of Fertilisers in the Netherlands Anne Miek Kremer CBS.
Census of Agriculture 2010 Summary & Current Position Fiona O’Callaghan 24 th April 2012.
Berien Elbersen Maarten Hilferink Wim Nieuwenhuizen Marta Pérez-Soba Janneke Roos Alterra, The Netherlands Udine, 22 nov 2002 allocation of ELPEN farm.
„Improvement of statistical methods on the use of organic and inorganic fertilisers” GRANT project No Co-ordination meeting, Luxembourg,
Regional Gross Nutrient Balances Hungary RISSAC HCSO.
Scottish Government Statistics Scottish Government statistics Agriculture Statistics Conference 2016 Neil White.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development.
National Income Concept and Measurement
Eurostat activities concerning regional nutrient balances.
Nagraj Rao Statistician Asian Development Bank CROP CUTTING: AN INTRODUCTION.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 18 – Statistics Bilateral screening: Chapter.
General features regarding Agricultural Census/ farm structure surveys in EU Presentation in a training workshop September 2011 “Preparing for Agricultural.
Use of the Statistics New Zealand Business Register for the agriculture industry and the not for profit sector Geoff Mead
2009/12/02 Valuation of forage crops Valuation of forage crops (doc ASA/AAP/116)
Adjustment Methodologies for the Census of Agriculture Andrea C. Lamas, Denise A. Abreu, Shu Wang, Daniel Adrian, Linda J. Young National Agricultural.
Comparison of Estimation Methods for Agricultural Productivity Yu Sheng ABARES the Superlative vs. the Quantity- based Index Approach August 2015.
Nagraj Rao Statistician Asian Development Bank CROP CUTTING: AN INTRODUCTION.
Organic farming in CZ – more detailed description Research Institute of Agricultural Economics (VUZE)‏ Pavla Wollmuthová Andrea Hrabalová Summer Academy,
Organic farming development in CEECs Research Institute of Agricultural Economics (VUZE)‏ Andrea Hrabalová Pavla Wollmuthová Summer Academy, 16 June 2008.
Determining the costs and revenues for dairy cattle
Allocation of costs in complex cropping and mixed farming systems
The farm typology Kiev April 2014 Peter Vig Jensen Karsten Larsen from Statistics Denmark.
Calculating regional gross nutrient balances
Presentation transcript:

Developments in new farm typology

Background EC Farm Structure Survey in 2010 (full) and 2013 and 2016 (partial). Previously 2000 (full) and partial surveys in 2003, 2005 and 2007 Two major developments for FSS 2010: FSS 2010 – a new typology is being implemented FSS 2010 – a new system of valuing commodities on each holding, i.e., changing from SGM (Standard Gross Margins) to SO (Standard Outputs). All Member States are implementing these changes Scottish Government working with the rest of the UK in progressing these changes. FSS 2010 ‘suite’ will be populated using SAF/June census, and a stand alone survey on agricultural production methods (SAPM). Some administrative data will also be used (UK organics data).

What is farm ‘typology’? A system for creating consistent farm types across the EC. Farmers do not self-report their farm type, they report their commodities (areas and units) and we calculate what farm type this falls into. A consistent methodology in use which allows comparison across Member States. Effects Farm Accounts Survey (FADN), FSS, June. Also – farm type is used as a key strata for drawing samples and producing TIFF estimates. Is is also used for producing regional and National Accounts data along with various policy interests in reporting statistics by farm type.

How does it work? Collect data on commodities at farm (holding) level Calculate standard multipliers (coefficients) for ‘a unit’ of each commodity (e.g., 1 hectare of wheat, 1 dairy cow etc.). For each holding, multiply and sum all of these commodities together to produce an output ‘worth’ for each holding. FSS top-level categories, 18 medium categories and 55 low-level categories. Apply the EC typology to each holding. This allocates each holding into a particular farm type based on the relative weight/contribution of the commodities to the total output worth. The EC provide the ‘rules’ that are used to allocate holdings to a particular farm type. Allocation route is based on thresholds within the ‘commodity mix’.

Worked example 1.36 Ha pasture & £ = £ £ = £2, Total standard output (SO) = £2, Holding has GL present (Grazing Livestock) = £2, …therefore FCP1 (forage for sale) = 0 …meaning FCP4 (forage for grazing livestock) = £ Typology P4 (grazing livestock and forage) > 2/3 total SO = yes [high code 4) Doesn’t meet criteria for dairying, cattle rearing/fattening therefore is coded as: - sheep goats and other grazing livestock [medium code 48] - various grazing livestock [low code 484]

Coefficients - SGM vs SO SGM was calculated as [output value + subsidy – input costs] 2005 – introduction of Single Farm Payment meant that negative SGMs were possible. Standard Output introduced to counter this. Based wholly on output value. Test series submitted to EC in December Was 2004 centred (3 years). Subsidy data for 2005 was rolled forward from FSS 2010 will need SO for 2007 centred on 5 years. Calculated in early 2010.

SGM versus SO Standard Gross Margin Wheat (non-LFA) = £708 Primary product Yield * price = value of £645 ADD By-product & compensatory payment = £365 EQUALS output worth of £1,010 MINUS Input costs of £302 EQUALS STANDARD GROSS MARGIN of £708 Standard Output Wheat (no LFA designation) = £775 Primary product Yield * price = value of £645 ADD By-product of £130 No adjustment for compensatory payment or input costs EQUALS STANDARD OUTPUT of £775

Effect of new typology - 1

Effect of new typology - 2

Summary of changes Currently, holdings with grazing and no livestock are counted as mixed livestock (ID = 4440). FSS2010 – these will be counted as general cropping (ID = 16summat). Effects around 4,500 holdings. Removal of LFA coefficients – local solution will be implemented. Fodder crops / rough grazing etc currently allocated a value of £1 per hectare – FSS2010 this area is now specifically valued, based on input costs. This causes shifts in the farm type of some holdings.