Insider’s Guide to NIH Peer Review for Reviewers Richard Kitsis, M.D. Former Chair CSR’s Myocardial Ischemia and Metabolism Study Section.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Objectives: At the end of the class, students will (hopefully) be able to: Explain the importance of a good presentation List the steps they will take.

Advertisements

Applicant and Reviewer Perspectives on the NIH Review process 2012 NIH Summer Institute Thursday, July 10, 2012 Steven Schinke.

Understanding and Dealing with Grant Review Panel Comments Randy R. Brutkiewicz, Ph.D. Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs and Professional Development.

D e b r i e f i n g DEBRIEFING Reflecting on our experiences of the workshops and how they relate to our lives!

Ground Rules for Meetings

Evaluate to Motivate. Before the Speech  Review the Manual Project Learn the objectives Read the manual project & evaluation guide  Review the Speaker.

Academic Learning Services:.  Provides individual or group assistance for most subjects and general literacy / numeracy  Located down the very back.

What is Teamwork & Team Building Team work : Concept of people working together as a team. Team Player : A team player is someone who is able to get.

Team Building Eman Abdallah.

Communication Effective Listening.

Classroom Tips and Tricks

Rationale Group Work for Interactive Teaching. Group work for interactive teaching implies: Pupils learn by interacting with each other Teachers’ role.

CSR Quick Feedback Pilot Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Senior Scientific Review Officer CSR Office of the Director.

Obj.1.03 Practice interpersonal skills Ms. Jessica Edwards, M.A.Ed.

Provided by Nova Carden Electronics Engineer NSWC Crane

A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.

The Center for Symptom Management The NIH review process Kathryn Lee, RN, PhD April 3, 2009 MDP.

Yorkshire and Humber GP curriculum group Leadership skills.

20 Ways to Succeed in College 1. Go to class... and participate. Professors test on what is discussed in class as well as grade for attendance and participation.

Student Development and Counselling. Emotional intelligence noun: emotional intelligence the capacity to be aware of, control, and express one's emotions,

Building Relationships

STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS 1. Build and Sustain a Vital Research Environment Understand the NIH extramural research program –Know the guidelines, deadlines,

Bell Ringer  List the problems of yesterday’s SIMON SAYS game!  2 nd list some emotions that you felt as the game unfolded and as problems persisted.

Why Collaborate?. “Why do we have to collaborate? I know my job. If I do my job and everybody else does his, we will be fine. The teachers I work with.

Overcoming Proposal Phobia Linda Petzold Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Santa Barbara.

NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.

Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.

Objectives: Have some useful tips for doing well Know the layout and expectations of the exam paper.

APACA Northern California Section March 23, 2013.

"Writing Successful Grant Proposals: Lessons Learned” Don W. Morgan Department of Health and Human Performance Center for Physical Activity and Health.

Getting Your Stories Straight: Using Examples and Anecdotes as Outcome Measures Montgomery County September 17, 2015 Barry Jay Seltser.

BE NICE TO OTHERS. IF SOMEONE IS NOT NICE TO YOU Try to stay calm and look as confident as you can.

BALANCING LIFE’S ISSUES, INC. Dealing with Difficult People.

GROUP TRIUMPH BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS IN COLLEGE. READING Step 1: Identify people who can & will impact your future ■Make a list of possible future employers.

GRANT WRITING TIPS (With specific reference to NSERC Discovery Grants) Project Summary Plain language does not mean dumbed down Place the work in context.

Introduction Teaching without any reflection can lead to on the job. One way of identifying routine and of counteracting burnout is to engage in reflective.

Helping others By: CALVIN ARTEAGA. Slide #2 My section is about how to get help when you feel alone and. Mabye even isolated Who and to go to when u need.

Distance Learning Events brought to you by the Center for Early Literacy Learning Evidence-Based Early Literacy Practice Guides 1.

OR, HOW TO DO A THOROUGH PEER REVIEW ENGLISH 101: JC CLAPP NORTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE NOTE: THIS INFORMATION IS HEAVILY BORROWED FROM NELLE ENGORON.

Your Family, Your Friends, and You.

NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.

Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Senior Scientific Review Officer CSR Office of the Director Review Issues – CSR Surveys.

6 Steps for Resolving Conflicts STEP 1. Begin the Process Calmly approach the person you are having the conflict with, and explain to them that you have.

Managing Stress in Relationships By Andrew Stochel, Ph.D. Marquette University Counseling Center.

Why Have Good Relationships?

The 3 Habits By: Leah K.. In this advertisement, you will see 7 habits that will help you at Derby. These habits will also help you to become a better.

What Makes a Proposal Successful Dr. George B. Stefano The State University of New York College at Old Westbury October 6, 2008.

ALICIA FOURIE How to survive your Masters or PhD degree…. Or have fun trying….

Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.

How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University

Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:

An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.

Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.

Literature Circles Mrs. Ince’s Class Establish Objective I will be able to identify specific evidence from the text and explain how it supports.

Writing a Fundable NIH K-Series Application. My Background and why it was important to my path. I received my BS from UC Irvine, my MD from Medical College.

Class 3 Research Strategy (cont’d) Click on the speaker icon in the upper left corner of each slide to listen to the lecture.

Sept. 7, 2012 AGENDA: 1 – Bell Ringer 2 – Philosophical Chairs Discussion 3 – Envi. Sci. Pre- Assessment! 4 – Start HW: Discussion Reflection Today’s.

Helping others By: Calvin Arteaga. Slide #2  My section is about how to get help when you feel alone and. Mabye even isolated Who and to go to when u.

Balance and Personal Development Objectives At the completion of this module, participants will be able to:  Develop a daily practice to center themselves.

How To Be A Constructive Reviewer Publish, Not Perish: How To Survive The Peer Review Process Experimental Biology 2010 Anaheim, CA Michael J. Ryan, Ph.D.

Preparation for Field Fair How to prepare  Select a minimum of 5 agencies that you are interested in  Research your agency:  Mission, goals,

By: President Thomas Hayes.  Peer Mediation is a mutually beneficiary approach to resolving a conflict between two students ◦ Usually carried out by.

Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.

A Reviewer’s Perspective on G20 Grants Lyndon J. Goodly DVM, MS, DACLAM May 2016–ACLAM Forum.

#1- Be Proactive I am a Responsible person. I take the blame for my wrong actions. I choose my mood, actions, and attitude. I Do The right thing without.

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

$$ Money $$ (for research) Bob McMurray

Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS

Presentation transcript:

Insider’s Guide to NIH Peer Review for Reviewers Richard Kitsis, M.D. Former Chair CSR’s Myocardial Ischemia and Metabolism Study Section

Collective Wisdom from CSR Study Section Chairs

Staying Grounded When you review NIH grant applications: Your goal is to perform thorough and fair evaluations of their scientific and technical merit Your focus should be on overall impact: Will the research have a sustained, powerful effect on the research field involved?

Getting Started Don’t be overwhelmed by the number of applications. Get started right away to see if you have a conflict with an application. Remember you are not alone and you were asked to review because of your expertise.

Writing Your Reviews Don’t mince words but don’t be too critical. Focus on the strengths and weaknesses that matter.

Writing Your Reviews Don’t just express your opinions. Explain them. Don’t try to rewrite an application.

Scoring Applications Score the application, not your discipline. Keep your reviews and scores in sync.

Participating in the Meeting Don’t rehash. Talk about what matters. Paint a big and balanced picture.

Participating in the Review Meeting Don’t be unsettled if someone disagrees with you. Listen and be open to changing your mind.

Enjoying the Experience Meet new friends and colleagues. Learn new and cool things about related fields. Know you’re going to be a better application writer.

Insider’s Guide to NIH Peer Review for Reviewers

More Information